Notebookcheck Logo

Oukitel RT2 review - Extremely robust outdoor tablet for the construction site with monster battery and LTE

Rugged Tab with IP rating & MIL-STD-810. With the RT2, Oukitel serves an interesting niche in the tablet segment, namely the outdoor sector. The casing is very robust and waterproof, and the battery runtimes are very good. Moreover, the tablet from Oukitel is attractively priced for a rugged tablet.
Test Oukitel RT2 Outdoor Tablet

The outdoor tablet from Oukitel is equipped with a 10.1-inch FHD+ display and relies on a MediaTek chipset with 8 GB DDR4X RAM. Besides the high resistance against damaging environmental influences, the Oukitel RT2 has another equipment highlight - the capacity of the installed battery is very generous at 20,000 mAh. The RT2 can even function as a power bank for the smartphone or smartwatch.

Oukitel RT2 (RT Series)
Processor
Mediatek MT8788 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A73 / A53
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
Display
10.10 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 224 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, IPS LCD, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 109 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: Type C, Card Reader: microsSD up to 1TB, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: G-sensor, Compass (magnetic), Gyroscope , OTG, reverse charging, Miracast, FM radio
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM B5/B8/B3/B2; WCDMA: B1/B2/B4/B5/B8; FDD-LTE: B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28A/B28B/B66; TDD-LTE: B38/B39/B40/B41", Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 17.3 x 249.1 x 167.8 ( = 0.68 x 9.81 x 6.61 in)
Battery
20000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.2,Samsung S5K3P3)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.4, Samsung S5K2P7SX)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Onscreen, charger, USB cable, hand belt, hardware hook, Oukitel UI, 12 Months Warranty, Widevine L3, SAR value: 1.681 W/kg Body, fanless, ruggedized, waterproof
Weight
1.03 kg ( = 36.33 oz / 2.27 pounds), Power Supply: 79 g ( = 2.79 oz / 0.17 pounds)
Price
330 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
77.6 %
11/2022
Oukitel RT2
Helio MT8788, Mali-G72 MP3
1 kg17.3 mm10.10"1920x1200
82.5 %
07/2022
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2
465 g7.45 mm10.61"2000x1200
80.5 %
03/2022
Teclast T40 Pro
T618, Mali-G52 MP2
480 g9.2 mm10.36"2000x1200
87.6 %
12/2021
Xiaomi Pad 5
SD 860, Adreno 640
511 g6.85 mm11.00"2560x1600
88.4 %
09/2021
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
SD 865, Adreno 650
485 g7.25 mm10.95"2560x1600

Case - Oukitel tablet with IP rating

The focus of the Oukitel RT2 is on high stability and durability. The outdoor tablet gets the former from a solid metal frame that contributes to the hefty weight of over 1000 grams (~2.2 lb). The display-to-surface ratio, on the other hand, is rather modest at only 71 percent.

The build quality is on a satisfactory level. The casing, which is mainly made of plastic, can convince with a high certification according to IP-68/69K and the MIL-STD-810H standard. The IP69K certification even protects the Oukitel RT2 from hot water during high-pressure cleaning from a short distance.

Test Oukitel RT2 Outdoor Tablet
Test Oukitel RT2 Outdoor Tablet

Size comparision

249.1 mm / 9.81 inch 167.8 mm / 6.61 inch 17.3 mm / 0.681 inch 1 kg2.27 lbs254.69 mm / 10 inch 166.25 mm / 6.55 inch 6.85 mm / 0.2697 inch 511 g1.127 lbs253.8 mm / 9.99 inch 165.3 mm / 6.51 inch 7.25 mm / 0.2854 inch 485 g1.069 lbs251.2 mm / 9.89 inch 158.8 mm / 6.25 inch 7.45 mm / 0.2933 inch 465 g1.025 lbs248 mm / 9.76 inch 157 mm / 6.18 inch 9.2 mm / 0.3622 inch 480 g1.058 lbs210 mm / 8.27 inch 148 mm / 5.83 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 2.9 g0.00639 lbs

Features - mid-range tab with FM radio

The Oukitel RT2 is only shipped with one storage size, namely 128 GB. After deducting the operating system, approximately 109 GB are still available. Users who need more capacity can expand the storage by up to 1 TB via microSD cards without exFAT support. Alternatively, the second card slot enables another SIM card for dual use.

