Qualcomm Adreno 685 vs ARM Mali-G57 MP2 vs Qualcomm Adreno 642L
Qualcomm Adreno 685 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 685 is an integrated graphics card in the Microsoft SQ1 ARM-based SoC. It is similar to the Adreno 680 in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx SoC for Windows laptops but higher clocked and therefore with a higher theoretical performance (2 versus 1.8 TFlops).
ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ► remove from comparison
The ARM Mali-G57 MP2 (or MC2) is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced mid 2021 in the MediaTek Dimensity 700 and uses 2 clusters (hence the MC2/MP2 name).
The G57 is based on the new Valhall architecture and is intended for mainstream phones.
The performance of the G57MP2 in our benchmarks is comparable to the Adreno 618 .
The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.
Qualcomm Adreno 642L ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 642L is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SoC . The chip will be available from mid 2021 and will be used mainly in upper mid-range Android devices.
According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 642L GPU offers a 40% improved performance over the Adreno 620 (compared to the specified +50% of the 642 in the SD 780G), its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 768G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR4X-4200 memory support of the SoC.
The Adreno 642L supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.
The Snapdragon 778G and therefore also the 642L is manufactured in the modern 6nm UEV process at TSMC that should provide a good power efficiency.
Qualcomm Adreno 685 ARM Mali-G57 MP2 Qualcomm Adreno 642L Adreno 600 Series Shared Memory yes no yes API DirectX 12 OpenGL ES 3.2 Power Consumption 7 Watt technology 7 nm 7 nm 6 nm Date of Announcement 06.12.2018 03.07.2020 07.05.2021 Codename Valhall Architecture Bifrost Pipelines 2 - unified Link to Manufacturer Page developer.arm.com Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 88482 avg: 89308 median: 89307.5 (10%) max: 90133 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 1440 avg: 3517 median: 3585 (16%) max: 3965 Points
min: 6398 avg: 6666 median: 6638 (29%) max: 7281 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1285 avg: 3573 median: 3637 (8%) max: 4075 Points
min: 7199 avg: 7627 median: 7536 (17%) max: 8605 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 969 avg: 2553 median: 2546 (13%) max: 3489 Points
min: 5032 avg: 5413 median: 5393.5 (27%) max: 5763 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 825 avg: 2425 median: 2347 (7%) max: 3908 Points
min: 5103 avg: 5654 median: 5612 (17%) max: 6240 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 1003 avg: 1167 median: 1166 (1%) max: 1340 Points
min: 2321 avg: 2517 median: 2493.5 (1%) max: 2831 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 309 avg: 353.8 median: 330 (0%) max: 1073 Points
min: 681 avg: 696 median: 687.5 (1%) max: 768 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
1968 Points (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
1927 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 685 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
373 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 2 avg: 2.4 median: 2.4 (1%) max: 2.8 fps
min: 5.9 avg: 6.2 median: 6.1 (2%) max: 6.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 1.9 avg: 5.6 median: 5.7 (1%) max: 6.5 fps
min: 13 avg: 13.6 median: 13.5 (2%) max: 15 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 5.2 avg: 15 median: 15 (1%) max: 18 fps
min: 34 avg: 36.4 median: 36 (3%) max: 40 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 4.7 avg: 14.7 median: 15 (2%) max: 28 fps
min: 33 avg: 33.7 median: 33 (4%) max: 37 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 8.6 avg: 23.9 median: 25 (1%) max: 43 fps
min: 56 avg: 57.7 median: 57 (1%) max: 64 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
31.7 fps (2%)
min: 14 avg: 38.1 median: 38.5 (2%) max: 70 fps
min: 77 avg: 79.1 median: 78 (5%) max: 89 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 685 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
167.7 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G57 MP2
min: 23 avg: 59.4 median: 63 (1%) max: 66 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642L
min: 132 avg: 134.9 median: 133 (1%) max: 148 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 0 avg: 64420 median: 60119 (7%) max: 83222 Points
