Notebookcheck

Motorola One Vision Review: Cinema smartphone with a strong camera

Stefan Schomberg, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, T. Hinum (translated by Mark Riege), 06/21/2019

Mobile cinema screen. The Motorola One Vision follows on from last year's Moto One and aims to set new standards with an updated display and improved camera. What was good, stays - at least that is what the manufacturer indicates, keeping the "Android One" name. Is this a good mixture?

Moto One Vision
Moto One Vision

While the Motorola One predecessor offered a solid performance in our test, it was not a real price-performance winner. Now, the Motorola One Vision successor wants to do better. The manufacturer took particular care with the display and the camera, but the performance and storage size were also improved. Previous virtues like the modest but sufficiently attractive design and Android One with its promise of updates were kept, just as the price was. So this should lead to a really good smartphone, shouldn't it?

Motorola One Vision (One Series)
Graphics adapter
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
6.3 inch 21:9, 2520 x 1080 pixel 435 PPI, capacitive, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass, glossy: yes
Storage
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 110 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: microSD up to 2 TB (hybrid slot), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, USB-C
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G: GSM net 2/3/5/8 3G: WCDMA bands 1/2/5/8 4G: LTE net 1/3/5/7/8/20/38/40/41, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.7 x 160.1 x 71.2 ( = 0.34 x 6.3 x 2.8 in)
Battery
3500 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix dual: 48MP (f/1.7, 1/2", 0.8µm) + 5MP (f/2.2)
Secondary Camera: 25 MPix f/2.0, 0.9µm
Additional features
Speakers: mono, at the bottom edge, Keyboard: virtual, Keyboard Light: yes, headset, bumper case, charger, USB-C cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, SAR head: 0.337 W/kg; SAR body: 1.447 W/kg, fanless
Weight
181 g ( = 6.38 oz / 0.4 pounds), Power Supply: 28 g ( = 0.99 oz / 0.06 pounds)
Price
299 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Especially English native speakers welcome!

Currently wanted: 
News and Editorial Editor - Details here

Case - Simple and elegant

At first glance, there are visually only a few differences between the new Motorola One Vision and last year's model. Both models bet on modest visuals without frills, but what stands out most is the size difference. While the predecessor still had a 5.9-inch display in the 19:9 format, Motorola uses a 6.3-inch display with a 21:9 format in the new model. This makes the One Vision, which measures 160.1 x 71.2 x 8.7 mm (~6.3 x 2.8 x 0.34 in), significantly longer but also even slimmer than the predecessor.

The screen is not blemished by a wide notch at the top edge anymore. Instead, Motorola uses a punch hole in the top left corner of the One Vision, allowing the front camera to peek through. Although the round notch could have been slightly smaller, it does not interfere in everyday operation. Together with the bezels that are small for a mid-range smartphone, the Motorola One Vision looks fresh and modern.

Looking closer, there is a rounder design language compared to the predecessor. The Gorilla Glass 4 on the back is much more rounded towards the edges, which in combination with the smaller form factor makes it feel better in the hands. Our blue test unit scores with a neat depth effect and different blue color tones depending on the light angle. To protect against the typical slipperiness of glass smartphones and also against fingerprints, as always, Motorola includes a simple, clear plastic bumper case. 

The main camera on the back no longer consists of two lenses, sticking out separately from the body; now there is a single dual combination. The fingerprint sensor on the back, which holds the Motorola "bat-wing" logo, was kept. The workmanship is excellent and the mid-range model gives a high-quality impression overall. An IP-52 certification means the device is protected against water splashes.

Moto One Vision
Moto One Vision
Moto One Vision
Moto One Vision

Size Comparison

160.1 mm / 6.3 inch 71.2 mm / 2.8 inch 8.7 mm / 0.3425 inch 181 g0.399 lbs159.5 mm / 6.28 inch 75 mm / 2.95 inch 8.1 mm / 0.3189 inch 184 g0.4057 lbs158.5 mm / 6.24 inch 74.7 mm / 2.94 inch 7.7 mm / 0.3031 inch 166 g0.366 lbs157.6 mm / 6.2 inch 74.6 mm / 2.94 inch 7.9 mm / 0.311 inch 183 g0.4034 lbs152.9 mm / 6.02 inch 72.7 mm / 2.86 inch 7.4 mm / 0.2913 inch 159 g0.3505 lbs149.5 mm / 5.89 inch 72.2 mm / 2.84 inch 7.97 mm / 0.3138 inch 160 g0.3527 lbs

Equipment - A lot of storage and a hybrid slot

While the working memory has remained the same at 4 GB compared to the predecessor, we see some improvements in terms of the processor and internal storage. Surprisingly, Motorola does not use the Snapdragon chip from Qualcomm anymore but uses a Samsung chipset. The Exynos 9609 that is used has a clock speed of up to 2.2 GHz and offers clearly more performance than its predecessor. In order to be able to make use of that in current games, the manufacturer has now integrated 128 GB of internal storage, instead of 64 GB. This continues to be expandable, but since the microSD card slot is now a hybrid slot, you cannot use a second SIM card at the same time anymore.