Besides an FM radio and a status LED, the outdoor tablet supports wireless transmission via Miracast and USB OTG. Data can then be read out through the USB Type-C port, for example for playing video material, and to connect other external peripherals, such as external keyboards. According to Oukitel, the USB port is supposed to deliver a data transfer rate of up to 500 MBit/s. We assume that the 2.0 standard is meant here.

microSD card reader

The integrated microSD slot supports the current SDHC and SDXC standards. The outdoor tablet's performance in the Cross Platform Disk test is quite convincing in combination with our reference card Angelbird AV PRO V60. However, the outdoor tablet is quite slow with a copy speed of less than 15 MB/s.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
40.3 MB/s ∼100% +161%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
18.12 MB/s ∼45% +18%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
16.11 MB/s ∼40% +4%
Oukitel RT2
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
15.42 MB/s ∼38%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Oukitel RT2 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.6 (25.4-49.2)
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø41.9 (28.3-49.3)
Oukitel RT2 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø77.2 (39.9-85.7)
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø69.3 (29-81.4)

Software - Oukitel RT2 with Android 12

The Oukitel tablet is based on Android in version 12, which the Chinese manufacturer combines with its in-house user interface. At the time of the test, the security updates are from September 2022 and the Widevine DRM level is L3. Oukitel does not specify whether and how many major Android updates will follow.

Test Oukitel RT2 Outdoor Tablet
Test Oukitel RT2 Outdoor Tablet
Test Oukitel RT2 Outdoor Tablet
Test Oukitel RT2 Outdoor Tablet

Communication and GNSS - Oukitel tablet with LTE

Bluetooth version 4.2 is available for wireless communication - an NFC chip is not installed. The integrated Wi-Fi module supports the IEEE 802.11 standard according to a/b/g/n/ac and thus theoretically operates in the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz frequency ranges. However, we could only test the Oukitel RT2 in the slow 2.4 GHz band since 5 GHz WLAN was not supported with our reference router, the Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000. The transmission speed is thus very slow and also proves to be somewhat unstable in use - the WLAN module often lost the connection to the router during the test.

However, the outdoor tablet can also access the mobile Internet with a maximum of LTE Cat. 7 thanks to a 4G modem. All popular bands in this country, including bands 20 and 28, are supported.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
902 (886min - 925max) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
635 (320min - 652max) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
780 (635min - 867max) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
538 (317min - 618max) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
347 (335min - 351max) MBit/s ∼100% +623%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
322 (315min - 326max) MBit/s ∼93% +571%
Oukitel RT2
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
48 (37min - 46max) MBit/s ∼14%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
346 (335min - 360max) MBit/s ∼100% +845%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
346 (167min - 354max) MBit/s ∼100% +845%
Oukitel RT2
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
36.6 (13min - 61max) MBit/s ∼11%
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630Tooltip
Oukitel RT2 Mediatek MT8788, ARM Mali-G72 MP3; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø43.8 (37-46)
Xiaomi Pad 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Qualcomm Adreno 640; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø538 (317-618)
Oukitel RT2 Mediatek MT8788, ARM Mali-G72 MP3; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø36.5 (13-61)
Xiaomi Pad 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Qualcomm Adreno 640; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø624 (320-652)
Outdoor locating
Outdoor locating
Locating in the building
Locating in the building

The Oukitel RT2 uses the GPS, BeiDou, Galileo and GLONASS satellite networks for positioning, but only in single-band. The outdoor positioning can score with a good accuracy, but the positioning takes quite a long time and is below average with an SNR value of under 30.

In addition, we check the positioning accuracy on a bicycle tour and compare the results with Garmin's Venu 2 smartwatch. Since the GNSS test was always aborted with our test device, we cannot provide a detailed route course for the Oukitel RT2.

Cameras - Oukitel RT2 with single cam

Shooting with the front camera of the outdoor tablet
Shooting with the front camera of the outdoor tablet

A 16-megapixel front-facing camera with an f/2.4 aperture is located in the display's upper frame. As tablets go, the quality of the photos is more than sufficient for video calls and quick selfies. Oukitel overdoes it in terms of color contrasts and exposure, but the front-facing camera still takes solid pictures.

The rear also features a 16-megapixel camera with an aperture of f/2.2. The image sharpness and details of the pictures are usable in bright light, but the quality is modest even for a tablet in this price range. Dynamics and sharpness are in need of improvement and the exposure is not a strength of the outdoor tablet.

