Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-13900HX vs Intel Core i5-10200H

Intel Core i9-13900HX

► remove from comparison Intel i9-13900HX

The Intel Core i9-13900HX is a fast high-end mobile processor of the Raptor Lake series. Is was announced in early 2023 and looks like it is based on the desktop Core i9-13000K with combined 24 cores and 32 threads. Eight fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading that clock between 2.2 GHz (base) and 5.4 GHz (single core boost, 4.9 GHz for all cores) and sixteen Gracemont efficiency cores without Hyper-Threading (1.6 - 3.9 GHz).

Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-Cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger Caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13900HX).

Performance

The average 13900HX in our database is in the same league as the Core i9-13950HX and the Ryzen 9 7845HX, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is really impressive, to say the least.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 99 W, the Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 is among the fastest laptops built around the 13900HX that we know of. It can be about 50% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

The CPU is still produced in a further improved 10nm FinFET process (Intel 7) that allows the higher clock speeds. The power consumption is specified at 55W base power up to 157 Watt max. Turbo power.

Intel Core i5-10200H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10200H

The Intel Core i5-10200H is a fast quad-core processor for laptops with four cores based on the Comet Lake-H series (4th generation of Skylake architecture). The processor clocks at between 2.4 and 4.1 GHz  and can execute up to eight threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured on 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i5-10200H supports no vPro, TXT or SIPP. These business features are available in the faster (and later released) Core i5-10400H (2.6 - 4.6 GHz).

Performance

The performance is only minimal better than the Core i5-9300H thanks to the support for faster DDR4-2933 RAM. This means, the CPU is well suited for demanding tasks, although the faster versions offer a significantly higher Turbo Boost clock speed for faster single core execution. 

Power consumption

This 10th gen Comet Lake processor has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W, a value that laptop manufacturers are allowed to reduce somewhat, 35 W being the lower limit. Doing so will result in lower clock speeds and lower performance. Either way, this CPU is too power-hungry to be used as the base of a passively cooled laptop.

