Notebookcheck

Oppo R17 Pro Smartphone Hands-on Review

Vaidyanathan Subramaniam, 👁 J. Simon Leitner, Daniel R. Deakin, 06/14/2019

Knight in radiant armor with a few flaws. The Oppo R17 Pro tries to combine suave aesthetics with flagship-grade performance. With a launch price close to ₹45,990 (~US$660), the R17 Pro didn't find too many takers. Now, with a more reasonable pricing and several software updates to iron out some wrinkles, the R17 Pro is still a leading contender in the upper mid-range segment. Does the R17 Pro have what it takes to outclass other Snapdragon 710 phones or is there still work to be done? We aim to find out just that.

Oppo has had pretty competitive offerings in the Indian smartphone market managing to garner attention alongside popular phones from Xiaomi, OnePlus, Samsung, and Asus. Recent offerings such as the Oppo K1, F7 Pro, F9 Pro, and F11 Pro have had fairly reasonable outings in the crowded mid-range segment. At the top end of Oppo's lineup, we have the Find X with its mechanized camera slider and a Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SoC. Between the Snapdragon 845-based Find X and the Helio P70/P60-based offerings, Oppo didn't have a competitive upper mid-range offering. This is where the R17 Pro comes in.

Featuring a Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SoC, a sleek design with a radiant finish at the back, a 3D ToF sensor, and an in-display fingerprint scanner, the R17 Pro has a lot going for it. The Oppo R17 Pro faces some stiff competition from other Snapdragon 710-powered phones such as the Xiaomi Mi 8 SE, Vivo Nex A, and the Nokia 8.1. Some of these phones cost much less than the R17 Pro, which means Oppo has an uphill task to convince you of giving up your hard-earned money in favor of its smartphone. 

Even with the now reduced pricing (₹29,990, ~US$431), the R17 Pro faces immense competition from flagship killers that offer the latest SoCs and more raw power. Amidst all this, can the Oppo R17 Pro still manage to consolidate its position in the market or does it aspire for more than it ought to? Let's find out in our hands-on review.

Note — This is more of an extensive hands-on than the typical smartphone review you are used to seeing on Notebookcheck. We've incorporated most of the performance benchmarks that we think will give a fair performance estimate of the phone. All tests were done on the latest software version CPH1877EX_11_A.16 with Android Security Patch May 5, 2019.

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Indian citizens welcome!

Currently wanted: 
News and Editorial Editor - Details here

Oppo R17 Pro (R Series)
Graphics adapter
Memory
8192 MB 
Display
6.4 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, Capacitive, AMOLED on-cell, glossy: yes
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
Connections
Card Reader: microSD, NFC, Sensors: E-Compass, Light Sensor, Proximity Sensor, G-Sensor, microUSB
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM: 850/900/1800/1900MHz; WCDMA: 850/900/1700/1900/2100MHz; FDD-LTE: 700/800/850/900/1500/1700/1800/1900/2100/2600MHz; TD-LTE: 1900/2000/2300/2496-2690/2570-2620MHz, Dual SIM, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 157.6 x 74.6 ( = 0.31 x 6.2 x 2.94 in)
Battery
3700 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 20 MPix 12M (f1.5 / f2.4) + 20M (f/2.6) + TOF 0.432M (f/1.14)
Secondary Camera: 25 MPix f/2.0, 20mm
Additional features
Keyboard: Virtual, ColorOS 5.2, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
183 g ( = 6.46 oz / 0.4 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
600 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Design

Oppo has given thought to the box packaging as well, which exudes a similar foggy color appearance as the phone itself lending a premium look. Inside the box, we find the R17 Pro itself, a 50 W Super VOOC USB charger, a USB Type-A to Type-C cable, a TPU case, a SIM ejector tool, and the usual paperwork. The phone comes with a pre-applied screen protector. You also get a nice set of USB Type-C earbuds, which is a good thing to have.

The Oppo R17 Pro is sure to turn heads with its design. The aluminum sides combined with a matte glass back exudes a luxurious look. Oppo says that that the texture of the glass prevents fingerprints from spoiling the appearance. While it is true to an extent, it does get greased after extended use. Our review unit is the Radiant Mist variant and the flow of light reflection when light is shone on it at certain angles lends a touch of exquisiteness. At 183 g, the R17 Pro is not the lightest phone out there but users shouldn't face any handling issues.

The back houses a protruding camera housing comprised of 12 MP + 20 MP + 3D ToF sensors with OIS, support for RAW capture, and a host of AI scene recognition modes. Below the camera array is an LED flash. The cameras are excellent but Oppo's sensor choices leave us baffled. We'll come to that shortly. The camera protrusion causes a slight wobble when the phone is placed flat on a desk. There is no physical capacitive fingerprint sensor at the back.

On the left we have just the volume rockers, which are easy to press and give good tactile feedback. Towards the bottom, we have the speaker grill, microphone, USB 3.1 Type-C Gen1 reversible port, and a SIM tray that can take two nano SIMs or a single micro SIM. The SIM tray comes with a seal that should prevent any liquid entry, although the phone itself isn't rated for waterproofing. Going to the right, we have the power button and at the top we have the antenna lines and a noise-canceling microphone.

The 6.4-inch 2340x1080 AMOLED display is one of the highlights of the R17 Po. At the top of the display is a teardrop-shaped notch that houses a 25 MP selfie camera. The ambient light sensor is hidden in the notch. There is no built-in selfie flash and the phone brightens up the display as a faux flash or to provide light for unlocking the phone using facial recognition in the dark. Oppo says that a lot of work has gone into designing the notch in a way that is flush with the screen. The speakerphone is not conspicuous and you'll have to look hard for it as it is neatly sandwiched between the glass and the frame. Given the space constraints of the teardrop notch, Oppo uses an AI algorithm instead of a hardware proximity sensor similar to the Qeexo EarSense in the Find X. The transition from the frame to glass is fairly seamless but there's still room for improvement.

Overall, if design is one of the primary criteria that can influence your buying decision, the Oppo R17 Pro should be high on your list.