However, we are somewhat surprised by the color reproduction - and in a positive way. In order to be able to evaluate the color reproduction under the most objective conditions possible, we take additional photos with the Oukitel RT2 in artificial light with the help of the X-Rite ColorChecker Passport. The photos surprised us with a relatively true color reproduction.

Test Oukitel RT2 Outdoor Tablet
Test Oukitel RT2 Outdoor Tablet
Camera app of the Oukitel RT2
Test Oukitel RT2 Outdoor Tablet

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow LightZoom 5x
click to load images
ColorChecker
9 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
2 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Oukitel RT2: 5.05 ∆E min: 1.37 - max: 9.37 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
55 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
63.7 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
43.8 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
66.2 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
48.6 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
77.1 ∆E
44 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Oukitel RT2: 47.4 ∆E min: 14.02 - max: 93.71 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - Oukitel tablet with power adapter

The Chinese manufacturer equips its outdoor tablet with a 33-watt power supply, a USB cable and a wrist strap including mounting utensils.

The Warranty is 12 months.

Input devices & operation - Oukitel RT2 with FaceUnlock

The outdoor tablet has a capacitive touchscreen with convincing gliding properties. There is also nothing to complain about in terms of precision, so our inputs with the fingers are accurately implemented. However, the touchscreen response is often a bit delayed or only works on the second try.

A 2D face recognition is available for biometric security. The recognition is quite fast, but a fingerprint sensor is unfortunately not available.

Display - Oukitel tablet with IPS panel

Subpixel arrangement
Subpixel arrangement

The 10.1-inch IPS display has a 2K resolution and a pixel density of just over 200 ppi. The IPS panel with 60 Hz has a somewhat uneven illumination, but we cannot see any significant shadowing.

Interestingly, Oukitel advertises its outdoor tablet with a peak brightness of 350 nits. However, the maximum brightness of 488 cd/m² measured by us with a pure white screen background is clearly higher. In addition, we check the panel's luminosity with a certain proportion of dark to bright areas (APL18) in the test. Here, we determined a similar maximum brightness of 445 cd/m².

It should be noted that despite LC technology, flickering with a very high frequency of about 300k Hz can be determined by us. In our temporal dithering test, the outdoor tablet exhibits conspicuous flickering of the subpixels.

402
cd/m²
423
cd/m²
427
cd/m²
410
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
464
cd/m²
425
cd/m²
453
cd/m²
488
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 488 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 437.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.45 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 447 cd/m²
Contrast: 758:1 (Black: 0.59 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.1 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.2
ΔE Greyscale 10.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.5
88.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.71
Oukitel RT2
IPS LCD, 1920x1200, 10.10
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
IPS LCD, 2000x1200, 10.61
Teclast T40 Pro
IPS, 2000x1200, 10.36
Xiaomi Pad 5
IPS, 2560x1600, 11.00
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
IPS, 2560x1600, 10.95
Screen
40%
27%
23%
17%
Brightness middle
447
510
14%
433
-3%
491
10%
550
23%
Brightness
438
480
10%
412
-6%
473
8%
515
18%
Brightness Distribution
82
85
4%
86
5%
91
11%
90
10%
Black Level *
0.59
0.49
17%
0.48
19%
0.87
-47%
0.96
-63%
Contrast
758
1041
37%
902
19%
564
-26%
573
-24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
10.1
1.8
82%
3
70%
1.9
81%
3.3
67%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
15.8
3.7
77%
7.2
54%
4.1
74%
7.9
50%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
10.6
2.2
79%
4.4
58%
3
72%
4.9
54%
Gamma
1.71 129%
2.17 101%
2.12 104%
2.21 100%
2.24 98%
CCT
9577 68%
6907 94%
7003 93%
7182 91%
7288 89%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 316400 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 316400 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 316400 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19409 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

The analysis of the photospectrometer and the CalMAN software reveals strongly increased Delta-E deviations from the sRGB color space with 10.1 (colors) and 10.6 (grayscale) in the factory preset color profile "Natural". We also noticed a clear blue cast in the grayscale. The black value to maximum brightness ratio of about 1:750 is also below average for an IPS panel.

Color accuracy (target color space: sRGB; profile: Natural)
Color accuracy (target color space: sRGB; profile: Natural)
Color space (Target color space: sRGB; Profile: Natural)
Color space (Target color space: sRGB; Profile: Natural)
Grayscale (Target color space: sRGB; Profile: Natural)
Grayscale (Target color space: sRGB; Profile: Natural)
Color saturation (target color space: sRGB; profile: Natural)
Color saturation (target color space: sRGB; profile: Natural)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20.04 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.89 ms rise
↘ 14.15 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39.11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.57 ms rise
↘ 20.54 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (35.7 ms).

