Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Smartphone Review – An economical rugged phone with a removable battery
Samsung's Galaxy XCover series is directed at users who enjoy being outdoors and who need a phone that won't immediately show scratches or get water damage after a little rough handling. This also makes it an interesting choice for businesses whose employees work in locations that are somewhat less protected than the standard office environment.
The Galaxy XCover 7 has returned to a more affordable price point after the fairly expensive 2022 XCover 6 Pro. In the meantime, however, the price of the previous model has also fallen considerably and the XCover 7 is significantly weaker in some areas. In this review, we will take a close look at how the new outdoor phone performs and whether it is worth the money.
Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Wanted:
- News translator (DE-EN)
- Review translation proofreader (DE-EN)
Details here
Possible competitors in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
79.1 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2 | 240 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.60" | 2408x1080 | |
81.9 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L | 235 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.60" | 2408x1080 | |
82.3 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Nokia XR21 SD 695 5G, Adreno 619 | 231 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.49" | 2400x1080 | |
79.7 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | CAT S75 Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256 | 268 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.58" | 2408x1080 | |
78.1 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Gigaset GX4 Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2 | 270 g | 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.10" | 1560x720 |
Case – a removeable back cover
The XCover 7 is a very well-protected smartphone. Its main camera and screen are sunk in to protect them from scratches. The screen is also protected by Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ – this is a special variant of the Victus glass that was developed for Samsung. It doesn't quite reach the stability of the most recent Victus 2 but was also used in the Galaxy S22 and should provide decent protection.
Samsung has certified its smartphone to IP68 and MIL-STD-810H standards to confirm it is protected from dust and can handle immersion in freshwater, provided it is not too deep, without damage. The phone should also easily survive being dropped from chest height and can regularly be cleaned with disinfectant.
The device has more or less the same dimensions as the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro and is only 10.2 mm thick, making it a fairly slim outdoor phone. At 240g, the phone is easy to hold without it becoming tiring.
The screen shows ripples when pressure is applied to the screen and the phone can be warped slightly by hand, causing the back cover to creak audibly. The device is fairly robust overall, though Samsung could have made it even more trustworthy with a little more care.
The device is only available in black, with the orange accents on the large XCover key and framing the main camera giving the device a more relaxed look. The back cover is embellished with diagonal grooves in four slightly raised blocks. This looks good and makes the phone easier to grip. There is no rubber coating, however.
Connectivity – plenty of storage space
At first glance, the storage specifications of the Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 look great: 128 GB of storage space and 6 GB RAM are considerable given its relatively affordable pricing. This first impression is slightly tainted by the fact that the phone only uses slow UFS 2.1 technology for data storage. The competition is equipped with more modern and thus faster technology.
The USB-C port offers USB 2.0 speeds and can therefore only process data transfers at standard speed. NFC is available for wireless payments and reading tags.
The fact that there is both a normal Galaxy XCover 7 and an "Enterprise Edition" on the market often causes confusion. The two are exactly the same in terms of features, but the Enterprise Edition has a warranty of up to 3 years and provides software support for managing and updating many devices centrally. The additional 12-month warranty is a nice bonus, but apart from that the "Enterprise Edition" offers no advantages to end users.
The phone only has a single SIM slot below its removable back cover, but users can easily set up an eSIM on the phone, thus making the device suitable for dual-SIM operation.
microSD card reader
The microSD card reader is accessible by removing the back cover and is not connected to the SIM slot. The phone can read cards with up to 1 TB of storage capacity.
The reader performed well in our trial with our Angelbird V60 reference card, achieving read rates of around 33.5 MByte/s and reaching a similar level to its comparison devices in the CPDT benchmark.
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 (Angelbird V60) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Angelbird V60) | |
CAT S75 (Angelbird V60) | |
Gigaset GX4 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
Software – the XCover7 will stay up-to-date for a while
The Galaxy XCover phone currently runs on Android 14 and has the manufacturer's own OneUI 6.0 interface. This changes the look and operation of Android significantly. The manufacturer has paid close attention to positioning the most important controls in the lower area of the screen, making them easy to access when holding the phone in one hand.
Several third-party apps have been pre-installed but can be removed fairly easily. This is not the case for Samsung's proprietary apps, which cannot always be removed despite partly covering the same functions as the Google apps, which are also pre-installed.
The security patches on our device are from March 2024 and are therefore fully up-to-date at the time of testing. Samsung promises to provide security updates for five years, up to 2029, and four new operating system generations, going all the way to Android 18.