Intel Core i5-10200H is built with an old, as of late 2022, 14 nm Intel process for subpar energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i9-13900HXIntel Core i5-10200H
CodenameRaptor Lake-HXComet Lake-H
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-HXIntel Comet Lake
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
Intel Core i9-13980HX compare1.6 - 5.6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13950HX compare1.6 - 5.5 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HX « 1.6 - 5.4 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13850HX compare1.5 - 5.3 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700HX compare1.5 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13650HX compare1.9 - 4.9 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600HX compare1.9 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500HX compare1.8 - 4.7 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13450HX compare1.8 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H « 2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock1600 - 5400 MHz2400 - 4100 MHz
L2 Cache32 MB1 MB
L3 Cache36 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads24 / 32
8 x 5.4 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 x 3.9 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
4 / 8
TDP55 Watt45 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm
Die Size257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1964BGA1440
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-5600 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL B., GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, BMI2, AES-NI, SSE4.1, ABM, VMX, EIST, RDRAND, SSE4.2, TM1, RDSEED, SSE, AVX, FMA, SMEP, TM2, SSE2, AVX2, ADX, SMAP, HT, SGX, SSE3, Turbo, SSSE3, MPX, SST
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1650 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 610 (350 - 1050 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache256 KB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13900HX
45 pt (75%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10200H
28.3 pt (47%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
121.4 Points (68%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
1675 Points (31%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 24270     avg: 28275     median: 27900 (26%)     max: 32623 Points
5372 Points (5%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1867     avg: 2044     median: 2056 (86%)     max: 2105 Points
1089 Points (46%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 722     avg: 784     median: 788 (86%)     max: 810 Points
419 Points (46%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 9152     avg: 10785     median: 10557 (26%)     max: 12541 Points
2082 Points (5%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 3913     avg: 4521     median: 4494.5 (28%)     max: 4970 Points
842 Points (5%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 247     avg: 292     median: 296 (82%)     max: 304 Points
171.6 Points (48%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 49.5     avg: 52.3     median: 52.3 (68%)     max: 55.14 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.64     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (87%)     max: 3.67 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 11618     avg: 11700     median: 11699.5 (71%)     max: 11781 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 76718     avg: 79300     median: 79299.5 (57%)     max: 81881 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
111582 Points (71%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
17169 Points (21%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
215.7 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 12876     avg: 12916     median: 12916 (20%)     max: 12956 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 90675     avg: 112115     median: 115262 (66%)     max: 127283 MIPS
21148 MIPS (12%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6340     avg: 6859     median: 6895 (81%)     max: 7177 MIPS
4497 MIPS (53%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
217.7 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
387.7 fps (10%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 23.5     avg: 29.2     median: 29.8 (52%)     max: 34.4 fps
6.5 fps (11%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 2.1     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (66%)     max: 2.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 4.1     avg: 4.3     median: 4.3 (73%)     max: 4.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 15.2     avg: 17     median: 17 (44%)     max: 18.8 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 175     avg: 209.9     median: 202 (3%)     max: 275 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 101     avg: 117.6     median: 113.5 (1%)     max: 153 Seconds
515 Seconds (4%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.375     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4564 sec
0.7 sec (15%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 16591     avg: 17802     median: 18036.5 (38%)     max: 18235 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 6.2     avg: 6.2     median: 6.2 (1%)     max: 6.215 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
13.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 315     avg: 315.1     median: 315.1 (1%)     max: 315.265 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 74788     avg: 76276     median: 76275.5 (59%)     max: 77763 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 19090     avg: 23181     median: 23767 (59%)     max: 25681 Points
6233 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 77043     avg: 86045     median: 83045 (67%)     max: 101046 Points
51050 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
82808 Points (67%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
85007 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16532     avg: 21282     median: 21573 (55%)     max: 23984 Points
7729 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 28693     avg: 37096     median: 37730 (67%)     max: 43004 Points
10760 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 13288     avg: 15302     median: 15066 (64%)     max: 18304 Points
3613 Points (15%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2548     avg: 2770     median: 2871 (72%)     max: 2892 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 15031     avg: 16586     median: 16712 (65%)     max: 18014 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2191     avg: 2625     median: 2713 (86%)     max: 2818 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 14982     avg: 16173     median: 16420.5 (67%)     max: 16949 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1345     avg: 1991     median: 2041.5 (80%)     max: 2093 Points
min: 1093     avg: 1094     median: 1094 (43%)     max: 1095 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 17614     avg: 19819     median: 20013.5 (36%)     max: 21075 Points
min: 3564     avg: 3845     median: 3845 (7%)     max: 4126 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1804     avg: 1964     median: 1982 (9%)     max: 2064 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 18612     avg: 19451     median: 19027 (60%)     max: 20594 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8706     avg: 8840     median: 8843 (88%)     max: 8936 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 66537     avg: 70316     median: 71143 (71%)     max: 71700 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 453     avg: 471     median: 464 (1%)     max: 520 ms
882 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 95898     avg: 101834     median: 103988 (76%)     max: 105526 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 243     avg: 289.1     median: 291 (80%)     max: 304 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 266     avg: 321.9     median: 322 (58%)     max: 358 Points
187.3 Points (34%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1825     avg: 2073     median: 2113.5 (79%)     max: 2295 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 106.1     avg: 173.5     median: 178.7 (31%)     max: 231 Watt
99.5 Watt (17%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 176     avg: 216.9     median: 222 (41%)     max: 266 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 13.9     avg: 24.1     median: 25 (17%)     max: 31.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 15     avg: 19.7     median: 18.8 (21%)     max: 29 Watt
4.9 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 19.5     avg: 20.9     median: 21 (16%)     max: 21.8 Points per Watt
77 Points per Watt (57%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13900HX → 100% n=20

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10200H → 38% n=20

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 11. 14:20:50

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14659 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12747 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1757593250s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 10 Sep 2025 11:38:25 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14659 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 14659 +0.029s ... 0.038s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12747 +0.004s ... 0.042s

#10 got single benchmarks 12747 +0.005s ... 0.047s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.047s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.054s ... 0.1s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.103s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)