min: 135972 avg: 157798 median: 157454 (20%) max: 175807 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 22.5 avg: 244 median: 27.1 (0%) max: 2418 fps
min: 45.96 avg: 49.6 median: 46.9 (0%) max: 54.4 fps
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 1179 avg: 1250 median: 1254 (0%) max: 1292 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 1133 avg: 1233 median: 1255 (0%) max: 1290 Points
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
2292 Points (2%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 13388 avg: 20840 median: 20466 (20%) max: 26779 Points
min: 23666 avg: 31803 median: 30994 (31%) max: 38436 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 10582 avg: 18758 median: 19555.5 (34%) max: 24231 Points
min: 26134 avg: 36660 median: 40236 (70%) max: 43000 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 1.077 avg: 3.3 median: 3 (1%) max: 8.02 Watt
min: 0 avg: 4.3 median: 4 (2%) max: 9.27 Watt
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 685 → 100% n=2 Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G57 MP2 → 80% n=2 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642L → 163% n=2
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
Adreno 642L:
59 59 ~ 59 fps
Adreno 642L:
51 60 ~ 56 fps
Adreno 642L:
61 [X] Xiaomi 12 Lite 3.4.0.5930
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 642L
min:
57 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Mali-G57 MP2:
26 [X] Samsung Galaxy A15 4.5.0_21307647_21321795
Mediatek Helio G99 2GHz
Mali-G57 MP2
min:
2 fps, max:
36 fps
35.4 37 39.2 [X] Teclast T65 Max 4.6.0_22174900_22378599
Mediatek Helio G99 2GHz
Mali-G57 MP2
min:
14 fps, max:
53 fps
55 [X] Oukitel WP33 Pro 5G 4.4.0_20481013_20559831
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ 2GHz
Mali-G57 MP2
min:
45 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 39 fps
Mali-G57 MP2:
17 [X] Samsung Galaxy A15 4.5.0_21307647_21321795
Mediatek Helio G99 2GHz
Mali-G57 MP2
min:
1 fps, max:
30 fps
20.7 [X] Teclast T65 Max 4.6.0_22174900_22378599
Mediatek Helio G99 2GHz
Mali-G57 MP2
min:
4 fps, max:
31 fps
22 23.2 23.5 [X] Oukitel WP33 Pro 5G 4.4.0_20481013_20559831
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ 2GHz
Mali-G57 MP2
min:
19 fps, max:
30 fps
~ 21 fps
Adreno 642L:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
Mali-G57 MP2:
39 90 ~ 65 fps
Mali-G57 MP2:
30 [X] Realme 8 5G 2.8.4a
MediaTek Dimensity 700 2GHz
Mali-G57 MP2
min:
21 fps, max:
31 fps
fps
Adreno 642L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
Mali-G57 MP2:
30 [X] Realme 8 5G 2.8.4a
MediaTek Dimensity 700 2GHz
Mali-G57 MP2
min:
19 fps, max:
31 fps
fps
Adreno 642L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
Adreno 642L:
90 [X] Motorola Edge 30 2.36.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G 1.9GHz
Adreno 642L
min:
82 fps, max:
91 fps
fps
Qualcomm Adreno 642L low med. high ultra QHD 4K Diablo Immortal 59 56 League of Legends: Wild Rift 61 Armajet 89 PUBG Mobile 58 40 38 Dead Trigger 2 60 Asphalt 9: Legends 30 30 Subway Surfers 90 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 3 1 2 3 1 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 25. 22:05:25
#0 checking url part for id 9954 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 10691 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 10945 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 25 May 2024 05:40:03 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.131s ... 0.132s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.132s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.132s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9954 +0.038s ... 0.17s
#9 got single benchmarks 9954 +0.006s ... 0.176s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10691 +0.002s ... 0.178s
#11 got single benchmarks 10691 +0.184s ... 0.361s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 10945 +0.002s ... 0.363s
#13 got single benchmarks 10945 +0.054s ... 0.417s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.417s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.144s ... 0.561s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.561s
#17 Got 130 rows for game benchmarks. +0.039s ... 0.6s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.6s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.604s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.019s ... 0.623s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.623s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.625s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)