Notebookcheck

Motorola One Zoom Smartphone Review: the Motorola One smartphone that isn't really a One...

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Finn D. Boerne), 10/15/2019

One camera to rule them all. The quad-camera system of Motorola's One Zoom is supposed to include the right lens for all of life's circumstances. Find out how the Motorola smartphone did and how it differs from previous Motorola One smartphones in our review.

Motorola One Zoom smartphone review

The Motorola One Zoom differs significantly from the previously reviewed Motorola One smartphones, such as the One Vision and the One Action. First of all, at around $450 it sells for much more than its mid-range siblings. Second, despite its moniker it is not running Android One but Android 9.0 with a sleek custom skin instead. And third, the typical 21:9 LCD display has been replaced by a 19.5:9 OLED display.

The One Zoom’s highlight is certainly its quad-camera system at the rear as well as its 25 MP front-facing camera. Sounds like the device is going to offer an amazing mid-range smartphone camera experience, right?

Motorola One Zoom (One Series)
Graphics adapter
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
6.4 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, capacitive multi-touch touchscreen, OLED, glossy: yes
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 104 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5-mm headphone jack, Card Reader: microSD slot (up to 512GB), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, OTG, status LED, FM radio, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G: GSM band 2/3/5/8 3G: band 1/2/4/5/8 4G: LTE band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/20/28/38/40/41/66, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.8 x 158 x 75 ( = 0.35 x 6.22 x 2.95 in)
Battery
4000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix f/​1.7, phase comparison AF, OIS, dual LED flash, videos @2160p/​30fps (camera 1); 16.0MP, wide-angle lens (camera 2); 8.0MP, telephoto lens (camera 3); 5.0MP, field of depth (camera 4)
Secondary Camera: 25 MPix f/​2.0, videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, Keyboard: on-screen, charger, USB cable, headset, case, Motorola UI, 24 Months Warranty, head SAR: 0.709W/​kg, body SAR 1.542W/​kg, DRM Widevine: L1, fanless
Weight
190 g ( = 6.7 oz / 0.42 pounds), Power Supply: 34 g ( = 1.2 oz / 0.07 pounds)
Price
429 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Especially English native speakers welcome!

Currently wanted: 
News and Editorial Editor - Details here

RatingDateModelWeightHeightSizeResolutionBest Price
79%10/2019Motorola One Zoom
675, Adreno 612
190 g8.8 mm6.4"2340x1080
89%08/2019Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
855, Adreno 640
191 g8.8 mm6.39"2340x1080
87%07/2019Samsung Galaxy A80
730, Adreno 618
220 g9.3 mm6.7"2400x1080
85%06/2019OnePlus 7
855, Adreno 640
182 g8.2 mm6.41"2340x1080
85%07/2019LG G8s ThinQ
855, Adreno 640
181 g7.99 mm6.2"2248x1080
86%07/2019Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
855, Adreno 640
190 g9.2 mm6.4"2340x1080
86%06/2019Samsung Galaxy A70
675, Adreno 612
183 g7.9 mm6.7"2400x1080
82%05/2019Google Pixel 3a XL
670, Adreno 616
167 g8.2 mm6"2160x1080

Case

The satin-finished rear glass does a great job of hiding fingerprints and smudges, albeit it feels a bit slippery with dry hands. While the One Zoom lacks an IP certification it features a water-repellent nano-coating, which is supposed to protect the device from spillage and splashes according to Motorola. For the first time ever the Motorola logo at the rear doubles as notification LED. Its transparent cover that extends over the camera modules takes some getting used to, though.

Motorola One Zoom smartphone review
Motorola One Zoom smartphone review
Motorola One Zoom smartphone review
Motorola One Zoom smartphone review

Size Comparison

165.2 mm / 6.5 inch 76.5 mm / 3.01 inch 9.3 mm / 0.3661 inch 220 g0.485 lbs159.1 mm / 6.26 inch 75.44 mm / 2.97 inch 9.2 mm / 0.3622 inch 190 g0.4189 lbs158 mm / 6.22 inch 75 mm / 2.95 inch 8.8 mm / 0.3465 inch 190 g0.4189 lbs157.7 mm / 6.21 inch 74.8 mm / 2.94 inch 8.2 mm / 0.3228 inch 182 g0.4012 lbs156.7 mm / 6.17 inch 74.3 mm / 2.93 inch 8.8 mm / 0.3465 inch 191 g0.4211 lbs155.3 mm / 6.11 inch 76.6 mm / 3.02 inch 7.99 mm / 0.3146 inch 181 g0.399 lbs

Connectivity

Two connectivity features that set the One Zoom apart in this day and age are its 3.5-mm headphone jack and its built-in FM radio tuner. After first boot around 104 GB of the 128 GB of internal UFS-II storage is user-accessible, and if so desired the One Zoom can take a microSD card. Thanks to USB-OTG support the smartphone can also access USB peripherals, such as thumb drives, via an OTG dongle.

Software

Despite its name the Motorola One Zoom is not running Android One but a custom skin on top of Android 9. At the time of writing, the One Zoom’s security patches were out of date (July 2019).

