Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D vs AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D

► remove from comparison AMD R7 9800X3D

Der AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D ist ein High-End-Prozessor, der speziell für Gamer und anspruchsvolle Anwender entwickelt wurde. Er basiert auf der neuesten Zen-5-Architektur von AMD und wird im fortschrittlichen 4-nm-Verfahren gefertigt, was nicht nur höhere Effizienz, sondern auch eine bessere Leistung ermöglicht. Mit seinen 8 Kernen und 16 Threads bietet der 9800X3D eine solide Basis für rechenintensive Anwendungen.

Der größte Vorteil des AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D ist die 3D V-Cache-Technologie, die komplett überarbeitet wurde und sich signifikant von den Modellen der 7000er-Serie unterscheidet. Die Änderungen resultieren in einer deutlich gesteigerten Taktfrequenz und einer besseren Wärmeverteilung. Der interne Aufbau besteht weiterhin aus einem I/O-Die sowie einem CCD. Letzterer beinhaltet die 8 Kerne sowie den 3D V-Cache und wird im 4nm-Prozess hergestellt. Beim I/O-Die hält AMD weiterhin am 6nm-Herstellungsprozess fest. Die Taktraten steigen im Vergleich zum Vorgängermodell spürbar. So beträgt der Basistakt 4,7 GH/z, wenngleich im Turbo bis zu 5,2 GH/s möglich sind.

Neben der überragenden Gaming-Performance überzeugt der AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D auch in produktiven Anwendungen. Während er speziell auf Spieleoptimierung ausgelegt ist, schneidet er in Anwendungen wie 3D-Modellierung, Videobearbeitung und anderen kreativen Workloads spürbar besser ab als ein AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Die Leistungsaufnahme des AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D beträgt 120 Watt, welche als PPT maximal 162 Watt beträgt. Damit gibt es in diesem Punkt keine Änderungen im Vergleich zum AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D. Aufgrund gesteigerter Leistung kann die Effizienz des AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D spürbar gesteigert werden. An die Effizienz der Arrow-Lake-Prozessoren kommt AMD allerdings trotz deutlich besserer Gaming-Leistung nicht heran.

Hier geht es zu unserem Test des AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D.

AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS

► remove from comparison AMD R5 8645HS

The Ryzen 5 8645HS is an upper mid-range processor (APU) of the Hawk Point family. This isn't an entirely new chip; instead, the 8645HS is a rebadged Ryzen 5 7640HS with higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. The 8645HS was brought to life in Q4 2023 and it has 6 SMT-enabled Zen 4 cores (12 threads) running at 4.3 GHz to 5.0 GHz. The Radeon 760M iGPU is responsible for carrying out 3D calculations and similar duties.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these chips are promised to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop even more powerful.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8645HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a super-fast DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 RAM controller. USB 4 (and thus Thunderbolt) is supported natively and so is PCIe 4. In fact, 20 PCIe 4 lanes are on offer; data transfer speeds of up to 7.8 GB/s will be possible provided a sufficiently fast NVMe SSD is used.

Systems powered by this Ryzen 5 series chip are expected to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Please note that the APU is not overclockable and neither will you be able to replace it with a faster one as it gets soldered to the motherboard permanently (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since the 8645HX is an 7640HS in disguise, it is safe to expect the APU to be about as fast as the Ryzen 9 5900HX, Ryzen 7 6800H, Ryzen 7 7736U and also the Core i5-12500H, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 760M has 8 CUs (512 shaders) running at up to 2,600 MHz. While this is not the best graphics adapter for gaming as it's only just fast enough for low quality settings and resolutions such as 1600 x 900, it will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it also HW-encodes and HW-decodes the most widely used video codecs such as AV1, HEVC and AVC without breaking a sweat.

Power consumption

The 8645HS has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving laptop makers a choice between improving battery life and giving the system they are working on more oomph. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by the chip.

This Ryzen 5 series APU is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 PRO 8840HS

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is a powerful processor (APU) of the Hawk Point family. This isn't an entirely new laptop chip; instead, it's a rebadged Ryzen 7 7840U with a slightly higher wattage as well as higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. The 8840HS has eight Zen 4 cores running at 3.3 GHz to 5.1 GHz that are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads, while the great Radeon 780M is responsible for 3D processing and similar duties. Compared to the consumer 8840HS, the PRO variant supports AMD PRO technologies with management features and usually longer availability and support.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these processors are set to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs, making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop more useful than ever before.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the R7 PRO 8840HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM. The chip is compatible with USB 4 and therefore with Thunderbolt. It comes with 20 PCIe 4 lanes, giving NVMe SSDs up to 7.8 GB/s of throughput.

