Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

NVIDIA Quadro M600M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro M600M

The 28nm NVIDIA Quadro M600M is an entry-level DirectX 12 (FL 11_0) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a 1st generation Maxwell GPU that is most likely built on the GM107 architecture with 384 of the 640 shader cores activated. Compared to the older Quadro K620M and consumer GeForce 940M, the GPU offers a 128-Bit memory bus that separates it from the GM108-based K620M. The M600M typically comes with 2 GB GDDR5 VRAM clocked at 1250 MHz (5000 MHz effective at 80 GB/s instead of 16 GB/s on the K620M). 

In the Lenovo Thinkpad P70 the M600M is clocked at 837 - 876 MHz (Boost) for the shaders, and 1253 MHz (5012 MHz effektive) for the 2 GB GDDR5 from Samsung (thanks to our reader John for the GPU-Z screenshot).

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Performance

The Quadro M600M is about 20% faster than the previous Quadro K620M thanks to the wider 128-bit memory interface and pretty much right between the siblings Quadro M500M & Quadro M1000M. The consumer GPU GeForce 940MX is beaten by ~10-15%, while the GeForce GTX 950M is another 20% faster.

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M600M can be used for general calculations.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M600M is rated at the same 30 Watt TGP as the K620M including the board and memory components. Therefore, the card is also suited for thin and light notebooks.

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

The Nvidia Quadro M4000M is a high-end, DirectX 12 (FL_12_1) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM204 chip with all 1280 of the 1536 shader cores activated and is manufactured in 28 nm at TSMC. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M. The Quadro M4000M is built for the Intel Skylake generation and is a successor to the Quadro K4100M (Kepler-based). The M4000M usually comes with 4 GB GDDR5 VRAM clocked at 1250 MHz (5000 MHz effective, 160 GB/s opposed to 102.4 GB/s of the K4100M). 

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Performance

The clock speeds of the Quadro M4000M are very similar to the GTX 970M based on the same chip. The base clock is slightly higher with 975 versus 924 MHz but the Boost speed is lower at 1013 versus 1038 MHz. Therefore, with good cooling the GTX 970M should be slightly faster. Compared to the Quadro line-up, it is the second fastest Quadro card in 2015 and therefore clearly faster than the old Quadro K4100M.

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.2) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M4000M can be used for general calculations.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M4000M is rated at the same TGP of 100 Watt as the M5000M and older K5100M/K4100M (including the board and memory components). Therefore, the card is suited for large notebooks with 17-inch displays or greater.

NVIDIA Quadro M600MNVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Quadro M Series
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 compare 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 compare 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
ArchitectureMaxwellMaxwell
Pipelines384 - unified1280 - unified
Core Speed837 - 876 (Boost) MHz975 - 1013 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed5012 MHz5012 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB4 GB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5
Power Consumption30 Watt100 Watt
technology28 nm28 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, OptimusOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebook Sizelargelarge
Date of Announcement02.10.2015 02.10.2015
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro-for-...http://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro-for-...
Transistors5.2 Billion

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M600M
6.3 pt (7%)
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M4000M
19.8 pt (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
719 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
631 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
66347 Points (9%)
176003 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
13310 Points (14%)
min: 13452     avg: 17686     median: 17686 (19%)     max: 21920 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
18491 Points (7%)
49204 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
2322 Points (6%)
6937 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
2430 Points (4%)
7723 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
73348 Points (10%)
218874 Points (29%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
3216 Points (7%)
min: 9042     avg: 9296     median: 9295.5 (19%)     max: 9549 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
2911 Points (4%)
10259 Points (15%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
12734 Points (4%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
10958 Points (7%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
3DMark 06
20563 Points (30%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
34.2 fps (24%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
111.4 fps (79%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
36.7 fps (61%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
58.1 fps (97%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
47.5 fps (57%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
61.3 fps (74%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
16.4 fps (68%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
18.8 fps (78%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
51.9 fps (39%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
109.2 fps (82%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
52.3 fps (56%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
76.3 fps (82%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
27.6 fps (13%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
110.2 fps (53%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
45.1 fps (55%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
82.3 fps (100%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
52.4 fps (23%)
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
min: 80     avg: 88.6     median: 88.6 (38%)     max: 97.1 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
24.8 fps (7%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
min: 92     avg: 109.9     median: 109.9 (31%)     max: 127.8 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
17.2 fps (6%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
min: 40.33     avg: 44.5     median: 44.5 (14%)     max: 48.6 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
7.5 fps (5%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
min: 26.06     avg: 27.2     median: 27.2 (17%)     max: 28.4 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
22 fps (7%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
min: 47.6     avg: 55.8     median: 55.8 (17%)     max: 64 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
0.5 fps (1%)
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
min: 6.04     avg: 6.5     median: 6.5 (16%)     max: 6.9 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
31.7 fps (17%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
min: 58.3     avg: 68.4     median: 68.4 (37%)     max: 78.4 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
27.6 fps (9%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
min: 71     avg: 79.6     median: 79.6 (27%)     max: 88.1 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6832 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
67.1 fps (24%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
89.3 fps (33%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
75.2 fps (19%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
93.2 fps (24%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
59.4 fps (16%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
104.3 fps (8%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
45.9 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
49.8 fps (0%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
484 Samples/s (2%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
1016 Samples/s (2%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
1754 Points (3%)
5686 Points (11%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
59.5 Watt (9%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
48.6 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.2 Points per Watt (0%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M600M → 100% n=28