Communication and GNSS – 5G included
The XCover7 is a 5G smartphone. The phone covers a wide range of frequencies both in the LTE and the 5G network, which means it can be used to access mobile internet in many countries. Its signal strength could be better: the Samsung smartphone lags behind many high-end phones despite its plastic back.
Of course, the device also works on Wi-Fi. It supports the WiFi 5 standard and can achieve transfer rates of around 300-340 MBit/s. This is similar to most outdoor phones but quite a bit slower than the XCover 6 Pro, which came close to fully utilizing Gigabit connections.
With the XCover7, you will have to wait a moment for large websites to load – even when standing close to the router. Images take particularly long to appear while scrolling. Reception drops to 3/4 at a distance of 10 meters and through 3 walls, with websites only taking a little longer to load.
Networking | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Nokia XR21 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
CAT S75 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Gigaset GX4 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Average of class Smartphone | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
The phone supports all major satellite networks for localization and also uses SBAS to further increase location accuracy. This means the phone can locate its position outdoors within mere seconds and with an accuracy of 1 meter.
We tested the phone's location accuracy in practice by taking it on a bike ride along with the Garmin Venu 2 smartwatch.
The result: The XCover 7 positioned us precisely on our path. There were minimal deviations from time to time, but these were rare. We can thus confirm the rugged phone's very good (albeit not perfect) location accuracy.
This makes it suitable for navigating in situations that require high precision.
Call functions and voice quality – better speak up
Samsung uses its own telephone app that places more focus on the keypad than Google's standard app. Recent calls and contacts can be accessed through tabs. You can easily also block individual phone numbers or hidden callers within the app.
The voice quality is fairly decent through the earpiece and integrated microphone, both for the user and the person at the other end. However, it is important to speak loudly and clearly, or else the microphone won't register your voice.
On speakerphone, the other party sounds very loud yet also unpleasantly treble-heavy at maximum volume. This can be avoided by turning down the volume where possible. The speaker also adds reverberation that is not audible when talking through the earpiece. The hands-free microphone only registers our voice when we speak loudly enough.
Both microphones have medium capability for suppressing loud background noise. Still, the other party was able to understand us fairly well even in loud surroundings.
Cameras – decent images
The back of the phone is home to a single 50-megapixel camera that usually uses pixel binning to combine four pixels in order to capture more light. This reduces image resolution to 12.5 megapixels, which should suffice for most needs – except for printing large posters, perhaps.
The image quality is average. The photos feature some details, but the results of high-end smartphones are more precise and well-lit in comparison. The landscape image shows plenty of details in the sky while the comparison camera's higher quality shows in the wall and structures. Still, the Galaxy XCover 7 takes good-quality pictures for its price range.
In low light and with high contrasts, very bright areas soon appear over-exposed while dark areas lack details. In general, though, the exposure is satisfactory while image sharpness is more mediocre.
Videos can be recorded at a maximum of FullHD and 30 fps. Image quality is good, autofocus and brightness adjustment work reliably and quickly in the background.
The front camera has a resolution of 5 megapixels. It takes somewhat blurred selfies when it comes to details but is still useful in good light.
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Hauptkamera PflanzeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low LightWe took the main camera through its paces in our lab, where we photographed our test chart in full studio lighting and at 1 lux. Contrasts could be higher in good lighting, but the image sharpness hardly drops towards the edges. In low lighting, you can still roughly make out the image but the camera can no longer show details.
Accessories & Warranty – charger not included
Samsung appears stingy when it comes to accessories: it has chosen not to include a charger and instead only provides a single USB cable. The removable back cover makes SIM tools superfluous.
Users who need a charger can purchase one for €10 from the Samsung Amazon store. For companies, third-party providers now offer charging stations for up to 10 or more devices. A suitable replacement battery is available online for around €30-40.
The Galaxy XCover 7 generally comes with a 24-month warranty. The Enterprise Edition covers 36 months.
Input Devices & Operation – no fingerprint reader
The touchscreen is scanned for touch inputs 120 times per second. That's less often than on most current smartphones but still enough to ensure smooth and reliable operation. The touchscreen is just as reactive in the corners and along the edges and we can confirm that the phone can also be operated while wearing thick gloves.
The physical volume and standby keys are positioned on the right side of the device. They are also easy to use while wearing gloves and have a clear actuation point. On the left, users will find the large XCover key, which can be set up to trigger specific actions after a single, long, or double click.
We feel that this key could do with more actuation force as we often pressed it by mistake when picking up the phone. In our case, this turned on the flashlight on the back of the device.
