Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Review - The update to the extremely well-priced smartphone

Rebranded. The Poco M4 Pro 5G is the European version of the Redmi Note 11 5G. The 230-Euro (~$260) Xiaomi smartphone comes with a 90-Hz IPS screen, 50-MP camera, a lot of internal storage and a new SoC. Read our review to learn what else the well-priced device has to offer.
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Stanislav Kokhanyuk), 🇩🇪 🇳🇱 ...

The Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G is the successor to the Poco M3 Pro 5G. The M4 Pro 5G bears a lot of similarities to the Redmi Note 11 5G. When compared to the predecessor, the M4 is a bit bigger and heavier, because it comes with a bigger screen. The M4 also comes with a more modern SoC, an additional speaker, and a new camera system.

The Poco M4 5G costs 30 Euros (~$34) more than the predecessor. The model with 4 GB of RAM and 64 GB of internal memory now costs 230 Euros 230-Euro (~$260). The model with 6 GB of RAM or 128 GB of internal storage--our review device--costs 250 Euros (~$295).

Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Poco M Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 810 8 x 2 - 2.4 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G57 MP2, Core: 1068 MHz
Memory
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.60 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 399 PPI, Capacitive, 10 multi touch points, 240 Hz touch sampling rate, TFT-LCD, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 114.99 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: Audio Jack (3.5 mm), USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity, Accelerometer, Magnetometer, Orientation, Gyroscope, OTG, IR-Blaster, FM-Radio
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.75 x 163.56 x 75.78 ( = 0.34 x 6.44 x 2.98 in)
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8) + 8 MPix (Ultra Wide, f/2.2, 119°); 1080p-Video (60 FPS); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.45); 1080p-Video (30 FPS)
Additional features
Speakers: Mono, Keyboard: Onscreen, 33W-Charger, USB-Cabel (Type-A to Type-C), SIM-Tool, Silicon Case, Sticker, Documentations, MIUI 12.5 for Poco, 12 Months Warranty, GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1), BeiDou (B1), SBAS; Head-SAR: 0.594 W/kg, Body-SAR: 0.999 W/kg; DRM Widevine L1, fanless
Weight
195 g ( = 6.88 oz / 0.43 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
250 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Likely Competitors

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
80.5 %
01/2022
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2
195 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2400x1080
80.5 %
07/2021
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2
190 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.50"2400x1080
80 %
07/2021
Vivo Y72 5G
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2
193 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.58"2408x1080
82.4 %
08/2021
Oppo A74 5G
SD 480, Adreno 619
190 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
79.6 %
08/2021
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2
203 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.60"2400x1080

Case - Textured plastic back

The back of the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G is one of the few things which distinguish it from the Redmi Note 11 5G. The M4 Pro 5G comes in different colour schemes (Power Black, Poco Yellow and Cool Blue) and has a Poco logo on the back. Because of the 1.7-mm camera bump, the Poco M4 wobbles on flat surfaces without the protective case.

The Xiaomi smartphone looks quite decent. The screen is protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 3. Both the mid-frame and the back are made of plastic. The latter has a textured surface, which increases grip and helps hide fingerprints. It is worth mentioning, though, that removing the IMEI sticker without it leaving any residue on the back is going to be quite challenging.

The build quality is on an acceptable level. Howbeit, there are tiny gaps between the back cover and the mid-frame, and the power button feels rather mushy. The Poco M4 Pro 5G does not bend or twist, but applying a lot of pressure to the screen can lead to the rippling effect. The smartphone is neither water- nor dustproof. The battery is non-removable.

Size Comparison

167.2 mm / 6.58 inch 76.4 mm / 3.01 inch 9 mm / 0.3543 inch 203 g0.4475 lbs164 mm / 6.46 inch 75.3 mm / 2.96 inch 8.5 mm / 0.3346 inch 193 g0.4255 lbs163.56 mm / 6.44 inch 75.78 mm / 2.98 inch 8.75 mm / 0.3445 inch 195 g0.4299 lbs162.9 mm / 6.41 inch 74.7 mm / 2.94 inch 8.4 mm / 0.3307 inch 190 g0.4189 lbs161.81 mm / 6.37 inch 75.34 mm / 2.97 inch 8.92 mm / 0.3512 inch 190 g0.4189 lbs

Connectivity - Poco M4 Pro 5G with an FM radio receiver and IR blaster

The Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G offers good connectivity options. The USB 2.0 port supports OTG functionality, but it cannot be used for video output. The audio jack is used for sound output, but it can also serve as an antenna for the integrated FM radio receiver. The radio app has a sortable station list and can also record radio programs.

