Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 vs AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX vs AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is a powerful Strix Point family processor that debuted in June 2024. The APU comes with 12 CPU cores running at 2.0 GHz to 5.1 GHz, the 16 CU RDNA 3+ Radeon 890M graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Other noteworthy features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM support.

Of the 12 CPU cores, 4 are full Zen 5 cores and 8 are smaller Zen 5c cores. The latter run at significantly lower clock speeds than the former.

Architecture and Features

Strix Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more energy-efficient version of the former. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is cache size; Zen 5 cores have larger caches to work with. According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the HX 370 supports LPDDR5x-8000 and DDR5-5600 RAM, and is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors did. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

Performance

Given the IPC improvement, we expect 4 Zen 5 cores combined with 8 Zen 5c cores to perform about as well as 16 Zen 4 cores meaning there is a real chance of the HX 370 dethroning the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. We'll make sure to update this section once we get our hands on a laptop powered by the HX 370.

Graphics

The Radeon 890M is the most powerful iGPU that AMD has on offer right now. It features 16 RDNA 3+ architecture CUs (1024 unified shaders) running at up to 2,900 MHz. We expect the graphics adapter to deliver gaming performance good enough for playing 2023 and 2024 games in 1080p (Low detail settings).

Naturally, the 890M is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs including AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The HX 370 is supposed to have a base TDP of 28 W, with laptop makers free to crank it up to up to 54 W. Which they will most likely do to maximize performance.

The 4 nm TSMC process that the CPU cores are built with make for decent, as of mid 2024, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX

► remove from comparison AMD R9 9955HX

The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX is a high-end notebook processor from the Fire Range series with 16 cores and hyperthreading (SMT), which means it can process up to 32 threads simultaneously. Unlike the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, the chip does not offer a 3D V-Cache. The chip was presented at CES in early 2025 and is intended for fast and expensive gaming laptops.

Thanks to the high-clocked 16 Zen 5 cores, the performance of the CPU should be excellent and only be outperformed by the 9955HX3D thanks to the 3D V-Cache. Together with the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX at the top of the mobile CPUs.

The 9955HX is intended for large and heavy gaming notebooks and is therefore configurable from 55-75 watts TDP (default 55 watts). The SoC is manufactured in the modern 4nm FinFET process at TSMC (both compute dies, I/O die in 6nm) and should therefore have very good energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is a powerful Strix Halo family processor that debuted in January 2025. The APU comes with 16 Zen 5 CPU cores running at up to 5.1 GHz, the 40 CU RDNA 3+ Radeon 8060S graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Unlike its non-PRO sibling, the chip features AMD Secure Processor (an on-package ARM security co-processor), Windows Device Guard and AMD-Vi. Other noteworthy features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM support and a whole lot of L3 cache.

Architecture and Features

Unlike Strix Point, Strix Halo parts are powered by Zen 5 cores - no Zen 5c here. It's not clear if this is the desktop Zen 5 implementation with full AVX512 throughput or the mobile one. According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the AI Max+ PRO chip supports RAM as fast as LPDDR5x-8000, and is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors had. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

Performance

From leaks, we know that the Ryzen delivers around 20,700 Geekbench 6.3 Multi points, meaning it trades blow with very powerful desktop CPUs like the Ryzen 9 9900X.

Graphics

The Radeon 8060S is the most powerful iGPU that AMD has on offer, as of Jan 2025. It features 40 RDNA 3+ architecture CUs (2560 unified shaders) that could see it outcompeting lower mid-range desktop graphics cards like the GeForce RTX 4050. This GPU will undoubtedly run any game at 1080p on Ultra, however, the ultimate question is whether or not the cooling solution of the laptop will be powerful enough to let the iGPU shine.

Naturally, the Radeon is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs including AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The AI Max+ PRO 395 can eat up to 120 W depending on the system and its TDP power targets, with 45 W named as the minimum TDP.

