NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia Quadro T2000 for laptops is a professional mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). It is based on the consumer desktop GTX 1650 Ti with comparable clock speeds and therefore currently between a mobile GTX 1650 and GTX 1660 Ti . The chip is manufactured in 12nm FinFET at TSMC.
The GPU features 1024 shaders, 64 texture mapping units and 32 ROPs. The 4 GB GDDR5 memory is connected with a 128-bit memory interface and clocked at 2000 MHz. At a TGP of 60W, the clock speeds are specified from 1575 MHz (base) to 1785 MHz (boost).
The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to up to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal. In contrary to the faster Quadro RTX cards (e.g. Quadro RTX 3000 ), the T1000 and T2000 don not feature raytracing and Tensor cores.
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Max-Q ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia Quadro P5000 Max-Q (official Nvidia Quadro P5000 with Max-Q Design) is a mobile high-end workstation graphics card for notebooks. It is the power efficient variant of the normal Quadro P5000 for laptops and offers slightly reduced clock speeds (1101 - 1366 MHz versus 1164 - 1506 MHz) and a greatly reduced power consumption (80 versus 100 Watt TGP). Similar to the consumer GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (Laptop), it is based on a slimmed-down GP104 chip with 2048 shaders. The graphics card is designed for the Kaby Lake generation.
The Quadro GPUs offer certified drivers , which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.
Performance
The theoretical performance should be slightly below the normal Quadro P4000 due to the reduced clock speeds.
Power Consumption
With an TGP of 80 Watt, the P5000 Max-Q is only slightly higher rated (5 Watt) as the much slower Quadro P3000 (75 Watt) and therefore similar sized laptops can use the P5000 Max-Q.
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design is a professional high-end graphics card for powerful laptops and mobile workstations. It is based on the same TU106 chip as the consumer GeForce RTX 2070 (mobile) but with reduced clock speeds, shader count and memory bandwidth. Compared to the normal mobile RTX3000 , the Max-Q variants are clocked lower and work in a more efficient state. Currently, we know of three variants with different clock speeds and power consumptions (60, 65 and 70 W).
Model Shader TGP (W) Base (MHz) Boost (MHz) Quadro RTX 4000 Desktop 2304 160 1005 1545 Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile 1920 80 945 1380 Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q 1920 70 870 1380 Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 2304 65 765 1305 Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 2304 60 600 1215 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile 2304 80 885 1185 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile 2304 90 1080 1305
The Quadro GPUs offer certified drivers , which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.
NVIDIA manufacturers the TU106 chip on a 12 nm FinFET process and includes features like Deep Learning Super Sampling (DLSS) and Real-Time Ray Tracing (RTRT), which should combine to create more realistic lighting effects than older GPUs based on the company's Pascal architecture (if the games support it). The Quadro RTX 3000 is also DisplayPort 1.4 ready, while there is also support for HDMI 2.0b, HDR, Simultaneous Multi-Projection (SMP) and H.265 video en/decoding (PlayReady 3.0).
Performance
In professional applications, the Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q can be faster GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q due to the optimized drivers and bigger VRAM. When gaming with the RTX 3000, the slower clock speeds and less frequently updated drivers should hinder the performance compared to the GeForce variant.
The still relatively high power consumption of the RTX3000 Max-Q makes the card most suited for big laptops. However, we should see thinner designs with the Max-Q variants than the regular RTX 3000.
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q Quadro Turing Series Codename N19P-Q3 N17E-Q5 Max-Q N19E-Q1 MAX-Q Architecture Turing Pascal Turing Pipelines 1024 - unified 2048 - unified 1920 - unified Core Speed 1575 - 1785 (Boost) MHz 1101 - 1366 (Boost) MHz 600 - 870 - 1215 - 1380 (Boost) MHz Memory Speed 8000 MHz 6006 MHz 14000 MHz Memory Bus Width 128 Bit 256 Bit 192 Bit Memory Type GDDR5 GDDR5 GDDR6 Max. Amount of Memory 4 GB 16 GB 6 GB Shared Memory no no no API DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6 DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5 DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6 Power Consumption 60 Watt 100 Watt 60 - 70 Watt Transistors 4.7 Billion 10.8 Billion technology 12 nm 16 nm 12 nm Notebook Size medium sized large large Date of Announcement 27.05.2019 11.01.2017 27.05.2019 Features Optimus,
PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus DLSS, Raytraycing, VR Ready, G-SYNC, Vulkan, Multi Monitor Link to Manufacturer Page www.nvidia.com
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
6.2 pt (19%)
...