Software - Android One with the promise of updates

For years, Motorola has been using almost unmodified Android – and the performance of its smartphones, although not always the frequency of the manufacturer updates, has benefited from that. Since the new One Vision uses Android 9 One, Google dictates two years of version updates and three years of current security patches, which is very nice. In addition to the typical Vanilla Android apps, as usual, the new model also offers its helpful small extensions that are called Moto Actions. These allow you for example to activate the flashlight function with a double hacking movement. There is no bloatware. The level of the security patches on our test unit is May 2019.

Moto One Vision home screen
Moto One Vision home screen
Task switcher
Task switcher
Software
Software

Communication and GPS - A significant jump in the connection speeds of the One Vision

In contrast to its predecessor, the Motorola One Vision also supports WLAN networks according to the ac standard in the 5-GHz band. Overall, the new model has improved significantly in terms of the WLAN speeds. It is much faster than the old One model, and now its communication speed is at eye level with those of the top models of its price range in the test with our Linksys EA8500 reference router.

The reception strength in the mobile net turned out very stable in our test. However, interested buyers cannot look forward to many LTE frequencies supported by the One Vision – at least not, if you travel around the world. But here (in Germany) or in the rest of Europe, there should not be any problems.

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 128 GB eMMC Flash
335 (min: 267, max: 343) MBit/s ∼100% +6%
Motorola One Vision
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9609, 128 GB eMMC Flash
315 (min: 296, max: 330) MBit/s ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
294 (min: 278, max: 302) MBit/s ∼88% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=434)
226 MBit/s ∼67% -28%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
188 (min: 45, max: 237) MBit/s ∼56% -40%
Motorola One
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
103 (min: 36, max: 118) MBit/s ∼31% -67%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 128 GB eMMC Flash
308 (min: 302, max: 312) MBit/s ∼100% +8%
Motorola One Vision
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9609, 128 GB eMMC Flash
285 (min: 216, max: 312) MBit/s ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
272 (min: 250, max: 285) MBit/s ∼88% -5%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
218 (min: 95, max: 239) MBit/s ∼71% -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=434)
216 MBit/s ∼70% -24%
Motorola One
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
112 (min: 57, max: 117) MBit/s ∼36% -61%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350Tooltip
Motorola One Vision Samsung Exynos 9609, ARM Mali-G72 MP3; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø315 (296-330)
Motorola One Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø103 (36-118)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, ARM Mali-G51 MP4; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø188 (45-237)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, ARM Mali-G72 MP3; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø293 (278-302)
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, ARM Mali-G72 MP3; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø330 (267-343)
Motorola One Vision Samsung Exynos 9609, ARM Mali-G72 MP3; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø285 (216-312)
Motorola One Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø110 (57-117)
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, ARM Mali-G51 MP4; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø218 (95-239)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, ARM Mali-G72 MP3; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø272 (250-285)
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, ARM Mali-G72 MP3; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø308 (302-312)
Locating outdoors
Locating outdoors
Locating indoors
Locating indoors

You should not expect any wonders in terms of the reception of GPS signals (A-GPS, Glonass, and Galileo), where the device ranges in the midfield. Outdoors, it behaves rather sluggishly before it finally finds a stable signal, but indoors the locating process fails.  

In the comparison with our Garmin Edge 500 professional navigation device, the Motorola One Vision does very well. In some parts, you can even see on which side of the road we went in our test route. During everyday use, there should not be any complaints in terms of Google maps and other similar usage.

Moto One Vision - overview
Moto One Vision - overview
Moto One Vision - lake
Moto One Vision - lake
Moto One Vision - urban roads
Moto One Vision - urban roads
Garmin Edge 500 - overview
Garmin Edge 500 - overview
Garmin Edge 500 - lake
Garmin Edge 500 - lake
Garmin Edge 500 - urban roads
Garmin Edge 500 - urban roads

Telephone Functions and Voice Quality - No compromises anymore

As always with Motorola, Google's standard Telephone app, which leaves no questions unanswered, is also used in the new One Vision. During the conversation, the new model presents itself better than its predecessor. The voice of our conversation partner sounds less booming but is instead sufficiently clear and understandable. The volume is also relatively high. The same goes for the mono speaker, which produces more bass compared to the predecessor, without losing clarity and without distortions.

Cameras - Almost reference grade in the 300-Euro range

Moto One Vision front camera
Moto One Vision front camera

One of the highlights of the Motorola One Vision is the main camera. Not only does it offer an ample 48 megapixels with an aperture of f/1.7 and a quad pixel size of 1.6 µm, but it also offers an optical image stabilizer (OIS). With this, you should succeed in taking good images not only in daylight but also when there is little light. In reality this works quite well, considering the price of barely 300 Euros (~$339; about $360 in the US). At first glance, the image quality appears close to the top of the crop, such as the Samsung Galaxy S10+ or Huawei P30 Pro. Only a closer look reveals that some of the image sharpness or richness in detail is lacking. 