Motorola One Zoom smartphone review
Motorola One Zoom smartphone review
Motorola One Zoom smartphone review
Motorola One Zoom smartphone review

Communication and GPS

The One Zoom supports Bluetooth 5.0 as well as NFC.

The built-in Wi-Fi modem supports IEEE 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac in both bands, 2.4 and 5 GHz. Wi-Fi reception was rock solid and pretty good in everyday use. When connected to our Linksys EA8500 reference router the mid-range smartphone managed above average transfer rates for its class of around 250 to 350 Mbps.

The cellular modem supports Dual SIM and speeds of up to 600 Mbps downstream (LTE Cat.12). Thanks to its support for a total of 15 different LTE bands, all relevant European and American LTE bands are supported.

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel 3a XL
Adreno 616, 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash
668 (min: 617, max: 692) MBit/s ∼100% +98%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
578 (min: 474, max: 617) MBit/s ∼87% +72%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
447 (min: 201, max: 659) MBit/s ∼67% +33%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Adreno 618, 730, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
428 (min: 360, max: 501) MBit/s ∼64% +27%
OnePlus 7
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
388 (min: 361, max: 421) MBit/s ∼58% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
383 (min: 242, max: 434) MBit/s ∼57% +14%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Adreno 612, 675, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
338 (min: 302, max: 356) MBit/s ∼51% 0%
Motorola One Zoom
Adreno 612, 675, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
337 (min: 323, max: 346) MBit/s ∼50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=449)
228 MBit/s ∼34% -32%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel 3a XL
Adreno 616, 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash
580 (min: 548, max: 602) MBit/s ∼100% +97%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
523 (min: 410, max: 563) MBit/s ∼90% +78%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
502 (min: 465, max: 517) MBit/s ∼87% +71%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
389 (min: 366, max: 444) MBit/s ∼67% +32%
OnePlus 7
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
330 (min: 232, max: 365) MBit/s ∼57% +12%
Motorola One Zoom
Adreno 612, 675, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
294 (min: 266, max: 318) MBit/s ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Adreno 618, 730, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
282 (min: 249, max: 327) MBit/s ∼49% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Adreno 612, 675, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
264 (min: 221, max: 293) MBit/s ∼46% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=449)
217 MBit/s ∼37% -26%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø337 (323-346)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø294 (266-318)
GPS-Test indoors
GPS-Test indoors
GPS-Test outdoors
GPS-Test outdoors

The smartphone’s GPS module was very quick to obtain GPS lock at an accuracy of 4 m (13 ft) outdoors. Indoor positioning is supported as well.

We take every device on a quick bike tour around the block in order to determine real-world GPS accuracy and performance. The differences between the Motorola One Zoom and the professional Garmin Edge 500 were marginal, and the smartphone turned out to offer a very accurate GPS experience.

GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Motorola One Zoom
GPS Motorola One Zoom
GPS Motorola One Zoom
GPS Motorola One Zoom
GPS Motorola One Zoom
GPS Motorola One Zoom

Telephony and Call Quality

Motorola One Zoom smartphone review
Motorola One Zoom smartphone review

With VoLTE and Wi-Fi calling, two features allowing to place and receive phone calls via either 4G/LTE or Wi-Fi, respectively, the One Zoom offers support for both modern telephony technologies. Cellular reception and call quality were satisfactory overall.

Cameras

25-Megapixel-Frontkamera
25-Megapixel-Frontkamera

At the core of the One Zoom’s 48 MP main camera with optical image stabilization sits Samsung’s Isocell Bright GM1 sensor with 4-in-1 pixel binning and an effective resolution of 12 MP. Photos are natural and appealing, although we would have expected crisper images and a higher dynamic range given the One Zoom’s price of more than $400. Low-light performance in particular was fairly poor due to the Isocell Bright GM1 sensor’s increased noise and reduced sharpness under these conditions.

In addition to this main shooter, the camera also features a 16 MP wide-angle lens with a 117° field of view as well as an 8 MP telephoto lens with a 3x zoom. Both offered a decent quality that was almost on a par with the main 48 MP Samsung sensor.

A dedicated 5 MP sensor collects depth of field information in order to create natural background blur. Just like Samsung’s Live Focus, background blur can be retroactively adjusted and fine-tuned. The resulting bokeh effect was very nice and great to look at.

At the front we find a 25 MP camera with the same quad-pixel-technology to improve light sensitivity, resulting in an effective resolution of slightly over 6 MP. Selfies turn out crisp and rich in details, however, just like at the rear photo quality suffers very quickly and noticeably in low-light situations.