The outdoor readability is not really convincing for an outdoor tablet even under cloudy skies. Reflections cannot be compensated with the achieved brightness level. As soon as reflections appear on the screen, content is hardly legible. However, the viewing angles are on a good level.

Test Oukitel RT2 Outdoor Tablet
Test Oukitel RT2 Outdoor Tablet
Test Oukitel RT2 Outdoor Tablet
Test Oukitel RT2 Outdoor Tablet

Performance - Oukitel tablet with MediaTek SoC

The Oukitel RT2 is based on the MediaTek MT8788, an octa-core SoC manufactured in a 12 nm process. Four Cortex-A73 cores face a Cortex-A53 cluster for power-saving tasks. The graphics unit is a Mali-G72 MP3.

In combination with the 8 GB RAM, the MediaTek chipset, which is almost identical to the Helio P60T, ensures a solid system performance. However, the outdoor tablet reveals a few hangs, and animations often do not look smooth.

In our benchmark package, the rather weak CPU unit offers low results in Geekbench, especially in single-core. In multi-core, the chipset installed in Oukitel's RT2 performs on the level of a Helio G80.

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
905 Points ∼39% +220%
Xiaomi Pad 5
784 Points ∼34% +177%
Average of class Tablet (152 - 1892, n=46, last 2 years)
745 Points ∼32% +163%
Teclast T40 Pro
380 Points ∼16% +34%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
343 Points ∼15% +21%
Oukitel RT2
283 Points ∼12%
Average Mediatek MT8788
283 Points ∼12% 0%
Multi-Core
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
3288 Points ∼11% +138%
Xiaomi Pad 5
2768 Points ∼10% +100%
Average of class Tablet (780 - 8524, n=46, last 2 years)
2675 Points ∼9% +94%
Oukitel RT2
1382 Points ∼5%
Average Mediatek MT8788
1382 Points ∼5% 0%
Teclast T40 Pro
1303 Points ∼5% -6%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
1247 Points ∼4% -10%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
628715 Points ∼44% +195%
Xiaomi Pad 5
575553 Points ∼41% +170%
Average of class Tablet (117837 - 1416727, n=36, last 2 years)
526113 Points ∼37% +147%
Teclast T40 Pro
240502 Points ∼17% +13%
Oukitel RT2
213255 Points ∼15%
Average Mediatek MT8788
213255 Points ∼15% 0%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
211417 Points ∼15% -1%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
11610 Points ∼60% +80%
Xiaomi Pad 5
11318 Points ∼59% +76%
Teclast T40 Pro
8364 Points ∼44% +30%
Average of class Tablet (4564 - 13996, n=37, last 2 years)
8360 Points ∼44% +30%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
6583 Points ∼34% +2%
Oukitel RT2
6445 Points ∼34%
Average Mediatek MT8788
6445 Points ∼34% 0%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet (335 - 1585, n=24, last 2 years)
784 Points ∼30%
Xiaomi Pad 5
635 Points ∼25%
Teclast T40 Pro
384 Points ∼15%
Oukitel RT2
Points ∼0%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
5276 Points ∼55% +224%
Xiaomi Pad 5
5154 Points ∼54% +217%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 6908, n=31, last 2 years)
3511 Points ∼37% +116%
Teclast T40 Pro
2145 Points ∼22% +32%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
2134 Points ∼22% +31%
Oukitel RT2
1627 Points ∼17%
Average Mediatek MT8788
1627 Points ∼17% 0%
System
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
9624 Points ∼49% +165%
Xiaomi Pad 5
8805 Points ∼45% +143%
Average of class Tablet (2793 - 10926, n=31, last 2 years)
6536 Points ∼33% +80%
Teclast T40 Pro
4863 Points ∼25% +34%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
4133 Points ∼21% +14%
Oukitel RT2
3627 Points ∼18%
Average Mediatek MT8788
3627 Points ∼18% 0%
Memory
Xiaomi Pad 5
5788 Points ∼50% +237%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
5388 Points ∼46% +214%
Average of class Tablet (970 - 8167, n=31, last 2 years)
4007 Points ∼34% +134%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
2436 Points ∼21% +42%
Oukitel RT2
1716 Points ∼15%
Average Mediatek MT8788
1716 Points ∼15% 0%
Teclast T40 Pro
1608 Points ∼14% -6%
Graphics
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
11366 Points ∼39% +587%
Xiaomi Pad 5
10293 Points ∼36% +522%
Average of class Tablet (928 - 22308, n=31, last 2 years)
6354 Points ∼22% +284%
Teclast T40 Pro
2063 Points ∼7% +25%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
1786 Points ∼6% +8%
Oukitel RT2
1655 Points ∼6%
Average Mediatek MT8788
1655 Points ∼6% 0%
Web
Xiaomi Pad 5
1346 Points ∼56% +17%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
1314 Points ∼55% +14%
Teclast T40 Pro
1313 Points ∼55% +14%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1598, n=31, last 2 years)
1189 Points ∼50% +3%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
1186 Points ∼50% +3%
Oukitel RT2
1152 Points ∼48%
Average Mediatek MT8788
1152 Points ∼48% 0%
AImark - Score v2.x
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
119152 Points ∼42% +1827%
Xiaomi Pad 5
46413 Points ∼16% +651%
Average of class Tablet (4468 - 119686, n=23, last 2 years)
29074 Points ∼10% +370%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
6865 Points ∼2% +11%
Oukitel RT2
6182 Points ∼2%
Average Mediatek MT8788
6182 Points ∼2% 0%
Teclast T40 Pro
4695 Points ∼2% -24%
UL Procyon AI Inference - Overall Score
Average of class Tablet (1535 - 73266, n=19, last 2 years)
9924 Points ∼12% +177%
Oukitel RT2
3577 Points ∼4%
Average Mediatek MT8788
3577 Points ∼4% 0%
VRMark - Amber Room
Average of class Tablet (676 - 8816, n=6, last 2 years)
3327 Score ∼34% +146%
Oukitel RT2
1352 Score ∼14%
Average Mediatek MT8788
1352 Score ∼14% 0%