During daylight, we really like the general sharpness, the balanced colors, and particularly the image dynamic. Thanks to Auto HDR, there are hardly any image areas that are drowned or burnt out. The results are 12-megapixel images (with four pixels being combined into a Super Pixel) that also make good prints, as long as you don't go overboard on the printing size. For night pictures, the Motorola One Vision is also convincing, however, you should select the night mode manually, since in the automatic mode, the image dynamic can produce overexposed image areas. Overall, we also noticed the auto-focus appearing a bit clueless at times – the user should therefore always check whether the focus is really adjusted correctly.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images

The front camera also offers a high pixel count: Here it is 25 megapixels with an f/1.8 aperture and also the quad-pixel technology. The result convinces. For a front camera, the pictures are surprisingly sharp and the image dynamic is decent. Videos also look good with both cameras, but 4K at 30 FPS is the limit. Due to the OIS, video-recordings also succeed when holding the smartphone in your unsupported hand. Thanks to the second main lens with 5 megapixels that is solely used to collect depth information, portraits with artificial bokeh also look fairly decent. As always, there are also some nice software gimmicks such as enhancing a particular color and Google Lens.

The test charts from the lab show the sufficient sharpness of the camera, but there is also some noticeable image noise in the details. Colors are recorded too bright overall.

Picture taken of the test chart
Picture taken of the test chart
Test chart detail
Test chart detail
ColorChecker: The target color is displayed in the bottom half of each field.
ColorChecker: The target color is displayed in the bottom half of each field.

Accessories and Warranty - Now also with a headset

In addition to the 18-watt charger and a USB cable, the box also includes a silicone case for the smartphone. A SIM tool to open the tray and earphones are also included.

The manufacturer offers 24 months of warranty for the smartphone. Google will update the software with security patches for three years and with operating system updates for two years.

Input Devices and Operation - Motorola One Vision with a good touchscreen

The touchscreen has very good sliding characteristics and is very responsive, including into the corners and edges. The preinstalled Gboard keyboard can be replaced without any trouble. The Moto app offers four expanded control options. For example, you can activate the flashlight by a hacking movement, and open up the camera app by rotating the phone twice. In addition, you can setup a single-key control and take screenshots with three fingers. 

The fingerprint sensor on the back unlocked our test unit reliably, but there was always a slight delay until the display content appeared.  Alternatively, you can use the front camera to unlock the smartphone via face recognition. However, as in most smartphones, this is not particularly secure or reliable. But this might not really make any difference in everyday operation, where the Motorola One Vision behaves inconspicuously and always delivers sufficient performance for smooth operation.

Keyboard - portrait
Keyboard - portrait
Keyboard - landscape
Keyboard - landscape

Display - Cinema screen format

Subpixel grid
Subpixel grid

The screen of the Motorola One Vision offers a resolution of 2530x1080 pixels in a diagonal of 6.3 inches, while the predecessor only offered HD. In addition, the screen of the One Vision is stretched out due to the 21:9 cinematic display format, which also offers advantages when surfing the Internet in portrait format. On the other hand, in landscape format this leads to annoying black bars on both sides in most YouTube videos that have the 16:9 format.

Overall, the display did very well in the test. The brightness was measured at 626 cd/m² and the reproduction of colors and grayscales turned out comfortably accurate. On the other hand, the brightness distribution was less than optimal and turned out rather mediocre at only 84%. In addition, the display did not appear as bright in everyday operation as in our measurements. This might also be due to the fact that the high brightness is only available in the center of the screen and the rest is in parts significantly darker. While this is less than optimal, it should be fine to a large extent in everyday operation. 

563
cd/m²
583
cd/m²
529
cd/m²
545
cd/m²
626
cd/m²
534
cd/m²
551
cd/m²
618
cd/m²
528
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 626 cd/m² Average: 564.1 cd/m² Minimum: 5.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 626 cd/m²
Contrast: 1527:1 (Black: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.7 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 7.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.13
Motorola One Vision
IPS, 2520x1080, 6.3
Motorola One
IPS, 1520x720, 5.9
Huawei P30 Lite
IPS LCD, 2312x1080, 6.15
Samsung Galaxy A50
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4
Wiko View 3 Pro
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3
Oppo R17 Pro
AMOLED on-cell, 2340x1080, 6.4
Screen
2%
10%
26%
-0%
Brightness middle
626
467
-25%
451
-28%
644
3%
459
-27%
Brightness
564
452
-20%
430
-24%
628
11%
450
-20%
Brightness Distribution
84
87
4%
90
7%
91
8%
90
7%
Black Level *
0.41
0.38
7%
0.55
-34%
0.39
5%
Contrast
1527
1229
-20%
820
-46%
1177
-23%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.7
5.29
7%
1.4
75%
2.64
54%
4.8
16%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.5
7.71
27%
4.4
58%
9.23
12%
9.2
12%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.8
5
36%
2.5
68%
2.5
68%
5.5
29%
Gamma
2.13 103%
2.376 93%
2.22 99%
2.024 109%
2.26 97%
CCT
8662 75%
7583 86%
6422 101%
6649 98%
7494 87%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9361 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Positive: We did not find any flickering when dimming the brightness, so the Motorola One Vision can also be recommended for those who are disturbed by flickering displays.