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M4000M → 280% n=28

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M600M:
36.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
24.6  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
23.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
16  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M600M:
73.7  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
42.7  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
18.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
16.3  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M600M:
29  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
21.6  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
11.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
5.8  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
46.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
28.6  fps
315%
Quadro M4000M:
90  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
15.3  fps
359%
Quadro M4000M:
55  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
12.7  fps
378%
Quadro M4000M:
48  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M4000M:
20  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
83  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
47.9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
21.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
18.5  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
43  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
26.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
14.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
7.6  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
103.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
65.2  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
47.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
20.6  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M600M:
127.6  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
80.2  fps
244%
Quadro M4000M:
196  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
71.7  fps
252%
Quadro M4000M:
181  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
26.9  fps
316%
Quadro M4000M:
85  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M600M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M4000M → 311%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 369%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 02. 17:58:44

#0 checking url part for id 6510 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6506 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 02 Oct 2022 17:27:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.064s ... 0.065s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.069s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#22 composed specs +0s ... 0.069s

#23 did output specs +0s ... 0.069s

#24 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.069s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.03s ... 0.1s

#26 getting avg benchmarks for device 6510 +0.003s ... 0.103s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.104s

#28 got single benchmarks 6510 +0.007s ... 0.111s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.114s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.116s

#31 getting avg benchmarks for device 6506 +0s ... 0.116s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.116s

#33 got single benchmarks 6506 +0.006s ... 0.122s

#34 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.122s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.122s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.123s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.123s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.124s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.124s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.124s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.125s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.126s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.127s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.127s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.128s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.128s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.129s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.13s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.13s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.131s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.131s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.131s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.132s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.133s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.134s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.134s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.134s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.134s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.135s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.135s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.135s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.136s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.136s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.136s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.136s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.137s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.137s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.137s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.137s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.137s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.137s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.138s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.138s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.138s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.138s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.139s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.139s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.139s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.139s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.139s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.14s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.14s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.14s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.14s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.141s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.141s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.141s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.142s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.142s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.142s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.143s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.143s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.143s

#104 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.144s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.144s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.145s

#107 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.145s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.145s

#109 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.146s

#110 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.146s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#112 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.147s

#113 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.147s

#114 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.148s

#115 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.148s

#116 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.148s

#117 Got 39 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.153s

#118 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.153s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.153s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.153s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.153s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.153s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.153s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.153s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#148 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#149 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#150 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.155s

#151 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.156s

#152 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.156s

#153 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.156s

#154 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.156s

#155 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.157s

#156 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.157s

#157 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.157s

#158 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.158s

#159 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.159s

#160 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.159s

#161 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.159s

#162 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.159s

#163 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.159s

#164 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.159s

#165 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.159s

#166 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.159s

#167 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.159s

#168 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.159s

#169 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.159s

#170 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.159s

#171 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.16s

#172 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.16s

#173 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.16s

#174 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.16s

#175 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.161s

#176 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.161s

#177 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.161s

#178 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.161s

#179 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.161s

#180 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.161s

#181 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.161s

#182 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.161s

#183 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.162s

#184 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.162s

#185 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.162s

#186 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.162s

#187 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.162s

#188 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.162s

#189 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.162s

#190 benchmarks composed for output. +0s ... 0.162s

#191 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.162s

#192 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.163s

#193 return log +0.002s ... 0.165s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)