Top: Speaker, microphone, IR Blaster
Top: Speaker, microphone, IR Blaster
Left side: Card slot
Left side: Card slot
Right side: Volume rocker, power button
Right side: Volume rocker, power button
Bottom: Speaker, USB-C port, microphone, audio jack
Bottom: Speaker, USB-C port, microphone, audio jack

Card Reader

Those who need more storage space can insert a microSD card into the smartphone. External storage cannot be formatted as internal memory. App data cannot be stored on an SD card.

The Poco M4 Pro achieves a decent read rate in our cross-platform SD card benchmark. However, other devices can achieve much higher read speeds with our reference-grade SD card (Angelbird AV Pro V60). When copying data to the SD card, the Poco M4 Pro 5G is very slow.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
44 MB/s ∼100% +184%
Oppo A74 5G
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
30.03 MB/s ∼68% +94%
Vivo Y72 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
16.1 MB/s ∼37% +4%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
15.47 MB/s ∼35%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13.66 MB/s ∼31% -12%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø32 (25-46.5)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential write: Ø28.8 (15.3-45.8)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø75.5 (58.6-78.9)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential read: Ø70.7 (11.8-76.8)

Software - Xiaomi smartphone with MIUI for Poco

The Poco M4 Pro 5G runs Android 11 with a proprietary UI, which is known as MIUI 12.5. Xiaomi promises an update to Android 12. There are no other promises of software support. The security patches were last updated in November, 2021.

The MIUI launcher for Poco looks a lot like the bog-standard MIUI launcher. Unfortunately, there are ads in the user interface and a lot of third-party apps, which can be uninstalled. There is no DRM certification.

Communication & GNSS - Poco with a 5G modem

The Poco M4 Pro 5G supports all current cellular communications standards as well as Bluetooth 5.1, NFC, Wi-Fi 5 and 5G Sub6. The Xiaomi smartphone supports a lot of frequency bands, for a device in this price range.

Unfortunately, we could not perform any Wi-Fi benchmarks because the Poco smartphone failed repeatedly to connect to our reference-grade router Netgear Nighthawk AX12. We shall wait for an update to the smartphone and the router, and try to perform our Wi-Fi benchmarks, then, if need be.

GPS Test: Indoors
Indoors
GPS Test: Outdoors
Outdoors

The Poco M4 Pro 5G acquires the user’s location quickly and accurately even indoors. However, the single-band GNSS module of the Xiaomi smartphone is not the best for geolocation.

In order to determine how accurate our review device is when it comes to navigation, we take it with us on a bike ride. The low-priced smartphone did not map the route that we took very accurately. However, it is good enough for occasional navigation.

GNSS bike ride: Riding around the lake
GNSS bike ride: Riding around the lake
GNSS bike ride: Turning about
GNSS bike ride: Turning about
GNSS bike ride: Ride overview
GNSS bike ride: Ride overview

Telephony & Call Quality

The Poco M4 Pro 5G sounds decent as long as it is held close to the ear. However, the user sounds a bit nasal. Thanks to active noise control, talking on busy streets presents no problems. However, there is always some background noise. In places where many people are talking at the same time, there are sometimes short dropouts. In loudspeaker mode, there is some reverb, but the user’s voice gets picked up well even at a medium distance from the phone. That being said, the user’s voice occasionally drops out for a very short time.

The Poco M4 Pro is a hybrid-SIM smartphone, meaning that it can be used with two SIM cards or with one SIM card and one microSD card at the same time. eSIM functionality is not supported. VoLTE and Wi-Fi calling are supported, but there is no way to create a SIP account.

Cameras - Fewer lenses, more quality?

Selfie taken with the Poco M4 Pro 5G
Selfie taken with the Poco M4 Pro 5G

The resolution of the front-facing camera has doubled compared to the Poco M3 Pro. It can take photos in four different aspect ratios (1:1, 3:4, 9:16 and 9:20), and can record video at up to 1080p30. The image quality is good enough for social media and messaging apps. However, the images appear a bit oversharpened.