Legend

 
Oukitel RT2 Mediatek MT8788, ARM Mali-G72 MP3, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mediatek Helio G80, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Teclast T40 Pro UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Pad 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Qualcomm Adreno 640, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

However, the Oukitel RT2 does not perform much better in the graphics tests. The Mali G72 MP3 in the outdoor tablet is often even beaten by a Mali G52 MP2 of the Teclast T40 Pro in the graphics tests of GFXBench. But even in the Wild Life benchmarks of 3DMark, the results are only marginally different from a Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3.

Performance Rating
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 -4!
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
96.4 pt ∼96%
Xiaomi Pad 5 -1!
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76.2 pt ∼76%
Teclast T40 Pro -1!
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
36 pt ∼36%
Oukitel RT2
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
34.8 pt ∼35%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 -1!
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
33.5 pt ∼34%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1103 Points ∼100% +490%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
970 Points ∼88% +419%
Oukitel RT2
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
187 Points ∼17%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
180 Points ∼16% -4%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
171 Points ∼16% -9%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1116 Points ∼100% +503%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
985 Points ∼88% +432%
Oukitel RT2
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
185 Points ∼17%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
182 Points ∼16% -2%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
176 Points ∼16% -5%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3823 Points ∼100% +489%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3436 Points ∼90% +429%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
709 Points ∼19% +9%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
691 Points ∼18% +6%
Oukitel RT2
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
649 Points ∼17%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3818 Points ∼100% +485%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3428 Points ∼90% +425%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
709 Points ∼19% +9%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
687 Points ∼18% +5%
Oukitel RT2
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
653 Points ∼17%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1456 Points ∼100% +17%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1384 Points ∼95% +11%
Oukitel RT2
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1245 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1281 Points ∼100% +17%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1182 Points ∼92% +8%
Oukitel RT2
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1098 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2783 Points ∼100% +13%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2587 Points ∼93% +5%
Oukitel RT2
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2457 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points ∼0% -100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps ∼100% +261%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼54% +94%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
39 fps ∼35% +26%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
39 fps ∼35% +26%
Oukitel RT2
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
31 fps ∼28%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
206 fps ∼100% +489%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
184 fps ∼89% +426%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
44 fps ∼21% +26%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps ∼20% +17%
Oukitel RT2
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35 fps ∼17%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps ∼100% +242%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps ∼89% +205%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
25 fps ∼38% +32%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
21 fps ∼32% +11%
Oukitel RT2
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
19 fps ∼29%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
127 fps ∼100% +310%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
109 fps ∼86% +252%
Oukitel RT2
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
31 fps ∼24%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
26 fps ∼20% -16%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
24 fps ∼19% -23%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps ∼100% +275%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps ∼89% +233%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps ∼33% +25%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps ∼29% +8%
Oukitel RT2
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
12 fps ∼27%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps ∼100% +394%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78 fps ∼88% +333%
Oukitel RT2
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
18 fps ∼20%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps ∼17% -17%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps ∼16% -22%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps ∼100% +322%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
25 fps ∼93% +291%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.3 fps ∼31% +30%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.1 fps ∼30% +27%
Oukitel RT2
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6.4 fps ∼24%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps ∼100% +373%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47 fps ∼90% +327%
Oukitel RT2
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
11 fps ∼21%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.2 fps ∼18% -16%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.7 fps ∼17% -21%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18 fps ∼100% +300%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
17 fps ∼94% +278%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
6 fps ∼33% +33%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.2 fps ∼29% +16%
Oukitel RT2
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4.5 fps ∼25%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps ∼100% +678%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18 fps ∼86% +567%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3.6 fps ∼17% +33%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.2 fps ∼15% +19%
Oukitel RT2
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2.7 fps ∼13%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps ∼100% +287%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26 fps ∼90% +247%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
9.9 fps ∼34% +32%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8 fps ∼28% +7%
Oukitel RT2
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7.5 fps ∼26%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps ∼100% +559%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47 fps ∼87% +473%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
10 fps ∼19% +22%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.7 fps ∼16% +6%
Oukitel RT2
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8.2 fps ∼15%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal / Overall Score
Oukitel RT2
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
403 Points ∼100%