48 MP main camera
48 MP main camera
Wide-angle camera
Wide-angle camera
3x optical zoom
3x optical zoom
10x hybrid zoom
10x hybrid zoom
Motorola One Zoom smartphone review
Motorola One Zoom smartphone review
Motorola One Zoom smartphone review

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker Photo
26.5 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
28.8 ∆E
25.6 ∆E
40.3 ∆E
40.9 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
27.8 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
38.1 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
33.8 ∆E
26.9 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
26.9 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
36.2 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
29.3 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola One Zoom: 29.33 ∆E min: 10.47 - max: 45.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Photo
17.9 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
10 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
9 ∆E
4 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola One Zoom: 8.87 ∆E min: 2.47 - max: 18.9 ∆E
Motorola One Zoom smartphone review
Motorola One Zoom smartphone review
Motorola One Zoom smartphone review
Motorola One Zoom smartphone review
Motorola One Zoom smartphone review

Accessories and Warranty

Included in the box is an 18-W charger, a fitting USB cable, a SIM tool, a quick-start guide, a silicone case, and last but not least a headset.

Unlike European models that come with a 24-month warranty Motorola smartphones sold in the US are limited to just 12 months.

Input Devices & Handling

Two separate biometric identification technologies are supported by the Motorola One Zoom. First and foremost, the device can be unlocked with a simple and comparatively insecure 2D face detection. This worked reliably and fast.

The other way is an optical fingerprint reader embedded into the One Zoom’s display. Unlike the FaceUnlock feature, its detection rate and overall performance were very poor. According to Motorola, the fingerprint reader’s accuracy is supposed to continuously improve via machine learning, and it is thus supposed to get both faster and more accurate over time. However, in its current implementation the in-display fingerprint reader is all but useless.

Display

Subpixel array
Subpixel array

The 6.4-inch OLED display runs at a native resolution of 2340x1080 pixels with a resulting pixel density of 440 PPI. One of the innate features of the organic light-emitting diode technology is the fact that the diodes almost never shine at their maximum brightness. Thus, Motorola resorts to PWM (pulse-width modulation) in order to regulate brightness. Even at maximum brightness we found PWM flickering at between 235 and 250 Hz, which is low enough to potentially cause headaches and dizziness in sensitive users.

At just 461 nits with an all-white background maximum brightness was mediocre at best, and only slightly higher at 471 nits with the enabled ambient light sensor. We also test every panel with the so-called APL 50 test with evenly distributed black and white surfaces all over the display, and the Motorola One Zoom topped out at 608 nits in this test.

484
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
466
cd/m²
484
cd/m²
461
cd/m²
466
cd/m²
479
cd/m²
465
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 484 cd/m² Average: 471.8 cd/m² Minimum: 5.01 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 461 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.9 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 6.9 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
Gamma: 2.12
Motorola One Zoom
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.4
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Samsung Galaxy A80
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7
OnePlus 7
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.41
LG G8s ThinQ
P-OLED, 2248x1080, 6.2
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.4
Samsung Galaxy A70
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7
Google Pixel 3a XL
OLED, 2160x1080, 6
Screen
42%
21%
31%
28%
22%
25%
35%
Brightness middle
461
594
29%
478
4%
603
31%
539
17%
569
23%
554
20%
409
-11%
Brightness
472
607
29%
486
3%
605
28%
556
18%
537
14%
552
17%
410
-13%
Brightness Distribution
95
91
-4%
96
1%
94
-1%
88
-7%
79
-17%
98
3%
96
1%
Black Level *
0.31
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.9
1.51
74%
2.97
50%
3.5
41%
3.78
36%
3.5
41%
3.3
44%
1.3
78%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.4
4.27
59%
10.18
2%
7.7
26%
6.95
33%
6
42%
9.2
12%
2.3
78%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.9
2.6
62%
2.5
64%
2.7
61%
2.2
68%
5.1
26%
3.4
51%
1.5
78%
Gamma
2.12 104%
2.219 99%
2.031 108%
2.266 97%
2.274 97%
2.36 93%
2.08 106%
2.22 99%
CCT
8167 80%
6390 102%
6533 99%
6775 96%
6013 108%
6827 95%
6606 98%
6621 98%
Contrast
1835

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 250 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9270 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

The One Zoom’s display’s contrast ratio is very high due to the in theory, infinite contrast ratio of OLED displays. Using a photo spectrometer in combination with the CalMAN software we were able to determine average sRGB DeltaE deviations of 5.9 and 6.9 for colors and grayscale, respectively. Ideally, you want these to be less than three. Color temperature was also not quite perfect.

CalMan color accuracy (target color space: P3)
CalMan color accuracy (target color space: P3)
CalMan color space (target color space: P3)
CalMan color space (target color space: P3)
CalMan grayscale (target color space: P3)
CalMan grayscale (target color space: P3)
CalMan saturation (target color space: P3)
CalMan saturation (target color space: P3)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.6 ms).

As expected of an OLED panel, viewing angles are superb. Outdoor usability is somewhat limited due to the display’s low maximum brightness.

 

Performance

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 at the core of Motorola’s One Zoom features two Cortex A76 high-performance cores and six Cortex A55 high-efficiency cores. Graphics are handled by an Adreno 612.

Thanks to the efficient user interface the overall system performance was decent. However, we did encounter occasional frame drops and lags in everyday use. As can be seen in the synthetic benchmark results the Snapdragon 675 yielded the lowest score in this comparison. Combined with 4 GB of RAM the Motorola One Zoom was incapable of keeping up with its high-performance Snapdragon-powered Android competitors.

