ARM Mali-G72 MP12 vs Qualcomm Adreno 690 vs Qualcomm Adreno 650
ARM Mali-G72 MP12 ► remove from comparison
The ARM Mali-G72 MP12 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced in October 2017 in the Huawei Mate 10 and uses 12 clusters (hence the MP12 name). In our benchmarks it performs between a Adreno 530 and 540 and is therefore suitable for demanding mobile games.
The G72 is based on the second generation of the Bifrost architecture and offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency and a bigger tile buffer for 16x anti-aliasing.
The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 FL11_1 and Renderscript.
Qualcomm Adreno 690 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 is an integrated graphics card in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 SoC for Windows laptops. According to Qualcomm, the 690 is up to 60% faster than the previous generation. In our tests with the Lenovo ThinkPad X13s, the Adreno 690 was only on par with a low en Intel UHD Graphics iGPU and not well suited for 3D games.
The chip is manufactured in 5nm at Samsung (5LPE) and suited for fanless laptops.
Qualcomm Adreno 650 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 650 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 , 865+ and 870 SoCs. The chip will be available from early 2020 and will be used mainly in high-end Android devices. The base clock speed of the GPU is 250 MHz and the boost depends on the used SoC. For the 865 it is 587 MHz, the 865 Plus increased to 846 MHz and the 2021 870 reached 670 MHz.
According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 650 GPU offers a 25% improved performance over the Adreno 640 , its predecessor, which is integrated into the Snapdragon 855 SoC. The enhanced performance is achieved by the Adreno 650 having 50% more compute units (ALUs) than the Adreno 640. Furthermore, the clock speed of the pixel shaders was also increased by 50%.
The performance in our first benchmarks of a reference system positions itself above the ARM Mali-G76 MP16 and e.g. in 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme even on the top spot. In GFXBench only the Apple A13 GPU is able to best the Adreno 650 (regarding smartphone GPUs).
As a novelty, the GPU driver can be updated in the Android Play Store. Furthermore, some features are running under the Elite Gaming brand (e.g., 144 Hz display support, desktop forward rendering).
The Adreno 650 supports Vulkan 1.1, DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, and OpenCL 2.0 FP. Furthermore, games and videos can use HDR10+ and Dolby Vision (with a supported display). The 650 supports 2 displays with up to 4K 60 Hz / QHD+ 144 Hz.
ARM Mali-G72 MP12 Qualcomm Adreno 690 Qualcomm Adreno 650 Adreno 600 Series Architecture Bifrost Adreno 600 Pipelines 12 - unified Core Speed 850 MHz 250 - 670 (Boost) MHz Shared Memory no yes yes API OpenGL ES 3.2 DirectX 12 DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2 technology 16 nm 5 nm 7 nm Date of Announcement 18.10.2017 06.12.2018 04.12.2019 Link to Manufacturer Page developer.arm.com Power Consumption 7 Watt Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Adreno 690
1.3 pt (4%)
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
909 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
811 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 22429 avg: 32596 median: 33740 (4%) max: 36231 Points
min: 110875 avg: 149779 median: 149017 (17%) max: 180392 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 8602 avg: 9818 median: 9818 (10%) max: 11034 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 13768 avg: 16708 median: 16707.5 (4%) max: 19647 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 2758 avg: 2835 median: 2834.5 (5%) max: 2911 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 2837 avg: 2933 median: 2932.5 (3%) max: 3028 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
14652 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 2021 avg: 3208 median: 3360.5 (15%) max: 3710 Points
min: 7970 avg: 9563 median: 9684 (42%) max: 11492 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2062 avg: 3386 median: 3545 (8%) max: 4040 Points
min: 11617 avg: 13051 median: 12858 (28%) max: 16809 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2487 avg: 2882 median: 2961.5 (15%) max: 3070 Points
min: 6960 avg: 8089 median: 8085 (40%) max: 8975 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2597 avg: 2945 median: 3012.5 (9%) max: 3109 Points
min: 8593 avg: 9728 median: 9498 (28%) max: 11999 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 3789 avg: 4168 median: 4230 (2%) max: 5039 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
3067 Points (4%)
min: 1103 avg: 1218 median: 1223 (1%) max: 1246 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 3063 avg: 3085 median: 3077 (4%) max: 3115 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 2898 avg: 2930 median: 2912 (3%) max: 2979 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 690 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
558 Points (0%)
Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Qualcomm Adreno 690 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 13.4 avg: 13.7 median: 13.7 (1%) max: 14 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Qualcomm Adreno 690 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 9.7 avg: 9.9 median: 10 (4%) max: 10 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 8.4 avg: 8.6 median: 8.6 (2%) max: 8.7 fps
min: 18 avg: 21.1 median: 21 (4%) max: 27 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 10 avg: 20.6 median: 23 (2%) max: 24 fps
min: 27 avg: 55 median: 55 (4%) max: 67 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 11 avg: 20.4 median: 21 (2%) max: 23 fps
min: 39 avg: 52.6 median: 51 (6%) max: 62 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 19 avg: 33.9 median: 38.5 (1%) max: 39 fps
min: 67 avg: 87.2 median: 88 (2%) max: 103 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 23 avg: 54.6 median: 59 (3%) max: 66 fps
min: 96 avg: 125.1 median: 125 (7%) max: 151 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G72 MP12 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 45 avg: 108 median: 118 (1%) max: 125 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 650
min: 168 avg: 209.5 median: 206 (2%) max: 266 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 214123 avg: 240087 median: 240035 (30%) max: 276746 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