In the browser benchmarks, the outdoor tablet only succeeds in beating the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3, the last place finisher in the comparison. Interestingly, the Oukitel RT2 has problems with both webXPRT tests, so no values are available.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (17 - 225, n=41, last 2 years)
81.9 Points ∼100% +125%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)
73 Points ∼89% +100%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)
66.6 Points ∼81% +83%
Oukitel RT2 (Chrome 104)
36.435 Points ∼44%
Average Mediatek MT8788
36.4 Points ∼44% 0%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Chrome 102)
32.868 Points ∼40% -10%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (28.1 - 436, n=30, last 2 years)
156.9 Points ∼100% +143%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)
128.1 Points ∼82% +98%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)
112.9 Points ∼72% +75%
Teclast T40 Pro (Chrome 98)
75.3 Points ∼48% +17%
Average Mediatek MT8788
64.6 Points ∼41% 0%
Oukitel RT2
64.583 Points ∼41%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Chrome 102)
57.32 Points ∼37% -11%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (13.9 - 376, n=39, last 2 years)
91.2 runs/min ∼100% +260%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)
65.5 runs/min ∼72% +159%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)
61.3 runs/min ∼67% +142%
Oukitel RT2 (Chrome 104)
25.3 runs/min ∼28%
Average Mediatek MT8788
25.3 runs/min ∼28% 0%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Chrome 102)
21.8 runs/min ∼24% -14%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)
28456 Points ∼100% +177%
Average of class Tablet (5004 - 74614, n=44, last 2 years)
27345 Points ∼96% +166%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)
24196 Points ∼85% +136%
Teclast T40 Pro (Chrome 98)
14722 Points ∼52% +43%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Chrome 102)
12744 Points ∼45% +24%
Oukitel RT2 (Chrome 104)
10273 Points ∼36%
Average Mediatek MT8788
10273 Points ∼36% 0%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Oukitel RT2 (Chrome 104)
3874.26 ms * ∼100%
Average Mediatek MT8788
3874 ms * ∼100% -0%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Chrome 102)
3227.4 ms * ∼83% +17%
Average of class Tablet (451 - 12972, n=42, last 2 years)
2844 ms * ∼73% +27%
Teclast T40 Pro (Chrome 98)
2762 ms * ∼71% +29%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)
1933 ms * ∼50% +50%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)
1603 ms * ∼41% +59%

* ... smaller is better

The outdoor tablet's UFS 2.1 storage, which is a bit outdated by now, performs solidly in our AndroBench benchmark measurements. Compared to a Xiaomi Pad 5 the Oukitel RT2 has significantly lower read and write speeds.