When using CalMAN software in the lab test we found an LCD-typical blue tint of the display. Otherwise, no negative points stood out.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.2 ms rise
↘ 13.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms rise
↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.7 ms).

Outdoors, the display can be read a little easier than that of the predecessor, but it is still not perfect. This is due to the brightness that is still slightly too low overall. On the other hand, the general viewing-angle stability is very good.

CalMAN Color Space
CalMAN Color Space
CalMAN Grayscales
CalMAN Grayscales
CalMAN Color Accuracy
CalMAN Color Accuracy
CalMAN Saturation
CalMAN Saturation


Performance - Ready for anything

We already mentioned Motorola's unusual choice for the processor of the One Vision: Instead of using a Qualcomm chip as usual, the manufacturer has turned to the Samsung Exynos 9609. Its eight cores have a clock speed of up to 2.2 GHz, which is 100 MHz less than the older Exynos 9610. The CPU and the Mali-G72-MP3 GPU ensure a decent mid-range performance, with which the One Vision does not need to hide behind the competition, depending on the benchmark. At least, the jump from the Motorola One is enormous.

Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4866 Points ∼73%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
3592 Points ∼54% -26%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3551 Points ∼53% -27%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4913 Points ∼74% +1%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
5309 Points ∼80% +9%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
6668 Points ∼100% +37%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (4860 - 4866, n=2)
4863 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=320)
4684 Points ∼70% -4%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5273 Points ∼89%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
4374 Points ∼74% -17%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5429 Points ∼92% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5605 Points ∼95% +6%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
5743 Points ∼97% +9%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
5917 Points ∼100% +12%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (5273 - 5375, n=2)
5324 Points ∼90% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 11598, n=379)
4700 Points ∼79% -11%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1601 Points ∼87%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
878 Points ∼48% -45%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1544 Points ∼84% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1721 Points ∼94% +7%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1487 Points ∼81% -7%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
1833 Points ∼100% +14%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (1601 - 1605, n=2)
1603 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=379)
1419 Points ∼77% -11%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
6812 Points ∼91%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
4936 Points ∼66% -28%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6483 Points ∼87% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5827 Points ∼78% -14%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7486 Points ∼100% +10%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
6453 Points ∼86% -5%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (6578 - 6812, n=2)
6695 Points ∼89% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11440, n=371)
5249 Points ∼70% -23%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8902 Points ∼83%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
5927 Points ∼55% -33%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
8125 Points ∼76% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
7029 Points ∼65% -21%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
10757 Points ∼100% +21%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
7041 Points ∼65% -21%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (8188 - 8902, n=2)
8545 Points ∼79% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 14439, n=542)
5678 Points ∼53% -36%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2103 Points ∼78%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2518 Points ∼93% +20%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
2129 Points ∼79% +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (2103 - 2243, n=2)
2173 Points ∼81% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=57)
2697 Points ∼100% +28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1249 Points ∼45%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
997 Points ∼36% -20%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
1579 Points ∼57% +26%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (1245 - 1249, n=2)
1247 Points ∼45% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=57)
2792 Points ∼100% +124%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1373 Points ∼54%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1152 Points ∼45% -16%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
1675 Points ∼66% +22%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (1373 - 1388, n=2)
1381 Points ∼54% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=57)
2534 Points ∼100% +85%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2045 Points ∼70%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
2027 Points ∼69% -1%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2550 Points ∼87% +25%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2266 Points ∼78% +11%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2918 Points ∼100% +43%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
1840 Points ∼63% -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (2045 - 2296, n=2)
2171 Points ∼74% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4635, n=379)
1957 Points ∼67% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1210 Points ∼65%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
441 Points ∼24% -64%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
843 Points ∼45% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1188 Points ∼63% -2%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
993 Points ∼53% -18%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
1875 Points ∼100% +55%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (1210 - 1241, n=2)
1226 Points ∼65% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=379)
1761 Points ∼94% +46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1331 Points ∼71%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
534 Points ∼29% -60%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
981 Points ∼53% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1328 Points ∼71% 0%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1164 Points ∼62% -13%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
1867 Points ∼100% +40%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (1331 - 1357, n=2)
1344 Points ∼72% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6875, n=380)
1634 Points ∼88% +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1979 Points ∼68%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
2003 Points ∼69% +1%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2578 Points ∼88% +30%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2241 Points ∼77% +13%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2924 Points ∼100% +48%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
1862 Points ∼64% -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (1979 - 2145, n=2)
2062 Points ∼71% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=408)
1866 Points ∼64% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1712 Points ∼60%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
762 Points ∼27% -55%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1336 Points ∼47% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1553 Points ∼55% -9%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1605 Points ∼56% -6%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
2841 Points ∼100% +66%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (1712 - 1734, n=2)
1723 Points ∼61% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=408)
2340 Points ∼82% +37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1765 Points ∼69%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
884 Points ∼35% -50%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1494 Points ∼59% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1667 Points ∼66% -6%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1784 Points ∼70% +1%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
2544 Points ∼100% +44%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (1765 - 1814, n=2)
1790 Points ∼70% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=408)
1966 Points ∼77% +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2504 Points ∼99%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
2067 Points ∼82% -17%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2489 Points ∼98% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2351 Points ∼93% -6%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2528 Points ∼100% +1%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
2445 Points ∼97% -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (2368 - 2504, n=2)
2436 Points ∼96% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4492, n=459)
1864 Points ∼74% -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1200 Points ∼70%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
397 Points ∼23% -67%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
819 Points ∼48% -32%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1149 Points ∼67% -4%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
986 Points ∼58% -18%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
1709 Points ∼100% +42%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (1200 - 1200, n=2)
1200 Points ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=459)
1452 Points ∼85% +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1357 Points ∼74%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
484 Points ∼26% -64%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
963 Points ∼53% -29%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1296 Points ∼71% -4%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1141 Points ∼62% -16%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
1832 Points ∼100% +35%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (1348 - 1357, n=2)
1353 Points ∼74% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=460)
1398 Points ∼76% +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2282 Points ∼84%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
2091 Points ∼77% -8%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2490 Points ∼92% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2432 Points ∼89% +7%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2720 Points ∼100% +19%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
2400 Points ∼88% +5%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (2282 - 2421, n=2)
2352 Points ∼86% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4454, n=500)
1727 Points ∼63% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1730 Points ∼63%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
751 Points ∼28% -57%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1256 Points ∼46% -27%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1279 Points ∼47% -26%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1593 Points ∼58% -8%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
2725 Points ∼100% +58%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (1725 - 1730, n=2)
1728 Points ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=499)
1891 Points ∼69% +9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1828 Points ∼69%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
876 Points ∼33% -52%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1414 Points ∼53% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1430 Points ∼54% -22%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1755 Points ∼66% -4%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
2645 Points ∼100% +45%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (1828 - 1830, n=2)
1829 Points ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8136, n=502)
1636 Points ∼62% -11%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
22441 Points ∼93%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