The main camera has changed quite a bit. The main sensor can now shoot 50-MP photos in the same aspect ratios as the front-facing camera. The photos are decent, but they often look a bit washed-out and blurry. The autofocus occasionally falters when focusing on faraway subjects. 10X digital zoom is supported, but the quality degrades significantly beyond 5X zoom. The ultra-wide angle lens produces decent images with a good depth of field, but there are chromatic aberrations at the edges. Moreover, distortion correction should be disabled because it can cause very severe distortions, which is quite a shame.

Video can be recorded with the main camera at up to 1080p60.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light

Under controlled lighting conditions, the main camera of the Poco M4 Pro 5G produces naturally looking photos. Our test chart is reproduced very well, but there is some blurriness at the edges.

ColorChecker
6.5 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
5 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
3 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G: 4.95 ∆E min: 1.58 - max: 9.88 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
55 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
29 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
64.6 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
48.6 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
76.2 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
42 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G: 47.08 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 93.69 ∆E

Accessories & Warranty

The Poco M4 Pro 5G comes with a 33-W power adapter.
The Poco M4 Pro 5G comes with a 33-W power adapter.

The Poco M4 Pro 5G comes with a 33-W modular power adapter, a USB cable (Type-A to Type-C), a transparent silicone case, stickers and a SIM card removal tool. Xiaomi does not offer any custom accessories for the Poco M4 Pro 5G.

The manufacturer offers 12 months of warranty. The seller’s warranty is not affected.

Input Devices & Handling - Highly responsive thanks to 90/240 Hz

The capacitive touchscreen of the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G can recognize up to ten inputs at the same time and has a sampling rate of 240 Hz. In combination with the 90 Hz refresh rate, the smartphone feels very responsive, which is not that common in this price range. A screen protector has been applied to the display at the factory.

Google's GBoard serves as the main keyboard. However, it can be replaced with any other keyboard from the Play Store. The additional input gestures, such as double tapping on the display to wake it up, are quite useful in practice. The one-handed mode is also included.

The fingerprint sensor is integrated into the power button. It unlocks the smartphone quickly and reliably. It can be configured to perform other functions in the settings menu by way of long-pressing, double-pressing, or double-tapping. Furthermore, facial recognition is supported, but it is less secure.

Display - Flicker-free 90-Hz IPS panel in the Poco M4 Pro 5G

Pixel arrangement
Pixel arrangement

The size of the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G’s screen has grown slightly when compared to the predecessor. The pixel density remains high, though, thanks to the unchanged resolution (2400x1080 pixels). With the ambient light sensor enabled, the brightness now peaks at over 500 cd/m², which is a significant improvement. With the ambient light sensor disabled, the brightness peaks at about 420 cd/m². In the APL50 test, in which the screen displays a pattern of alternating black and white squares of equal size, we measured a brightness of 512 cd/m² in the centre of the screen.

HRD is not supported, which is not surprising given the maximum brightness. However, the Poco M4 Pro comes with a flicker-free panel, which should make reading e-books more comfortable on the eyes. The low minimum brightness is another plus here, as is the low blue light mode.

Thanks to the 90-Hz refresh rate, the Xiaomi smartphone feels very smooth. Having said that, both the contrast ratio and the black value are quite poor.

517
cd/m²
507
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
519
cd/m²
504
cd/m²
475
cd/m²
517
cd/m²
509
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 519 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 499.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.76 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 504 cd/m²
Contrast: 700:1 (Black: 0.72 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.3 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
TFT-LCD, 2400x1080, 6.60
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
Vivo Y72 5G
IPS, 2408x1080, 6.58
Oppo A74 5G
LTPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.60
Screen
60%
-2%
45%
-1%
Brightness middle
504
427
-15%
419
-17%
582
15%
415
-18%
Brightness
499
404
-19%
384
-23%
573
15%
378
-24%
Brightness Distribution
91
87
-4%
87
-4%
94
3%
76
-16%
Black Level *
0.72
0.17
76%
0.7
3%
0.35
51%
0.26
64%
Contrast
700
2512
259%
599
-14%
1663
138%
1596
128%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.3
1.5
55%
3.32
-1%
1.8
45%
5.41
-64%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6
2.1
65%
5.06
16%
3.4
43%
9.77
-63%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.1
1.6
61%
3
27%
2
51%
4.8
-17%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.3 96%
2.203 100%
2.26 97%
2.348 94%
CCT
7041 92%
6652 98%
7236 90%
6736 96%
7748 84%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21941 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Our Calman test reveals acceptable colour and grayscale performance in the Livid mode and with the colour temperature set to warm. However, the predecessor offered slightly better colour reproduction. There is a slight magenta cast, which does not prove annoying in day-to-day use.