The 4 nm TSMC process that the CPU cores are built with make for decent, as of Jan 2025, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370AMD Ryzen 9 9955HXAMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
CodenameStrix Point-HX (Zen 5/5c)Fire Range-HX (Zen 5)Strix Halo PRO
SeriesAMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)AMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7X4X/8X4X)AMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)
Clock2000 - 5100 MHz2500 - 5400 MHz3000 - 5100 MHz
L2 Cache12 MB16 MB16 MB
L3 Cache24 MB64 MB64 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 24
4 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 5
8 x 3.3 GHz AMD Zen 5c
16 / 32
16 x 5.4 GHz AMD Zen 5
16 / 32
16 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 5
TDP28 Watt55 Watt55 Watt
TDP Turbo PL254 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm4 nm
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketFP8FP11
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4ALPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
iGPUAMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz)AMD Radeon 610M ( - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon 8060S ( - 2900 MHz)
NPU / AI50 TOPS INT850 TOPS INT8
Chip AI80 TOPS INT8126 TOPS INT8
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
Series: Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300) Strix Halo PRO
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D2.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX « 2.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX3 - 5.2 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 « 3 - 5.1 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 3903.2 - 5 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 3853.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 3803.6 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
L1 Cache1.3 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
43.2 pt (72%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 9955HX
50.1 pt (83%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
45.4 pt (76%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 113.6     avg: 117     median: 117 (58%)     max: 121 Points
min: 125.3     avg: 128.9     median: 129.5 (65%)     max: 130 Points
min: 112.2     avg: 112.6     median: 112.6 (56%)     max: 113 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 621     avg: 1083     median: 1152 (21%)     max: 1299 Points
min: 1775     avg: 1951     median: 1971.5 (37%)     max: 2069 Points
min: 1643     avg: 1691     median: 1690.5 (31%)     max: 1738 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 10435     avg: 20600     median: 21761 (20%)     max: 23902 Points
min: 36078     avg: 38155     median: 39384 (37%)     max: 39690 Points
min: 30706     avg: 35061     median: 35061 (33%)     max: 39416 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1921     avg: 2011     median: 2018 (82%)     max: 2049 Points
min: 1828     avg: 2128     median: 2176 (88%)     max: 2183 Points
min: 2003     avg: 2013     median: 2012.5 (82%)     max: 2022 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 753     avg: 789     median: 791.5 (86%)     max: 804 Points
min: 819     avg: 848     median: 853 (93%)     max: 854 Points
min: 783     avg: 787     median: 787 (86%)     max: 791 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6449     avg: 8343     median: 8711 (21%)     max: 9280 Points
min: 14166     avg: 14877     median: 15309 (37%)     max: 15524 Points
min: 11816     avg: 13429     median: 13428.5 (33%)     max: 15041 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2498.13     avg: 3240     median: 3409.5 (22%)     max: 3551 Points
min: 5639     avg: 5933     median: 6046 (38%)     max: 6103 Points
min: 4784     avg: 5247     median: 5247 (33%)     max: 5710 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 188.8     avg: 292.4     median: 307 (85%)     max: 315 Points
min: 320     avg: 334.1     median: 336 (93%)     max: 338 Points
min: 305     avg: 306     median: 306 (85%)     max: 307 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 34.85     avg: 39     median: 39.5 (51%)     max: 41.17 Points
min: 64.66     avg: 67.4     median: 67.4 (87%)     max: 69.87 Points
62.9 Points (81%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.59     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (88%)     max: 3.7 Points
min: 3.72     avg: 3.9     median: 3.9 (94%)     max: 3.97 Points
3.6 Points (86%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8437     avg: 8639     median: 8655 (52%)     max: 8797 Points
min: 8710     avg: 9087     median: 9178.5 (55%)     max: 9279 Points
8580 Points (52%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 48553     avg: 53517     median: 53766 (39%)     max: 56689 Points
min: 73626     avg: 76474     median: 76058 (55%)     max: 80152 Points
60278 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 89081     avg: 97658     median: 98125 (63%)     max: 103657 Points
min: 14159     avg: 76087     median: 76087 (49%)     max: 138015 Points
108876 Points (70%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 15381     avg: 15748     median: 15797 (19%)     max: 15935 Points
min: 17067     avg: 17205     median: 17205 (21%)     max: 17343 Points
15953 Points (19%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 50.536     avg: 75.7     median: 79.4 (1%)     max: 84.742 s
