NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M5500
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia Quadro M3000M is a high-end, DirectX 12 (FL_12_1) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM204 chip with 1024 of the 1536 shader cores activated and is manufactured in 28 nm at TSMC. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M . The Quadro M3000M is built for the Intel Skylake generation and is a successor to the Quadro K3100M (Kepler-based). The M3000M usually comes with 4 GB GDDR5 VRAM clocked at 1250 MHz (5000 MHz effective, 160 GB/s opposed to 102.4 GB/s of the K5100M).
The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.
Performance
As the exact clock speed of the M3000M is still not known, we can only speculate on the performance of the card. However, it is the mid-range model of the mobile Quadro line in 2015 and based on the same chip as the GeForce GTX 965M. Therefore, it should be clearly faster than the old Quadro K3100M.
Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.2) or OpenCL 1.2 , the cores of the Quadro M3000M can be used for general calculations.
Power Consumption
The power consumption of the Quadro M3000M is rated at the same TGP of 75 Watt as the K3100M (including the board and memory components). Therefore, the card is suited for large notebooks with 17-inch displays or greater and 25 Watt less than the M4000M and M5000M.
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M ► remove from comparison
The 28nm NVIDIA Quadro M1000M is a mid-range DirectX 12 (FL 11_0) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a 1st generation Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM107 architecture with 512 of the 640 shader cores activated. Therefore, the GPU is not similar to any current consumer card. The Geforce GTX 950M , for example, uses the full 640 shader cores. The Quadro M1000M is built for the Intel Skylake generation as the successor to the Kepler-based Quadro K1100M . The M1000M typically comes with 2 GB GDDR5 VRAM clocked at 1250 MHz (5000 MHz effective at 80 GB/s compared to 44.8 GB/s on the K1100M).
The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.
Performance
As the exact clock speed of the M1000M is still not known, we can only speculate on the performance of the card. However, it is a lower mid-range model from the mobile Quadro line in 2015. It should be slower than the GTX 950M in 3D gaming due to the lower shader count, but should easily outperform the old Quadro K1100M.
Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2 , the cores of the Quadro M1000M can be used for general calculations.
Power Consumption
The power consumption of the Quadro M1000M is rated for a 40 Watt TGP including the board and memory components, which is 5 Watt lower than the K1100M. Therefore, the card is suited for 15-inch notebooks and greater.
NVIDIA Quadro M5500 ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia Quadro M5500 is a high-end, DirectX 12 (FL_12_1) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM204 chip with all 2048 shader cores activated and is manufactured in 28 nm at TSMC. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 (Notebook). Compared to the slower and less power hungry Quadro M5000M, the M5500 offers 512 more shaders which should result in 30-40% more performance according to Nvidia.
The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.
Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.2) or OpenCL 1.2 , the cores of the Quadro M5000M can be used for general calculations.
The power consumption of the Quadro M5000M is rated at the same TGP of 150 Watt. Therefore, the card is suited for very large notebooks with 17-inch displays or greater.
The first laptop with the M5500 in it is the MSI WT72 Workstation.
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M NVIDIA Quadro M1000M NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Quadro M Series Architecture Maxwell Maxwell Maxwell Pipelines 1024 - unified 512 - unified 2048 - unified Core Speed 1050 MHz 993 - 1072 (Boost) MHz 1139 - 1140 (Boost) MHz Memory Speed 5000 MHz 5000 MHz 6606 MHz Memory Bus Width 256 Bit 128 Bit 256 Bit Memory Type GDDR5 GDDR5 GDDR5 Max. Amount of Memory 4 GB 4 GB 8 GB Shared Memory no no no API DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5 DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5 DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.5 Power Consumption 75 Watt 40 Watt 150 Watt Transistors 5.2 Billion 1.9 Billion 5.2 Billion technology 28 nm 28 nm 28 nm Features Optimus,
PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus Optimus,
PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus CUDA, 3D Vision, PhysX, GeForce Experience, Surround, GameStream, GPU Boost 2.0, Adaptive Vertical Sync, G-SYNC, SLI Notebook Size large large large Date of Announcement 02.10.2015 02.10.2015 04.04.2016 Link to Manufacturer Page www.nvidia.com www.nvidia.com
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M3000M
3 pt (9%)
...