Grayscale (Mode: Livid, temperature: warm, colour space: DCI-P3)
Grayscale (Mode: Livid, temperature: warm, colour space: DCI-P3)
Colour accuracy (Mode: Livid, temperature: warm, colour space: DCI-P3)
Colour accuracy (Mode: Livid, temperature: warm, colour space: DCI-P3)
Colour space coverage (Mode: Livid, temperature: warm, colour space: DCI-P3)
Colour space coverage (Mode: Livid, temperature: warm, colour space: DCI-P3)
Saturation (Mode: Livid, temperature: warm, colour space: DCI-P3)
Saturation (Mode: Livid, temperature: warm, colour space: DCI-P3)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
34.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.8 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
50 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25.6 ms rise
↘ 24.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (37 ms).

On overcast days, the screen is full of reflections, but is still readable. In summer, the display of the Poco M4 Pro 5G will be hard to read, given its low brightness.

The viewing angles are very good. We did not observe any clouding, glow or ghosting. The brightness falls at very acute angles, though.

Poco M4 Pro 5G outdoors
Poco M4 Pro 5G outdoors
Viewing angles of the Poco M4 Pro 5G
Viewing angles of the Poco M4 Pro 5G

Performance - Dimensity 810 in the Poco M4 Pro 5G

The Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 810. The naming is quite confusing here because the Dimensity 810 is not the true successor to the Dimensity 800 or 800U. It is rather the successor to the Dimensity 700 since it offers the same GPU.

The CPU of the Dimensity 810 is made of two clusters (two cortex-A72 cores clocked at up to 2.4 Hz and 6 Cortex-A55 clocked at up to 1.8 GHz). The Dimensity 810 is faster than its predecessor in both gaming benchmarks and Geekbench.

MediaTek does not provide a lot of specifics about the iGPU, but it still lists it as the ARM Mali-G57 MP2. Xiaomi claims, though, that the iGPU can clock up to 1068 MHz whereas the iGPU of the Dimensity 700 operates at 700 to 950 MHz. In the offscreen benchmarks, the Poco M4 Pro 5G performs 16 to 21 % better than the devices with the Dimensity 700. In the onscreen benchmarks, the lead is smaller.