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 5070 avg: 5388 median: 5357 (15%) max: 5737 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 60 W 100% 99%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 4943 avg: 5132 median: 5048 (13%) max: 5405 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 60 W 100% 98%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 32299 avg: 33282 median: 33281.5 (36%) max: 34264 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 54418 avg: 66284 median: 66284 (17%) max: 78150 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 12130 avg: 12705 median: 12642 (22%) max: 13342 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 60 W 100% 99%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 13196 avg: 13714 median: 13617 (15%) max: 14328 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 60 W 100% 99%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
86888 Points (10%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 13150 avg: 13271 median: 13271 (18%) max: 13392 Points
min: 14763 avg: 16774 median: 16577 (23%) max: 18981 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 60 W 91% 100%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 13370 avg: 13524 median: 13523.5 (12%) max: 13677 Points
min: 17074 avg: 18037 median: 17523 (15%) max: 19513 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 60 W 91% 100%
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
68 fps (22%)
SPECviewperf 12 specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
106 fps (26%)
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
min: 108.6 avg: 110.3 median: 110.3 (27%) max: 111.9 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
91.1 fps (13%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
min: 90.5 avg: 96.8 median: 96.8 (14%) max: 103 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
43.9 fps (10%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
min: 67.8 avg: 70.6 median: 70.6 (15%) max: 73.3 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
47.2 fps (13%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
min: 58.5 avg: 61.6 median: 61.6 (17%) max: 64.7 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
101 fps (40%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
min: 99.1 avg: 109.8 median: 109.8 (44%) max: 120.4 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
101 fps (17%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
min: 97.4 avg: 104.8 median: 104.8 (17%) max: 112.1 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
111 fps (19%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 41.02 avg: 43.8 median: 43.8 (11%) max: 46.63 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 9.99 avg: 10.6 median: 10.6 (9%) max: 11.25 fps
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
111 fps (30%)
specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
min: 110.8 avg: 120.4 median: 123.7 (33%) max: 126.7 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 60 W 91% 100%
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
167 fps (19%)
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
min: 179.4 avg: 192.4 median: 195.8 (22%) max: 202.1 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 60 W 93% 100%
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
42.7 fps (9%)
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
min: 67.8 avg: 70.7 median: 71.5 (16%) max: 72.8 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 60 W 85% 100%
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
125 fps (14%)
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
min: 146.4 avg: 158.7 median: 160.8 (18%) max: 168.8 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 60 W 91% 100%
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
120 fps (18%)
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
min: 151.8 avg: 167 median: 168.3 (25%) max: 180.9 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 60 W 90% 100%
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
164 fps (18%)
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
min: 166.9 avg: 186.8 median: 194.8 (22%) max: 198.6 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 60 W 91% 100%
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
111 fps (19%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
min: 120.3 avg: 130.4 median: 134.6 (23%) max: 136.2 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 60 W 91% 100%
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 67.1 avg: 70.2 median: 69.5 (15%) max: 73.9 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 60 W 100% 99%
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 25.94 avg: 27.2 median: 27.1 (9%) max: 28.6 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 60 W 100% 99%
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
93.8 fps (18%)
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
184 fps (30%)
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
33.9 fps (24%)
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
177 fps (26%)
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
29.3 fps (24%)
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
101 fps (50%)
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
56.4 fps (36%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
65.5 fps (30%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6821 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
116.6 fps (40%)
Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
203 fps (12%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
min: 201 avg: 211.7 median: 202 (12%) max: 232 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 60 W 100% 95%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 60 W 100% 100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
102.9 fps (19%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
243.8 fps (18%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
234 fps (26%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
2153 Samples/s (10%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
4392 Samples/s (8%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
10064 Points (11%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
102 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
109.6 Watt (15%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 106 avg: 113.8 median: 115.4 (25%) max: 120 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 60 W 103% 100%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.4342 avg: 0.5 median: 0.5 (41%) max: 0.4957 fps per Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 60 W 100% 91%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.5 fps per Watt (39%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 31.6 avg: 43.5 median: 46.3 (74%) max: 52.5 dB(A)
GPU TDP ? TDP 60 W 91% 100%
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark
600 MHz (24%)
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) → 0% n= Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q → 0% n=
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
178 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
100 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
86 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
78 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
27 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
93 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
52 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
43 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
36 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
10 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
105 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
71 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
63 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
58 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
24 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
131 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
88 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
66 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
59 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
18 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
90 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
60 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
50 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
44 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
19 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
133 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
