ARM Mali-G72 MP3 vs Qualcomm Adreno 642 vs ARM Mali-G71 MP8
ARM Mali-G72 MP3 ► remove from comparison
The ARM Mali-G72 MP3 is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced early 2018 in the MediaTek Helio P60 and uses 3 clusters (hence the MP3 name).
The G72 is based on the second generation of the Bifrost architecture and offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency and a bigger tile buffer for 16x anti-aliasing.
The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 FL11_1 and Renderscript.
Qualcomm Adreno 642 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 642 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G SoC . The chip will be available from mid 2021 and will be used mainly in upper mid-range Android devices.
According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 642 GPU offers a 50% improved performance over the Adreno 620, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 768G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR4X-4200 memory support of the SoC.
The Adreno 642 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.
The Snapdragon 780G is manufactured in the modern 5nm LPPE process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.
ARM Mali-G71 MP8 ► remove from comparison
The ARM Mali-G71 MP8 is an integrated high-end graphics adapter for ARM SoCs, which was used in combination with the smartphone and tablet chip HiSilicon Kirin 960 in November 2016 for the first time. Based on initial benchmarks, the GPU performance is slightly better compared to the Adreno 530 in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 . It is therefore one of the most powerful graphics units for (Android) devices in the end of 2016.
ARM Mali-G72 MP3 Qualcomm Adreno 642 ARM Mali-G71 MP8 Mali-G Series Architecture Bifrost Bifrost Pipelines 3 - unified 8 - unified Core Speed 850 MHz 900 (Boost) MHz Shared Memory no yes no API OpenGL ES 3.2 OpenGL ES 3.2 OpenGL ES 3.2 technology 16 nm 5 nm 16 nm Date of Announcement 18.10.2017 07.05.2021 03.06.2016 Link to Manufacturer Page developer.arm.com www.arm.com Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 Codename Mimir
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 15971 avg: 21202 median: 20999.5 (2%) max: 25625 Points
min: 32243 avg: 35201 median: 35210 (4%) max: 38979 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 1309 avg: 1756 median: 1761.5 (8%) max: 2074 Points
5587 Points (24%)
min: 1900 avg: 2396 median: 2399 (10%) max: 2894 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1159 avg: 1635 median: 1605.5 (4%) max: 2021 Points
8380 Points (18%)
min: 1848 avg: 2494 median: 2463.5 (5%) max: 3241 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 853 avg: 1293 median: 1272 (6%) max: 1659 Points
4478 Points (22%)
min: 1600 avg: 1994 median: 2011 (10%) max: 2368 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 721 avg: 1146 median: 1104 (3%) max: 1533 Points
6148 Points (18%)
min: 1511 avg: 1957 median: 1967.5 (6%) max: 2380 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 635 avg: 668 median: 652.5 (0%) max: 713 Points
3212 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 183 avg: 186.4 median: 185 (0%) max: 192 Points
786 Points (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
1.2 fps (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 2.1 avg: 3.1 median: 2.9 (1%) max: 4.9 fps
18 fps (3%)
min: 4.7 avg: 5.9 median: 5.9 (1%) max: 7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 6.1 avg: 8.4 median: 8.3 (1%) max: 10 fps
50 fps (4%)
min: 11 avg: 11.5 median: 11.5 (1%) max: 12 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 5.8 avg: 8.2 median: 7.7 (1%) max: 11 fps
40 fps (5%)
min: 15 avg: 15.7 median: 15 (2%) max: 18 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 6.9 avg: 13.1 median: 13 (0%) max: 18 fps
65 fps (1%)
min: 18 avg: 23.3 median: 23 (0%) max: 28 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 16 avg: 21 median: 20 (1%) max: 31 fps
90 fps (5%)
min: 19 avg: 33.3 median: 32 (2%) max: 44 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G72 MP3 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 28 avg: 37.8 median: 38 (0%) max: 48 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642
153 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G71 MP8
min: 43 avg: 71.9 median: 73.5 (1%) max: 96 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 25971 avg: 36762 median: 36761.5 (5%) max: 47552 Points
162946 Points (20%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 31104 avg: 34536 median: 34536 (78%) max: 37968 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 42176 avg: 42979 median: 42979 (96%) max: 43782 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
14.9 fps (0%)
48 fps (0%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 5364 avg: 8946 median: 7445.5 (7%) max: 22800 Points
min: 10073 avg: 10164 median: 10164 (10%) max: 10255 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1538 avg: 4645 median: 2242.5 (4%) max: 21615 Points
min: 1909 avg: 1915 median: 1915 (3%) max: 1921 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 3.48 avg: 3.7 median: 3.7 (1%) max: 4 Watt
Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G72 MP3 → 100% n=10 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 484% n=10 Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G71 MP8 → 169% n=10
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
100%
Mali-G72 MP3:
43 53 57 ~ 51 fps
109%
Mali-G71 MP8:
58 60 ~ 59 fps
102%
Mali-G71 MP8:
58 60 ~ 59 fps
79%
Mali-G71 MP8:
30 58 ~ 44 fps
84%
Mali-G71 MP8:
30 58 60 ~ 49 fps
Mali-G71 MP8:
58 60 ~ 59 fps
Mali-G71 MP8:
58 60 60 ~ 59 fps
Mali-G71 MP8:
30 [X] Honor 8 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 960 2.4GHz
Mali-G71 MP8
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
45 [X] Honor 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960 2.4GHz
Mali-G71 MP8
56 60 ~ 48 fps
Mali-G71 MP8:
29 [X] Honor 8 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 960 2.4GHz
Mali-G71 MP8
min:
28 fps, max:
30 fps
29 [X] Honor 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960 2.4GHz
Mali-G71 MP8
30 30 ~ 30 fps
Mali-G71 MP8:
29 [X] Honor 8 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 960 2.4GHz
Mali-G71 MP8
min:
27 fps, max:
30 fps
29 [X] Honor 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960 2.4GHz
Mali-G71 MP8
30 30 ~ 30 fps
Average Gaming ARM Mali-G72 MP3 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 180% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 204%
Average Gaming ARM Mali-G71 MP8 → 94% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 94%
ARM Mali-G72 MP3 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Armajet 51 PUBG Mobile 38 28 29 World of Tanks Blitz 60 41 Arena of Valor 54 58 Shadow Fight 3 56 58 Asphalt 9: Legends 28 26 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 3 1 1 2 3 1
Qualcomm Adreno 642 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Armajet 30 PUBG Mobile 60 59 60 40 Asphalt 9: Legends 60 60 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 2 1 1 2 1
ARM Mali-G71 MP8 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Arena of Valor 59 59 Shadow Fight 3 44 49 Battle Bay 59 59 Dead Trigger 2 48 Asphalt 8: Airborne 30 30 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 4 4 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 07. 06:11:01
#0 checking url part for id 8804 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 10693 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 7648 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 May 2024 05:40:33 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.193s ... 0.195s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.195s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.195s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8804 +0.062s ... 0.257s
#9 got single benchmarks 8804 +0.143s ... 0.4s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10693 +0.002s ... 0.402s
#11 got single benchmarks 10693 +0.008s ... 0.41s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 7648 +0.002s ... 0.412s
#13 got single benchmarks 7648 +0.023s ... 0.435s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.435s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.191s ... 0.626s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.626s
#17 Got 106 rows for game benchmarks. +0.05s ... 0.675s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.676s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.005s ... 0.681s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.024s ... 0.705s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.705s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.707s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)