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
598 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
454 Points ∼70% -24%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
565 Points ∼87% -6%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
520 Points ∼80% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
564 Points ∼86% -6%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
523 Points ∼80% -13%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
598 Points ∼92% 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
598 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=262, last 2 years)
653 Points ∼100% +9%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1809 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1347 Points ∼63% -26%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1772 Points ∼82% -2%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1713 Points ∼80% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1712 Points ∼80% -5%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
2143 Points ∼100% +18%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
1778 Points ∼83% -2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
1809 Points ∼84% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=262, last 2 years)
2151 Points ∼100% +19%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1600 Points ∼64%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1397 Points ∼56% -13%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1474 Points ∼59% -8%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
926 Points ∼37% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1376 Points ∼55% -14%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
1564 Points ∼63% -2%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
1575 Points ∼63% -2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
1600 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 8702, n=200, last 2 years)
2485 Points ∼100% +55%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1612 Points ∼65%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1346 Points ∼54% -17%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1493 Points ∼60% -7%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1099 Points ∼44% -32%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1392 Points ∼56% -14%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
1987 Points ∼80% +23%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
2089 Points ∼84% +30%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
1612 Points ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 9069, n=199, last 2 years)
2476 Points ∼100% +54%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
9402 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
9100 Points ∼90% -3%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
6783 Points ∼67% -28%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7016 Points ∼69% -25%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
7434 Points ∼73% -21%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
9402 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=133, last 2 years)
10130 Points ∼100% +8%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3777 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3149 Points ∼70% -17%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3449 Points ∼77% -9%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3509 Points ∼78% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3357 Points ∼75% -11%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
4497 Points ∼100% +19%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
4299 Points ∼96% +14%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
3777 Points ∼84% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=196, last 2 years)
3417 Points ∼76% -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3846 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3319 Points ∼70% -14%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3425 Points ∼73% -11%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3662 Points ∼78% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3442 Points ∼73% -11%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
4722 Points ∼100% +23%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
4609 Points ∼98% +20%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
3846 Points ∼81% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=196, last 2 years)
3938 Points ∼83% +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3553 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2669 Points ∼69% -25%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3535 Points ∼92% -1%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3061 Points ∼79% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3090 Points ∼80% -13%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3855 Points ∼100% +8%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3479 Points ∼90% -2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
3553 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (677 - 5301, n=196, last 2 years)
2845 Points ∼74% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3965 Points ∼82%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3277 Points ∼68% -17%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3516 Points ∼73% -11%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3625 Points ∼75% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3565 Points ∼74% -10%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
4259 Points ∼89% +7%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
4206 Points ∼87% +6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
3965 Points ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 13121, n=240, last 2 years)
4809 Points ∼100% +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
4014 Points ∼61%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3435 Points ∼52% -14%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3612 Points ∼55% -10%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3825 Points ∼58% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3619 Points ∼55% -10%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
4497 Points ∼68% +12%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
4457 Points ∼67% +11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
4014 Points ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=240, last 2 years)
6610 Points ∼100% +65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3801 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2824 Points ∼74% -26%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3216 Points ∼85% -15%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3064 Points ∼81% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3389 Points ∼89% -11%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3593 Points ∼95% -5%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3512 Points ∼92% -8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
3801 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (651 - 6394, n=238, last 2 years)
3202 Points ∼84% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2714 Points ∼83%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2411 Points ∼73% -11%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2419 Points ∼74% -11%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2420 Points ∼74% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2360 Points ∼72% -13%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3288 Points ∼100% +21%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3146 Points ∼96% +16%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
2714 Points ∼83% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=194, last 2 years)
2565 Points ∼78% -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2546 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2313 Points ∼74% -9%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2222 Points ∼71% -13%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2287 Points ∼73% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2217 Points ∼70% -13%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3145 Points ∼100% +24%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3063 Points ∼97% +20%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
2546 Points ∼81% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=194, last 2 years)
2675 Points ∼85% +5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3529 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2829 Points ∼72% -20%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3508 Points ∼90% -1%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3037 Points ∼78% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3047 Points ∼78% -14%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3909 Points ∼100% +11%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3473 Points ∼89% -2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
3529 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (688 - 5318, n=194, last 2 years)