Systems built around this Ryzen 7 series APU are designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Please note that this processor is not overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since this is a 7840U in disguise that we are dealing with here, it is safe to expect the 8840HS to be about as fast as the Core i7-12650H, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) purring away at up to 2,700 MHz. This is exactly the right iGPU for people looking for a bit more horsepower than what Intel's aging Xe options can provide. The Radeon will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it will also HW-decode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs (including AV1, HEVC and AVC) without breaking a sweat. In terms of gaming, the thing is good enough for 1080p and medium-to-low settings, as of late 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W that laptop makers are free to tune to their liking, with values between 20 W and 30 W greenlighted by AMD. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

The 8840HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 9800X3DAMD Ryzen 5 8645HSAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
CodenameGranite RidgeHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
SeriesAMD Granite Ridge (Zen 5, AM5)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X4.4 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X3.8 - 5.5 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D « 4.7 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X3.9 - 5.4 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 H 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 H 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2404.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS « 4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 H 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 H 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2404.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock4700 - 5200 MHz4300 - 5000 MHz3300 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache640 KB384 KB512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB6 MB8 MB
L3 Cache96 MB16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 5
6 / 12
6 x 5.0 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP120 Watt45 Watt28 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2162 Watt
Transistors9970 Million
Technology4 nm4 nm4 nm
Voltage1.28 - 1.31 (nominal), 1.4 (max) V
Die Size192.6 mm2178 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.95 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketAM5 (LGA 1718)FP7/FP7r2/FP8FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 5, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, BMI1, BMI2, F16C, FMA3, EVP, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, SHA, XFR2DDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3DDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
iGPUAMD Radeon 610M ( - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$479 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 9800X3D
47.3 pt (79%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 8645HS
38.5 pt (64%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 PRO 8840HS
39.2 pt (65%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
132 Points (74%)
99.7 Points (56%)
103.7 Points (58%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
1358 Points (25%)
727 Points (14%)
869 Points (16%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
23230 Points (22%)
13220 Points (12%)
min: 14621     avg: 14784     median: 14784 (14%)     max: 14947 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
2080 Points (88%)
1714 Points (72%)
min: 1712     avg: 1724     median: 1724 (73%)     max: 1736 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
818 Points (89%)
668 Points (73%)
min: 671     avg: 673     median: 673 (73%)     max: 675 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
9057 Points (22%)
5121 Points (12%)
min: 5760     avg: 5820     median: 5819.5 (14%)     max: 5879 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3647 Points (23%)
2094 Points (13%)
min: 2427     avg: 2458     median: 2458 (16%)     max: 2489 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
328 Points (91%)
270 Points (75%)
min: 271     avg: 271.5     median: 271.5 (75%)     max: 272 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
41.7 Points (54%)
26.4 Points (34%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.8 Points (91%)
2.6 Points (61%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8933 Points (54%)
5809 Points (35%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
60825 Points (44%)
39747 Points (29%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
119288 Points (76%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
16618 Points (20%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
54.3 s (1%)
89.7 s (1%)
362.5 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.3 s (0%)
3.3 s (1%)
7.9 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
15574 Points (25%)
6695 Points (11%)
21172 Points (34%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 90226     avg: 90604     median: 90354 (52%)     max: 91233 MIPS
55608 MIPS (32%)
min: 63624     avg: 63845     median: 63845 (37%)     max: 64066 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 8346     avg: 8407     median: 8392 (99%)     max: 8484 MIPS
6190 MIPS (73%)
min: 6261     avg: 6289     median: 6289 (74%)     max: 6317 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
203 fps (68%)
121.8 fps (41%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
375.5 fps (87%)
281.5 fps (65%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
30.6 fps (54%)
17.2 fps (30%)
min: 17.8     avg: 17.9     median: 17.9 (31%)     max: 18 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.7 GB/s (50%)
1 GB/s (28%)
1.3 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.9 GB/s (50%)
