NVIDIA Quadro M1200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M620
NVIDIA Quadro M1200 ► remove from comparison
The 28 nm Nvidia Quadro M1200 is a mid-range DirectX 12 (FL 11_0) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a (first generation) Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM107 chip with 640 shader cores. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M . The Quadro M1200M is built for the Intel Skylake generation and is the successor to the Quadro M1000M (950M based) .
The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.
Performance
The performance of the Quadro M1200 is on a level to the previous generation M2000M which is also based on the 960M. In games it is comparable to the GTX 960M although the driver support is not optimized for gaming.
Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2 , the cores of the Quadro M2000M can be used for general calculations.
Power Consumption
The power consumption of the Quadro M1200 is rated for the same TGP of 45 Watt (32.5 Watt TDP) and therefore a bit lower than the M2000M with 55 Watt TGP.
NVIDIA Quadro 4000M ► remove from comparison
The NVIDIA Quadro 4000M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture (or more specifically, probably the GF104). Unlike the 5010M, the 4000M does not support ECC memory and dual-precision (DP) floating point calculations.
The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications such as CAD or DCC. As a result, multiple scientific or business disciplines can make use of the workstation GPU. The OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better than consumer-oriented GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.
The shader / CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11 or OpenGL 4.1 for graphics rendering or DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE, and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi core, the 4000M should offer higher performance in general purpose calculations compared to its predecessors.
Furthermore, the Nvidia Quadro 4000M is compatible with 3D Vision Pro, a new software solution by Nvidia for stereoscopic output.
The 4000M supports Nvidia Optimus in order to automatically switch between the integrated graphics card and the Quadro for power-saving purposes. Whether or not this feature is supported on a laptop, however, is dependent on the laptop manufacturer.
Similar to the GeForce GTX 480M, the Quadro 4000M is specified at 100 Watt TDP and is therefore only found in large laptops such as the Clevo D901F .
NVIDIA Quadro M620 ► remove from comparison
The 28nm NVIDIA Quadro M620 is a mid-range DirectX 12 (FL 11_0) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a 1st generation Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM107 architecture with 512 of the 640 shader cores activated. Therefore, the GPU is not similar to any current consumer card. The Geforce GTX 950M , for example, uses the full 640 shader cores. The older Quadro M1000M offers very similar specs (same amount of shader cores and also based on the same chip but more graphics memory), but was intended for the Skylake generation. The M620 is intended for the Kaby Lake generation.
The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.
Performance
Due to the smaller amount of memory, the Quadro M620 should be slightly slower than the older Quadro M1000M. However, the exact clock speeds are not known up to now. In early benchmarks we have, the M1000M is about 9 % faster than the M620 in SPECviewperf 12.
Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2 , the cores of the Quadro M620 can be used for general calculations.
Power Consumption
The power consumption of the Quadro M620 is rated for a 30 Watt TGP including the board and memory components (21.2 Watt TDP), which is 10 Watt lower than the M1000M (which offers more memory). Therefore, the card is suited for 15-inch notebooks and greater.
NVIDIA Quadro M1200 NVIDIA Quadro 4000M NVIDIA Quadro M620 Quadro M Series Codename N17P-Q1 Fermi Architecture Maxwell Fermi Maxwell Pipelines 640 - unified 336 - unified 512 - unified Core Speed 991 - 1150 (Boost) MHz 475 MHz 1018 MHz Memory Speed 5000 MHz 1200 MHz 5012 MHz Memory Bus Width 128 Bit 256 Bit 128 Bit Memory Type GDDR5 GDDR5 GDDR5 Max. Amount of Memory 4 GB 2048 MB 2048 MB Shared Memory no no no API DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5 DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5 Power Consumption 45 Watt 100 Watt 30 Watt Transistors 1.9 Billion technology 28 nm 40 nm 28 nm Features Optimus,
PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus OpenGl 4.1, FP32 Optimus,
PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus Notebook Size large large large Date of Announcement 13.01.2017 22.02.2011 13.01.2017 Link to Manufacturer Page www.nvidia.de www.nvidia.com www.nvidia.de Shader Speed 950 MHz
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M1200
1.9 pt (6%)
...