2860 Points ∼73% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2770 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2449 Points ∼62% -12%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2476 Points ∼63% -11%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2563 Points ∼65% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2463 Points ∼63% -11%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3410 Points ∼87% +23%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3262 Points ∼83% +18%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
2770 Points ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 11528, n=244, last 2 years)
3936 Points ∼100% +42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2570 Points ∼53%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2336 Points ∼48% -9%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2308 Points ∼48% -10%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2448 Points ∼51% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2290 Points ∼47% -11%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3353 Points ∼69% +30%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3201 Points ∼66% +25%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
2570 Points ∼53% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 19364, n=244, last 2 years)
4838 Points ∼100% +88%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3804 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2948 Points ∼77% -23%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3325 Points ∼87% -13%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3068 Points ∼81% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3350 Points ∼88% -12%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3626 Points ∼95% -5%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3497 Points ∼92% -8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
3804 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 5793, n=244, last 2 years)
3212 Points ∼84% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2489 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2188 Points ∼69% -12%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2280 Points ∼72% -8%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2270 Points ∼72% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2244 Points ∼71% -10%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3165 Points ∼100% +27%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3027 Points ∼96% +22%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
2489 Points ∼79% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (426 - 6977, n=173, last 2 years)
2401 Points ∼76% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2396 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2136 Points ∼68% -11%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2140 Points ∼68% -11%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2186 Points ∼70% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2141 Points ∼68% -11%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3139 Points ∼100% +31%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3029 Points ∼96% +26%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
2396 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 11259, n=173, last 2 years)
2658 Points ∼85% +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2882 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2391 Points ∼73% -17%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2956 Points ∼91% +3%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2622 Points ∼80% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2698 Points ∼83% -6%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3258 Points ∼100% +13%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3022 Points ∼93% +5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
2882 Points ∼88% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1567 - 3958, n=173, last 2 years)
2576 Points ∼79% -11%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1235 Points ∼38%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1102 Points ∼34% -11%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
980 Points ∼30% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1094 Points ∼33% -11%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
1631 Points ∼50% +32%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
1235 Points ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (216 - 10062, n=172, last 2 years)
3282 Points ∼100% +166%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1210 Points ∼36%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1083 Points ∼32% -10%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
969 Points ∼29% -20%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1074 Points ∼32% -11%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
1620 Points ∼48% +34%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
1210 Points ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 11700, n=170, last 2 years)
3370 Points ∼100% +179%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
360 Points ∼36%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
321 Points ∼32% -11%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
292 Points ∼29% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
316 Points ∼32% -12%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
360 Points ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102 - 3080, n=124, last 2 years)
1000 Points ∼100% +178%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
348 Points ∼32%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
312 Points ∼29% -10%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
285 Points ∼27% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1073 Points ∼100% +208%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
348 Points ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 2864, n=121, last 2 years)
978 Points ∼91% +181%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
56 fps ∼83%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
51 fps ∼76% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
52 fps ∼77% -7%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
60 fps ∼89% +7%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
59 fps ∼88% +5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
56 fps ∼83% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.5 - 143, n=204, last 2 years)
67.4 fps ∼100% +20%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
66 fps ∼49%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
55 fps ∼41% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
61 fps ∼46% -8%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
86 fps ∼64% +30%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
83 fps ∼62% +26%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
66 fps ∼49% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 428, n=204, last 2 years)
133.7 fps ∼100% +103%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
36 fps ∼66%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
32 fps ∼59% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
33 fps ∼61% -8%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
46 fps ∼84% +28%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
48 fps ∼88% +33%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
36 fps ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 121, n=203, last 2 years)
54.5 fps ∼100% +51%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
40 fps ∼52%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
34 fps ∼44% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
37 fps ∼48% -7%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
50 fps ∼65% +25%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
51 fps ∼66% +28%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
40 fps ∼52% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.4 - 251, n=204, last 2 years)
76.8 fps ∼100% +92%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
23 fps ∼55%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
21 fps ∼50% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
21 fps ∼50% -9%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
30 fps ∼71% +30%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
31 fps ∼74% +35%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
23 fps ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 121, n=203, last 2 years)
42.1 fps ∼100% +83%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
26 fps ∼50%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
22 fps ∼42% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
24 fps ∼46% -8%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
34 fps ∼66% +31%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
35 fps ∼67% +35%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
26 fps ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 169, n=204, last 2 years)
51.9 fps ∼100% +100%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
13 fps ∼49%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
12 fps ∼45% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
11 fps ∼42% -15%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
17 fps ∼64% +31%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