Oppo R17 Pro - Box
Oppo R17 Pro - Box
Oppo R17 Pro - Front panel
Oppo R17 Pro - Rear panel with triple cameras
Oppo R17 Pro - Top with antenna lines and noise-canceling microphone
Oppo R17 Pro - Bottom with speaker grill, microphone, USB Type-C port, and SIM tray
Oppo R17 Pro - Left with volume rocker
Oppo R17 Pro - Right with power button

Size Comparison

162 mm / 6.38 inch 77 mm / 3.03 inch 8 mm / 0.315 inch 199 g0.4387 lbs157.9 mm / 6.22 inch 75.5 mm / 2.97 inch 8.5 mm / 0.3346 inch 175 g0.3858 lbs157.6 mm / 6.2 inch 74.6 mm / 2.94 inch 7.9 mm / 0.311 inch 183 g0.4034 lbs155.1 mm / 6.11 inch 73 mm / 2.87 inch 9.3 mm / 0.3661 inch 210 g0.463 lbs154.8 mm / 6.09 inch 75.8 mm / 2.98 inch 8 mm / 0.315 inch 180 g0.3968 lbs147.3 mm / 5.8 inch 73.1 mm / 2.88 inch 7.5 mm / 0.2953 inch 164 g0.3616 lbs

Features and Specifications

The Oppo R17 Pro is powered by the new Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (SD 710) SoC. The 10nm SD 710 is the first of the 700-series and is positioned right in the middle of the flagship 800-series and the mid-range 600-series. There aren't too many phones with the SD 710 yet, and going forward we expect OEMs to embrace the newer SD730 or SD730G as the SoC of choice for upper mid-range smartphones. Still, the performance of the SD710 is nothing to scoff at, and it is pretty responsive for almost whatever you throw at it. The R17 Pro comes with 8 GB RAM and 128 GB UFS 2.1 storage option without microSD expansion. You can use USB drives with the supported OTG function, though.

When it comes to connectivity, the R17 Pro is well-endowed. The SIM tray can take dual nano SIMs with dual standby and VoLTE support for both the SIMs. Wireless connectivity is offered up to 802.11ac along with Bluetooth 5.0, NFC, and GPS. FM radio is not present. The usual set of sensors including compass, ambient light, gyroscope, accelerometer and an in-display fingerprint sensor are available. Face unlock is supported via the front-facing camera but there's no IR camera onboard.

There is a single loudspeaker at the bottom that offers sufficient clarity just below the maximum volume. Similar to the OnePlus 6T, the R17 Pro comes with a 3,700 mAh battery that is implemented in a bi-cell 1850 mAh x 2 configuration. The battery can be topped up insanely fast thanks to Oppo's SuperVOOC fast charging that can top up the battery by 40% in about 10 minutes.

Software

The R17 Pro still runs on ColorOS 5.2 based on Android 8.1 Oreo, and the ColorOS 6 update based on Android 9 Pie update is only scheduled to arrive in August this year. Before we go deeper into the software, let's get this out of the way — ColorOS is chock full of features and functionality that some users, especially those coming from stock Android, might actually find that it takes time to get used to all of them. The OS also includes many apps in the base image that not everyone will find useful. Thankfully, you can uninstall most of them and save some space. Oppo also bundles its own AppStore apart from Google Play, which you can ignore if not required. The Oppo AppStore is not as populated as the Play Store but includes most popular apps. A minor gripe is that you often get two update notifications for most apps — one from the Play Store and another from the AppStore. 

Listing out all that ColorOS has to provide begets an entire article in itself so we'll focus on a few important ones. True to its name, ColorOS appears very colorful and eye-catching. It is pretty evident that Oppo has taken a lot of cues from iOS, including the absence of an app drawer. Swiping to the left of the homescreen brings up a fully customizable so-called Smart Assistant that offers quick access to common apps, favorite contacts, weather, step tracking, online orders, and more. It is more of a shortcut page than anything "smart". A swipe down from the top brings up the notification shade with big colorful icons and the brightness slider. A useful and customizable sidebar that offers handy shortcuts for apps and tools such as Screenshot, Screen Recorder, Camera, and File Manager can be invoked by a swipe from the right edge of the display.

In the Settings, apart from the regular ones, we find options to set the Theme, Lockscreen Magazine, and Wallpaper. We liked the image selection offered in the Lockscreen Magazine that helps show off the vibrant colors of the AMOLED panel. ColorOS also offers a slew of privacy protection features and settings to secure financial apps. The device will warn you if any apps fail the security checklist. To top it all, you also get a separate Secure Keyboard whenever password fields are detected. The Secure Keyboard also prevents taking screenshots and screen recording. Prompts for microphone and camera usage by third-party apps also show up in the status bar. Gesture-based navigation is also provided for and is very intuitive to use.

However, not all is well with ColorOS 5.2, at least in our testing. For one, you don't get to see any app icons in the system tray apart from the clock, cellular and Wi-Fi strength, and battery indicator so it is easy to miss notifications unless you actually swipe down the notification center. Also, we found that notifications get delayed sometimes even under good connectivity. A more worrisome observation is that some apps such as Telegram, Discord, Slack, etc. fail to show up notifications unless they've been opened at least once and are running in memory. We hope Oppo addresses this shortcoming in a future update.

About Phone
About Phone
Charging animation
Charging animation
Homescreen
Homescreen
Preinstalled apps
Notification shade
Recent apps screen
OPPO AppStore
Smart Assistant
Gesture navigation options
Lockscreen Magazine

Telephony, Networking, and GPS

Call quality on the Oppo R17 Pro is very good and cellular reception was excellent even in areas with supposedly shoddy coverage. Both the SIM slots are VoLTE compatible if your provider supports it. Although there is only one noise-cancelation microphone, it works well to cut out excess background noise. The phone supports wireless AC and could reach the full 50 Mb/s speed offered by the ISP. GPS-A, GLONASS, BDS, and GALILEO are supported.

You have control over the locating mode and can choose either a device-only GPS feature or a high accuracy mode that uses the Internet to more accurately identify the location. We set the option to Device Only to get a fair assessment of the GPS radio's tracking abilities. Indoors, the phone could not secure a proper fix but the signal reception was good outdoors with up to 4 m accuracy. Battery drain while using the GPS was slightly on the higher side, but the phone didn't heat up.

Dialer and Contacts app
Dialer and Contacts app
GPS indoors
GPS indoors
GPS outdoors
GPS outdoors
Locating Mode settings
Wi-Fi settings
Other network settings
SIM settings - 1
SIM settings - 2

Display

No Widevine CDM L1 support
No Widevine CDM L1 support

The 6.4-inch FHD+ AMOLED display comes with Corning Gorilla Glass 6 protection. Our unit also came with a screen protector applied as well. With a screen-to-body ratio of 91.5%, the viewing experience is very immersive with punchy colors and deep blacks characteristic of AMOLEDs. Viewing angles are good and the display is very much legible even under direct sunlight, although the brightness levels aren't the highest we've seen. 

A major feature of the display is the presence of the optical in-display fingerprint reader. While it is cool to have one, the technology certainly isn't as responsive as a regular capacitive one. It does take a perceivable amount of time to recognize the fingerprint and also fails to register the input sometimes. The animation near the area of the fingerprint is customizable and offers some nice effects but we'd like further fine tuning of the responsiveness of the sensor as much as possible. 