Oukitel RT2Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3Teclast T40 ProXiaomi Pad 5Huawei MatePad 11 2021Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-27%
-18%
131%
163%
45%
60%
Sequential Read 256KB
509.78
393.23
-23%
260.9
-49%
1459
186%
1468
188%
773 ?(427 - 1011, n=106)
52%
770 ?(151.1 - 2031, n=41, last 2 years)
51%
Sequential Write 256KB
198.25
234.88
18%
199.2
0%
534
169%
708
257%
294 ?(13.6 - 719, n=106)
48%
437 ?(66.7 - 1559, n=41, last 2 years)
120%
Random Read 4KB
98.29
75.12
-24%
94.2
-4%
208.7
112%
190.7
94%
150.9 ?(92.6 - 239, n=106)
54%
136.3 ?(10.1 - 310, n=41, last 2 years)
39%
Random Write 4KB
102.22
23.97
-77%
83.6
-18%
158.9
55%
217.5
113%
129.8 ?(18.2 - 290, n=106)
27%
131.1 ?(5.3 - 370, n=41, last 2 years)
28%

Games - Oukitel tablet manages 60 fps

Using the GameBench app, we take a look at the Mali-G72 in more detail using games from the Play Store. Here, the GPU manages a maximum frame rate close to the panel's native 60 Hz mark - at least temporarily. However, these are only reached in less graphics demanding games, such as Armajet, due to the underpowered graphics unit.

Graphically demanding games, such as PUBG Mobile in HD, can be played smoothly on the outdoor tablet, but it stops at 30 fps. It is not possible to play the shooter in the best display quality, UltraHD. The racing game Asphalt 9 Legends also reached 30 fps in the test, but massive frame rate drops are partly noticeable.

Armajet
Armajet
PUBG mobile
PUBG mobile
Asphalt 9
Asphalt 9
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Oukitel RT2; Armajet: Ø52.9 (39-60)
Oukitel RT2; Asphalt 9: Legends: Ø28.9 (12-31)
Oukitel RT2; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø29.8 (24-31)
Oukitel RT2; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø29.9 (28-31)
Oukitel RT2; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø29.8 (25-31)

Emissions - outdoor tablet stays cool

Temperature

The surface temperatures of the outdoor tablet are hardly noticeable even under load. Thus, the Oukitel RT2 unsurprisingly reveals a very continuous performance in the 3DMark Wild Life stress tests.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

05101520Tooltip
Oukitel RT2 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.81 (3.77-3.85)
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.1 (4.03-4.12)
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø4.27 (4.26-4.29)
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø20.5 (20.3-20.6)
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø22.7 (22.7-22.9)
Oukitel RT2 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.109 (1.1-1.122)
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø1.038 (1.025-1.051)
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø1.097 (1.093-1.102)
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø5.86 (5.85-5.89)
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.4.2: Ø6.66 (6.65-6.67)
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø4.25 (4.24-4.25)
Max. Load
 30 °C
86 F
30.2 °C
86 F
35 °C
95 F
 
 29.5 °C
85 F
29.3 °C
85 F
32.1 °C
90 F
 
 28.7 °C
84 F
28.8 °C
84 F
29.8 °C
86 F
 
Maximum: 35 °C = 95 F
Average: 30.4 °C = 87 F
29 °C
84 F
31.6 °C
89 F
32.6 °C
91 F
29.4 °C
85 F
29.7 °C
85 F
30.1 °C
86 F
28.6 °C
83 F
28.8 °C
84 F
28.4 °C
83 F
Maximum: 32.6 °C = 91 F
Average: 29.8 °C = 86 F
Power Supply (max.)  28.1 °C = 83 F | Room Temperature 21.8 °C = 71 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.3 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.6 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
Test Oukitel RT2 Outdoor Tablet
Test Oukitel RT2 Outdoor Tablet

Speaker

The tablet from Oukitel has two speakers that offer stereo sound, but cannot really keep up with the rich sound of the tablet competition in the mid-range price segment. Especially lower frequency ranges are hardly present in the RT2's sound. The high tones also clearly collapse.