18 fps ∼68% +38%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
13 fps ∼49% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.3 - 81, n=203, last 2 years)
26.5 fps ∼100% +104%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
16 fps ∼51%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
13 fps ∼41% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
14 fps ∼45% -12%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
20 fps ∼64% +25%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
20 fps ∼64% +25%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
16 fps ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 96.6, n=203, last 2 years)
31.4 fps ∼100% +96%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
15 fps ∼54%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
14 fps ∼50% -7%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
13 fps ∼47% -13%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
16 fps ∼57% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
13 fps ∼47% -13%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
20 fps ∼72% +33%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
20 fps ∼72% +33%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
15 fps ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 98, n=259, last 2 years)
27.9 fps ∼100% +86%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
17 fps ∼51%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
14 fps ∼42% -18%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
15 fps ∼45% -12%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
19 fps ∼57% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
15 fps ∼45% -12%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
22 fps ∼66% +29%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
22 fps ∼66% +29%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
17 fps ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2 - 257, n=260, last 2 years)
33.4 fps ∼100% +96%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
9.3 fps ∼49%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
8.8 fps ∼46% -5%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
8.4 fps ∼44% -10%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
10 fps ∼52% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8.1 fps ∼42% -13%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
12 fps ∼63% +29%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
12 fps ∼63% +29%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
9.3 fps ∼49% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.1 - 69, n=260, last 2 years)
19.1 fps ∼100% +105%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
6.2 fps ∼48%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
5.5 fps ∼43% -11%
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
5.6 fps ∼43% -10%
Oppo A74 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
6.7 fps ∼52% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
5.5 fps ∼43% -11%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
8.2 fps ∼64% +32%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
8 fps ∼62% +29%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
6.2 fps ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 101, n=260, last 2 years)
12.9 fps ∼100% +108%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
353908 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
287506 Points ∼52% -19%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
353908 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (111952 - 1041980, n=102, last 2 years)
550205 Points ∼100% +55%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
300496 Points ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
249843 Points ∼70% -17%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
297875 Points ∼83% -1%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
331094 Points ∼92% +10%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
300496 Points ∼84% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (77514 - 727247, n=143, last 2 years)
358778 Points ∼100% +19%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2970 Score ∼91%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3279 Score ∼100% +10%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3178 Score ∼97% +7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
2970 Score ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 7649, n=46, last 2 years)
3021 Score ∼92% +2%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
9008 Points ∼14%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
12011 Points ∼19% +33%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8794 Points ∼14% -2%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
37055 Points ∼58% +311%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
13522 Points ∼21% +50%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
9008 Points ∼14% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 286905, n=121, last 2 years)
63547 Points ∼100% +605%
Basemark GPU 1.2
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
25.78 (8.99min - 41.58max) fps ∼44%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
39.26 fps ∼68% +52%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
37.7 fps ∼65% +46%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
25.8 fps ∼44% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.7 - 1203, n=52, last 2 years)
58 fps ∼100% +125%
OpenGL Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
24.03 (7.17min - 39.18max) fps ∼35%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
34.61 fps ∼50% +44%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
32.89 fps ∼47% +37%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
24 fps ∼35% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 1905, n=51, last 2 years)
69.5 fps ∼100% +189%
1280x720 Vulkan Simple Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
187.8 (92.15min - 891.63max) fps ∼46%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
200.2 fps ∼50% +7%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
200.2 fps ∼50% +7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
187.8 fps ∼46% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (29.8 - 7929, n=44, last 2 years)
404 fps ∼100% +115%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
29.57 (10.34min - 49.42max) fps ∼50%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
34.21 fps ∼58% +16%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
34.42 fps ∼58% +16%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
29.6 fps ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.79 - 1082, n=49, last 2 years)
59.3 fps ∼100% +101%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
25.82 (9.11min - 45.85max) fps ∼39%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
30.7 fps ∼46% +19%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
30.52 fps ∼46% +18%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
25.8 fps ∼39% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11.2 - 1709, n=49, last 2 years)
66.9 fps ∼100% +159%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3268 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3107 Points ∼75% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3005 Points ∼73% -8%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3350 Points ∼81% +3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
3268 Points ∼79% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (895 - 8124, n=180, last 2 years)
4141 Points ∼100% +27%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
6361 Points ∼87%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
6148 Points ∼84% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6486 Points ∼88% +2%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
6052 Points ∼82% -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
6361 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1542 - 19657, n=180, last 2 years)
7351 Points ∼100% +16%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
4589 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
4264 Points ∼87% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
4473 Points ∼92% -3%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
4877 Points ∼100% +6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
4589 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1012 - 9044, n=180, last 2 years)
4782 Points ∼98% +4%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2929 Points ∼42%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2626 Points ∼37% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2398 Points ∼34% -18%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3161 Points ∼45% +8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
2929 Points ∼42% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (478 - 25642, n=180, last 2 years)
7035 Points ∼100% +140%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1334 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1353 Points ∼99% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1172 Points ∼85% -12%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
1349 Points ∼98% +1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
 