There is no option to change color settings apart from a Night Shield mode that helps with blue-light filtration. However, you can force the phone to use the sRGB color space by enabling it in the hidden Developer Options. There is no notification LED and the ambient display shows only the clock, date, battery indicator, and missed calls. Oppo could have actually put the ambient display to good use to show app notifications without having to unlock the phone.

For a device that sports a good display and fairly powerful internals, the Oppo R17 Pro, and by extension other Oppo phones, unfortunately does not feature support for Widevine CDM L1, which means no HD playback of DRM content in Netflix or Amazon Prime.

Ambient Display with indication for the in-display fingerprint sensor
Ambient Display with indication for the in-display fingerprint sensor
Display outdoors at auto/max brightness
Display outdoors at auto/max brightness
Display indoors at auto brightness
Display indoors at auto brightness

Cameras

The R17 Pro places a lot of emphasis on the imaging side of things. The Camera app is feature-rich yet simple to use and offers AI scene recognition for up to 23 unique scenes. While the selfie camera uses AI automatically, AI for the rear camera has to be specifically enabled in the Camera Settings. The Camera app features an Expert mode for those who like more control over their shots. The Expert mode offers manual settings for white balance, focus, shutter speed, exposure, and ISO but does not allow changing the aperture, which is fully at the mercy of the phone. There are also some cool stickers and "Omojis" to play with but the reactions of the animated characters are not as smooth as in iOS. You can also apply live filters, set Flash, and toggle HDR along with a new Dazzle Color mode that over-saturates the images to make them look more appealing. 

Camera interface
Camera interface
Expert mode
Expert mode
Omojis
Omojis
Settings for shooting stills
Settings for shooting video

Rear Camera

AR Measurement app
AR Measurement app

The Oppo R17 Pro sports an impressive rear camera setup consisting of a 12 MP primary camera with a smart variable aperture that can shift between f/1.5 and f/2.4 depending on the scene. The 12 MP camera uses a Sony IMX362 1/2.55-inch sensor with a large 1.4 micron pixel size and three-axis OIS support. Interestingly, Oppo has decided to use the larger 20 MP sensor for portrait depth sensing. There is also a dedicated 3D ToF sensor that should help with even more accurate depth sensing, but we found that it is not fully utilized in regular photos. However, the ToF sensor is extremely useful in AR applications. The latest OS update included an AR app that uses Google ARCore to take AR measurements. The phone does get considerably warm while using AR applications, though.

Photo quality in daylight is very good with adequate details, rich colors, and good sharpness. The phone does tend to go overboard with the sharpness when using HDR at times so you might want to fiddle around to find the optimal combination for the scene. The AI didn't seem to be of much help apart from identifying the scene. We also noticed a tendency of the camera to brighten up the scene more than required.

The large pixel size helps a lot with night shots and this is where the R17 Pro really shines. Oppo uses a combination of AI and software tricks to reduce noise and enhance colors in low-light scenes. We found that night shots are captured well with minimal noise and color artifacts both indoors and outdoors making the R17 Pro one of the best low-light performers available. You will see some artifacts when fully zoomed in, but for the most part low-light pictures are highly serviceable. Oppo also does HDR well thanks to RAW HDR. While you cannot save in RAW yet, the HDR function directly works on the captured RAW image from the sensor instead of compressing it beforehand. We see that the HDR results are really good for a smartphone of this class.

The R17 Pro can manage video recording in 4K 30 fps and slow motion video at 1080p 240 fps/720p 480 fps. You can choose between Efficient (H.265) and Best Compatibility (H.264) saving options. Video quality is good but there is no option to toggle EIS/OIS so you'll have to be content with shaky videos or use a smartphone mount.

Indoors low light
Indoors low light
Outdoors low light
Outdoors low light
Portrait mode
Portrait mode - 2
Indoors without Dazzle Color
Indoors with Dazzle Color
Outdoors without HDR
Outdoors with HDR

Front Camera

Front camera sample
Front camera sample

The R17 Pro uses a 25 MP Sony IMX576 sensor with an f/2.0 aperture. The selfie cam also gets a good dose of AI support and a real-time hardware-based Sensor HDR feature that allows for good selfies even with a strong backlight. The AI does a good job of beautifying things albeit it sometimes feels as if the picture is overly smoothened out. Selfies come out well and the portrait effects are prominent. However, we did notice a tendency of the camera to brighten the image more than required.

Performance

The Snapdragon 710 is an able upper mid-range chipset that can offer a near-flagship performance. In regular use, we found absolutely no lags in the interface or any hiccups while playing demanding games. AI functions also seem to be accelerated as we will be seeing shortly. Since ColorOS is a relatively heavier skin, it did have its bearing on the SoC sometimes. But given the copious 8 GB of RAM the stutters were rare to come by. That being said, we feel there's still a lot of room for optimization in ColorOS and we hope things get more refined with ColorOS 6.

CPU and GPU Benchmarks

We evaluated the SoC performance using a variety of synthetic CPU and GPU benchmarks. For comparison, we pitted the Oppo R17 Pro against a few other Snapdragon 710-powered phones and also against the HiSilicon Kirin 710, Snapdragon 660, and Snapdragon 835 SoCs. When it comes to raw CPU scores, the Snapdragon 710 was about 10-15 % better than the Kirin 710 and was within striking distance of the Snapdragon 835. This is noteworthy as the Snapdragon 835 was Qualcomm's flagship just two generations ago. Interestingly, the Snapdragon 660 in the Samsung Galaxy A9 wasn't too far behind the R17 Pro's Snapdragon 710. However, the Snapdragon 660 in the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) did trail by at least 15% as it was clocked lower than normal. So overall, we see that the Snapdragon 710 has good number-crunching abilities comparable to the Snapdragon 835 from a couple of years ago. 

GPU tests tell a different story, though. The Adreno 616 in the R17 Pro posted somewhat low scores in most GPU tests. It trails behind the Adreno 540 by a long shot but performs admirably better than the Adreno 512 and the Mali-G51 MP4. We did see some performance penalties compared to other SD 710 phones, so there's a likelihood of Oppo's software being at fault here. 