15762 Points ∼65% -30%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12023 Points ∼50% -46%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14353 Points ∼59% -36%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
24165 Points ∼100% +8%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
13760 Points ∼57% -39%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (22441 - 22995, n=2)
22718 Points ∼94% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=661)
14062 Points ∼58% -37%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
24388 Points ∼66%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
13382 Points ∼36% -45%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21643 Points ∼58% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16593 Points ∼45% -32%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
21847 Points ∼59% -10%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
37157 Points ∼100% +52%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (23539 - 24388, n=2)
23964 Points ∼64% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=659)
21674 Points ∼58% -11%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23927 Points ∼89%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
13847 Points ∼51% -42%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
18377 Points ∼68% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16037 Points ∼59% -33%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
22323 Points ∼83% -7%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
26967 Points ∼100% +13%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (23415 - 23927, n=2)
23671 Points ∼88% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=659)
17596 Points ∼65% -26%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
40 fps ∼62%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
23 fps ∼35% -42%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
33 fps ∼51% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
39 fps ∼60% -2%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
38 fps ∼58% -5%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
65 fps ∼100% +63%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (40 - 40, n=2)
40 fps ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=682)
37.5 fps ∼58% -6%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
36 fps ∼67%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
35 fps ∼65% -3%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
31 fps ∼57% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
36 fps ∼67% 0%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
34 fps ∼63% -6%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
54 fps ∼100% +50%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (35 - 36, n=2)
35.5 fps ∼66% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=691)
27.8 fps ∼51% -23%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
24 fps ∼73%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
9.9 fps ∼30% -59%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
17 fps ∼52% -29%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23 fps ∼70% -4%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
20 fps ∼61% -17%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
33 fps ∼100% +38%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (24 - 24, n=2)
24 fps ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=588)
21.6 fps ∼65% -10%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
21 fps ∼78%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
19 fps ∼70% -10%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
16 fps ∼59% -24%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
21 fps ∼78% 0%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
19 fps ∼70% -10%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
27 fps ∼100% +29%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (21 - 21, n=2)
21 fps ∼78% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=597)
19.2 fps ∼71% -9%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼61%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
14 fps ∼61% 0%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12 fps ∼52% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼61% 0%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
12 fps ∼52% -14%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
23 fps ∼100% +64%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (14 - 14, n=2)
14 fps ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=454)
17.7 fps ∼77% +26%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
13 fps ∼68%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
6.5 fps ∼34% -50%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
11 fps ∼58% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
13 fps ∼68% 0%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
11 fps ∼58% -15%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
19 fps ∼100% +46%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (13 - 13, n=2)
13 fps ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=456)
16.6 fps ∼87% +28%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5 fps ∼49%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
4 fps ∼39% -20%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4.2 fps ∼41% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4.9 fps ∼48% -2%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
4.3 fps ∼42% -14%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
6.9 fps ∼68% +38%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (3.2 - 5, n=2)
4.1 fps ∼40% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=172)
10.2 fps ∼100% +104%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.2 fps ∼45%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
1.2 fps ∼17% -62%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2.6 fps ∼37% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.1 fps ∼44% -3%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2.7 fps ∼38% -16%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
4.9 fps ∼70% +53%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (3.2 - 4.9, n=2)
4.05 fps ∼57% +27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=171)
7.05 fps ∼100% +120%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.1 fps ∼54%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
6.5 fps ∼44% -20%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.4 fps ∼43% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.2 fps ∼55% +1%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7 fps ∼47% -14%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
11 fps ∼74% +36%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (8.1 - 8.1, n=2)
8.1 fps ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=176)
14.9 fps ∼100% +84%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9.3 fps ∼56%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
3.6 fps ∼22% -61%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7 fps ∼42% -25%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9 fps ∼54% -3%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7.5 fps ∼45% -19%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
13 fps ∼78% +40%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (9.3 - 9.3, n=2)
9.3 fps ∼56% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=176)
16.6 fps ∼100% +78%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9.3 fps ∼72%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
3.6 fps ∼28% -61%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.9 fps ∼53% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.9 fps ∼68% -4%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7.4 fps ∼57% -20%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
13 fps ∼100% +40%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (9.3 - 9.3, n=2)
9.3 fps ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=379)
12.1 fps ∼93% +30%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
7.8 fps ∼71%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
7.3 fps ∼66% -6%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.5 fps ∼59% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.1 fps ∼74% +4%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
6.8 fps ∼62% -13%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
11 fps ∼100% +41%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (7.8 - 7.8, n=2)
7.8 fps ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=383)
10.8 fps ∼98% +38%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
0 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14.51 fps ∼85%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.24 - 37.4, n=59)
17 fps ∼100%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
0 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
11.59 fps ∼82%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 37.3, n=53)
14.2 fps ∼100%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
0 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
13.03 fps ∼74%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 39.7, n=50)
17.5 fps ∼100%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
139138 Points ∼90%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
65759 Points ∼42% -53%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
132834 Points ∼86% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
144194 Points ∼93% +4%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
138589 Points ∼89% 0%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
155113 Points ∼100% +11%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (139138 - 149757, n=2)
144448 Points ∼93% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17073 - 462516, n=290)
141701 Points ∼91% +2%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1168 Points ∼100%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
860 Points ∼74% -26%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1024 Points ∼88% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
927 Points ∼79% -21%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1146 Points ∼98% -2%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
1135 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (1119 - 1168, n=2)
1144 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=626)
754 Points ∼65% -35%
Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1942 Points ∼67%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
1019 Points ∼35% -48%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1478 Points ∼51% -24%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1957 Points ∼67% +1%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1590 Points ∼55% -18%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
2906 Points ∼100% +50%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (1942 - 1947, n=2)
1945 Points ∼67% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=626)
2035 Points ∼70% +5%
Memory (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2588 Points ∼72%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
1235 Points ∼35% -52%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3036 Points ∼85% +17%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2492 Points ∼70% -4%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1958 Points ∼55% -24%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
3575 Points ∼100% +38%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (2588 - 2736, n=2)
2662 Points ∼74% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=626)
1503 Points ∼42% -42%
System (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4474 Points ∼79%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
3176 Points ∼56% -29%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5146 Points ∼91% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5112 Points ∼91% +14%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
3915 Points ∼70% -12%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
5632 Points ∼100% +26%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (4474 - 4998, n=2)
4736 Points ∼84% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=626)
2951 Points ∼52% -34%
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola One Vision
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2264 Points ∼79%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
1362 Points ∼48% -40%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2201 Points ∼77% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2193 Points ∼77% -3%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1933 Points ∼68% -15%
Oppo R17 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 8192
2855 Points ∼100% +26%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
  (2264 - 2336, n=2)
2300 Points ∼81% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=626)
1478 Points ∼52% -35%