min: 32.998     avg: 90.4     median: 33.9 (0%)     max: 204.3 s
31.8 s (0%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.701     avg: 2.9     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 3.743 s
min: 2.195     avg: 3.3     median: 2.2 (0%)     max: 5.6 s
2.7 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4008     avg: 4504     median: 4759 (8%)     max: 4859 Points
min: 9033     avg: 21586     median: 10079 (16%)     max: 45647 Points
4649 Points (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 66154     avg: 78426     median: 80572.5 (46%)     max: 84735 MIPS
min: 132435     avg: 139265     median: 141048 (81%)     max: 144064 MIPS
min: 109760     avg: 117149     median: 117148 (67%)     max: 124537 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5859     avg: 6182     median: 6181 (73%)     max: 6497 MIPS
min: 7061     avg: 7300     median: 7393 (87%)     max: 7462 MIPS
min: 5613     avg: 5998     median: 5998 (71%)     max: 6383 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 144.9     avg: 167.2     median: 169.8 (4%)     max: 185.1 fps
min: 233.5     avg: 234.8     median: 234.8 (6%)     max: 236 fps
182.8 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 300     avg: 309.4     median: 306 (8%)     max: 330 fps
min: 343.5     avg: 351.3     median: 351.3 (9%)     max: 359 fps
316 fps (8%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 20.3     avg: 25.4     median: 26.2 (46%)     max: 28.7 fps
min: 38.9     avg: 41.4     median: 42.1 (74%)     max: 43 fps
min: 30.4     avg: 31.7     median: 31.7 (56%)     max: 33 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.6     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (47%)     max: 1.7 GB/s
min: 3.1     avg: 3.1     median: 3.1 (91%)     max: 3.4 GB/s
1.6 GB/s (47%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2.5     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (47%)     max: 2.8 GB/s
min: 4.9     avg: 5     median: 5 (85%)     max: 5 GB/s
2.5 GB/s (43%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 15.1     avg: 15.5     median: 15.3 (40%)     max: 16.6 GB/s
min: 27.3     avg: 27.6     median: 27.6 (72%)     max: 27.9 GB/s
15.6 GB/s (41%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 208     avg: 238.3     median: 221 (3%)     max: 306 Seconds
min: 122     avg: 129.7     median: 125 (2%)     max: 145 Seconds
min: 132     avg: 145.5     median: 145.5 (2%)     max: 159 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 139     avg: 155.8     median: 148 (1%)     max: 192 Seconds
min: 80     avg: 84.6     median: 85 (1%)     max: 91 Seconds
min: 90     avg: 96     median: 96 (1%)     max: 102 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3892     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.603 sec
min: 0.3517     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.3737 sec
min: 0.4027     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4127 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 13761     avg: 16239     median: 16471.5 (35%)     max: 17466 Points
min: 19498     avg: 19963     median: 19731 (42%)     max: 20890 Points
16509 Points (35%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.224     avg: 8.4     median: 8.4 (2%)     max: 8.482 s
min: 7.701     avg: 7.9     median: 7.8 (2%)     max: 8.2 s
8.2 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.504     avg: 18.6     median: 17.8 (1%)     max: 22.248 s
min: 16.472     avg: 16.8     median: 16.6 (1%)     max: 17.5 s
23.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
375.8 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 66119     avg: 73048     median: 75346 (58%)     max: 77565 Points
min: 93819     avg: 98006     median: 98275.5 (75%)     max: 101654 Points
89313 Points (69%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17129     avg: 20565     median: 20809.5 (51%)     max: 24599 Points
min: 29429     avg: 32133     median: 32436.5 (80%)     max: 33671 Points
min: 21268     avg: 23295     median: 23295 (57%)     max: 25322 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 50952     avg: 62767     median: 63723.5 (52%)     max: 76578 Points
min: 78557     avg: 82036     median: 83067 (67%)     max: 84483 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 50955     avg: 64270     median: 66513.5 (54%)     max: 77375 Points
min: 78596     avg: 81706     median: 81638 (66%)     max: 84884 Points
77244 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 48351     avg: 63261     median: 64870 (52%)     max: 76518 Points
min: 81426     avg: 82900     median: 81582 (66%)     max: 85692 Points
79672 Points (64%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16960     avg: 19505     median: 19578 (50%)     max: 21349 Points
min: 23962     avg: 24593     median: 23963 (61%)     max: 25855 Points
min: 20971     avg: 21827     median: 21826.5 (55%)     max: 22682 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 24918     avg: 30085     median: 30411 (54%)     max: 33844 Points
min: 37802     avg: 41920     median: 42652.5 (76%)     max: 44312 Points
min: 29555     avg: 31057     median: 31057 (55%)     max: 32559 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8866     avg: 10462     median: 10533 (44%)     max: 12293 Points
min: 9758     avg: 12610     median: 13012 (55%)     max: 13348 Points
min: 9596     avg: 9831     median: 9831 (41%)     max: 10066 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 2780     avg: 2890     median: 2891.5 (67%)     max: 2965 Points
