Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro K4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M620

NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

The NVIDIA Quadro K4000M is a high-end, DirectX 11.1 compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Kepler-based GPU built on the GK104 chip (but using only 960 shader cores) and is manufactured in 28nm at TSMC. The Quadro K4000M is built for the Intel Chief River generation (Ivy Bridge) and is the successor to the Fermi-based Quadro 4000M (Huron River platform).

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better than GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Architecture

The Kepler architecture is the successor to the Fermi architecture that first appeared in laptops with the GeForce 400M series. The GK104 Kepler core offers eight shader blocks, called SMX, that are clocked at the same speed as the central core. In the K4000M, 5 blocks are active leading to the 960 CUDA cores. Although more shader cores are available in the Kepler architecture as compared to the Fermi design, the Kepler shaders are still expected to be up to twice as power efficient. However, due to the missing hot clock of the shader domain, two shaders of a Kepler chip offer similar performance to just one shader of a Fermi chip (as the latter is clocked twice as fast). 

PCIe 3.0 is now supported by the mobile Kepler series and an optional Turbo mode can automatically overclock the Nvidia card by a theoretical 15 percent if the laptop cooling system allows it. The implementation of this boost mode is done in the BIOS, but it is ultimately dependent upon the manufacturer of the laptop.

Performance

The performance is significantly above the level of the older Quadro 5010M and also beats the GeForce GTX 675M. Therefore, the card will manage both CAD software and demanding 3D games of 2013 in high quality settings.

Features

The improved feature set now includes support for up to 4 active displays. Furthermore, high resolution monitors of up to 3840x2160 pixels can now be connected using DisplayPort 1.2 or HDMI 1.4a if available. HD-Audio codecs, such as Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD, can be transmitted via bitstream mode through the HDMI port. However, as most laptops will feature Optimus, the integrated GPU will likely have direct control over the display ports and may limit the feature set available by the Nvidia Kepler cards.

The 5th generation PureVideo HD video processor (VP5) is also integrated in the GK107 core and offers hardware decoding of HD videos. Common codecs such as MPEG-1/2, MPEG-4 ASP, H.264 and VC1/WMV9 are fully supported up to 4K resolutions while VC1 and MPEG-4 are supported up to 1080p. Two streams can be decoded in parallel for features such as Picture-in-Picture. Another novelty is the inclusion of a dedicated video encoding engine similar to Intel QuickSync that can be accessed by the NVENC API.

The power consumption of the K4000M is rated at 100 Watt (TGP according to Nvidia) and is therefore suited for large-sized notebooks 17-inches or greater.

NVIDIA Quadro M620

► remove from comparison

The 28nm NVIDIA Quadro M620 is a mid-range DirectX 12 (FL 11_0) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a 1st generation Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM107 architecture with 512 of the 640 shader cores activated. Therefore, the GPU is not similar to any current consumer card. The Geforce GTX 950M, for example, uses the full 640 shader cores. The older Quadro M1000M offers very similar specs (same amount of shader cores and also based on the same chip but more graphics memory), but was intended for the Skylake generation. The M620 is intended for the Kaby Lake generation.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Performance

Due to the smaller amount of memory, the Quadro M620 should be slightly slower than the older Quadro M1000M. However, the exact clock speeds are not known up to now. In early benchmarks we have, the M1000M is about 9 % faster than the M620 in SPECviewperf 12.

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M620 can be used for general calculations.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M620 is rated for a 30 Watt TGP including the board and memory components (21.2 Watt TDP), which is 10 Watt lower than the M1000M (which offers more memory). Therefore, the card is suited for 15-inch notebooks and greater.