The same also goes for the browser benchmarks, where the One Vision is at times in front, but most of the time in the upper midfield. In everyday operation, everything runs fast and smoothly.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=100)
35.5 Points ∼100% +15%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
31.781 Points ∼90% +3%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609 (30.9 - 31.4, n=2)
31.2 Points ∼88% +1%
Motorola One Vision (Chrome)
30.916 Points ∼87%
Oppo R17 Pro (Chrome 73)
29 Points ∼82% -6%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=89)
39.6 runs/min ∼100% +32%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chome 73)
33.07 runs/min ∼84% +11%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
31.7 runs/min ∼80% +6%
Motorola One Vision (Chrome)
29.9 runs/min ∼76%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
29.9 runs/min ∼76% 0%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Motorola One Vision (Chrome)
68 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=157)
66.9 Points ∼98% -2%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
66 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609 (58 - 68, n=2)
63 Points ∼93% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
62 Points ∼91% -9%
Oppo R17 Pro
58 Points ∼85% -15%
Wiko View 3 Pro (Chrome 74)
53 Points ∼78% -22%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Oppo R17 Pro (Chrome 73)
10885 Points ∼100% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
10322 Points ∼95% +5%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609 (9807 - 9809, n=2)
9808 Points ∼90% 0%
Motorola One Vision (Chrome)
9807 Points ∼90%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
9779 Points ∼90% 0%
Wiko View 3 Pro (Chrome 74)
8778 Points ∼81% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=684)
6701 Points ∼62% -32%
Motorola One (Chrome 69)
3781 Points ∼35% -61%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Motorola One (Chrome 69)
12194 ms * ∼100% -189%
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=709)
10602 ms * ∼87% -151%
Wiko View 3 Pro (Chrome 74)
4447.6 ms * ∼36% -5%
Motorola One Vision (Chrome)
4216 ms * ∼35%
Average Samsung Exynos 9609 (4188 - 4216, n=2)
4202 ms * ∼34% -0%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
4137.8 ms * ∼34% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
3897 ms * ∼32% +8%
Oppo R17 Pro (Chrome 73)
3800.1 ms * ∼31% +10%