min: 3156     avg: 3215     median: 3230 (75%)     max: 3253 Points
min: 2756     avg: 2824     median: 2823.5 (65%)     max: 2891 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 11973     avg: 14682     median: 15051 (58%)     max: 16311 Points
min: 16313     avg: 18689     median: 19052 (74%)     max: 19587 Points
min: 16503     avg: 16679     median: 16679 (65%)     max: 16855 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2645     avg: 2751     median: 2764 (88%)     max: 2844 Points
3071 Points (97%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 12289     avg: 13856     median: 14161 (58%)     max: 15017 Points
18139 Points (74%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1957     avg: 2091     median: 2098 (71%)     max: 2175 Points
min: 2307     avg: 2380     median: 2395 (81%)     max: 2425 Points
min: 2071     avg: 2141     median: 2141 (72%)     max: 2211 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11394     avg: 14344     median: 14516 (26%)     max: 16322 Points
min: 20576     avg: 21787     median: 21893 (39%)     max: 22406 Points
min: 16565     avg: 17408     median: 17408 (31%)     max: 18251 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1827     avg: 1935     median: 1934.5 (8%)     max: 2041 Points
min: 2233     avg: 2235     median: 2235 (10%)     max: 2237 Points
2072 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12962     avg: 14250     median: 14282 (45%)     max: 15009 Points
min: 20686     avg: 21227     median: 21227 (67%)     max: 21768 Points
16377 Points (52%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7480     avg: 7969     median: 7818 (78%)     max: 8628 Points
min: 9140     avg: 9238     median: 9237.5 (92%)     max: 9335 Points
8865 Points (89%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 42842     avg: 52918     median: 54586.5 (54%)     max: 57060 Points
min: 87050     avg: 88125     median: 88125 (86%)     max: 89200 Points
65863 Points (65%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 307.8     avg: 437.1     median: 434 (1%)     max: 503 ms
min: 397     avg: 415.3     median: 404 (0%)     max: 453 ms
min: 428     avg: 430.5     median: 430.5 (1%)     max: 433 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 64079     avg: 112489     median: 122618 (81%)     max: 125813 Points
136623 Points (90%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 189.2     avg: 254     median: 256.5 (67%)     max: 345 Points
min: 287     avg: 301.8     median: 298.8 (78%)     max: 322 Points
min: 225     avg: 250     median: 250 (65%)     max: 275 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 252     avg: 308.7     median: 316.5 (57%)     max: 363 Points
min: 315     avg: 335     median: 335 (60%)     max: 361 Points
min: 275     avg: 304.5     median: 304.5 (55%)     max: 334 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1307     avg: 1758     median: 1778 (66%)     max: 2040 Points
min: 2176     avg: 2214     median: 2220.5 (83%)     max: 2259 Points
min: 1892     avg: 1909     median: 1909 (71%)     max: 1926 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45.6     avg: 89.1     median: 90.8 (16%)     max: 133.7 Watt
min: 122.3     avg: 169.1     median: 162.5 (28%)     max: 229 Watt
min: 116.5     avg: 151.8     median: 151.8 (26%)     max: 187.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 46.3     avg: 94.6     median: 101.8 (19%)     max: 130.3 Watt
min: 143.7     avg: 179.6     median: 176.8 (32%)     max: 221 Watt
min: 115.3     avg: 170.7     median: 170.7 (31%)     max: 226 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.66     avg: 8.6     median: 7.6 (5%)     max: 19.6 Watt
min: 19.3     avg: 27.4     median: 27.3 (18%)     max: 35.6 Watt
min: 7.45     avg: 8.5     median: 8.5 (6%)     max: 9.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.4     avg: 9.3     median: 9.2 (7%)     max: 12.8 Watt
min: 13.6     avg: 18.2     median: 15.7 (11%)     max: 25.2 Watt
7.2 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 26.9     avg: 36.1     median: 32.4 (24%)     max: 54.9 Points per Watt
min: 32.6     avg: 35     median: 32.8 (24%)     max: 39.5 Points per Watt
25.3 Points per Watt (19%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 → 100% n=50

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX → 138% n=50

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 → 115% n=50

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.35
log 17. 15:45:03

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17543 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18731 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 18881 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1765982703s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Dec 2025 05:18:30 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 17543 +0.005s ... 0.011s

#9 got single benchmarks 17543 +0.038s ... 0.048s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 18731 +0.004s ... 0.053s

#11 got single benchmarks 18731 +0.012s ... 0.065s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 18881 +0.004s ... 0.07s

#13 got single benchmarks 18881 +0.006s ... 0.076s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.076s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.111s ... 0.187s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.187s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)