Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-7300HQ vs AMD PRO A12-9800B vs Intel Core i7-7820HQ

Intel Core i5-7300HQ

► remove from comparison Intel i5-7300HQ

The Intel Core i5-7300HQ is a quad-core processor for notebooks based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in January 2017. Compared to the faster Core i7 models, the Core i5 does not support Hyper Threading and has lower clocks. The CPU cores run at 2.5 - 3.5 GHz (4 cores up to 3.1, 2 cores up to 3.3 GHz). The processor is also equipped with the HD Graphics 630 GPU as well as a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L-1600/DDR4-2400). It is manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

The performance should be quite similar to the old Core i5-6440HQ (2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Skylake) that offers the same per-MHz performance and only 100 MHz higher core speed. The performance is therefore sufficient even for demanding tasks.

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 630 has 24 Execution Units (similar to previous HD Graphics 530) running at 350 - 1000 MHz (i7 models up to 1100). The performance depends a lot on the memory configuration; it should be comparable to a dedicated Nvidia GeForce 920M in combination with fast DDR4-2133 dual-channel memory.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake now supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors, which were announced in January, should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel still specifies the TDP with 45 Watts, but it can also be reduced to 35 Watts by the notebook manufacturers (cTDP down). This will obviously affect the performance, because the Turbo Boost cannot be maintained for longer periods.

AMD PRO A12-9800B

► remove from comparison AMD PRO A12-9800B

The AMD PRO A12-9800B is a mobile mainstream SoC from the Bristol-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. It is the business version of the AMD FX-9800P and features the same specifications. The PRO A12-9800B is (together with the FX-9800P) the fastest Bristol Ridge APU with a 15-Watt TDP and the successor to the 15-Watt A12-8800B / FX-8800P from the Carrizo generation. The ULV chip has four CPU cores (two Excavator modules = 4 integer and 2 FP units), a Radeon R7 GPU as well as a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. Carrizo is a full-fledged SoC and is also equipped with an integrated chipset, which provides all I/0 ports.

Architecture

Bristol Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 1866 MHz. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Thanks to higher clocks, the A12-9800B is slightly ahead of the old 15-Watt top model FX-8800P and competes with a Intel Core i3-6100U (Skylake, 15 Watts). Compared to the Intel model, the AMD chip has a small advantage in multi-thread scenarios, but is beaten when you only stress one or two cores.

This means there is sufficient performance for typical office and web applications as well as light multitasking.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) GPU has 512 active shader units (8 compute cores) clocked at up to 758 MHz. Thanks to the better utilization of the clock range as well as faster DDR4-RAm, the GPU can slightly beat its predecessors Radeon R7 (Carrizo) and competes with a dedicated GeForce 920MX in the best-case scenario (dual-channel memory, low CPU requirements). Many games from 2015/2016 can be played smoothly at low settings. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A12-9800B with 12-15 Watts, which is comparable to Intel's ULV models. This means the APU is a good choice for thin notebooks starting with a 12-inch screen.

Intel Core i7-7820HQ

► remove from comparison Intel i7-7820HQ

The Intel Core i7-7820HQ is a fast quad-core processor for notebooks based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in January 2017. It is the second fastest model of the consumer series at the time of the announcement. Only the i7-7920HQ and Xeon E3-1535M v6 are faster. Besides four cores including Hyper-Threading support running at 2.9 - 3.9 GHz (4 cores up to 3.5 GHz, 2 cores up to 3.7 GHz), the processor is also equipped with the HD Graphics 630 GPU as well as a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L-1600/DDR4-2400). It is manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

Due to the higher clock speeds, the performance of the i7-7820HQ is slightly faster than the old Skylake top model Core i7-6920HQ (2.9 - 3.8 GHz). The performance is sufficient even for very demanding tasks and on par with powerful desktop quad-core processors.

