, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M1200

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

The 28nm NVIDIA Quadro M1000M is a mid-range DirectX 12 (FL 11_0) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a 1st generation Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM107 architecture with 512 of the 640 shader cores activated. Therefore, the GPU is not similar to any current consumer card. The Geforce GTX 950M, for example, uses the full 640 shader cores. The Quadro M1000M is built for the Intel Skylake generation as the successor to the Kepler-based Quadro K1100M. The M1000M typically comes with 2 GB GDDR5 VRAM clocked at 1250 MHz (5000 MHz effective at 80 GB/s compared to 44.8 GB/s on the K1100M). 

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Performance

As the exact clock speed of the M1000M is still not known, we can only speculate on the performance of the card. However, it is a lower mid-range model from the mobile Quadro line in 2015. It should be slower than the GTX 950M in 3D gaming due to the lower shader count, but should easily outperform the old Quadro K1100M.

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M1000M can be used for general calculations.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M1000M is rated for a 40 Watt TGP including the board and memory components, which is 5 Watt lower than the K1100M. Therefore, the card is suited for 15-inch notebooks and greater.

NVIDIA Quadro M1200

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro M1200

The 28 nm Nvidia Quadro M1200 is a mid-range DirectX 12 (FL 11_0) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a (first generation) Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM107 chip with 640 shader cores. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M. The Quadro M1200M is built for the Intel Skylake generation and is the successor to the Quadro M1000M (950M based).

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Performance

The performance of the Quadro M1200 is on a level to the previous generation M2000M which is also based on the 960M. In games it is comparable to the GTX 960M although the driver support is not optimized for gaming.

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M2000M can be used for general calculations.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M1200 is rated for the same TGP of 45 Watt (32.5 Watt TDP) and therefore a bit lower than the M2000M with 55 Watt TGP.

NVIDIA Quadro M1000MNVIDIA Quadro M1200
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro M Series
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 compare 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 compare 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
ArchitectureMaxwellMaxwell
Pipelines512 - unified640 - unified
Core Speed993 - 1072 (Boost) MHz991 - 1150 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed5000 MHz5000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory4096 MB4096 MB
Shared Memorynono
DirectXDirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0
Transistors1870 Million1870 Million
technology28 nm28 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, OptimusOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebook Sizelargelarge
Date of Announcement02.10.2015 13.01.2017
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro-for-...http://www.nvidia.de/object/mobile-works...
CodenameN17P-Q1

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M1000M
7.7 pt (8%)
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M1200
10.2 pt (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
1290 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
240298 Points (37%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
42129 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 15717     avg: 15949     median: 15948.5 (21%)     max: 16180 Points
min: 12632     avg: 14705     median: 13600 (18%)     max: 17884 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 23067     avg: 23422     median: 23422 (12%)     max: 23777 Points
min: 26860     avg: 27557     median: 27557 (14%)     max: 28254 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3302     avg: 3323     median: 3323 (9%)     max: 3344 Points
min: 3759     avg: 3846     median: 3878 (10%)     max: 3900 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 3478     avg: 3498     median: 3497.5 (7%)     max: 3517 Points
min: 4118     avg: 4142     median: 4141.5 (8%)     max: 4165 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 41161     avg: 41908     median: 41907.5 (6%)     max: 42654 Points
63463 Points (8%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 4648     avg: 4661     median: 4660.5 (11%)     max: 4673 Points
min: 5513     avg: 5515     median: 5514.5 (13%)     max: 5516 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 4225     avg: 4230     median: 4229.5 (7%)     max: 4234 Points
min: 5105     avg: 5310     median: 5310 (9%)     max: 5515 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
3DMark 06
min: 24393     avg: 24483     median: 24483 (46%)     max: 24573 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
26109 Points (49%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 18.7     avg: 18.8     median: 18.8 (9%)     max: 18.9 fps
27.7 fps (14%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
44.9 fps (15%)
30.1 fps (10%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
min: 43.4     avg: 43.6     median: 43.6 (19%)     max: 43.8 fps
28.9 fps (13%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
min: 61.3     avg: 62.3     median: 62.3 (12%)     max: 63.2 fps
28.1 fps (5%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 40.87     avg: 40.9     median: 40.9 (29%)     max: 41 fps
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
43.9 fps (31%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 40     avg: 41.7     median: 41.7 (70%)     max: 43.34 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
44.2 fps (74%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 46.32     avg: 48.7     median: 48.7 (59%)     max: 51 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
56.4 fps (68%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 20.22     avg: 20.6     median: 20.6 (86%)     max: 21 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
22 fps (92%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 56     avg: 56.1     median: 56.1 (42%)     max: 56.19 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
57.2 fps (43%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 50.94     avg: 52.5     median: 52.5 (56%)     max: 54 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
57.8 fps (62%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 39     avg: 39.6     median: 39.6 (19%)     max: 40.12 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
46.7 fps (22%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 53.07     avg: 53.5     median: 53.5 (65%)     max: 54 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
53.4 fps (65%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 56.65     avg: 59.3     median: 59.3 (26%)     max: 62 fps
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 69.01     avg: 72.5     median: 70 (30%)     max: 78.37 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 31     avg: 31.1     median: 31.1 (11%)     max: 31.13 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 34.18     avg: 34.9     median: 34.7 (12%)     max: 36 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 20     avg: 20.4     median: 20.4 (8%)     max: 20.72 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 22.17     avg: 24.8     median: 26 (11%)     max: 26.2 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 12     avg: 12     median: 12 (11%)     max: 12.06 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 17.49     avg: 17.8     median: 17.8 (16%)     max: 18 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 30     avg: 30.6     median: 30.6 (13%)     max: 31.27 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 32.07     avg: 34.4     median: 33.7 (14%)     max: 37.29 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 0.69     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (6%)     max: 2.72 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 3.78     avg: 3.8     median: 3.9 (13%)     max: 3.9 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 33.8     avg: 33.9     median: 33.9 (19%)     max: 34 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 45     avg: 46     median: 46.1 (26%)     max: 46.97 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 37     avg: 37.4     median: 37.4 (13%)     max: 37.89 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 45.75     avg: 46.2     median: 45.9 (16%)     max: 47 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
46 fps (14%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 6833     avg: 6839     median: 6839 (32%)     max: 6845
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 81.51     avg: 83.7     median: 83.7 (36%)     max: 85.95 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
102 fps (43%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 93.7     avg: 95.9     median: 95.9 (27%)     max: 98.09 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 102.79     avg: 108     median: 108.2 (30%)     max: 113.54 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
99.6 % (100%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 534     avg: 682     median: 682 (7%)     max: 830 Samples/s
min: 656     avg: 818     median: 817.5 (8%)     max: 979 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 889     avg: 1180     median: 1179.5 (4%)     max: 1470 Samples/s
min: 852     avg: 1207     median: 1207 (4%)     max: 1562 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
2676 (6%)
388 (1%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 74.8     avg: 87.5     median: 87.5 (19%)     max: 100.2 Watt