71 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
58 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
47 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
37 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
23 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
110 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
70 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
61 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
33 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
12 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
118 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
76 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
65 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
56 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
41 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
23 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
98 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
85 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
79 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
76 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
54 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
29 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
178.3 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
119.2 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
104.4 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
102.6 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
67.5 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
31.6 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
76.8 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
71.8 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
66.3 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
46.8 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
24.1 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
82 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
74.7 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
66.7 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
61.9 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
47.5 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
25.9 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
142.5 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
93.8 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
81 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
54.3 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
34 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
17.5 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
93 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
72.4 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
66.3 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
51.4 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
46.6 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
21.2 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
75 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
65 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
59 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
45 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
32 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
16 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
114 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
86 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
68 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
50 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
34 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
17 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
203 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
128 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
101 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
64 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
47.2 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
66.3 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
63.2 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
57.5 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
55.9 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
44.8 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
24.3 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
86 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
76 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
71 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
65 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
43 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
21 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
143 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
87 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
79 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
75 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
26 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
149 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
79.1 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
59.5 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
43.8 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
25.9 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
195 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
139 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
96.7 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
80.8 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
34 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
155 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
150 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
111.8 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
58.5 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
49.4 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:
65 fps
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q low med. high ultra QHD 4K Hitman 3 178 100 86 78 27 Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 93 52 43 36 10 Immortals Fenyx Rising 105 71 63 58 24 Yakuza Like a Dragon 131 88 66 59 18 Assassin´s Creed Valhalla 90 60 50 44 19 Dirt 5 133 71 58 47 37 23 Watch Dogs Legion 110 70 61 33 12 Horizon Zero Dawn 118 76 65 56 41 23 Death Stranding 98 85 79 76 54 29 Doom Eternal 178.3 119.2 104.4 102.6 67.5 31.6 Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order 76.8 71.8 66.3 46.8 24.1 Need for Speed Heat 82 74.7 66.7 61.9 47.5 25.9 Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 142.5 93.8 81 54.3 34 17.5 GRID 2019 93 72.4 66.3 51.4 46.6 21.2 Ghost Recon Breakpoint 75 65 59 45 32 16 The Division 2 114 86 68 50 34 17 Dirt Rally 2.0 203 128 101 64 47.2 Hitman 2 66.3 63.2 57.5 55.9 44.8 24.3 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 86 76 71 65 43 21 Far Cry 5 143 87 79 75 26 X-Plane 11.11 110 97 81 65 Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 149 79.1 59.5 43.8 25.9 Rise of the Tomb Raider 195 139 96.7 80.8 34 Dota 2 Reborn 144 131 126 118 75 The Witcher 3 270 179 100 53 35 GTA V 155 150 111.8 58.5 49.4 65 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 13 12 1 20 5 6 19 1 14 10 14 1 19 3 3
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.27
log 17. 08:05:35
#0 checking url part for id 9858 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 8084 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 9884 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:38:48 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.134s ... 0.135s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.135s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.135s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9858 +0.034s ... 0.169s
#9 got single benchmarks 9858 +0.012s ... 0.181s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 8084 +0.002s ... 0.183s
#11 got single benchmarks 8084 +0s ... 0.184s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 9884 +0.016s ... 0.2s
#13 got single benchmarks 9884 +0.012s ... 0.212s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.212s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.198s ... 0.41s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.41s
#17 Got 169 rows for game benchmarks. +0.018s ... 0.428s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.428s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.02s ... 0.448s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.063s ... 0.51s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.51s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.513s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)