The internal UFS memory is comparatively fast, albeit not nearly as fast as the OnePlus 7's or Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's.

Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
5466 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
7881 Points ∼100% +44%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7372 Points ∼94% +35%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7442 Points ∼94% +36%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7703 Points ∼98% +41%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
6104 Points ∼77% +12%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
6479 Points ∼82% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (5466 - 6104, n=2)
5785 Points ∼73% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=325)
4691 Points ∼60% -14%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
5998 Points ∼53%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10976 Points ∼96% +83%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
6826 Points ∼60% +14%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
11388 Points ∼100% +90%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10274 Points ∼90% +71%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10878 Points ∼96% +81%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
6446 Points ∼57% +7%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
5172 Points ∼45% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (5998 - 6446, n=2)
6222 Points ∼55% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 11598, n=384)
4726 Points ∼41% -21%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
2266 Points ∼65%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3429 Points ∼98% +51%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2436 Points ∼69% +8%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3510 Points ∼100% +55%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3406 Points ∼97% +50%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3444 Points ∼98% +52%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2380 Points ∼68% +5%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1616 Points ∼46% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (2266 - 2380, n=2)
2323 Points ∼66% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=384)
1426 Points ∼41% -37%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
7524 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9296 Points ∼95% +24%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
7177 Points ∼73% -5%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9205 Points ∼94% +22%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9125 Points ∼93% +21%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9814 Points ∼100% +30%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
7315 Points ∼75% -3%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
7377 Points ∼75% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (7315 - 7524, n=2)
7420 Points ∼76% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11440, n=388)
5333 Points ∼54% -29%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
9522 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
11167 Points ∼86% +17%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
8626 Points ∼66% -9%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
12095 Points ∼93% +27%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
11890 Points ∼91% +25%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
13047 Points ∼100% +37%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
9288 Points ∼71% -2%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
9397 Points ∼72% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (9288 - 9522, n=2)
9405 Points ∼72% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 14946, n=556)
5785 Points ∼44% -39%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
2324 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
2657 Points ∼80% +14%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2708 Points ∼81% +17%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3324 Points ∼100% +43%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2794 Points ∼84% +20%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2492 Points ∼75% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2482 Points ∼75% +7%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2314 Points ∼70% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (2324 - 2482, n=2)
2403 Points ∼72% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=68)
2676 Points ∼81% +15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
914 Points ∼16%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5702 Points ∼97% +524%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2160 Points ∼37% +136%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5862 Points ∼100% +541%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4236 Points ∼72% +363%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5747 Points ∼98% +529%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
914 Points ∼16% 0%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1416 Points ∼24% +55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (914 - 914, n=2)
914 Points ∼16% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=68)
2721 Points ∼46% +198%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
1066 Points ∼21%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4548 Points ∼91% +327%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2262 Points ∼45% +112%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5012 Points ∼100% +370%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3800 Points ∼76% +256%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4454 Points ∼89% +318%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1063 Points ∼21% 0%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1550 Points ∼31% +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (1063 - 1066, n=2)
1065 Points ∼21% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=68)
2478 Points ∼49% +132%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
2378 Points ∼54%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3280 Points ∼74% +38%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3160 Points ∼72% +33%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4416 Points ∼100% +86%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3309 Points ∼75% +39%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2840 Points ∼64% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2719 Points ∼62% +14%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2532 Points ∼57% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (2378 - 2719, n=2)
2549 Points ∼58% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4683, n=396)
1981 Points ∼45% -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
851 Points ∼12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6739 Points ∼95% +692%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2438 Points ∼34% +186%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7089 Points ∼100% +733%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5184 Points ∼73% +509%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7069 Points ∼100% +731%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
949 Points ∼13% +12%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1612 Points ∼23% +89%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (851 - 949, n=2)
900 Points ∼13% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=396)
1787 Points ∼25% +110%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
1097 Points ∼18%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5440 Points ∼87% +396%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2568 Points ∼41% +134%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6249 Points ∼100% +470%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4604 Points ∼74% +320%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5311 Points ∼85% +384%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1110 Points ∼18% +1%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1754 Points ∼28% +60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (1097 - 1110, n=2)
1104 Points ∼18% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6916, n=397)
1658 Points ∼27% +51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
2365 Points ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3288 Points ∼70% +39%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3025 Points ∼64% +28%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4405 Points ∼94% +86%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3293 Points ∼70% +39%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4703 Points ∼100% +99%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2727 Points ∼58% +15%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2495 Points ∼53% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (2365 - 2727, n=2)
2546 Points ∼54% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=424)
1893 Points ∼40% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
1614 Points ∼16%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6730 Points ∼65% +317%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3635 Points ∼35% +125%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10302 Points ∼100% +538%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6358 Points ∼62% +294%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10290 Points ∼100% +538%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1571 Points ∼15% -3%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2537 Points ∼25% +57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (1571 - 1614, n=2)
1593 Points ∼15% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=424)
2386 Points ∼23% +48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
1737 Points ∼21%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5460 Points ∼67% +214%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3479 Points ∼43% +100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7940 Points ∼98% +357%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5268 Points ∼65% +203%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8141 Points ∼100% +369%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1734 Points ∼21% 0%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2528 Points ∼31% +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (1734 - 1737, n=2)
1736 Points ∼21% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=424)
2004 Points ∼25% +15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
2567 Points ∼59%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3724 Points ∼86% +45%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3215 Points ∼74% +25%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4093 Points ∼95% +59%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3242 Points ∼75% +26%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4320 Points ∼100% +68%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2886 Points ∼67% +12%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2466 Points ∼57% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (2567 - 2886, n=2)