...
max:
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M620
1.4 pt (4%)
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
1290 Points (4%)
968 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
862 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
240298 Points (27%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
42129 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 12632 avg: 14705 median: 13600 (15%) max: 17884 Points
min: 11481 avg: 13620 median: 13620 (15%) max: 15759 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 26860 avg: 27557 median: 27557 (7%) max: 28254 Points
min: 20980 avg: 22120 median: 22119.5 (6%) max: 23259 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3759 avg: 3846 median: 3878 (7%) max: 3900 Points
min: 2694 avg: 2914 median: 2989 (5%) max: 3059 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 4118 avg: 4142 median: 4141.5 (5%) max: 4165 Points
min: 2867 avg: 3067 median: 3130 (4%) max: 3204 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
63463 Points (8%)
163099 Points (20%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 5513 avg: 5515 median: 5514.5 (8%) max: 5516 Points
min: 2229 avg: 2335 median: 2334.5 (3%) max: 2440 Points
min: 4015 avg: 4118 median: 4140 (6%) max: 4200 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 5105 avg: 5310 median: 5310 (5%) max: 5515 Points
min: 2025 avg: 2092 median: 2092 (2%) max: 2159 Points
min: 3676 avg: 3761 median: 3801 (3%) max: 3805 Points
3DMark Vantage 3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
10722 Points (3%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M620
17237 Points (5%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
9184 Points (5%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M620
15307 Points (9%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
26109 Points (34%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
17727 Points (23%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
24751 Points (32%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
27.7 fps (9%)
min: 15.6 avg: 16.5 median: 16.5 (5%) max: 17.4 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
30.1 fps (10%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
28.9 fps (13%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
28.1 fps (5%)
31.4 fps (6%)
56.6 fps (11%)
SPECviewperf 11 specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
43.9 fps (26%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
26.4 fps (16%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
37.9 fps (23%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
44.2 fps (25%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
29.2 fps (17%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
40.4 fps (23%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
56.4 fps (43%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
39.1 fps (30%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
50.1 fps (38%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
22 fps (26%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
10.6 fps (12%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
20.2 fps (24%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
57.2 fps (43%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
51.4 fps (39%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
55.4 fps (42%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
57.8 fps (62%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
42.1 fps (45%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
54.8 fps (59%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
46.7 fps (22%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
24.9 fps (12%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
32.6 fps (16%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
53.3 fps (28%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
36.5 fps (19%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
51.5 fps (27%)
SPECviewperf 12 specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 69 avg: 72.5 median: 70 (17%) max: 78.4 fps
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
min: 55.3 avg: 57.6 median: 56.3 (14%) max: 62.5 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 34.18 avg: 35 median: 34.7 (5%) max: 36 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
min: 25.96 avg: 27.5 median: 27.8 (4%) max: 28.2 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 22.17 avg: 24.8 median: 26 (6%) max: 26.2 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
min: 15.8 avg: 18.8 median: 20.2 (4%) max: 20.3 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 17.49 avg: 17.8 median: 17.8 (5%) max: 18 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
min: 10.34 avg: 11 median: 10.9 (3%) max: 11.6 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 32.07 avg: 34.4 median: 33.7 (9%) max: 37.29 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
min: 22.94 avg: 24.9 median: 25.2 (7%) max: 26.5 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 3.78 avg: 3.8 median: 3.9 (3%) max: 3.9 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
min: 0.22 avg: 0.5 median: 0.6 (1%) max: 0.67 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 45 avg: 46 median: 46.1 (18%) max: 46.97 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
min: 33.8 avg: 34.5 median: 34.4 (14%) max: 35.26 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 45.75 avg: 46.2 median: 45.9 (8%) max: 47 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
min: 29.42 avg: 31.7 median: 32.1 (5%) max: 33.32 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
46 fps (8%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
min: 17.3 avg: 24.9 median: 24.9 (4%) max: 32.47 fps
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
59.6 fps (16%)
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
46.8 fps (5%)
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
16.2 fps (4%)
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
5.2 fps (1%)
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
39.7 fps (5%)
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
0.6 fps (0%)
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
35.6 fps (5%)
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
40.7 fps (5%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
16.6 fps (3%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
