Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 632

Qualcomm SD 632

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (SD632) is a mid-range octa-core SoC with eight Kryo 250 cores (Cortex-A53 based) at up to 1.8 GHz, an Adreno 506 GPU, a LPDDR3 memory controller (dual channel) and a X9 LTE (Cat 12, 300 Mbps down, 150 Mbps up) modem. Furthermore, the chip supports 802.11abgn WiFi and Bluetooth 5.0. It is manufactured in 14nm FinFet. Qualcomm states a 40% faster performance compared to the old Snapdragon 626.

SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameKryo 250
Clock Rate1800 MHz
Number of Cores / Threads8 / 8
Manufacturing Technology14 nm
FeaturesAdreno 506 GPU, X9 LTE Modem, Hexagon 546 DSP, 2x ISP 14-Bit
GPUQualcomm Adreno 506
64 Bit64 Bit support
ArchitectureARM
Announcement Date06/26/2018
Product Link (external)Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 632

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.1, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU
21.9 pt (38%)
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T
11.5 -47%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
15.5 -29%
Mediatek Helio G35
15.9 -27%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
16.1 -26%
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
16.3 -26%
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
16.3 -26%
Samsung Exynos 7904
18.4 -16%
Samsung Exynos 850
19 -13%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
21.1 -4%
UNISOC T618
21.9 0%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
21.9
Samsung Exynos 9611
22.2 1%
Mediatek MT8183
22.6 3%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
23.9 9%
Mediatek Helio P65
24.1 10%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
24.5 12%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
24.6 12%
HiSilicon Kirin 710
24.8 13%
HiSilicon Kirin 710A
25.1 15%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
25.7 17%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
57.4 162%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 15123     avg: 15916     median: 15948.5 (13%)     max: 16647 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2132     avg: 2202     median: 2206 (28%)     max: 2281 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2130     avg: 2200     median: 2174 (31%)     max: 2323 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
271 points (12%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1233 points (4%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1194     avg: 1236     median: 1247 (13%)     max: 1256 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4179     avg: 4497     median: 4515 (5%)     max: 4765 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1256 points (18%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4515 points (11%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 4806     avg: 4899     median: 4895 (6%)     max: 5037 ms
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 8185     avg: 8287     median: 8268.5 (8%)     max: 8420 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 50     avg: 55.3     median: 58 (13%)     max: 58 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 76724     avg: 83178     median: 84051.5 (29%)     max: 87883 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 6466     avg: 8367     median: 8156 (25%)     max: 10510 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 25769     avg: 29160     median: 29882 (37%)     max: 30294 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 13554     avg: 13851     median: 13921 (4%)     max: 13942 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 49427     avg: 52229     median: 52684 (32%)     max: 53683 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 97294     avg: 103607     median: 103114 (18%)     max: 108408 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
49912 Points (42%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
25162 Points (20%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
15277 Points (3%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
59443 Points (22%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
149794 Points (14%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work 2.0 Battery Life
1353 min (26%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 3078     avg: 3242     median: 3242 (17%)     max: 3406 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 4200     avg: 7719     median: 7719 (16%)     max: 11238 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 5785     avg: 5942     median: 5921.5 (39%)     max: 6076 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 6566     avg: 7099     median: 7152 (36%)     max: 7498 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2023, 2022
v1.22
log 07. 17:37:47

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 07 Jun 2023 13:55:12 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.014s ... 0.015s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.015s

#5 getting avg benchmarks for device 11121 +0.011s ... 0.026s

#6 got single benchmarks 11121 +0.017s ... 0.043s

#7 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.043s

#8 min, max, avg, median took s +0.322s ... 0.365s

#9 return log +0.033s ... 0.398s

Reviews for the Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 processor

Fairphone 3

Fairphone 3 Smartphone in Review: All Around Improvement

The makers of the Fairphone can certainly claim to make the most sustainable smartphone currently available. While some devices will not even let you swap out t...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 | Qualcomm Adreno 506 | 5.65" | 189 g
Xiaomi Redmi 7

Xiaomi Redmi 7 Smartphone Review

Redmi = affordable. Offering a good price-to-performance ratio has been Xiaomi's formula of success in the past. The Redmi 7 is no exception: It is available fo...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 | Qualcomm Adreno 506 | 6.26" | 180 g
Motorola Moto G7 Power

Motorola Moto G7 Power Smartphone Review

On paper, the Motorola Moto G7 Power is all about battery life. Motorola promises up to 60 hours of battery life from a single charge, but the device shares man...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 | Qualcomm Adreno 506 | 6.20" | 193 g
Motorola Moto G7 Play

Motorola Moto G7 Play Smartphone Review

Motorola has released its G7 series and now it is time for us to test the Moto G7 Play, a budget smartphone that incorporates a Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SoC, 2 G...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 | Qualcomm Adreno 506 | 5.70" | 149 g
Motorola Moto G7

Motorola Moto G7 Smartphone Review

Compared to its predecessor, the Motorola Moto G7 reaches new heights with more performance and more storage. The price remains the same, which makes Motorola's...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 | Qualcomm Adreno 506 | 6.20" | 172 g

Asus Zenfone Max M2 ZB633KL: Qualcomm Adreno 506, 6.26", 0.2 kg
  Review » Asus ZenFone Max (M2) Smartphone — Hands-on Review and First Impressions

Fairphone 3+: Qualcomm Adreno 506, 5.65", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Fairphone 3+

Motorola Moto E 2020: Qualcomm Adreno 506, 6.20", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto E 2020

Lenovo K10 Plus: Qualcomm Adreno 506, 6.22", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo K10 Plus

Fairphone 3: Qualcomm Adreno 506, 5.65", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Fairphone 3

Xiaomi Redmi Y3: Qualcomm Adreno 506, 6.26", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi Y3

Meizu Note 8: Qualcomm Adreno 506, 6.00", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Meizu Note 8

Xiaomi Redmi 7: Qualcomm Adreno 506, 6.26", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi 7

Motorola Moto G7 Play: Qualcomm Adreno 506, 5.70", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G7 Play

Motorola Moto G7: Qualcomm Adreno 506, 6.20", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G7

Motorola Moto G7 Power: Qualcomm Adreno 506, 6.20", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G7 Power

Asus Zenfone Max M2 ZB633KL: Qualcomm Adreno 506, 6.26", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenfone Max M2 ZB633KL

Honor 8C: Qualcomm Adreno 506, 6.26", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 8C

Fairphone 3: Qualcomm Adreno 506, 5.65", 0.2 kg
   » Fairphone 3: The hardware is competitive but the price is not

Please share our article, every link counts!