* ... smaller is better

After we had complained about the storage of the predecessor being too slow, Motorola now uses significantly faster chips in the One Vision. The values we measured point to older UFS storage, which is not common at all in the mid-range. In terms of the internal storage, the new mid-range smartphone places ahead of the comparison devices. In our test of the storage slot with our Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 reference card, our test unit performs at eye level with the competitors.

Motorola One VisionMotorola OneHuawei P30 LiteSamsung Galaxy A50Wiko View 3 ProOppo R17 ProAverage 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-21%
-21%
-18%
-26%
-23%
-28%
-47%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
68.76 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
60.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-11%
67.85 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
60.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-12%
60.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-12%
65.6 (58.8 - 73.5, n=14)
-5%
49.1 (1.7 - 87.1, n=417)
-29%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
78.11 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
80.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
76.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
73.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
77.38 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-1%
77.9 (72.3 - 85.9, n=14)
0%
67.3 (8.1 - 96.5, n=417)
-14%
Random Write 4KB
126.63
69.1
-45%
87.29
-31%
18.2
-86%
31.2
-75%
20.98
-83%
35.4 (8.48 - 127, n=15)
-72%
21.5 (0.14 - 250, n=734)
-83%
Random Read 4KB
108.15
61.9
-43%
71.57
-34%
98.9
-9%
89.67
-17%
102.37
-5%
68.5 (20.7 - 108, n=15)
-37%
46.5 (1.59 - 196, n=734)
-57%
Sequential Write 256KB
192.17
214.9
12%
158.63
-17%
192.1
0%
171.57
-11%
191.65
0%
172 (90 - 201, n=15)
-10%
95.4 (2.99 - 590, n=734)
-50%
Sequential Read 256KB
499.45
280.2
-44%
293.23
-41%
507.3
2%
302.74
-39%
489.9
-2%
286 (144 - 499, n=15)
-43%
269 (12.1 - 1504, n=734)
-46%

Games - Also for gamers in landscape format

The modern mid-range SoC allows effortless gaming on the Motorola One Vision. We did not encounter any games that just did not want to run, as was the case on the predecessor. We took a closer look at this with GameBench. Top games such as Asphalt 9 did not always run smoothly in the test. Thanks to the accurate touchscreen, there were no problems at all controlling the games.

Temple Run 2
Temple Run 2
Asphalt 9
Asphalt 9
PUBG (high settings)
010203040Tooltip
; 0.13.0: Ø29.7 (18-32)
Asphalt 9 (high settings)
0102030Tooltip
; 1.6.2a: Ø27 (22-28)

Emissions - The Moto One with a good mono speaker

Temperature - Warming remains limited

GFXBench Manhattan
GFXBench Manhattan

Although you notice some significant warming of the Motorola One Vision under load, the Moto phone never becomes annoyingly or dangerously hot in everyday operation. During the test, the smartphone remained below 40 °C (104 °F) with an even temperature distribution to a large extent. We did not notice any throttling of the processor after longer peak load, and even after 30 runs of GFXBench Manhattan, the performance remained mostly stable.

Max. Load
 37.1 °C
99 F
37.3 °C
99 F
39.1 °C
102 F
 
 36.7 °C
98 F
37.1 °C
99 F
39.2 °C
103 F
 
 33.7 °C
93 F
36.8 °C
98 F
38.9 °C
102 F
 
Maximum: 39.2 °C = 103 F
Average: 37.3 °C = 99 F
32.8 °C
91 F
35.5 °C
96 F
36.5 °C
98 F
33.8 °C
93 F
35.2 °C
95 F
36.7 °C
98 F
32.3 °C
90 F
35.4 °C
96 F
36.3 °C
97 F
Maximum: 36.7 °C = 98 F
Average: 34.9 °C = 95 F
Power Supply (max.)  30.1 °C = 86 F | Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
Heat map front
Heat map front
Heat map back
Heat map back