2727 Points ∼63% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4519, n=476)
1888 Points ∼44% -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
823 Points ∼13%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6325 Points ∼100% +669%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2244 Points ∼35% +173%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6336 Points ∼100% +670%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6040 Points ∼95% +634%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6336 Points ∼100% +670%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
823 Points ∼13% 0%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1487 Points ∼23% +81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (823 - 823, n=2)
823 Points ∼13% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=476)
1478 Points ∼23% +80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
969 Points ∼17%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5475 Points ∼96% +465%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2405 Points ∼42% +148%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5648 Points ∼99% +483%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5068 Points ∼89% +423%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5705 Points ∼100% +489%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
978 Points ∼17% +1%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1631 Points ∼29% +68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (969 - 978, n=2)
974 Points ∼17% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=477)
1423 Points ∼25% +47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
2743 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3726 Points ∼84% +36%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3211 Points ∼72% +17%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4068 Points ∼91% +48%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3505 Points ∼79% +28%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4454 Points ∼100% +62%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2869 Points ∼64% +5%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2489 Points ∼56% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (2743 - 2869, n=2)
2806 Points ∼63% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4540, n=516)
1754 Points ∼39% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
1567 Points ∼16%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6325 Points ∼63% +304%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3478 Points ∼35% +122%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10008 Points ∼100% +539%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6122 Points ∼61% +291%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9973 Points ∼100% +536%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1427 Points ∼14% -9%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2428 Points ∼24% +55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (1427 - 1567, n=2)
1497 Points ∼15% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=515)
1936 Points ∼19% +24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
1745 Points ∼22%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5478 Points ∼70% +214%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3415 Points ∼44% +96%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7556 Points ∼97% +333%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5251 Points ∼67% +201%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7820 Points ∼100% +348%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1606 Points ∼21% -8%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2441 Points ∼31% +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (1606 - 1745, n=2)
1676 Points ∼21% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8165, n=518)
1674 Points ∼21% -4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
17876 Points ∼53%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
27278 Points ∼81% +53%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
19389 Points ∼58% +8%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
30972 Points ∼92% +73%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
33697 Points ∼100% +89%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
15948 Points ∼47% -11%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
14631 Points ∼43% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (15948 - 17876, n=2)
16912 Points ∼50% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=676)
14217 Points ∼42% -20%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
26734 Points ∼26%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
103955 Points ∼100% +289%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
51091 Points ∼49% +91%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
97354 Points ∼94% +264%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
26348 Points ∼25% -1%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
35596 Points ∼34% +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (26348 - 26734, n=2)
26541 Points ∼26% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=674)
22183 Points ∼21% -17%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
24078 Points ∼37%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
63969 Points ∼97% +166%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
37475 Points ∼57% +56%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
65945 Points ∼100% +174%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
23013 Points ∼35% -4%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
26999 Points ∼41% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (23013 - 24078, n=2)
23546 Points ∼36% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=674)
17924 Points ∼27% -26%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
41 fps ∼25%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
167 fps ∼100% +307%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
84 fps ∼50% +105%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
167 fps ∼100% +307%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
85 fps ∼51% +107%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps ∼100% +307%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
41 fps ∼25% 0%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
58 fps ∼35% +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (41 - 41, n=2)
41 fps ∼25% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=694)
38.1 fps ∼23% -7%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
37 fps ∼54%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
69 fps ∼100% +86%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
59 fps ∼86% +59%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼87% +62%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼87% +62%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼87% +62%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
37 fps ∼54% 0%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
53 fps ∼77% +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (37 - 37, n=2)
37 fps ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=703)
28.1 fps ∼41% -24%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
21 fps ∼21%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
90 fps ∼90% +329%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
42 fps ∼42% +100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
100 fps ∼100% +376%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
50 fps ∼50% +138%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
97 fps ∼97% +362%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
20 fps ∼20% -5%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
29 fps ∼29% +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (20 - 21, n=2)
20.5 fps ∼21% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=600)
21.9 fps ∼22% +4%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
19 fps ∼32%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps ∼98% +211%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
36 fps ∼60% +89%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼100% +216%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
51 fps ∼85% +168%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +216%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
19 fps ∼32% 0%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
28 fps ∼47% +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (19 - 19, n=2)
19 fps ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=609)
19.4 fps ∼32% +2%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
14 fps ∼20%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
62 fps ∼90% +343%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
30 fps ∼43% +114%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
67 fps ∼97% +379%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
35 fps ∼51% +150%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps ∼100% +393%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
15 fps ∼22% +7%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
20 fps ∼29% +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (14 - 15, n=2)
14.5 fps ∼21% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=466)
17.9 fps ∼26% +28%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
8.4 fps ∼15%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
51 fps ∼89% +507%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
26 fps ∼46% +210%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
57 fps ∼100% +579%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
36 fps ∼63% +329%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
57 fps ∼100% +579%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
13 fps ∼23% +55%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
19 fps ∼33% +126%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (8.4 - 13, n=2)
10.7 fps ∼19% +27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=468)
16.7 fps ∼29% +99%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
3.1 fps ∼12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼65% +448%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
10 fps ∼38% +223%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
26 fps ∼100% +739%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
14 fps ∼54% +352%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼92% +674%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
4.7 fps ∼18% +52%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
7.2 fps ∼28% +132%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (3.1 - 4.7, n=2)
3.9 fps ∼15% +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=189)
9.99 fps ∼38% +222%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
4.8 fps ∼20%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
24 fps ∼100% +400%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
6.8 fps ∼28% +42%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼71% +254%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8.5 fps ∼35% +77%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼67% +233%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
3 fps ∼13% -37%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