Wired headphones can be connected to the outdoor tablet via the USB Type-C port. Alternatively, Bluetooth 4.2 can be used for wireless transmission. A rather limited codec palette of SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD and LDAC is available here.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.641.92535.232.23132.624.4402924.85037.436.76330.6268029.335.810026.725.912524.325.816022.542.320018.84725016.253.93151255.64009.956.750011.764.463010.368.880011.973.610001274.5125012.175.516001277.1200012.177.9250012.776.9315012.776.2400012.976.8500013.372.6630013.268.2800013.669.11000013.663.61250013.354.21600012.739.2SPL25.186.7N0.765median 12.7median 68.2Delta212.535.838.332.228.225.1262129.734.433.62433.528.94922.851.417.657.319.262.515.862.515.565.715.769.71369.712.472.814.47314.774.412.878.214.679.113.578.713.178.213.576.413.466.813.367.913.373.613.472.413.766.913.26813.257.412.255.325.987.20.772.1median 13.5median 69.71.75.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOukitel RT2Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oukitel RT2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Huawei MatePad 11 2021 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Power Management - Oukitel RT2 Tablet

Energy consumption

Energy is provided by a 20,000 mAh capacity battery. When completely drained, it can be recharged in about 3.5 hours with the included 33-watt power adapter. The power consumption of the Oukitel RT2 is on a similar level as the competition.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.19 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.47 / 3.99 / 4.08 Watt
Load midlight 5.5 / 8.94 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Oukitel RT2
20000 mAh
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
7500 mAh
Teclast T40 Pro
7000 mAh
Xiaomi Pad 5
8720 mAh
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
7250 mAh
Power Consumption
2%
-4%
-7%
-19%
Idle Minimum *
1.47
0.94
36%
1.44
2%
0.99
33%
1.33
10%
Idle Average *
3.99
4.22
-6%
3.87
3%
4.2
-5%
5.37
-35%
Idle Maximum *
4.08
4.37
-7%
3.91
4%
4.22
-3%
5.41
-33%
Load Average *
5.5
6.12
-11%
7.1
-29%
7.88
-43%
6.87
-25%
Load Maximum *
8.94
9.14
-2%
8.88
1%
10.63
-19%
10.08
-13%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Oukitel RT2 Mediatek MT8788: Ø4.31 (2.28-8.75)
Xiaomi Pad 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 860: Ø5.81 (2.06-10.2)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
Oukitel RT2 Mediatek MT8788; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4 (3.76-4.59)
Xiaomi Pad 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 860; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.83 (4-8.78)
Oukitel RT2 Mediatek MT8788; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.32 (2.28-2.39)
Xiaomi Pad 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 860; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.88 (1.838-2.2)

Battery life

The outdoor tablet lasted over 21 hours in our practical Wi-Fi test with an adjusted display brightness of 150 cd/m². This is an excellent rate, but we would have expected a bit more stamina in relation to the extremely large battery.

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 104)
21h 13min
Oukitel RT2
20000 mAh
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
7500 mAh
Teclast T40 Pro
7000 mAh
Xiaomi Pad 5
8720 mAh
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
7250 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
1273
909
-29%
806
-37%
733
-42%
835
-34%

Pros

+ long runtimes
+ high protection standards
+ LTE & GPS

Cons

- high weight
- lame WLAN with connection interruptions
- mediocre speakers
- weak SoC

Verdict

In review: Oukitel RT2. Test device provided by Oukitel
In review: Oukitel RT2. Test device provided by Oukitel

Given the very high weight for a 10.1-inch tablet, the Oukitel RT2 will probably only appeal to a group of people who absolutely need a high degree of durability. However, due to the IP-68/69K and MIL-STD-810G certifications as well as the massive construction, the outdoor tablet occupies a niche, which could make it an interesting choice for construction site use, among others, despite the existing weaknesses. Those who can do without a shock- and waterproof case will be better off with a Xiaomi Pad 5 or Huawei MatePad 11.

The slow and unstable WLAN coupled with the lame SoC limit the Oukitel RT2's recommendability.

In relation to the price of the Oukitel RT2, we find the chipset to be too weak, despite the high protection level. The relatively low brightness of the IPS panel and the deficits in tracking (dropped connections, single-band use) do not really fit into the concept of an outdoor tablet.

Price and availability

The Oukitel RT2 is available for about 330 Euros (~$327) as an import and for 400 Euros (~$396) on eBay. So far in Germany, only the predecessor is listed at Amazon.de.

Oukitel RT2 - 10/26/2022 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
83 / 98 → 84%
Keyboard
69 / 80 → 87%
Pointing Device
83%
Connectivity
43 / 70 → 61%
Weight
75 / 40-88 → 72%
Battery
93%
Display
78%
Games Performance
16 / 78 → 20%
Application Performance
54 / 92 → 59%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
72 / 91 → 79%