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M1000M → 100% n=34

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M1200 → 112% n=34

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
Quadro M1200:
79  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
66  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
37  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
34  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M1200:
12  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M1200:
88.1  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
49.2  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
28.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
23.9  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M1200:
9.9  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
137.8  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
79.9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
43.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
32  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M1000M:
13.2  fps
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
121  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
65  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
30  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
14  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M1000M:
12  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M1200:
74  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
63  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
35  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
29  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M1200:
11  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
54 59.4 ~ 57 fps
129%
Quadro M1200:
73.6  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
36.5 38 ~ 37 fps
124%
Quadro M1200:
45.9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
17 20.8 ~ 19 fps
147%
Quadro M1200:
26.3 29 fps ~ 28 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
10.8 11 ~ 11 fps
118%
Quadro M1200:
13 fps  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M1000M:
7 7.7 ~ 7 fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
261  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
115  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
62  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
29  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M1000M:
20  fps
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
133  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
128  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
123  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
84  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
76  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
52  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
23  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
21  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M1000M:
169  fps
med. 1344x756
100%
Quadro M1000M:
131  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
34  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
26  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
248  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
143  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
82  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
43  fps
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
78  fps
120%
Quadro M1200:
93.3  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
53  fps
111%
Quadro M1200:
58.9  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
45  fps
111%
Quadro M1200:
50.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
23  fps
114%
Quadro M1200:
26.2  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
166  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
126  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
107  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
20  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
54  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
48  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
34  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
12  fps
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
195  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
153  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
136  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
43  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
83  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
49  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
25  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M1000M:
176.7 195 ~ 186 fps
111%
Quadro M1200:
189 224.7 ~ 207 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
111 115 ~ 113 fps
119%
Quadro M1200:
130.8 137 ~ 134 fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
100 100.1 ~ 100 fps
119%
Quadro M1200:
113.1 125 ~ 119 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
37 38 ~ 38 fps
118%
Quadro M1200:
42.6 47 ~ 45 fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
279  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
144  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
98  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
43  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M1000M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M1200 → 120%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 116%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 17. 22:13:47

#0 checking url part for id 6509 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7704 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 15 May 2021 17:20:29 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.063s ... 0.064s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.064s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.064s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 6509 +0.031s ... 0.095s

#8 got single benchmarks 6509 +0.01s ... 0.105s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7704 +0.004s ... 0.108s

#10 got single benchmarks 7704 +0.009s ... 0.117s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.117s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.026s ... 0.143s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.143s

#14 Got 104 rows for game benchmarks. +0.013s ... 0.156s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.156s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.159s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.015s ... 0.174s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.174s

#19 return log +0.003s ... 0.177s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)