The XCover7 does not include a fingerprint reader. Instead, it allows biometric unlocking through face recognition using the front camera. This is limited to 2D, however, and doesn't use an additional infrared depth sensor, makes the method less secure. Still, the function worked well when tested.
Display – 60-Hz screen without PWM
The 6.6-inch PLS screen with an expanded Full-HD resolution is the centerpiece of the Galaxy XCover7. The panel, however, only has 60 Hz. Users looking for the smoother feel of a 90 or 120-Hz display will have to look elsewhere.
Our tests using a spectrophotometer and the CalMAN software confirm Samsung's claims of 600-nit brightness. The phone is slightly brighter than that of many competitors and can also be used in bright environments.
The black value is relatively high, reducing contrast and the intensity of colors displayed.
|
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 600 cd/m²
Contrast: 1053:1 (Black: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.07 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.249
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 PLS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro PLS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | Nokia XR21 TFT-LCD, 2400x1080, 6.5" | CAT S75 IPS LCD, 2408x1080, 6.6" | Gigaset GX4 IPS, 1560x720, 6.1" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -25% | 18% | 2% | -22% | |
Brightness middle | 600 | 510 -15% | 503 -16% | 566 -6% | 645 8% |
Brightness | 561 | 495 -12% | 487 -13% | 529 -6% | 602 7% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 92 3% | 94 6% | 83 -7% | 87 -2% |
Black Level * | 0.57 | 0.46 19% | 0.45 21% | 0.47 18% | 0.46 19% |
Contrast | 1053 | 1109 5% | 1118 6% | 1204 14% | 1402 33% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.07 | 7.41 -46% | 2.4 53% | 5.02 1% | 8.2 -62% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.1 | 13.26 -64% | 6.6 19% | 9.6 -19% | 15 -85% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.7 | 10.6 -86% | 1.9 67% | 4.4 23% | 11.2 -96% |
Gamma | 2.249 98% | 2.518 87% | 2.22 99% | 2.248 98% | 2.08 106% |
CCT | 8162 80% | 10050 65% | 6602 98% | 7173 91% | 10614 61% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
We noticed a distinct blue cast in light gray tones, and most colors are not entirely accurate.
We did not measure PWM flickering.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
32.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.1 ms rise | |
↘ 18.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
43.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27.5 ms rise | |
↘ 16.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
The screen is bright enough for users to read the display despite reflections on the screen, although this becomes challenging in direct sunlight. Still, the smartphone is easy to use outdoors if you turn away from the sun or work in the shade.
The image is clear and accurate even when viewing the display from an angle.
Performance – more power would have been nice
The MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ is a fairly new SoC that doesn't differ much from its predecessor. It is designed for affordable mid-range devices, making the Galaxy XCover7 significantly slower than other outdoor smartphones.
In everyday use, the device can display the menu smoothly and the system runs well as long as no demanding apps are being used. The system reaches its limits when multi-tasking or running background processes. Custom apps that are tailored to the user's own operating procedures, for example, would need to be well optimized, as the SoC does not have many performance reserves.
CrossMark - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2093, n=161, last 2 years) | |
CAT S75 | |
Nokia XR21 | |
Gigaset GX4 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ (499 - 524, n=3) |
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 75143, n=147, last 2 years) | |
Nokia XR21 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ (6283 - 6895, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
CAT S75 |
AImark - Score v3.x | |
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=139, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ (905 - 987, n=3) | |
CAT S75 | |
Nokia XR21 |
The system is also a lot slower than its competitors when it comes to graphics. The framerates of the Galaxy XCover6 Pro are up to twice as fast. Users who require graphically demanding apps or enjoy playing a game or two on their phone should carefully consider whether the performance is sufficient.
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Gigaset GX4 | |
Nokia XR21 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Gigaset GX4 | |
Nokia XR21 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Gigaset GX4 | |
Nokia XR21 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 |
3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Gigaset GX4 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
Nokia XR21 | |
CAT S75 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | |
CAT S75 | |
Gigaset GX4 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | |
CAT S75 | |
Gigaset GX4 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | |
CAT S75 | |
Gigaset GX4 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | |
Gigaset GX4 | |
Nokia XR21 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | |
Nokia XR21 | |
Gigaset GX4 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | |
Nokia XR21 | |
Gigaset GX4 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
CAT S75 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Nokia XR21 | |
CAT S75 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Nokia XR21 | |
CAT S75 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
CAT S75 | |
Nokia XR21 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
CAT S75 | |
Nokia XR21 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Nokia XR21 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
CAT S75 |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Nokia XR21 | |
CAT S75 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Nokia XR21 | |
CAT S75 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Nokia XR21 | |
CAT S75 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Gigaset GX4 | |
Nokia XR21 | |
CAT S75 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Nokia XR21 | |
CAT S75 | |
Gigaset GX4 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Gigaset GX4 | |
Nokia XR21 | |
CAT S75 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Nokia XR21 | |
CAT S75 | |
Gigaset GX4 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Nokia XR21 | |
Gigaset GX4 | |
CAT S75 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 |
The browser results aren't that bad, but this may be due to the more modern Chrome version in which we tested the benchmarks. Large websites load quite slowly and it takes a while for images to become visible when scrolling.