1.5 GB/s (26%)
2 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
17.8 GB/s (46%)
11 GB/s (29%)
14.2 GB/s (37%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
204 Seconds (3%)
389 Seconds (5%)
min: 345     avg: 354.5     median: 354.5 (5%)     max: 364 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
137 Seconds (1%)
241 Seconds (2%)
min: 212     avg: 217     median: 217 (2%)     max: 222 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.3 sec (7%)
0.4 sec (10%)
min: 0.4568     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4747 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 17855     avg: 18319     median: 18341.5 (39%)     max: 18804 Points
14055 Points (30%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8 s (2%)
8.3 s (2%)
8.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.1 s (1%)
20.4 s (1%)
20.7 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
718 s (3%)
571 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 106182     avg: 108581     median: 108660 (83%)     max: 109721 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 34973     avg: 38174     median: 38568 (95%)     max: 40357 Points
18811 Points (46%)
min: 20839     avg: 20940     median: 20940 (52%)     max: 21041 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 104270     avg: 105635     median: 105729 (86%)     max: 107334 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 104072     avg: 105578     median: 105670 (86%)     max: 107578 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 106846     avg: 109007     median: 108655 (87%)     max: 112948 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 28550     avg: 29255     median: 29271.5 (74%)     max: 29952 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 38742     avg: 39187     median: 39248 (70%)     max: 39893 Points
21505 Points (38%)
min: 23922     avg: 24665     median: 24664.5 (44%)     max: 25407 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 14848     avg: 15759     median: 15803 (67%)     max: 16218 Points
8081 Points (34%)
min: 8914     avg: 9434     median: 9433.5 (40%)     max: 9953 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 3213     avg: 3278     median: 3285 (82%)     max: 3337 Points
2570 Points (64%)
min: 2594     avg: 2607     median: 2607 (65%)     max: 2620 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 17704     avg: 18164     median: 18202 (71%)     max: 18579 Points
10882 Points (42%)
min: 12118     avg: 12481     median: 12480.5 (48%)     max: 12843 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2382     avg: 2425     median: 2428.5 (95%)     max: 2450 Points
1915 Points (75%)
1925 Points (75%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 15973     avg: 16469     median: 16531 (30%)     max: 16726 Points
9420 Points (17%)
min: 11318     avg: 11430     median: 11430 (20%)     max: 11542 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2176     avg: 2275     median: 2282 (10%)     max: 2316 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 15903     avg: 16448     median: 16524.5 (52%)     max: 16773 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 9107     avg: 9442     median: 9444 (94%)     max: 9739 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 64532     avg: 68545     median: 68717 (68%)     max: 70460 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
401 ms (0%)
547 ms (1%)
min: 537     avg: 538     median: 537.5 (1%)     max: 538 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
93292 Points (68%)
86267 Points (63%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
337 Points (93%)
248 Points (68%)
min: 226     avg: 238.5     median: 238.5 (66%)     max: 251 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
353 Points (63%)
295 Points (53%)
min: 298     avg: 304.9     median: 304.9 (55%)     max: 311.8 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2210     avg: 2279     median: 2278.5 (85%)     max: 2347 Points
1765 Points (66%)
min: 1648     avg: 1701     median: 1701 (64%)     max: 1754 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
272 Watt (47%)
114.2 Watt (20%)
min: 59.1     avg: 61     median: 61 (11%)     max: 62.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
238 Watt (43%)
61.6 Watt (11%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 87.4     avg: 105.4     median: 104.1 (69%)     max: 137.9 Watt
19.5 Watt (13%)
min: 6.65     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (5%)     max: 7.55 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
11 Watt (12%)
min: 6.31     avg: 6.5     median: 6.5 (7%)     max: 6.62 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
15.3 Points per Watt (11%)
39.4 Points per Watt (29%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D → 100% n=33

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS → 66% n=33

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS → 71% n=33

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 24. 15:17:23

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18494 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 16403 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 18727 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1756041442s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 22 Aug 2025 05:18:47 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 18494 +0.005s ... 0.014s

#9 got single benchmarks 18494 +0.043s ... 0.057s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 16403 +0.004s ... 0.061s

#11 got single benchmarks 16403 +0.006s ... 0.067s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 18727 +0.004s ... 0.071s

#13 got single benchmarks 18727 +0.005s ... 0.076s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.076s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.079s ... 0.155s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.155s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)