AnTuTu v7
MEM
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
11653 Points ∼100% +50%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
11076 Points ∼95% +43%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9027 Points ∼77% +16%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8639 Points ∼74% +11%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8159 Points ∼70% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7965 Points ∼68% +3%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7753 Points ∼67%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4470 - 19329, n=290)
7560 Points ∼65% -2%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7519 Points ∼65% -3%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6951 Points ∼60% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (3343 - 8159, n=4)
6694 Points ∼57% -14%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3343 Points ∼29% -57%
UX
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
46663 Points ∼100% +5%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
46549 Points ∼100% +5%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
45142 Points ∼97% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (43917 - 46663, n=4)
44744 Points ∼96% +1%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
44253 Points ∼95%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
44143 Points ∼95% 0%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
43917 Points ∼94% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
38546 Points ∼83% -13%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
36801 Points ∼79% -17%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
36411 Points ∼78% -18%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
33509 Points ∼72% -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (14770 - 78512, n=289)
32335 Points ∼69% -27%
GPU
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
85868 Points ∼100% +129%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
83821 Points ∼98% +124%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
49284 Points ∼57% +32%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
48087 Points ∼56% +28%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
47803 Points ∼56% +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (37446 - 49284, n=4)
45655 Points ∼53% +22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6252 - 191221, n=290)
41353 Points ∼48% +10%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
37446 Points ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
30434 Points ∼35% -19%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
28462 Points ∼33% -24%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
28186 Points ∼33% -25%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
21722 Points ∼25% -42%
CPU
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
73371 Points ∼100% +12%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
72127 Points ∼98% +10%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
66830 Points ∼91% +2%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
65796 Points ∼90% 0%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
65661 Points ∼89%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (63606 - 66830, n=4)
65473 Points ∼89% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
63897 Points ∼87% -3%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
63606 Points ∼87% -3%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
63215 Points ∼86% -4%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
57157 Points ∼78% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (24930 - 127208, n=290)
51806 Points ∼71% -21%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
48764 Points ∼66% -26%
Total Score
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
214815 Points ∼100% +38%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
209729 Points ∼98% +35%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
169262 Points ∼79% +9%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
166709 Points ∼78% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (155113 - 169262, n=4)
162553 Points ∼76% +5%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
159128 Points ∼74% +3%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
155113 Points ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
140878 Points ∼66% -9%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
140131 Points ∼65% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 398720, n=291)
133058 Points ∼62% -14%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
132834 Points ∼62% -14%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
116346 Points ∼54% -25%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 battery life
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
739 min ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (368 - 739, n=2)
554 min ∼75% -25%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
482 min ∼65% -35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (368 - 1353, n=32)
478 min ∼65% -35%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
368 min ∼50% -50%
Computer Vision score
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5006 Points ∼100% +47%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3783 Points ∼76% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1602 - 12391, n=131)
3558 Points ∼71% +5%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3518 Points ∼70% +3%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3495 Points ∼70% +3%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3487 Points ∼70% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (3402 - 3518, n=4)
3476 Points ∼69% +2%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3402 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3363 Points ∼67% -1%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3198 Points ∼64% -6%
Storage score
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5913 Points ∼100% +22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0 - 33199, n=129)
5527 Points ∼93% +14%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5372 Points ∼91% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (4719 - 5372, n=4)
4933 Points ∼83% +2%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4854 Points ∼82% 0%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4851 Points ∼82%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
4790 Points ∼81% -1%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4719 Points ∼80% -3%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Points ∼0% -100%
Work 2.0 performance score
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7193 Points ∼100% +11%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6929 Points ∼96% +7%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6887 Points ∼96% +7%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
6806 Points ∼95% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (6453 - 6887, n=4)
6691 Points ∼93% +4%
Qualcomm QRD SD835 5.5-inch reference smartphone
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6640 Points ∼92% +3%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6616 Points ∼92% +3%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6595 Points ∼92% +2%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
6483 Points ∼90% 0%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6453 Points ∼90%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5844 Points ∼81% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5789 Points ∼80% -10%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
5616 Points ∼78% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=378)
5073 Points ∼71% -21%
Work performance score
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9424 Points ∼100% +34%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8414 Points ∼89% +20%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8309 Points ∼88% +18%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8125 Points ∼86% +15%
Qualcomm QRD SD835 5.5-inch reference smartphone
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8085 Points ∼86% +15%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7925 Points ∼84% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (7041 - 8414, n=4)
7846 Points ∼83% +11%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7739 Points ∼82% +10%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7620 Points ∼81% +8%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7041 Points ∼75%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6573 Points ∼70% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6338 Points ∼67% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=546)
5569 Points ∼59% -21%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
5058 Points ∼54% -28%
BaseMark OS II
Web
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1329 Points ∼100% +17%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1202 Points ∼90% +6%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1194 Points ∼90% +5%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1135 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1105 Points ∼83% -3%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1098 Points ∼83% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (1070 - 1135, n=4)
1095 Points ∼82% -4%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1077 Points ∼81% -5%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1070 Points ∼81% -6%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1066 Points ∼80% -6%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1027 Points ∼77% -10%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1024 Points ∼77% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=621)
751 Points ∼57% -34%
Graphics
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6100 Points ∼100% +110%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6084 Points ∼100% +109%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4716 Points ∼77% +62%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3102 Points ∼51% +7%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3086 Points ∼51% +6%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3055 Points ∼50% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (2906 - 3102, n=4)
3037 Points ∼50% +5%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2906 Points ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2332 Points ∼38% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=621)
1986 Points ∼33% -32%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1970 Points ∼32% -32%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1489 Points ∼24% -49%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1478 Points ∼24% -49%
Memory
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3845 Points ∼100% +8%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3575 Points ∼93%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3162 Points ∼82% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (2947 - 3575, n=4)
3148 Points ∼82% -12%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3059 Points ∼80% -14%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3036 Points ∼79% -15%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3013 Points ∼78% -16%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3009 Points ∼78% -16%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2947 Points ∼77% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2393 Points ∼62% -33%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1737 Points ∼45% -51%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=621)
1487 Points ∼39% -58%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1434 Points ∼37% -60%
System
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5888 Points ∼100% +5%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5872 Points ∼100% +4%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5782 Points ∼98% +3%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5681 Points ∼96% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (5603 - 5782, n=4)
5675 Points ∼96% +1%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5632 Points ∼96%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
5603 Points ∼95% -1%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5267 Points ∼89% -6%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
5146 Points ∼87% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5063 Points ∼86% -10%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3745 Points ∼64% -34%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3047 Points ∼52% -46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=621)
2910 Points ∼49% -48%
Overall
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3678 Points ∼100% +29%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3416 Points ∼93% +20%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2855 Points ∼78%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2775 Points ∼75% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (2731 - 2855, n=4)
2774 Points ∼75% -3%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2735 Points ∼74% -4%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2731 Points ∼74% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2364 Points ∼64% -17%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2301 Points ∼63% -19%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2201 Points ∼60% -23%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2165 Points ∼59% -24%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1905 Points ∼52% -33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=625)
1450 Points ∼39% -49%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8000 Points ∼100% +20%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7865 Points ∼98% +18%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6813 Points ∼85% +2%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
6775 Points ∼85% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (6601 - 6813, n=4)
6714 Points ∼84% +1%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6668 Points ∼83%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6601 Points ∼83% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5542 Points ∼69% -17%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4983 Points ∼62% -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=322)
4603 Points ∼58% -31%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3813 Points ∼48% -43%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3551 Points ∼44% -47%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6701 Points ∼100% +13%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6670 Points ∼100% +13%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5917 Points ∼88%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5856 Points ∼87% -1%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5845 Points ∼87% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (5754 - 5917, n=4)
5843 Points ∼87% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5826 Points ∼87% -2%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
5754 Points ∼86% -3%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5497 Points ∼82% -7%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
5429 Points ∼81% -8%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4895 Points ∼73% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3240 - 11598, n=381)
4621 Points ∼69% -22%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1962 Points ∼100% +7%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1952 Points ∼99% +6%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1833 Points ∼93%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1829 Points ∼93% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (1799 - 1833, n=4)
1819 Points ∼93% -1%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1813 Points ∼92% -1%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1799 Points ∼92% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1601 Points ∼82% -13%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1563 Points ∼80% -15%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1544 Points ∼79% -16%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1431 Points ∼73% -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (903 - 4824, n=383)
1387 Points ∼71% -24%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Smartphone
  (2051 - 15735, n=61)
2372 Points ∼100% +11%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2129 Points ∼90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
 