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=166, last 2 years) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ (74.5 - 75, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 (Chrome 122) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104) | |
CAT S75 (Chrome 114) | |
Nokia XR21 (Chrome 114) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=151, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 (Chrome 122) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ (56.5 - 63.3, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chome 104) | |
CAT S75 (Chrome 114) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=156, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 (Chrome 122) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ (75 - 79, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104) | |
CAT S75 (Chrome 114) | |
Nokia XR21 (Chrome 114) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=206, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ (21764 - 22638, n=5) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 (Chrome 122) | |
Nokia XR21 (Chrome 114) | |
CAT S75 (Chrome 114) | |
Gigaset GX4 (Chrome 111) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ (1984 - 2003, n=3) | |
CAT S75 (Chrome 114) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 (Chrome 122) | |
Nokia XR21 (Chrome 114) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=164, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung skimped on memory and only used UFS 2.1 technology, which is further slowed down by a somewhat sluggish memory controller. As a result, data transfers and load times take longer than on many comparable devices.
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | Nokia XR21 | CAT S75 | Gigaset GX4 | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 9% | -11% | 45% | -11% | -15% | 132% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 488.2 | 841.6 72% | 509.76 4% | 991.21 103% | 672.59 38% | 760 ? 56% | 1859 ? 281% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 501 | 484.7 -3% | 465.31 -7% | 878.23 75% | 256.9 -49% | 297 ? -41% | 1445 ? 188% |
Random Read 4KB | 212 | 170.6 -20% | 187.51 -12% | 221.56 5% | 171.26 -19% | 152.9 ? -28% | 278 ? 31% |
Random Write 4KB | 240.2 | 204.2 -15% | 167.51 -30% | 233.91 -3% | 207.62 -14% | 131.6 ? -45% | 310 ? 29% |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | Nokia XR21 | CAT S75 | Gigaset GX4 | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCMark for Android | -2% | -36% | 41% | -13% | 147% | |
Storage 2.0 seq. read int. | 464 ? | 424.33 -9% | 719.36 55% | 488 ? 5% | 1608 ? 247% | |
Storage 2.0 seq. write int. | 400 ? | 413.56 3% | 253.68 -37% | 275 ? -31% | 1411 ? 253% | |
Storage 2.0 random read int. | 38.4 ? | 28.51 -26% | 41.39 8% | 25.8 ? -33% | 39.1 ? 2% | |
Storage 2.0 random write int. | 26.9 ? | 30.49 13% | 64.4 139% | 28.9 ? 7% | 63.1 ? 135% | |
Storage 2.0 | 17883 ? | 19174 7% | 11421 -36% | 15801 ? -12% | 35060 ? 96% |
Games – Gaming better at 40 fps
Due to the 60 Hz display, the frame rates of the outdoor phone are limited to 60 fps. But the relatively weak SoC only achieves these rates in very simple games. More demanding titles such as Genshin Impact or PUBG Mobile run at around 40-50 frames per second in low detail settings.
Users who insist on a high level of detail will have to make do with 30 fps or even significantly less. This means that lags can no longer be ruled out. We tested the framerates with the GameBench software suite.
The Samsung phone is not made with gaming in mind but can be used for this purpose provided the expectations aren't too high.
There are no issues when controlling the device using the touchscreen and position sensor.
Emissions – can get a little warm
Temperature
We measured a temperature of up to 42 °C after prolonged load. This will be noticeable to the user and could be even higher on hot summer days.
This temperature development doesn't seem to impact the SoC. Performance was not reduced in our 3DMark stress tests.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.6 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
Nokia XR21 | |
Gigaset GX4 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
Nokia XR21 | |
Gigaset GX4 |
Speaker
The small speaker at the bottom of the phone is solely responsible for sound output, which means that the device is not able to output stereo sound. Still, the speaker is decent and produces a good volume of up to 84.3 dB(A). Highs are very pronounced and users shouldn't expect to hear low mids or bass tones. The sound becomes more balanced at lower volumes.