Speaker

Pink Noise speaker test
Pink Noise speaker test

The Motorola One Vision has a single mono speaker on the bottom edge. However, it sounds fairly loud, hardly distorts even at maximum volume, and it delivers a pleasant, fairly warm sound. The low mids are still easily audible and the highs are not too overemphasized. The maximum volume is also impressive. The 3.5-mm audio port produces a clean sound, even with the included headset, and the sound output via Bluetooth 5.0 produces similar results.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.8352525.532.33127.522.74022.3255028.531.56318.927.28020.228.510021.626.212518.738.516020.250.820017.150.525014.655.531515.960.740015.460.550016.565.563014.265.980014.572.1100013.373.2125013.473.3160013.674200014.274.8250014.675.2315013.676.8400014.477.8500014.578.4630014.277.8800014.676.51000014.8781250014.974.71600015.263.5SPL26.587.6N0.872.1median 14.6median 73.2Delta0.89.236.947.436.544.237.235.437.637.631.739.423.822.824.423.323.621.319.919.923.324.418.437.718.244.815.851.414.658.715.560.51359.612.363.912.16711.969.310.770.210.767.210.566.910.365.110.768.410.571.810.569.210.665.710.664.710.562.610.642.663.572.461.552.561.424.179.716.225.514.68.214.50.644.7median 11.9median 63.93.411.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola One VisionMotorola One
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola One Vision audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Motorola One audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Battery Life - Sufficient but not outstanding

Power Consumption

Despite the modern processor, the Motorola One Vision does not deliver top values in terms of the power consumption. Compared to the chip in the Motorola One predecessor that is almost four years old, on average the power consumption is lower under load and during standby. This probably also explains why the new model only achieves a similar battery life as the predecessor despite the significantly larger battery. 

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.32 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.75 / 2.14 / 2.27 Watt
Load midlight 4.36 / 6.48 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola One Vision
3500 mAh
Motorola One
3000 mAh
Huawei P30 Lite
3340 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Wiko View 3 Pro
4000 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 9609
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
10%
-13%
-3%
17%
-7%
6%
Idle Minimum *
0.75
1
-33%
0.91
-21%
0.8
-7%
0.77
-3%
0.745 (0.74 - 0.75, n=2)
1%
0.877 (0.2 - 3.4, n=769)
-17%
Idle Average *
2.14
1.6
25%
2.41
-13%
1.5
30%
1.79
16%
2.13 (2.11 - 2.14, n=2)
-0%
1.734 (0.6 - 6.2, n=768)
19%
Idle Maximum *
2.27
2
12%
2.43
-7%
1.7
25%
1.86
18%
2.26 (2.25 - 2.27, n=2)
-0%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=769)
11%
Load Average *
4.36
3.3
24%
4.57
-5%
5.9
-35%
2.74
37%
5.06 (4.36 - 5.75, n=2)
-16%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=763)
7%
Load Maximum *
6.48
5.1
21%
7.57
-17%
8.3
-28%
5.53
15%
7.71 (6.48 - 8.94, n=2)
-19%
5.9 (1.2 - 14.2, n=763)
9%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Life

Accordingly, the new model should last through a workday just as well as the predecessor. However, you might want to think about recharging it in the evening, if you weren't able to do that during the day. It takes less than two hours to completely recharge the smartphone. Wireless charging is not supported.

Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 58min
Motorola One Vision
3500 mAh
Motorola One
3000 mAh
Huawei P30 Lite
3340 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Wiko View 3 Pro
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-6%
-34%
-10%
14%
Reader / Idle
1652
1248
1587
WiFi v1.3
778
735
-6%
515
-34%
701
-10%
886
14%
Load
268
198
275
H.264
769
685
869

Pros

+ great display
+ Android 10 guaranteed
+ decent speaker
+ great camera
+ good performance
+ excellent price-performance ratio

Cons

- uneven display brightness distribution
- battery could last longer

Verdict - The Motorola One Vision is great!

In review: Moto One Vision. Test unit provided by Motorola Germany.
In review: Moto One Vision. Test unit provided by Motorola Germany.

The Motorola One Vision is an all-round successful smartphone at a relatively low price. The display is great, and with its elongated form factor, the model fits well into the hand. The design should not give any reason for complaint either, and the camera is so good that in some situations even significantly more expensive smartphones cannot clearly differentiate themselves anymore.

The Motorola One Vision is the price-performance winner for camera fans.

The battery life is okay, even if the actual runtime does not quite keep the promises indicated by the large battery. Due to Android One, the user interface is slim, and there will be at least one upgrade to Android 10, thanks to the update promise from Google. In combination with a lot of storage and a decent amount of performance, currently you cannot go wrong with the Motorola One Vision.

Motorola One Vision - 06/19/2019 v6(old)
Stefan Schomberg

Chassis
82%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
83%
Connectivity
44 / 60 → 74%
Weight
90%
Battery
96%
Display
83%
Games Performance
52 / 63 → 83%
Application Performance
65 / 70 → 93%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
74 / 91 → 81%
Camera
73%
Average
77%
85%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Read all 1 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Motorola One Vision Review: Cinema smartphone with a strong camera
Stefan Schomberg, 2019-06-21 (Update: 2019-06-23)