...
max:
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M1000M
1.6 pt (5%)
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 19732 avg: 21408 median: 21407.5 (23%) max: 23083 Points
min: 15717 avg: 15949 median: 15948.5 (17%) max: 16180 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 38539 avg: 44603 median: 44602.5 (12%) max: 50666 Points
min: 23067 avg: 23422 median: 23422 (6%) max: 23777 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 5835 avg: 5972 median: 5971.5 (11%) max: 6108 Points
min: 3302 avg: 3323 median: 3323 (6%) max: 3344 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 6415 avg: 6537 median: 6536.5 (7%) max: 6658 Points
min: 3478 avg: 3498 median: 3497.5 (4%) max: 3517 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 42957 avg: 84310 median: 84309.5 (10%) max: 125662 Points
min: 41161 avg: 41908 median: 41907.5 (5%) max: 42654 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 8493 avg: 8540 median: 8539.5 (12%) max: 8586 Points
min: 4648 avg: 4661 median: 4660.5 (6%) max: 4673 Points
14413 Points (20%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 8264 avg: 8289 median: 8288.5 (7%) max: 8313 Points
min: 4225 avg: 4230 median: 4229.5 (4%) max: 4234 Points
3DMark Vantage 3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
27405 Points (8%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
27921 Points (16%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 26746 avg: 27321 median: 27320.5 (36%) max: 27895 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 24393 avg: 24483 median: 24483 (32%) max: 24573 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 37.8 avg: 38.2 median: 38.2 (13%) max: 38.5 fps
min: 18.7 avg: 18.8 median: 18.8 (6%) max: 18.9 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
min: 79.3 avg: 80 median: 80 (26%) max: 80.6 fps
44.9 fps (15%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
min: 43.4 avg: 59.8 median: 59.8 (27%) max: 76.2 fps
min: 43.4 avg: 43.6 median: 43.6 (19%) max: 43.8 fps
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
min: 112.7 avg: 114.5 median: 114.5 (22%) max: 116.2 fps
min: 61.3 avg: 62.3 median: 62.3 (12%) max: 63.2 fps
SPECviewperf 11 specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 49.91 avg: 55.8 median: 50 (30%) max: 67.4 fps
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 40.87 avg: 40.9 median: 40.9 (24%) max: 41 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 41.16 avg: 50.2 median: 53 (30%) max: 56.3 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 40 avg: 41.7 median: 41.7 (24%) max: 43.34 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 35.28 avg: 45.1 median: 48 (37%) max: 52 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 46.32 avg: 48.7 median: 48.7 (37%) max: 51 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 16.08 avg: 19.5 median: 20 (24%) max: 22.46 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 20.22 avg: 20.6 median: 20.6 (24%) max: 21 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 57 avg: 66.9 median: 57.8 (44%) max: 86 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 56 avg: 56.1 median: 56.1 (42%) max: 56.2 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 35.34 avg: 47.4 median: 51.9 (56%) max: 55 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 50.9 avg: 52.5 median: 52.5 (56%) max: 54 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 59 avg: 59.2 median: 59.1 (28%) max: 59.5 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 39 avg: 39.6 median: 39.6 (19%) max: 40.12 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 43.12 avg: 49.5 median: 52 (27%) max: 53.4 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 53.1 avg: 53.6 median: 53.6 (28%) max: 54 fps
SPECviewperf 12 specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 52.3 avg: 76.4 median: 84.8 (21%) max: 92 fps
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 56.7 avg: 59.4 median: 59.4 (15%) max: 62 fps
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
144 fps (36%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 39.84 avg: 52.5 median: 52 (8%) max: 65.8 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 31 avg: 31.1 median: 31.1 (5%) max: 31.13 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
120 fps (18%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 37 avg: 40.2 median: 39.8 (9%) max: 43.81 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 20 avg: 20.4 median: 20.4 (4%) max: 20.72 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
60.3 fps (13%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 17.46 avg: 20.6 median: 22 (6%) max: 22.34 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 12 avg: 12 median: 12 (3%) max: 12.06 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
53.8 fps (14%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 23.08 avg: 44.8 median: 50.4 (14%) max: 61 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 30 avg: 30.6 median: 30.6 (8%) max: 31.27 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
95 fps (26%)
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 4.68 avg: 4.8 median: 4.8 (4%) max: 4.85 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 0.69 avg: 1.7 median: 1.7 (2%) max: 2.72 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
12.2 fps (11%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 42.17 avg: 57.7 median: 64.8 (26%) max: 66 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 33.8 avg: 33.9 median: 33.9 (14%) max: 34 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
110 fps (44%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 45.24 avg: 66.7 median: 77 (13%) max: 77.9 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 37 avg: 37.5 median: 37.4 (6%) max: 37.89 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
137 fps (23%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 4455 avg: 5650 median: 5649.5 (4%) max: 6844 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 6833 avg: 6839 median: 6839 (5%) max: 6845 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 42.4 avg: 71.1 median: 71.1 (25%) max: 99.7 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 81.5 avg: 83.7 median: 83.7 (29%) max: 85.9 fps
Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 68 avg: 92.1 median: 92.1 (5%) max: 116.1 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 93.7 avg: 95.9 median: 95.9 (6%) max: 98.1 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
106.7 fps (6%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
249.9 fps (15%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 1258 avg: 1273 median: 1273 (6%) max: 1288 Samples/s
min: 534 avg: 682 median: 682 (3%) max: 830 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 2234 avg: 2261 median: 2261 (4%) max: 2288 Samples/s
min: 889 avg: 1180 median: 1179.5 (2%) max: 1470 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
4737 Points (5%)
2676 Points (3%)
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M3000M → 100% n=10 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M1000M → 59% n=10 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M5500 → 187% n=10
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
100%
Quadro M3000M:
114.9 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
69.9 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
40.2 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
33.4 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
146.8 fps
54%
Quadro M1000M:
79.9 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