2129 Points ∼90% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (341 - 14536, n=61)
2389 Points ∼100% +51%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1579 Points ∼66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
 
1579 Points ∼66% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (419 - 14786, n=64)
2076 Points ∼100% +24%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1675 Points ∼81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
 
1675 Points ∼81% 0%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3161 Points ∼100% +72%
Qualcomm QRD SD835 5.5-inch reference smartphone
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2986 Points ∼94% +62%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2789 Points ∼88% +52%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2774 Points ∼88% +51%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2550 Points ∼81% +39%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2534 Points ∼80% +38%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2492 Points ∼79% +35%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2382 Points ∼75% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (1840 - 2534, n=4)
2200 Points ∼70% +20%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2121 Points ∼67% +15%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1932 Points ∼61% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=392)
1844 Points ∼58% 0%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1840 Points ∼58%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1613 Points ∼51% -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4347 Points ∼100% +132%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4187 Points ∼96% +123%
Qualcomm QRD SD835 5.5-inch reference smartphone
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4086 Points ∼94% +118%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3144 Points ∼72% +68%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1875 Points ∼43%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1871 Points ∼43% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (1845 - 1875, n=4)
1863 Points ∼43% -1%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1862 Points ∼43% -1%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1845 Points ∼42% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=392)
1619 Points ∼37% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1268 Points ∼29% -32%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1139 Points ∼26% -39%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
843 Points ∼19% -55%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
840 Points ∼19% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4012 Points ∼100% +115%
Qualcomm QRD SD835 5.5-inch reference smartphone
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3764 Points ∼94% +102%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3584 Points ∼89% +92%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2596 Points ∼65% +39%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1981 Points ∼49% +6%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1964 Points ∼49% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (1867 - 1981, n=4)
1922 Points ∼48% +3%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1876 Points ∼47% 0%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1867 Points ∼47%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=395)
1504 Points ∼37% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1433 Points ∼36% -23%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1270 Points ∼32% -32%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
993 Points ∼25% -47%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
981 Points ∼24% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3157 Points ∼100% +70%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2723 Points ∼86% +46%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2645 Points ∼84% +42%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2578 Points ∼82% +38%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2526 Points ∼80% +36%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2516 Points ∼80% +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (1862 - 2526, n=4)
2272 Points ∼72% +22%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2238 Points ∼71% +20%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2184 Points ∼69% +17%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2119 Points ∼67% +14%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1862 Points ∼59%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=407)
1821 Points ∼58% -2%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1516 Points ∼48% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6056 Points ∼100% +113%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4514 Points ∼75% +59%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4333 Points ∼72% +53%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2887 Points ∼48% +2%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2884 Points ∼48% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (2841 - 2887, n=4)
2867 Points ∼47% +1%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2855 Points ∼47% 0%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2841 Points ∼47%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=407)
2194 Points ∼36% -23%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1806 Points ∼30% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1757 Points ∼29% -38%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1378 Points ∼23% -51%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1336 Points ∼22% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5030 Points ∼100% +98%
Qualcomm QRD SD835 5.5-inch reference smartphone
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4791 Points ∼95% +88%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3608 Points ∼72% +42%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3152 Points ∼63% +24%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2798 Points ∼56% +10%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2772 Points ∼55% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (2544 - 2798, n=4)
2701 Points ∼54% +6%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2690 Points ∼53% +6%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2544 Points ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1898 Points ∼38% -25%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1887 Points ∼38% -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=408)
1872 Points ∼37% -26%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1534 Points ∼30% -40%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1494 Points ∼30% -41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3068 Points ∼100% +25%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2946 Points ∼96% +20%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2668 Points ∼87% +9%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2514 Points ∼82% +3%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2489 Points ∼81% +2%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2447 Points ∼80% 0%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2445 Points ∼80%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (2054 - 2514, n=4)
2365 Points ∼77% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2073 Points ∼68% -15%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2054 Points ∼67% -16%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1883 Points ∼61% -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=468)
1781 Points ∼58% -27%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1667 Points ∼54% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4016 Points ∼100% +135%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3926 Points ∼98% +130%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2853 Points ∼71% +67%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1714 Points ∼43% 0%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1709 Points ∼43%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1709 Points ∼43% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (1702 - 1714, n=4)
1709 Points ∼43% 0%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1702 Points ∼42% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=470)
1350 Points ∼34% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1185 Points ∼30% -31%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1061 Points ∼26% -38%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
856 Points ∼21% -50%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
819 Points ∼20% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3758 Points ∼100% +105%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3656 Points ∼97% +100%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2548 Points ∼68% +39%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1836 Points ∼49% 0%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1834 Points ∼49% 0%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1832 Points ∼49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (1774 - 1836, n=4)
1819 Points ∼48% -1%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1774 Points ∼47% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1354 Points ∼36% -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=478)
1286 Points ∼34% -30%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1175 Points ∼31% -36%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
990 Points ∼26% -46%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
963 Points ∼26% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3031 Points ∼100% +26%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2741 Points ∼90% +14%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2654 Points ∼88% +11%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2495 Points ∼82% +4%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2490 Points ∼82% +4%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2467 Points ∼81% +3%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2400 Points ∼79%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2383 Points ∼79% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (1878 - 2495, n=4)
2310 Points ∼76% -4%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2287 Points ∼75% -5%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1878 Points ∼62% -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=501)
1691 Points ∼56% -30%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1667 Points ∼55% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5791 Points ∼100% +113%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4522 Points ∼78% +66%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4511 Points ∼78% +66%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2767 Points ∼48% +2%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2763 Points ∼48% +1%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2757 Points ∼48% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (2725 - 2767, n=4)
2753 Points ∼48% +1%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2725 Points ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1918 Points ∼33% -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=501)
1815 Points ∼31% -33%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1711 Points ∼30% -37%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1327 Points ∼23% -51%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1256 Points ∼22% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4816 Points ∼100% +82%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3709 Points ∼77% +40%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3275 Points ∼68% +24%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2694 Points ∼56% +2%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2691 Points ∼56% +2%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2645 Points ∼55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (2490 - 2694, n=4)
2630 Points ∼55% -1%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2490 Points ∼52% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2054 Points ∼43% -22%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1825 Points ∼38% -31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=509)
1562 Points ∼32% -41%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1490 Points ∼31% -44%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1414 Points ∼29% -47%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
22668 Points ∼100% +65%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
21407 Points ∼94% +56%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
21348 Points ∼94% +55%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
20772 Points ∼92% +51%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
18523 Points ∼82% +35%
Qualcomm QRD SD835 5.5-inch reference smartphone
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
18019 Points ∼79% +31%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
15088 Points ∼67% +10%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14820 Points ∼65% +8%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14621 Points ∼65% +6%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
14570 Points ∼64% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (13760 - 14820, n=4)
14443 Points ∼64% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=659)
13790 Points ∼61% 0%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