If you want good sound, the best choice is probably to connect headphones or speakers via the 3.5mm audio jack or Bluetooth. Don't expect too many Bluetooth audio codecs either: Samsung usually limits itself to its own SSC and the bare essentials from other providers. This is also the case with this smartphone, which offers a choice of SBC, AAC, aptX and LDAC.
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Gigaset GX4 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Battery life – low consumption
Energy Management
The smartphone's energy management is pleasingly low, particularly under high load. But of course performance is comparatively low as well.
The device can be charged with up to 15 watts. The phone does not come with a charger included. All our USB chargers from various manufacturers worked perfectly and fully recharged the empty battery within 2 hours.
Off / Standby | 0.1 / 0.2 Watt |
Idle | 1 / 1.2 / 1.3 Watt |
Load |
2.3 / 4.5 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 4050 mAh | Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro 4050 mAh | Nokia XR21 4800 mAh | CAT S75 5000 mAh | Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -46% | -56% | -27% | -5% | -68% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1 | 0.9 10% | 0.83 17% | 1.1 -10% | 1.05 ? -5% | 0.885 ? 11% |
Idle Average * | 1.2 | 1.4 -17% | 2.29 -91% | 1.5 -25% | 1.25 ? -4% | 1.451 ? -21% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.3 | 1.8 -38% | 2.32 -78% | 1.9 -46% | 1.4 ? -8% | 1.608 ? -24% |
Load Average * | 2.3 | 4.7 -104% | 4.41 -92% | 3.2 -39% | 2.45 ? -7% | 6.55 ? -185% |
Load Maximum * | 4.5 | 8.1 -80% | 6.12 -36% | 5.2 -16% | 4.6 ? -2% | 9.92 ? -120% |
* ... smaller is better
Energy Management: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Energy Management: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
Battery life
The battery has a fairly small capacity of 4050 mAh. Its runtimes are slightly better than those of the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro but cannot keep up with the other comparison devices. Remember, however, that the battery can be replaced fairly easily, which means you can multiply the battery life by however many batteries you have on you.
Even with only one battery, though, the battery life is decent and should keep you going for a day of average use and also cover several episodes of your favorite show.
The robust Galaxy Tab Active 5 tablet has a no-battery mode where the tablet can be used without a battery when connected to the grid. This makes sense in particularly hot environments that could harm the battery, for example. Unfortunately, this mode isn't available for the Galaxy XCover7. If you remove the battery while the device is plugged in, the screen stays on for a second, but then the device switches off and cannot be reactivated permanently without a battery.
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 4050 mAh | Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro 4050 mAh | Nokia XR21 4800 mAh | CAT S75 5000 mAh | Gigaset GX4 5000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -4% | 36% | 12% | 42% | |
Reader / Idle | 1405 | 1321 -6% | 2344 67% | ||
H.264 | 861 | 856 -1% | 1085 26% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 803 | 768 -4% | 875 9% | 896 12% | 1143 42% |
Load | 284 | 266 -6% | 400 41% |
Pros
Cons
Verdict – rare features for an outdoor phone
The Samsung Galaxy XCover7 has several advantages that could come in handy for everyday use. First and foremost: its removable battery, which is very rare in smartphones. The phone is also very sturdy, has a bright display and a relatively understated design, generous storage space, and an assignable key.
The Enterprise Edition comes with three years of warranty, as well as the promise of a long update period up until 2029. The phone's location accuracy is good and the main camera takes decent images and videos. The 5G model covers a fair amount of frequencies, making the phone a good candidate for international travel.
On the flip side, the battery could do with more capacity although it's removable. The battery life of Gigaset's GX4 would be something to aim for. Something we find even more disappointing, though, is the phone's meager performance, clearly trailing behind comparable phones. The panel is limited to 60 Hz and doesn't display colors very accurately. Plus, the phone comes without a charger.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover7 is relatively affordable but saves on performance. It has a very sturdy case, good features, and good location accuracy.
If you're looking for a phone with better performance, then the Galaxy XCover6 Pro might be a good alternative. Its price has now dropped to just above our test unit's price. The Gigaset GX4 is also available for a good price these days. It also features a removable battery but doesn't have 5G.
Price and Availability
The Galaxy XCover7 is currently available in Europe and can be purchased from the Samsung store.
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
- 03/23/2024 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.