NVIDIA Quadro K4000MNVIDIA Quadro M620
Quadro M Series
Quadro K5100M compare 1536 @ 0.77 GHz256 Bit @ 3600 MHz
Quadro K5000M compare 1344 @ 0.71 GHz256 Bit @ 3000 MHz
Quadro K4100M compare 1152 @ 0.71 GHz256 Bit @ 3200 MHz
Quadro K4000M 960 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 2800 MHz
Quadro K3100M compare 768 @ 0.71 GHz256 Bit @ 3200 MHz
Quadro K3000M compare 576 @ 0.65 GHz256 Bit @ 2800 MHz
Quadro K2100M compare 576 @ 0.67 GHz128 Bit @ 3000 MHz
Quadro K1100M compare 384 @ 0.71 GHz128 Bit @ 2800 MHz
Quadro K620M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 2000 MHz
Quadro K2000M compare 384 @ 0.75 GHz128 Bit @ 1800 MHz
Quadro K1000M compare 192 @ 0.85 GHz128 Bit @ 1800 MHz
Quadro K610M compare 192 @ 0.95 GHz64 Bit @ 2600 MHz
Quadro K510M compare 192 @ 0.85 GHz64 Bit @ 2400 MHz
Quadro K500M compare 192 @ 0.85 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 MHz
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 compare 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
CodenameN14E-Q3
ArchitectureKeplerMaxwell
Pipelines960 - unified512 - unified
Core Speed600 MHz1018 MHz
Memory Speed2800 MHz5012 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB2048 MB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 11, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.1DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5
Power Consumption100 Watt30 Watt
technology28 nm28 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, Verde Drivers, CUDA, 3D Vision, 3DTV PlayOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebook Sizelargelarge
Date of Announcement01.06.2012 13.01.2017
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.de

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro K4000M
1 pt (3%)
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M620
1.4 pt (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
968 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
862 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
12751 Points (14%)
min: 11481     avg: 13620     median: 13620 (15%)     max: 15759 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
19058 Points (5%)
min: 20980     avg: 22120     median: 22119.5 (6%)     max: 23259 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
2192 Points (4%)
min: 2694     avg: 2914     median: 2989 (5%)     max: 3059 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
2199 Points (2%)
min: 2867     avg: 3067     median: 3130 (4%)     max: 3204 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
150781 Points (18%)
163099 Points (20%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 3673     avg: 3760     median: 3777 (5%)     max: 3830 Points
min: 4015     avg: 4118     median: 4140 (6%)     max: 4200 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 3413     avg: 3466     median: 3466 (3%)     max: 3519 Points
min: 3676     avg: 3761     median: 3801 (3%)     max: 3805 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
15362 Points (4%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M620
17237 Points (5%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 14010     avg: 14050     median: 14049.5 (8%)     max: 14089 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M620
15307 Points (9%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
3DMark 06
min: 19573     avg: 20223     median: 20518 (27%)     max: 20578 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
24751 Points (32%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 15.6     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (5%)     max: 17.4 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
36.5 fps (12%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
48.5 fps (9%)
56.6 fps (11%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
34.7 fps (21%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
37.9 fps (23%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
40.3 fps (23%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
40.4 fps (23%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
39.7 fps (30%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
50.1 fps (38%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
12.2 fps (14%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
20.2 fps (24%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
51.3 fps (39%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
55.4 fps (42%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
42.8 fps (46%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
54.8 fps (59%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
40.5 fps (19%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
32.6 fps (16%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
45.6 fps (24%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
51.5 fps (27%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 55.3     avg: 57.6     median: 56.3 (14%)     max: 62.5 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 25.96     avg: 27.5     median: 27.8 (4%)     max: 28.2 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 15.8     avg: 18.8     median: 20.2 (4%)     max: 20.3 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 10.34     avg: 11     median: 10.9 (3%)     max: 11.6 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 22.94     avg: 24.9     median: 25.2 (7%)     max: 26.5 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 0.22     avg: 0.5     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.67 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 33.8     avg: 34.5     median: 34.4 (14%)     max: 35.26 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 29.42     avg: 31.7     median: 32.1 (5%)     max: 33.32 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
min: 17.3     avg: 24.9     median: 24.9 (4%)     max: 32.47 fps
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
59.6 fps (16%)
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
46.8 fps (5%)
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
16.2 fps (4%)
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
5.2 fps (1%)
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
39.7 fps (5%)
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
0.6 fps (0%)
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
35.6 fps (5%)
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
40.7 fps (5%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
16.6 fps (3%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
7.6 Points (96%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
7.6 Points (96%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6804 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M620
6851 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
70.9 fps (25%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M620
72.4 fps (25%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M620
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 82.7     avg: 95.3     median: 95.3 (6%)     max: 107.8 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M620
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
65.2 fps (7%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
97.8 fps (2%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
133.5 fps (8%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
232.3 fps (2%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
101 Samples/s (0%)
min: 482     avg: 658     median: 658 (3%)     max: 834 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
221 Samples/s (0%)
min: 718     avg: 1079     median: 1079 (2%)     max: 1440 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
2530 Points (3%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
45.2 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
48.8 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
58.8 Watt (13%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.2 fps per Watt (17%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.2 fps per Watt (17%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro K4000M → 100% n=23