4.5 fps ∼19% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (3 - 4.8, n=2)
3.9 fps ∼16% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=188)
6.98 fps ∼29% +45%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
8.3 fps ∼22%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
36 fps ∼95% +334%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
16 fps ∼42% +93%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
38 fps ∼100% +358%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps ∼58% +165%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
36 fps ∼95% +334%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
8 fps ∼21% -4%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11 fps ∼29% +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (8 - 8.3, n=2)
8.15 fps ∼21% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=193)
14.7 fps ∼39% +77%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
9.1 fps ∼21%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
42 fps ∼98% +362%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
18 fps ∼42% +98%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
43 fps ∼100% +373%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps ∼51% +142%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼98% +362%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
9 fps ∼21% -1%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
12 fps ∼28% +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (9 - 9.1, n=2)
9.05 fps ∼21% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=193)
16.4 fps ∼38% +80%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
8.2 fps ∼20%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
36 fps ∼86% +339%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps ∼40% +107%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
42 fps ∼100% +412%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps ∼52% +168%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼100% +412%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
8 fps ∼19% -2%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11 fps ∼26% +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (8 - 8.2, n=2)
8.1 fps ∼19% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=391)
12.2 fps ∼29% +49%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
7.1 fps ∼17%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼100% +477%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
15 fps ∼37% +111%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
37 fps ∼90% +421%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
21 fps ∼51% +196%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
36 fps ∼88% +407%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
7 fps ∼17% -1%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11 fps ∼27% +55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (7 - 7.1, n=2)
7.05 fps ∼17% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=395)
10.9 fps ∼27% +54%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
159646 Points ∼40%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
372734 Points ∼93% +133%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
202586 Points ∼51% +27%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
370908 Points ∼93% +132%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
321145 Points ∼81% +101%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
398720 Points ∼100% +150%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
167836 Points ∼42% +5%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
158868 Points ∼40% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (159646 - 167836, n=2)
163741 Points ∼41% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17073 - 462516, n=295)
143117 Points ∼36% -10%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
1216 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
1076 Points ∼76% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
1117 Points ∼79% -8%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
1407 Points ∼100% +16%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1171 Points ∼83% -4%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1321 Points ∼94% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1259 Points ∼89% +4%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1186 Points ∼84% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (1216 - 1259, n=2)
1238 Points ∼88% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=635)
760 Points ∼54% -37%
Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
2278 Points ∼24%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8700 Points ∼92% +282%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3855 Points ∼41% +69%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9477 Points ∼100% +316%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8414 Points ∼89% +269%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9416 Points ∼99% +313%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2272 Points ∼24% 0%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2815 Points ∼30% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (2272 - 2278, n=2)
2275 Points ∼24% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=635)
2070 Points ∼22% -9%
Memory (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
4068 Points ∼54%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3922 Points ∼52% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3435 Points ∼46% -16%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5610 Points ∼75% +38%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4324 Points ∼58% +6%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7500 Points ∼100% +84%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
3285 Points ∼44% -19%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
3316 Points ∼44% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (3285 - 4068, n=2)
3677 Points ∼49% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=635)
1530 Points ∼20% -62%
System (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
5940 Points ∼65%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7423 Points ∼82% +25%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
6484 Points ∼71% +9%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8986 Points ∼99% +51%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8718 Points ∼96% +47%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9094 Points ∼100% +53%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
6137 Points ∼67% +3%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
5507 Points ∼61% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (5940 - 6137, n=2)
6039 Points ∼66% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=635)
2994 Points ∼33% -50%
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola One Zoom
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 4096
2860 Points ∼53%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4045 Points ∼75% +41%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3129 Points ∼58% +9%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5089 Points ∼94% +78%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4389 Points ∼81% +53%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5397 Points ∼100% +89%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2756 Points ∼51% -4%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2794 Points ∼52% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (2756 - 2860, n=2)
2808 Points ∼52% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=635)
1501 Points ∼28% -48%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
63.057 Points ∼100% +40%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)
59.651 Points ∼95% +33%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
58.746 Points ∼93% +31%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
53.783 Points ∼85% +20%
Motorola One Zoom (Chrome 77)
44.908 Points ∼71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (43.4 - 44.9, n=2)
44.2 Points ∼70% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157)
43.423 Points ∼69% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
40.021 Points ∼63% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=107)
35.7 Points ∼57% -21%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
32.083 Points ∼51% -29%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
117.76 Points ∼100% +45%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)
112.17 Points ∼95% +39%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
96.094 Points ∼82% +19%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
94.144 Points ∼80% +16%
Motorola One Zoom (Chrome 77)
80.943 Points ∼69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (80.8 - 80.9, n=2)
80.9 Points ∼69% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157)
80.828 Points ∼69% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
77.376 Points ∼66% -4%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
57.573 Points ∼49% -29%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=532)
41.9 Points ∼36% -48%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
110 Points ∼100% +57%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)
108 Points ∼98% +54%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
107 Points ∼97% +53%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
107 Points ∼97% +53%
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157)
82 Points ∼75% +17%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
77 Points ∼70% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (70 - 82, n=2)
76 Points ∼69% +9%
Motorola One Zoom (Chrome 77)
70 Points ∼64%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=165)
67 Points ∼61% -4%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
62 Points ∼56% -11%
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
25051 Points ∼100% +60%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)
24313 Points ∼97% +55%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
23830 Points ∼95% +52%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
20598 Points ∼82% +31%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
16358 Points ∼65% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157)
15716 Points ∼63% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (15689 - 15716, n=2)
15703 Points ∼63% 0%
Motorola One Zoom (Chrome 77)
15689 Points ∼63%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
11056 Points ∼44% -30%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=693)
6801 Points ∼27% -57%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=718)
10523 ms * ∼100% -264%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
3360.7 ms * ∼32% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
3027 ms * ∼29% -5%
Motorola One Zoom (Chrome 77)
2889.9 ms * ∼27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (2807 - 2890, n=2)
2848 ms * ∼27% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157)
2806.8 ms * ∼27% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
2333.5 ms * ∼22% +19%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
2036 ms * ∼19% +30%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)
2029.5 ms * ∼19% +30%
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
1958 ms * ∼19% +32%