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 630 has 24 Execution Units (similar to previous HD Graphics 530) running at 350 - 1100 MHz. The performance depends a lot on the memory configuration; it should be comparable to a dedicated Nvidia GeForce 920M in combination with fast DDR4-2133 dual-channel memory.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake now supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors, which were announced in January, should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel still specifies the TDP with 45 Watts, but it can also be reduced to 35 Watts by the notebook manufacturers (cTDP down). This will obviously affect the performance, because the Turbo Boost cannot be maintained for longer periods.

ModelIntel Core i5-7300HQAMD PRO A12-9800BIntel Core i7-7820HQ
SeriesIntel Kaby LakeAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Kaby Lake
CodenameKaby LakeBristol RidgeKaby Lake
Series: Kaby Lake Kaby Lake
Intel Core i7-7700K4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-77003.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v63.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v63 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-75003.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ « 2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y751.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y571.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y541.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y321 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y301 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
AMD FX-9830P3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9830B3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9800P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9800B « 2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9720P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9700P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9620P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9600P2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A8-9600B2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Core i7-7700K4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-77003.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v63.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v63 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ « 2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-75003.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y751.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y571.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y541.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y321 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y301 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Clock2500 - 3500 MHz2700 - 3600 MHz2900 - 3900 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB1 MB
L3 Cache6 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 44 / 8
TDP45 Watt15 Watt45 Watt
Technology14 nm28 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C90 °C100 °C
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8Dual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 630 (300 - 1000 MHz)AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 630 (300 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$250 U.S.$378 U.S.
Announced
Transistors3100 Million
Die Size250 mm2
SocketFP4
Manufacturerproducts.amd.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 501     avg: 512     median: 513 (3%)     max: 520 Points
min: 222     avg: 225.3     median: 225 (1%)     max: 229 Points
min: 630     avg: 710     median: 736 (5%)     max: 762 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 129     avg: 141.1     median: 142 (43%)     max: 149 Points
min: 75     avg: 75.7     median: 75 (23%)     max: 77 Points
min: 160     avg: 163     median: 163 (49%)     max: 166 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 5.38     avg: 5.8     median: 5.9 (8%)     max: 5.93 Points
min: 2.47     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (3%)     max: 2.7 Points
min: 7.36     avg: 7.9     median: 8 (10%)     max: 8.28 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.49     avg: 1.5     median: 1.5 (38%)     max: 1.68 Points
min: 0.86     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (22%)     max: 0.9 Points
min: 1.79     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (46%)     max: 1.83 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 4920     avg: 5319     median: 5434.5 (33%)     max: 5581 Points
min: 2564     avg: 2593     median: 2592.5 (16%)     max: 2621 Points
min: 5776     avg: 6007     median: 6118 (37%)     max: 6128 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 17197     avg: 17956     median: 18064.5 (13%)     max: 18304 Points
min: 6854     avg: 7056     median: 7055.5 (5%)     max: 7257 Points
min: 21534     avg: 22293     median: 22369 (16%)     max: 22977 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 21912     avg: 22625     median: 22845 (16%)     max: 23117 Points
10237 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 6594     avg: 6811     median: 6700 (8%)     max: 7138 Points
3499 Points (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 331.1     avg: 346.7     median: 348.1 (4%)     max: 351.3 s
475.7 s (6%)
317 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 10.98     avg: 11.3     median: 11.1 (2%)     max: 12.41 s
13.8 s (3%)
9.4 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1383 Points (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 34     avg: 34.1     median: 34.1 (12%)     max: 34.2 fps
16.5 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 160     avg: 160.9     median: 160.8 (37%)     max: 162 fps
77 fps (18%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
4.7 fps (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