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M620 → 155% n=23

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
Quadro M620:
127.1  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
44.9  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
31.9  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M620:
15.7  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M620:
70.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
18.7  fps
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
Quadro M620:
59.2 60.4 ~ 60 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M620:
25.2 46.3 ~ 36 fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
18.7 25.2 ~ 22 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
13.9 19.5 ~ 17 fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M620:
55.1 62.2 ~ 59 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M620:
31.1 36.6 ~ 34 fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
17.8 20.4 ~ 19 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
14.4  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M620:
4.9  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M620:
110.6  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M620:
64.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
28.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
24.4  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M620:
53.9  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M620:
32.8  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
18.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
10  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M620:
249  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M620:
118.5  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
62  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
28.2  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M620:
190.5  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M620:
139.6  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M620:
114.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
17.8  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M620:
51.7  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M620:
44.4  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M620:
27.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
11.7  fps
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
Quadro M620:
192.8  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M620:
147.4  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M620:
126  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
39.1  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M620:
176.4  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M620:
105.6  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M620:
92.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
35.6  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro K4000M:
337  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro K4000M:
129  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro K4000M:
98  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro K4000M:
57  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro K4000M:
102  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro K4000M:
73  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro K4000M:
62  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro K4000M:
36  fps
Torchlight 2

Torchlight 2

2012
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro K4000M:
98  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro K4000M:
93  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro K4000M:
86  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro K4000M:
89  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro K4000M:
81  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro K4000M:
78  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro K4000M:
34  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro K4000M:
247  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro K4000M:
183  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro K4000M:
158  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro K4000M:
83  fps
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro K4000M:
181  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro K4000M:
90  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro K4000M:
54  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro K4000M:
29  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro K4000M:
98  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro K4000M:
72  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro K4000M:
51  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro K4000M:
24  fps
Total War: Shogun 2

Total War: Shogun 2

2011
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro K4000M:
228  fps
med. 1280x720
100%
Quadro K4000M:
71  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro K4000M:
24  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro K4000M:
248  fps
med. 1360x768
100%
Quadro K4000M:
115  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro K4000M:
69  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro K4000M:
48  fps
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro K4000M:
247  fps
ultra 1280x1024
100%
Quadro K4000M:
92  fps
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

2005
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro K4000M:
233  fps
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
100%
Quadro K4000M:
102  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro K4000M:
105  fps
high 1280x1024
100%
Quadro K4000M:
98  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro K4000M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

NVIDIA Quadro M620lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Rocket League127.144.931.915.7
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III70.318.7
Doom60362217
Rise of the Tomb Raider59341914.44.9
Star Wars Battlefront110.664.328.9224.37
The Witcher 353.932.8318.6210
Dirt Rally249118.56228.2
Total War: Rome II190.5139.6114.417.8
Company of Heroes 251.744.427.111.7
GRID 2192.8147.412639.1
BioShock Infinite176.4105.692.335.6
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

3
3
5
1
5
3
2
5
1
3
1
7
2




2


NVIDIA Quadro K4000Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dead Space 33371299857
World of Tanks v8102736236
Torchlight 2989386
Dirt Showdown89817834
Diablo III24718315883
Anno 2070181905429
Battlefield 398725124
Total War: Shogun 22287124
StarCraft 22481156948
Anno 140424792
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark233
World of Warcraft10210598
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


5
6


8
2

2
5
2
3
4
3






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 03. 14:25:51

#0 checking url part for id 3241 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7708 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 03 Jun 2024 11:30:31 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.081s ... 0.082s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.082s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.082s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3241 +0.042s ... 0.124s

#8 got single benchmarks 3241 +0.01s ... 0.134s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7708 +0.018s ... 0.152s

#10 got single benchmarks 7708 +0.016s ... 0.168s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.168s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.346s ... 0.515s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.515s

#14 Got 90 rows for game benchmarks. +0.01s ... 0.524s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.524s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.015s ... 0.54s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.051s ... 0.591s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.591s

#19 return log +0.036s ... 0.627s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)