13760 Points ∼61%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
12023 Points ∼53% -13%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
58097 Points ∼100% +56%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
58018 Points ∼100% +56%
Qualcomm QRD SD835 5.5-inch reference smartphone
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
57067 Points ∼98% +54%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
39655 Points ∼68% +7%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
39161 Points ∼67% +5%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
38920 Points ∼67% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (37157 - 39655, n=4)
38723 Points ∼67% +4%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
37157 Points ∼64%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
32056 Points ∼55% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
29065 Points ∼50% -22%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
25561 Points ∼44% -31%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
22605 Points ∼39% -39%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
21643 Points ∼37% -42%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7567 - 162695, n=659)
20320 Points ∼35% -45%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
42040 Points ∼100% +56%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
42022 Points ∼100% +56%
Qualcomm QRD SD835 5.5-inch reference smartphone
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
38739 Points ∼92% +44%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
28895 Points ∼69% +7%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
28603 Points ∼68% +6%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
28454 Points ∼68% +6%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
28423 Points ∼68% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (26967 - 28895, n=4)
28185 Points ∼67% +5%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
26967 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
25783 Points ∼61% -4%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
22168 Points ∼53% -18%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
22145 Points ∼53% -18%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
18377 Points ∼44% -32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8316 - 83518, n=660)
16844 Points ∼40% -38%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
15 fps ∼100% +117%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=172)
8.99 fps ∼60% +30%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.4 fps ∼56% +22%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.2 fps ∼55% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (5.9 - 8.4, n=4)
7.35 fps ∼49% +7%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6.9 fps ∼46%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
5.9 fps ∼39% -14%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
4.2 fps ∼28% -39%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3 fps ∼20% -57%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2.2 fps ∼15% -68%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9.7 fps ∼100% +98%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7.8 fps ∼80% +59%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=172)
6.24 fps ∼64% +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (4.9 - 7.8, n=4)
5.73 fps ∼59% +17%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.2 fps ∼54% +6%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5 fps ∼52% +2%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4.9 fps ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4.8 fps ∼49% -2%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.5 fps ∼36% -29%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2.6 fps ∼27% -47%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
24 fps ∼100% +118%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=173)
13.6 fps ∼57% +24%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps ∼54% +18%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps ∼54% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (11 - 13, n=4)
12.3 fps ∼51% +12%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps ∼50% +9%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
11 fps ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7.5 fps ∼31% -32%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
6.4 fps ∼27% -42%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4.7 fps ∼20% -57%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
25 fps ∼100% +92%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=173)
14.9 fps ∼60% +15%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps ∼56% +8%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps ∼56% +8%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps ∼56% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (13 - 14, n=4)
13.8 fps ∼55% +6%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
13 fps ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8.6 fps ∼34% -34%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7 fps ∼28% -46%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.7 fps ∼23% -56%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Qualcomm QRD SD835 5.5-inch reference smartphone
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
26 fps ∼100% +100%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
26 fps ∼100% +100%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
25 fps ∼96% +92%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
20 fps ∼77% +54%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
13 fps ∼50%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps ∼50% 0%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps ∼50% 0%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps ∼50% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (13 - 13, n=4)
13 fps ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=398)
10.7 fps ∼41% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9.1 fps ∼35% -30%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.1 fps ∼31% -38%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7.7 fps ∼30% -41%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
6.9 fps ∼27% -47%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps ∼100% +109%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
19 fps ∼83% +73%
Qualcomm QRD SD835 5.5-inch reference smartphone
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
15 fps ∼65% +36%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
15 fps ∼65% +36%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps ∼57% +18%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps ∼52% +9%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps ∼52% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (11 - 13, n=4)
12 fps ∼52% +9%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
11 fps ∼48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=402)
9.74 fps ∼42% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8.3 fps ∼36% -25%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7.5 fps ∼33% -32%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7.1 fps ∼31% -35%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
6.5 fps ∼28% -41%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Qualcomm QRD SD835 5.5-inch reference smartphone
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
119 fps ∼100% +83%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
113 fps ∼95% +74%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
106 fps ∼89% +63%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
88 fps ∼74% +35%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
65 fps ∼55%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
65 fps ∼55% 0%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
65 fps ∼55% 0%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
65 fps ∼55% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (65 - 65, n=4)
65 fps ∼55% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
46 fps ∼39% -29%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
45 fps ∼38% -31%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
39 fps ∼33% -40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=689)
35.3 fps ∼30% -46%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
33 fps ∼28% -49%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
88 fps ∼100% +63%
Qualcomm QRD SD835 5.5-inch reference smartphone
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps ∼68% +11%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps ∼68% +11%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps ∼68% +11%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
57 fps ∼65% +6%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
56 fps ∼64% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (54 - 57, n=4)
55.5 fps ∼63% +3%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
55 fps ∼63% +2%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
54 fps ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
50 fps ∼57% -7%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
42 fps ∼48% -22%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
35 fps ∼40% -35%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
31 fps ∼35% -43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=692)
27.3 fps ∼31% -49%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Qualcomm QRD SD835 5.5-inch reference smartphone
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
64 fps ∼100% +94%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps ∼94% +82%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
54 fps ∼84% +64%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
40 fps ∼63% +21%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
33 fps ∼52%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
33 fps ∼52% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (32 - 33, n=4)
32.5 fps ∼51% -2%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
32 fps ∼50% -3%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
32 fps ∼50% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps ∼36% -30%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
21 fps ∼33% -36%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
20 fps ∼31% -39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=608)
19.6 fps ∼31% -41%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
17 fps ∼27% -48%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
53 fps ∼100% +96%
Qualcomm QRD SD835 5.5-inch reference smartphone
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
40 fps ∼75% +48%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
39 fps ∼74% +44%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
37 fps ∼70% +37%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
31 fps ∼58% +15%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
31 fps ∼58% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (27 - 31, n=4)
29.5 fps ∼56% +9%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
29 fps ∼55% +7%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
27 fps ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
21 fps ∼40% -22%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
19 fps ∼36% -30%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
19 fps ∼36% -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=613)
18.1 fps ∼34% -33%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps ∼30% -41%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Qualcomm QRD SD835 5.5-inch reference smartphone
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
43 fps ∼100% +87%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
41 fps ∼95% +78%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
41 fps ∼95% +78%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
31 fps ∼72% +35%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps ∼53%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
23 fps ∼53% 0%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
23 fps ∼53% 0%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
23 fps ∼53% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (23 - 23, n=4)
23 fps ∼53% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=469)
16.1 fps ∼37% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
15 fps ∼35% -35%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps ∼33% -39%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps ∼30% -43%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps ∼28% -48%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
37 fps ∼100% +95%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
31 fps ∼84% +63%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
24 fps ∼65% +26%
Qualcomm QRD SD835 5.5-inch reference smartphone
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
22 fps ∼59% +16%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
22 fps ∼59% +16%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
22 fps ∼59% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (19 - 22, n=4)
20.8 fps ∼56% +9%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
20 fps ∼54% +5%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
19 fps ∼51%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=472)
15.4 fps ∼42% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
14 fps ∼38% -26%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps ∼32% -37%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps ∼32% -37%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps ∼30% -42%