0.4 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (6%)
0.3 GB/s (6%)
0.7 GB/s (11%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2.3 GB/s (6%)
1.8 GB/s (5%)
4.2 GB/s (11%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
901 Seconds (6%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 6266     avg: 6279     median: 6279 (13%)     max: 6292 Points
3249 Points (7%)
min: 6675     avg: 7448     median: 7679 (16%)     max: 7989 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 10.68     avg: 10.8     median: 10.7 (2%)     max: 11.29 s
18.6 s (4%)
9.6 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 24.38     avg: 24.5     median: 24.5 (1%)     max: 24.89 s
41.1 s (2%)
21.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 590     avg: 604     median: 596 (3%)     max: 654 s
908 s (4%)
527 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 23800     avg: 26622     median: 27717 (24%)     max: 28349 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 5382     avg: 6022     median: 6042 (16%)     max: 6627 Points
min: 2232     avg: 2318     median: 2275 (6%)     max: 2448 Points
min: 8362     avg: 9087     median: 9118.5 (25%)     max: 9747 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 42492     avg: 50667     median: 52482 (43%)     max: 53471 Points
min: 24353     avg: 25657     median: 25657 (21%)     max: 26961 Points
45502 Points (37%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 39401     avg: 48909     median: 50273 (41%)     max: 53025 Points
min: 25150     avg: 25871     median: 25871 (21%)     max: 26592 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 46577     avg: 50186     median: 50280 (42%)     max: 52451 Points
min: 27021     avg: 27778     median: 27778 (23%)     max: 28535 Points
min: 44113     avg: 50414     median: 52957 (45%)     max: 54171 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 4269     avg: 4697     median: 4722 (12%)     max: 4855 Points
min: 1989     avg: 2038     median: 2035 (5%)     max: 2089 Points
min: 6771     avg: 7398     median: 7384 (19%)     max: 8051 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 6020     avg: 6672     median: 6733 (12%)     max: 6881 Points
min: 2739     avg: 2999     median: 3007 (5%)     max: 3251 Points
min: 9364     avg: 10277     median: 10303.5 (18%)     max: 11138 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2726     avg: 2847     median: 2856 (12%)     max: 2912 Points
min: 437     avg: 439     median: 439 (2%)     max: 441 Points
min: 3698     avg: 3898     median: 3897.5 (16%)     max: 4097 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3387     avg: 3862     median: 4040 (40%)     max: 4159 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8081     avg: 10065     median: 11039 (12%)     max: 11075 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3387     avg: 3823     median: 4022 (55%)     max: 4061 Points
2073 Points (28%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8085     avg: 9720     median: 10525 (26%)     max: 10551 Points
4453 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9728     avg: 9773     median: 9752 (17%)     max: 9840 Points
5326 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3163     avg: 3184     median: 3195 (62%)     max: 3195 Points
2031 Points (40%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5575 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
2109 Points (32%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3270 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2974 Points (27%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
7151 Points (14%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
6518 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
5705 Points (15%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 955     avg: 1040     median: 1044 (1%)     max: 1132 ms
min: 2152     avg: 2225     median: 2159 (3%)     max: 2363 ms
min: 913     avg: 972     median: 995 (1%)     max: 1007 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
170.4 ms (2%)
74.1 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 31952     avg: 33838     median: 33589 (30%)     max: 36008 Points
min: 16552     avg: 17731     median: 18206 (16%)     max: 18435 Points
min: 35321     avg: 37525     median: 38182 (34%)     max: 39072 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
47.6 Watt (8%)
min: 68.4     avg: 79.1     median: 79.1 (14%)     max: 89.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
41.3 Watt (8%)
min: 65.1     avg: 67.7     median: 67.7 (12%)     max: 70.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
12.3 Points per Watt (9%)
min: 10.8     avg: 11.1     median: 11.1 (8%)     max: 11.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-7300HQ → 100% n=23

Average Benchmarks AMD PRO A12-9800B → 66% n=23

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-7820HQ → 129% n=23

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 28. 20:09:28

#0 checking url part for id 8417 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8544 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8413 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 28 May 2024 05:33:54 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.066s ... 0.067s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.067s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 8417 +0.003s ... 0.07s

#8 got single benchmarks 8417 +0.096s ... 0.166s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8544 +0.003s ... 0.169s

#10 got single benchmarks 8544 +0.011s ... 0.179s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 8413 +0.003s ... 0.182s

#12 got single benchmarks 8413 +0.021s ... 0.203s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.203s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.305s ... 0.508s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.508s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)