* ... smaller is better

Motorola One ZoomXiaomi Mi 9T ProSamsung Galaxy A80OnePlus 7LG G8s ThinQAsus ZenFone 6 ZS630KLSamsung Galaxy A70Google Pixel 3a XLAverage 128 GB UFS 2.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
22%
-28%
55%
-7%
27%
-16%
-29%
-13%
-43%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
51.15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
46.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
62.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
22%
58.78 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
15%
55.9 (33.6 - 70.2, n=6)
9%
49.2 (1.7 - 87.1, n=428)
-4%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
69.44 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67.53 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
87.04 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
25%
76.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
73.2 (54 - 83.4, n=6)
5%
67.5 (8.1 - 96.5, n=428)
-3%
Random Write 4KB
110.76
148.51
34%
21.6
-80%
28.7
-74%
29.6
-73%
160.18
45%
21.95
-80%
86.96
-21%
54.6 (13.5 - 150, n=9)
-51%
22.3 (0.14 - 250, n=752)
-80%
Random Read 4KB
134.53
142.5
6%
117.5
-13%
175.3
30%
138
3%
153.29
14%
103.8
-23%
92.12
-32%
116 (88.4 - 173, n=9)
-14%
47.6 (1.59 - 196, n=752)
-65%
Sequential Write 256KB
256.6
196.87
-23%
190.4
-26%
392
53%
182.4
-29%
195.6
-24%
193.97
-24%
179.09
-30%
181 (143 - 257, n=9)
-29%
97.6 (2.99 - 590, n=752)
-62%
Sequential Read 256KB
470.52
808.76
72%
501.5
7%
1463
211%
791.1
68%
831.4
77%
508.48
8%
315.6
-33%
488 (409 - 733, n=9)
4%
275 (12.1 - 1504, n=752)
-42%

Gaming

Demanding 3D games from Google’s Android Play Store, such as "PUBG Mobile" or "Asphalt 9 Legends", will run smooth with reduced details. And even then your gaming experience is going to be disrupted by occasional frame drops.

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
Asphalt 9 Legends
Asphalt 9 Legends

Emissions

Temperature

Surface temperatures are fairly low, and the device does not heat up noticeably during everyday use.