25922 Points (59%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
39033 Points (87%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 72.6 avg: 75.5 median: 75 (0%) max: 78.57 fps
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
2688 Points (1%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
2532 Points (1%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
8180 Points (8%)
54110 Points (54%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
3761 Points (7%)
42627 Points (75%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 17 avg: 19.7 median: 19.7 (3%) max: 22.3 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
15.8 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
16.4 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 5.18 avg: 8.2 median: 7.6 (3%) max: 12.7 Watt
Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G72 MP12 → 0% n= Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 690 → 0% n= Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 650 → 0% n=
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
Adreno 650:
60 119 [X] Asus ROG Phone 3 2.0.0.3727
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) 2.4GHz
Adreno 650
min:
106 fps, max:
122 fps
~ 90 fps
Adreno 650:
60 [X] Xiaomi Poco F4 3.3.0.5735
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G 2.4GHz
Adreno 650
min:
54 fps, max:
61 fps
117 [X] Asus ROG Phone 3 2.0.0.3727
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) 2.4GHz
Adreno 650
min:
97 fps, max:
121 fps
~ 89 fps
Adreno 650:
60 118 [X] Asus ROG Phone 3 2.0.0.3727
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) 2.4GHz
Adreno 650
min:
111 fps, max:
121 fps
~ 89 fps
Adreno 650:
60 [X] Asus ROG Phone 3 1.0.17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) 2.4GHz
Adreno 650
min:
56 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 650:
60 60 [X] OnePlus 8T 1.0.0_1112729_1135452
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 2.4GHz
Adreno 650
min:
54 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 60 fps
Adreno 650:
59 60 [X] OnePlus 8T 1.0.0_1112729_1135452
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 2.4GHz
Adreno 650
min:
50 fps, max:
61 fps
60 [X] Asus ROG Phone 3 1.1.1_1437351_1398019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) 2.4GHz
Adreno 650
min:
29 fps, max:
61 fps
60 [X] Xiaomi Poco F3 1.5.0_2574575_2578841
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G 2.4GHz
Adreno 650
min:
37 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 60 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
32 [X] Honor Play 0.7.0
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
18 fps, max:
33 fps
fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
32 [X] Honor 10 0.5.0
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
20 fps, max:
42 fps
32 [X] Honor Play 0.7.0
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
22 fps, max:
33 fps
33 [X] Huawei P20 Pro 0.7.0
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
14 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Huawei P20 Pro 0.7.0 mit GPU Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
16 fps, max:
42 fps
~ 34 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
60 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
31 55 [X] Honor Play 1.24.1.2
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
43 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 43 fps
142%
Adreno 650:
60 60 62 ~ 61 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 54 [X] Honor Play 1.24.1.2
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
21 fps, max:
61 fps
58 [X] Honor 10 1.21.1.3
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
2 fps, max:
60 fps
58 [X] Huawei P20 Pro 1.23.1.2
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
40 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 50 fps
120%
Adreno 650:
60 60 61 ~ 60 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
60 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 30 30 59 [X] Huawei P20 1.3.3
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
46 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 37 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
29 29 30 30 [X] Huawei P20 3.6.0k
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
26 fps, max:
31 fps
~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 fps
150%
Adreno 650:
30 [X] OnePlus 8 Pro 2.1.2a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 2.4GHz
Adreno 650
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
30 60 60 ~ 45 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
51 fps
200%
Adreno 650:
60 144 ~ 102 fps
Average Gaming ARM Mali-G72 MP12 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 650 → 171% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 149%
Qualcomm Adreno 690 low med. high ultra QHD 4K F1 22 26 22.5 17 12.6 X-Plane 11.11 14 12 11 Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 19 12.3 7.29 Dota 2 Reborn 58 55 44 37 The Witcher 3 25 16 10 4 GTA V 29.9 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 5 1 4 1 4 1 2 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 18. 04:58:05
#0 checking url part for id 8138 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 11411 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 9971 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 16 May 2024 05:40:59 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.132s ... 0.133s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.133s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.133s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8138 +0.049s ... 0.182s
#9 got single benchmarks 8138 +0.027s ... 0.209s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11411 +0.026s ... 0.235s
#11 got single benchmarks 11411 +0.012s ... 0.247s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 9971 +0.002s ... 0.249s
#13 got single benchmarks 9971 +0.115s ... 0.364s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.364s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.2s ... 0.564s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.564s
#17 Got 224 rows for game benchmarks. +0.06s ... 0.624s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.624s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.011s ... 0.634s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.047s ... 0.681s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.681s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.683s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)