76.8 fps
57%
Quadro M1000M:
43.5 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
54.5 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
23.8 fps
55%
Quadro M1000M:
13.2 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
85.6 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
50.4 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
43.7 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
17.8 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
124.5 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
59.4 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
50.9 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
17.8 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
179 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
68%
Quadro M1000M:
121 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
123 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
58 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
21 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
122.7 fps
46%
Quadro M1000M:
54 59.4 ~ 57 fps
50%
Quadro M1000M:
36.5 38 ~ 37 fps
45%
Quadro M1000M:
17 20.8 ~ 19 fps
50%
Quadro M1000M:
10.8 11 ~ 11 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
14.1 fps
50%
Quadro M1000M:
7 7.7 ~ 7 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
108.6 fps
106%
Quadro M1000M:
115 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
89.6 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
53.6 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
39.2 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
136.1 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
69.1 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
29.7 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
35.3 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
122 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
109%
Quadro M1000M:
133 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
122 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
105%
Quadro M1000M:
128 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
122 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
101%
Quadro M1000M:
123 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
120 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
94 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
87 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
69 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
45 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
200 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
85%
Quadro M1000M:
169 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
125 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
105%
Quadro M1000M:
131 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
68 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
54 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
380 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
65%
Quadro M1000M:
248 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
186 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
77%
Quadro M1000M:
143 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
151 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
81 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
88.6 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
77.4 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
43.1 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
349 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
48%
Quadro M1000M:
166 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
271 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
46%
Quadro M1000M:
126 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
217 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
49%
Quadro M1000M:
107 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
40 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
66 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
66 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
57 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
25 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
124.5 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
82.9 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
44.6 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
226.3 fps
63%
Quadro M1000M:
111 115 ~ 113 fps
54%
Quadro M1000M:
37 38 ~ 38 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
255.1 fps
56%
Quadro M1000M:
144 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
185 fps
100%
Quadro M3000M:
82.1 fps
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M3000M → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M1000M → 62% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 59%
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M low med. high ultra QHD 4K Rise of the Tomb Raider 114.9 69.9 40.2 33.4 Rainbow Six Siege 146.8 76.8 54.5 23.8 Just Cause 3 85.6 50.4 43.7 17.8 Star Wars Battlefront 124.5 59.4 50.9 17.8 Anno 2205 179 123 58 21 The Witcher 3 122.7 74 42 22 14.1 Dirt Rally 108.6 89.6 53.6 39.2 GTA V 136.1 69.1 29.7 35.3 F1 2014 122 122 122 120 Ryse: Son of Rome 94 87 69 45 Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor 200 125 68 54 GRID: Autosport 380 186 151 81 Thief 88.6 77.4 43.1 Total War: Rome II 349 271 217 40 Company of Heroes 2 66 66 57 25 Metro: Last Light 124.5 82.9 44.6 BioShock Infinite 226.3 179 165 70 Tomb Raider 255.1 185 82.1 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 3 7 7 11 6 7 5 4 10 3 1 4 2
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M low med. high ultra QHD 4K Rainbow Six Siege 137.8 79.9 43.5 32 13.2 Anno 2205 121 65 30 14 12 The Witcher 3 57 37 19 11 7 Dirt Rally 261 115 62 29 20 F1 2014 133 128 123 84 Ryse: Son of Rome 76 52 23 21 Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor 169 131 34 26 GRID: Autosport 248 143 82 43 Thief 78 53 45 23 Total War: Rome II 166 126 107 20 Company of Heroes 2 54 48 34 12 GRID 2 195 153 136 43 Metro: Last Light 83 49 25 BioShock Infinite 186 113 100 38 Tomb Raider 279 144 98 43 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 2 2 10 4 5 6 2 6 5 2 9 5 1 4
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 26. 21:35:42
#0 checking url part for id 6507 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 6509 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 7282 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.162s ... 0.163s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.163s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.163s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 6507 +0.052s ... 0.216s
#9 got single benchmarks 6507 +0.013s ... 0.228s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 6509 +0.016s ... 0.244s
#11 got single benchmarks 6509 +0.015s ... 0.259s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 7282 +0.002s ... 0.261s
#13 got single benchmarks 7282 +0.007s ... 0.268s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.268s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.3s ... 0.568s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.568s
#17 Got 148 rows for game benchmarks. +0.015s ... 0.582s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.582s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.015s ... 0.598s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.045s ... 0.643s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.643s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.645s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)