Max. Load
 28.8 °C
84 F
30.1 °C
86 F
35.1 °C
95 F
 
 28.5 °C
83 F
30 °C
86 F
34.7 °C
94 F
 
 28.6 °C
83 F
30.2 °C
86 F
33.6 °C
92 F
 
Maximum: 35.1 °C = 95 F
Average: 31.1 °C = 88 F
33.5 °C
92 F
33 °C
91 F
30.2 °C
86 F
33.1 °C
92 F
33 °C
91 F
29.9 °C
86 F
32.4 °C
90 F
32.1 °C
90 F
29.9 °C
86 F
Maximum: 33.5 °C = 92 F
Average: 31.9 °C = 89 F
Power Supply (max.)  32 °C = 90 F | Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
Motorola One Zoom smartphone review
Motorola One Zoom smartphone review

Speakers

Pink noise
Pink noise

With a maximum volume of 80 dB(A) the single mono speaker is comparatively loud, its overall performance is pleasant, and its frequency response fairly linear in regards to mids and highs. On the other hand, extreme highs and lows (bass) are practically non-existent.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.7322527.622.33130.635.14024.834.25032.739.86324.629.48023.225.510019.223.312517.933.316016.553.220015.251.325017.355.131517.254.640016.85750014.660.46301465.680014.768.9100014.770.9125014.869.916001567.8200014.966.125001568315014.670.740001471.1500015.166630014.666.2800014.862.21000015.155.51250015.1531600015.556.2SPL2780N0.946.7median 15median 62.2Delta0.47.143.947.343.642.638.339.738.339.441.242.434.1352729.728.631.827.932.726.145.825.150.62253.320.55720.561.120.665.618.668.518.171.218.577.817.975.518.676.817.877.317.577.616.976.216.868.61769.51775.617.280.917.179.617.162.117.347.878.865.174.766.430.387.942.119.134.418.71.472.9median 18.1median 68.62.712.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola One ZoomXiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola One Zoom audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Battery Life

Power Consumption

The One Zoom turned out to be very efficient, particularly under load where it outperformed the entire competition. 

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.22 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.69 / 1.54 / 1.57 Watt
Load midlight 4.1 / 5.79 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola One Zoom
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A80
3700 mAh
OnePlus 7
3700 mAh
LG G8s ThinQ
3550 mAh
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
5000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-10%
0%
-4%
-40%
-40%
-1%
-14%
Idle Minimum *
0.69
0.7
-1%
0.6
13%
0.6
13%
1.2
-74%
0.81
-17%
0.675 (0.66 - 0.69, n=2)
2%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=782)
-28%
Idle Average *
1.54
1
35%
1.2
22%
1.1
29%
1.6
-4%
2.35
-53%
1.615 (1.54 - 1.69, n=2)
-5%
1.74 (0.6 - 6.2, n=781)
-13%
Idle Maximum *
1.57
1.3
17%
1.4
11%
2
-27%
2
-27%
2.37
-51%
1.685 (1.57 - 1.8, n=2)
-7%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=782)
-29%
Load Average *
4.1
5.2
-27%
5
-22%
4
2%
5
-22%
5.33
-30%
3.76 (3.42 - 4.1, n=2)
8%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=776)
1%
Load Maximum *
5.79
10
-73%
7.1
-23%
8
-38%
10
-73%
8.55
-48%
5.84 (5.79 - 5.88, n=2)
-1%
5.92 (1.2 - 14.2, n=776)
-2%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Life

Thanks to its 4,000 mAh battery the One Zoom ran for 10.5 hours in our Wi-Fi test with display brightness normalized to 150 nits. Charging from near empty to full takes around 2 hours.

Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 44min
Motorola One Zoom
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A80
3700 mAh
OnePlus 7
3700 mAh
LG G8s ThinQ
3550 mAh
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
644
762
18%
713
11%
901
40%
693
8%
801
24%

Pros

+ good-looking design
+ 3.5-mm headphone jack
+ good GPS
+ wide variety of supported LTE bands
+ OLED panel
+ decent battery life
+ solid cameras ...

Cons

- ... with poor low-light performance
- mono speaker (albeit a good one)
- comparatively slow Snapdragon SoC
- poor gaming performance
- dim display
- fingerprint reader

Verdict

In review: Motorola One Zoom. Review unit provided by Motorola Germany.
In review: Motorola One Zoom. Review unit provided by Motorola Germany.

While the One Zoom might not offer all the previously available One-series benefits, it certainly offers a lot. However, not at its current MSRP of more than $400.

Like Google’s Pixel 3a smartphone the One Zoom also suffers from Motorola’s choice of a comparatively slow mid-range SoC. In return, Google’s Pixel offers great stereo speakers, vanilla Android, and excellent cameras while the Motorola One Zoom lacks all of the above.

Motorola has once again set out to prove that they can build great mid-range smartphone, and the Motorola One Zoom would be a great choice in the $300 to $350 price range.

Motorola’s latest One-series smartphone offers a decent and nice to look at OLED panel, a pleasant design, good connectivity, and decent performance. As such it can easily keep up with the likes of a Xiaomi Mi 9T. However, the latter is available at a much lower price and even the Pro version thereof can be had for much less than Motorola’s One Zoom.

Motorola One Zoom - 10/08/2019 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 90%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
49 / 70 → 70%
Weight
89%
Battery
89%
Display
81%
Games Performance
14 / 64 → 21%
Application Performance
65 / 86 → 75%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
69 / 90 → 76%
Camera
65%
Average
73%
79%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Motorola One Zoom Smartphone Review: the Motorola One smartphone that isn't really a One...
Marcus Herbrich, 2019-10-15 (Update: 2019-10-15)