We also wanted to evaluate how the Snapdragon 710 performs under sustained load. We ran GFXBench Long Term T-Rex ES 2.0 and Long Term Manhattan ES 3.1 for about 30 iterations. Temperatures hovered around a reasonable 33 °C during both runs. In Long Term T-Rex ES 2.0, we find intermittent drops in performance but the SoC was able to recover quickly. For some reason, it could not manage to sustain well and the maximum clock speed attained was 1.71 GHz.

In the more strenuous Long Term Manhattan ES 3.1 test, the only major performance drop was seen after 18 iterations and the SoC could sustain well for the most part. CPU clocks were mostly in the 1.7 GHz range with occasional boosts to 2.2 GHz. Overall, throttling didn't seem to be a major issue with the Snapdragon 710 and the phone also does a good job of keeping the thermals under check.

CPU temperature readings in GFXBench Long Term T-Rex ES 2.0
CPU temperature readings in GFXBench Long Term T-Rex ES 2.0
Intermittent drops in performance in GFXBench Long Term T-Rex ES 2.0
Intermittent drops in performance in GFXBench Long Term T-Rex ES 2.0
CPU clock speeds in GFXBench Long Term T-Rex ES 2.0
CPU clock speeds in GFXBench Long Term T-Rex ES 2.0
CPU temperature readings in GFXBench Long Term Manhattan ES 3.1
CPU temperature readings in GFXBench Long Term Manhattan ES 3.1
Drop in performance after 18 iterations in GFXBench Long Term Manhattan ES 3.1
Drop in performance after 18 iterations in GFXBench Long Term Manhattan ES 3.1
CPU clock speeds in GFXBench Long Term Manhattan ES 3.1
CPU clock speeds in GFXBench Long Term Manhattan ES 3.1

Web Benchmarks

Web browsing in Chrome
Web browsing in Chrome

Oppo offers no less than three browsers in the default ROM — Oppo Browser, UC Browser, and Google Chrome. Depending on how you configure them, both Oppo and UC Browsers can nag you to no end with notifications of unimportant news and rumors. We recommend using Google Chrome or Microsoft Edge for a much better and safer browsing experience. For our testing, we used the latest version of Google Chrome. We found that the R17 Pro scored much below even its contemporary SD 710 phones in all browser benchmarks and only marginally better than the SD 660 phones in some tests.

Regular browsing should pose no issues, though. With ample RAM available, you can have tabs open by the dozen and still have a responsive browsing experience. Streaming FHD or even 1440p videos was very smooth. We also played a game of Interland in the Chrome browser and didn't have issues with fluidity or touch responsiveness in the game. 

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Qualcomm QRD SD835 5.5-inch reference smartphone
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
71 Points ∼100% +41%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Chrome 63)
66.477 Points ∼94% +32%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 71)
66.048 Points ∼93% +31%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 72)
65.987 Points ∼93% +31%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 72)
65.331 Points ∼92% +29%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Chrome 66)
62.157 Points ∼88% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (50.5 - 66, n=4)
62 Points ∼87% +23%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 74)
55.132 Points ∼78% +9%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 52)
54.201 Points ∼76% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Chrome 70)
51.786 Points ∼73% +3%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Chrome 73)
50.5 Points ∼71%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 71)
45.31 Points ∼64% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (12 - 273, n=520)
39.3 Points ∼55% -22%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Chrome 74)
36.437 Points ∼100% +26%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 74)
32.095 Points ∼88% +11%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 74)
31.781 Points ∼87% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (12.9 - 108, n=97)
30.9 Points ∼85% +7%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Chrome 73)
29 Points ∼80%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
 
29 Points ∼80% 0%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Qualcomm QRD SD835 5.5-inch reference smartphone
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Chrome 56)
14300 Points ∼100% +31%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 72)
12802 Points ∼90% +18%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 71)
12717 Points ∼89% +17%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Chrome 63)
12509 Points ∼87% +15%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 72)
12209 Points ∼85% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (10885 - 12802, n=4)
12153 Points ∼85% +12%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Chrome 66)
11544 Points ∼81% +6%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Chrome 73)
10885 Points ∼76%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 74)
10288 Points ∼72% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Chrome 70)
10145 Points ∼71% -7%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 74)
9779 Points ∼68% -10%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 52)
9069 Points ∼63% -17%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 71)
8463 Points ∼59% -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1994 - 43280, n=682)
6403 Points ∼45% -41%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (603 - 59466, n=702)
10678 ms * ∼100% -181%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Chrome 66)
4812.6 ms * ∼45% -27%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 71)
4421.4 ms * ∼41% -16%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 74)
4137.8 ms * ∼39% -9%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 74)
4103 ms * ∼38% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Chrome 70)
3841.8 (min: 1) ms * ∼36% -1%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Chrome 73)
3800.1 ms * ∼36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (3035 - 3800, n=4)
3267 ms * ∼31% +14%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 72)
3176.5 ms * ∼30% +16%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Chrome 63)
3096 ms * ∼29% +19%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 72)
3057.7 ms * ∼29% +20%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 71)
3034.9 ms * ∼28% +20%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 52)
2768 ms * ∼26% +27%
Qualcomm QRD SD835 5.5-inch reference smartphone
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2425 ms * ∼23% +36%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 71)
209 Points ∼100% +23%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Chrome 66)
204 Points ∼98% +20%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 72)
198 Points ∼95% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (170 - 209, n=4)
192 Points ∼92% +13%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 72)
189 Points ∼90% +11%
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 71)
182 Points ∼87% +7%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Chrome 63)
181 Points ∼87% +6%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Chrome 73)
170 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Chrome 70)
167 Points ∼80% -2%
Qualcomm QRD SD835 5.5-inch reference smartphone
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
154 Points ∼74% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (66 - 362, n=333)
120 Points ∼57% -29%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 52)
90 Points ∼43% -47%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Chrome 66)
77 Points ∼100% +33%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 71)
72 Points ∼94% +24%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 72)
71 Points ∼92% +22%
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 72)
70 Points ∼91% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Qualcomm Adreno 616
  (58 - 72, n=4)
67.8 Points ∼88% +17%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 74)
66 Points ∼86% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 161, n=151)
63.4 Points ∼82% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Chrome 70)
59 Points ∼77% +2%
Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
58 Points ∼75%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Benchmarks