1334 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (718 - 2392, n=180, last 2 years)
1373 Points ∼100% +3%

The Poco M4 Pro 5G takes first place in our comparison chart when it comes to the browser benchmarks. All in all, it achieves decent results.

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Smartphone
88.4 pt ∼88%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
69.8 pt ∼70%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
69.8 pt ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
63.8 pt ∼64%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
57.1 pt ∼57%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
57 pt ∼57%
realme 7 5G
38.7 pt ∼39%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 182.6, n=177, last 2 years)
60 Points ∼100% +37%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
43.83 Points ∼73%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
43.8 Points ∼73% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)
38.21 Points ∼64% -13%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G (Chrome 87)
36.83 Points ∼61% -16%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G (Chrome 91.0.4472.101)
35.97 Points ∼60% -18%
realme 7 5G (Chrome 68)
28.09 Points ∼47% -36%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 414, n=184, last 2 years)
111.5 Points ∼100% +31%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
84.8 Points ∼76%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
84.8 Points ∼76% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)
78.4 Points ∼70% -8%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G (Chrome 87)
69.7 Points ∼63% -18%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G (Chrome 91.0.4472.101)
69.5 Points ∼62% -18%
realme 7 5G (Chrome 86)
51.4 Points ∼46% -39%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 244, n=162, last 2 years)
59.4 runs/min ∼100% +49%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
39.8 runs/min ∼67%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
39.8 runs/min ∼67% 0%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G (Chome 87)
37.9 runs/min ∼64% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chome 92)
37.2 runs/min ∼63% -7%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G (Chrome 91.0.4472.101)
36 runs/min ∼61% -10%
realme 7 5G (Chome 86)
26.3 runs/min ∼44% -34%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 265, n=189, last 2 years)
90 Points ∼100% +45%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
62 Points ∼69%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
62 Points ∼69% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)
58 Points ∼64% -6%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G (Chrome 87)
56 Points ∼62% -10%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G (Chrome 91.0.4472.101)
54 Points ∼60% -13%
realme 7 5G (Chrome 86)
45 Points ∼50% -27%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (3526 - 65969, n=193, last 2 years)
22261 Points ∼100% +17%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
19010 Points ∼85%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
19010 Points ∼85% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)
16870 Points ∼76% -11%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G (Chrome 91.0.4472.101)
15976 Points ∼72% -16%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G (Chrome 87)
14751 Points ∼66% -22%
realme 7 5G (Chrome 86)
9999 Points ∼45% -47%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
realme 7 5G (Chrome 86)
4695 ms * ∼100% -95%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G (Chrome 87)
3490 ms * ∼74% -45%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G (Chrome 91.0.4472.101)
3387 ms * ∼72% -41%
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 15230, n=195, last 2 years)
3271 ms * ∼70% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)
2543 ms * ∼54% -6%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
2410 ms * ∼51%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 810
2410 ms * ∼51% -0%

* ... smaller is better

Just like its predecessor, the Poco M4 Pro 5G comes with rather expensive and relatively fast UFS 2.2 storage.

Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5GXiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5GVivo Y72 5GOppo A74 5GSamsung Galaxy A22 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
4%
-21%
-31%
-51%
-6%
-5%
Sequential Read 256KB
964
954
-1%
956
-1%
492.6
-49%
300.5
-69%
753 ?(482 - 999, n=18)
-22%
897 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=259, last 2 years)
-7%
Sequential Write 256KB
471
489.1
4%
13.6
-97%
265.3
-44%
210.3
-55%
434 ?(105.3 - 857, n=18)
-8%
435 ?(11.9 - 1465, n=259, last 2 years)
-8%
Random Read 4KB
148.8
155.8
5%
164.4
10%
153.2
3%
118
-21%
163.4 ?(104.5 - 253, n=18)
10%
159.3 ?(13.5 - 325, n=259, last 2 years)
7%
Random Write 4KB
171.8
186.1
8%
179.4
4%
115.8
-33%
69.2
-60%
162.7 ?(120.4 - 213, n=18)
-5%
151.6 ?(269 - 449, n=260, last 2 years)
-12%

Gaming - Up to 90 FPS, but with limitations

The ARM Mali-G57 MP2 is a low-end graphics chip, which can run modern, demanding games only at low settings. The improvement in performance offered by the Poco M4 Pro 5G does not change the situation in any way. Here, even Armajet is limited to 30 FSP. Old titles such as Dead Trigger can be run at 90 FPS, though.

Dead Trigger 2
Dead Trigger 2
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
Armajet
Armajet
05