7.1 Points (90%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
7.1 Points (90%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6638 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M620
6851 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
102.2 fps (35%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
46 fps (16%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M620
72.4 fps (25%)
Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 102.8 avg: 108.2 median: 108.2 (6%) max: 113.5 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M620
min: 82.7 avg: 95.3 median: 95.3 (6%) max: 107.8 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M620
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
65.2 fps (7%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
97.8 fps (2%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
133.5 fps (8%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
232.3 fps (2%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 656 avg: 818 median: 817.5 (4%) max: 979 Samples/s
min: 482 avg: 658 median: 658 (3%) max: 834 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 852 avg: 1207 median: 1207 (2%) max: 1562 Samples/s
min: 718 avg: 1079 median: 1079 (2%) max: 1440 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
388 Points (0%)
2530 Points (3%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
45.2 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
48.8 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 74.8 avg: 87.5 median: 87.5 (19%) max: 100.2 Watt
58.8 Watt (13%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.2 fps per Watt (17%)
0.2 fps per Watt (17%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.2 fps per Watt (17%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 42.3 avg: 43.9 median: 43.9 (70%) max: 45.5 dB(A)
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M1200 → 100% n=13 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 4000M → 64% n=13 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M620 → 95% n=13
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
Quadro M620:
127.1 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
fps
Quadro M620:
44.9 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
fps
Quadro M620:
31.9 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
fps
Quadro M620:
15.7 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
fps
76%
Quadro M620:
59.2 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
60.4 ~ 60 fps
55%
Quadro M620:
25.2 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
46.3 ~ 36 fps
59%
Quadro M620:
18.7 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
25.2 ~ 22 fps
50%
Quadro M620:
13.9 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
19.5 ~ 17 fps
100%
Quadro M1200:
88.1 fps
67%
Quadro M620:
55.1 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
62.2 ~ 59 fps
100%
Quadro M1200:
49.2 fps
69%
Quadro M620:
31.1 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
36.6 ~ 34 fps
100%
Quadro M1200:
28.4 fps
67%
Quadro M620:
17.8 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
20.4 ~ 19 fps
100%
Quadro M1200:
23.9 fps
60%
Quadro M620:
14.4 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
fps
100%
Quadro M1200:
9.9 fps
50%
Quadro M620:
4.9 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
fps
100%
Quadro M1200:
73.6 fps
100%
Quadro M1200:
45.9 fps
100%
Quadro M1200:
26.3 29 ~ 28 fps
100%
Quadro M1200:
93.3 fps
100%
Quadro M1200:
58.9 fps
100%
Quadro M1200:
50.1 fps
100%
Quadro M1200:
26.2 fps
85%
Quadro M620:
176.4 fps
79%
Quadro M620:
105.6 fps
100%
Quadro M1200:
42.6 47 ~ 45 fps
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M1200 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M620 → 68% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 70%
NVIDIA Quadro M620 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Rocket League 127.1 44.9 31.9 15.7 Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III 70.3 18.7 Doom 60 36 22 17 Rise of the Tomb Raider 59 34 19 14.4 4.9 Star Wars Battlefront 110.6 64.3 28.92 24.37 The Witcher 3 53.9 32.83 18.62 10 Dirt Rally 249 118.5 62 28.2 Total War: Rome II 190.5 139.6 114.4 17.8 Company of Heroes 2 51.7 44.4 27.1 11.7 GRID 2 192.8 147.4 126 39.1 BioShock Infinite 176.4 105.6 92.3 35.6 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 3 3 5 1 5 3 2 5 1 3 1 7 2 2
NVIDIA Quadro M1200 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Doom 79 66 37 34 12 Rise of the Tomb Raider 88.1 49.15 28.36 23.92 9.88 Batman: Arkham Knight 74 63 35 29 11 The Witcher 3 73.6 45.9 28 13 Thief 93.3 58.9 50.1 26.2 BioShock Infinite 207 134 119 45 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 5 1 3 2 1 2 3 1 4 2 3
NVIDIA Quadro 4000M low med. high ultra QHD 4K StarCraft 2 180 112 79 71 Anno 1404 173 62 Sims 3 279 165 79 Racedriver: GRID 188 148 117 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 4 1 2 3 2
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 23. 19:00:09
#0 checking url part for id 7704 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 2431 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 7708 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 May 2024 05:38:57 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.11s ... 0.111s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.111s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.111s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 7704 +0.046s ... 0.158s
#9 got single benchmarks 7704 +0.016s ... 0.173s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 2431 +0.002s ... 0.175s
#11 got single benchmarks 2431 +0.008s ... 0.183s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 7708 +0.015s ... 0.198s
#13 got single benchmarks 7708 +0.015s ... 0.213s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.213s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.355s ... 0.568s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.568s
#17 Got 94 rows for game benchmarks. +0.011s ... 0.579s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.579s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.013s ... 0.592s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.04s ... 0.632s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.632s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.634s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)