The Oppo R17 Pro uses UFS 2.1 storage for high read and write speeds. We find that Random Writes are on par with other UFS 2.1 devices such as the Samsung Galaxy A9, Nokia 8 Sirocco, and the OnePlus 5T. Random Reads were somewhat slower than the above phones but still better than devices with eMMC storage. Sequential writes and reads were good, although we do find that other UFS 2.1 phones had significantly higher sequential write speeds. Nevertheless, the differences are not readily perceivable in daily usage and the relatively faster storage helps with improved game load times and app launches.

Oppo R17 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Meizu X8
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 ZB630KL
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
AndroBench 3-5
57%
-19%
57%
-34%
-24%
64%
-1%
26%
20%
-38%
Random Write 4KB
20.98
77.98
272%
16.46
-22%
87.29
316%
7.3
-65%
14.76
-30%
88.19
320%
19.79
-6%
22.4
7%
20
-5%
10.5
-50%
Random Read 4KB
102.37
94.07
-8%
81.96
-20%
71.57
-30%
69.9
-32%
77.44
-24%
74.92
-27%
116.76
14%
140.7
37%
138.1
35%
71.5
-30%
Sequential Write 256KB
191.65
191.75
0%
203.15
6%
158.63
-17%
203.8
6%
190.76
0%
198.95
4%
194.65
2%
211.6
10%
203.4
6%
138
-28%
Sequential Read 256KB
489.9
304.32
-38%
293.55
-40%
293.23
-40%
279.3
-43%
284.55
-42%
285.54
-42%
426.63
-13%
737.5
51%
698.7
43%
281
-43%

AI Benchmarks

As detailed in our Realme U1 review, AI benchmark scores depend on many variables and a low score doesn't really indicate that the SoC itself lacks AI capabilities. A lot depends on the software and how OEMs expose the AI SDKs as well. That being said, we ran AI Benchmark and AITuTu to get a relative idea of the Snapdragon 710's AI performance in comparison with some of the other SoCs we have with us for testing, including the MediaTek Helio P70, Snapdragon 632, and the Snapdragon 660.  

We find that the Oppo R17 Pro indeed tries to do a good job with AI but is held back by the software. In AI Benchmark, the R17 Pro scored 3677 points while the Android 9-based Realme 3 scored 6364. Android 9 has better AI support than Android 8.1 so we expect the R17 Pro to also show equivalent or even better performance once ColorOS 6 based on Android 9 arrives for the handset later this year. 

In AITuTu, we see that the R17 Pro led the charts by a long mile despite being on Android 8.1. However, we also find the Android 9 phones such as the Realme 3 and the Asus ZenFone Max (M2) offer equivalent performance for their SoCs' worth. Again, an update to Android 9 should help propel the R17 Pro's scores even further. During running the benchmark itself, we found that the Snapdragon 710 was able to easily perform all AI recognition functions and object tracking without breaking a sweat.

Oppo R17 Pro - Snapdragon 710 - Android 8.1 - AI Benchmark
Oppo R17 Pro - Snapdragon 710 - Android 8.1 - AI Benchmark
Realme U1 - Helio P70 - Android 8.1 - AI Benchmark
Realme U1 - Helio P70 - Android 8.1 - AI Benchmark
Realme 3 - Helio P70 - Android 9 - AI Benchmark
Realme 3 - Helio P70 - Android 9 - AI Benchmark
Asus ZenFone Max (M2) - Snapdragon 632 - Android 9 - AI Benchmark
Asus ZenFone Max (M2) - Snapdragon 632 - Android 9 - AI Benchmark
Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) - Snapdragon 660 - Android 9 - AI Benchmark
Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) - Snapdragon 660 - Android 9 - AI Benchmark
Oppo R17 Pro - Snapdragon 710 - Android 8.1 - AITuTu
Oppo R17 Pro - Snapdragon 710 - Android 8.1 - AITuTu
Realme U1 - Helio P70 - Android 8.1 - AITuTu
Realme U1 - Helio P70 - Android 8.1 - AITuTu
Realme 3 - Helio P70 - Android 9 - AITuTu
Realme 3 - Helio P70 - Android 9 - AITuTu
Asus ZenFone Max (M2) - Snapdragon 632 - Android 9 - AITuTu
Asus ZenFone Max (M2) - Snapdragon 632 - Android 9 - AITuTu
Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) - Snapdragon 660 - Android 9 - AITuTu
Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) - Snapdragon 660 - Android 9 - AITuTu

Gaming

Gaming on the Oppo R17 Pro is a pleasure thanks to the fast chipset, enough RAM, and the OLED display. While the synthetic GPU benchmarks weren't really convincing, games played with absolutely no stutter or lag. The phone was also comfortable to hold even during extended gameplay. Games such as PUBG Mobile and Asphalt 9: Legends averaged 30 fps consistently while Shadow Fight 3 and Dead Trigger 2 had no trouble in attaining 60 fps. 

Oppo offers a Game Space app for dedicating hardware resources to the game. You can select between High Performance, Low Power, and Balanced performance modes. It didn't make any perceivable difference to the actual gaming experience, but it does come in handy for minimizing notifications, restricting network activity of background apps, and other distractions while gaming. 

PUBG Mobile 30 fps (HD High)
PUBG Mobile 30 fps (HD High)
Shadow Fight 3 60 fps (High)
Shadow Fight 3 60 fps (High)
Asphalt 9: Legends 30 fps (High)
Asphalt 9: Legends 30 fps (High)
Dead Trigger 2 60 fps (High)
Dead Trigger 2 60 fps (High)
PUBG Mobile
 SettingsValue
 HD30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Shadow Fight 3
 SettingsValue
 high60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Asphalt 9: Legends
 SettingsValue
 High Quality29 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!