Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-9400F vs Intel Core i7-8700K vs Intel Core i9-9900K

Intel Core i5-9400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-9400F

The Intel Core i5-9400F is a six-core desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture introduced in October 2018 along with the flagship Intel Core i9-9900K. The processor clocks at 2.9-4.1 GHz and can process up to 6 threads simultaneously. The Intel Core i5-9400F is manufactured in the improved 14-nm process (14nm++).

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i5-8400, the performance could only be increased slightly. Performance increases of up to 10 percent can be expected. Both processors (old and new) still do not offer hyperthreading. The performance increase therefore only adds up to small architecture improvements and a slightly higher basic and turbo clock rate. This CPU is suitable for everyday office use, which does not require large coolers due to the low waste heat. But games are also among the application areas, because in games the Intel Core i5-9400F clearly beats the Intel Core i3-9100F. Here the six cores are paying off in the meantime. 

Graphics unit

The Intel Core i5-9400F is a processor without integrated graphics unit. If you value an iGPU, you should take a closer look at the Intel Core i5-9400, as it offers the entry level Intel UHD Graphics 630.

Power consumption

Intel puts the Thermal Design Power (TDP) at 65 watts. This means there is no need for large cooling systems, which also allows installation in very compact housings.

Intel Core i7-8700K

► remove from comparison Intel i7-8700K

The Intel Core i7-8700K is a high-end desktop processor with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture and was announced in September 2017. The processor clocks at between 3.7 and 4.7 GHz and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. The i7-8700K is comparatively easy to overclock thanks to the unlocked multiplier.

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 50% compared to the Core i7-7700K when all cores are in use. Single-core performance has not improved since its Kaby Lake predecessor. As a high-end model, the i7-8700K is suitable for the most demanding applications and games.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz. The build is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 95 watts. Therefore, well-dimensioned cooling systems should easily manage to deal with the created heat. We expect increased efficiency due to the higher performance.

Intel Core i9-9900K

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i9-9900K is a high end desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture. At the time of announcement in late 2018, the 9900K is the fastest Coffee Lake CPU and offers an open multiplicator for easy overclocking. The CPU integrates 8 cores (16 threads) clocked at 3.6 - 5 GHz and it needs a new Z390 based mainboard.

Thanks to the two additional cores, the performance in multi-threaded applications is up to 25 % faster than the older Core i7-8700K. The single thread performance is only slightly faster due to the higher clock speeds. As a high end desktop CPU, the i9-9900K is suited even for very demanding applications and perfect for 3D gaming.

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics card is clocked at up to 1.2 GHz and offers no advantage compared to previous generations. As it is a very low end GPU, only some low demanding games like Hearthstone can be played with it (see GPU page for benchmarks).

Intel specifies the TDP at 95 Watt, so if the CPU is used in laptops a big and chunky cooling system is needed to avoid throttling and lower clock speeds under sustained loads. When overclocking the CPU, the power consumption can easily rise up to 200 Watt and higher.

ModelIntel Core i5-9400FIntel Core i7-8700KIntel Core i9-9900K
CodenameCoffee Lake-RCoffee Lake-SCoffee Lake-R
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee Lake
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-R
Intel Core i9-9900KS4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-97003 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F « 2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8086K3.7 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8700K « 3.7 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-87003.2 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8600K3.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-85003 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-84002.8 - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8500T2.1 - 3.5 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900KS4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K « 3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-97003 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock2900 - 4100 MHz3700 - 4700 MHz3600 - 5000 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB384 KB512 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB1.5 MB2 MB
L3 Cache9 MB12 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 66 / 128 / 16
TDP65 Watt95 Watt95 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm14++ nm
Voltage100 V
Die Size149 mm2178 mm2
SocketLGA 1151-2FCLGA1151FCLGA1151
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX, Quick Sync, VirtualizationDual-Channel DDR3(L)-1600/DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vPro
Architecturex86x86x86
$182 U.S.$359 U.S.$488 U.S.
Announced
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.intel.de
max. Temp.100 °C

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-9400F
28.7 pt (48%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-9900K
33.5 pt (56%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
12397 Points (12%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1280 Points (54%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
416 Points (45%)
430 Points (47%)
min: 495     avg: 502     median: 502 (55%)     max: 509 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2378 Points (6%)
3165 Points (8%)
min: 4816     avg: 4871     median: 4871 (12%)     max: 4926 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
984 Points (6%)
min: 1323     avg: 1374     median: 1362 (9%)     max: 1422 Points
min: 1623     avg: 1939     median: 1979 (12%)     max: 2040 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
173 Points (48%)
min: 187     avg: 192.4     median: 192 (53%)     max: 199 Points
min: 203     avg: 210.6     median: 212 (59%)     max: 218 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
11.3 Points (15%)
min: 13.61     avg: 14.8     median: 15 (19%)     max: 15.64 Points
min: 17.37     avg: 20.7     median: 21.4 (28%)     max: 21.76 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (46%)
min: 2.11     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (52%)     max: 2.27 Points
min: 2.33     avg: 2.4     median: 2.4 (57%)     max: 2.44 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6490 Points (39%)
min: 7130     avg: 7302     median: 7328 (44%)     max: 7423 Points
min: 7786     avg: 7924     median: 7933 (48%)     max: 8042 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
31523 Points (23%)
min: 36392     avg: 38552     median: 39096 (28%)     max: 39624 Points
min: 36683     avg: 45846     median: 48778.5 (35%)     max: 49142 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
40065 Points (26%)
46535 Points (30%)
min: 63009     avg: 63708     median: 63976 (41%)     max: 64138 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8182 Points (10%)
9303 Points (11%)
min: 10167     avg: 10218     median: 10192 (12%)     max: 10294 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
198.7 s (2%)
min: 116.6     avg: 120.8     median: 118.9 (1%)     max: 129.1 s
min: 85.6     avg: 91.9     median: 91.3 (1%)     max: 98.7 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
6.8 s (1%)
min: 4     avg: 4.5     median: 4.2 (1%)     max: 5.341 s
min: 3.276     avg: 4     median: 3.6 (1%)     max: 5.203 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5794 Points (9%)
min: 7032     avg: 7196     median: 7120 (11%)     max: 7435 Points
min: 7315     avg: 7775     median: 7633 (12%)     max: 8518 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
25639 MIPS (15%)
min: 43248     avg: 48207     median: 48207 (28%)     max: 53166 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4678 MIPS (55%)
min: 5311     avg: 5411     median: 5410.5 (64%)     max: 5510 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
64 fps (21%)
min: 82.1     avg: 85.6     median: 87.2 (29%)     max: 87.4 fps
min: 90.9     avg: 110     median: 114.3 (38%)     max: 120.5 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
234 fps (54%)
min: 230     avg: 231.7     median: 232 (54%)     max: 233 fps
min: 252.7     avg: 260.9     median: 260.5 (60%)     max: 270 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
9.1 fps (16%)
10.8 fps (19%)
min: 12.36     avg: 14.8     median: 15.8 (28%)     max: 16.3 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (15%)
min: 0.668     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (23%)     max: 0.796 GB/s
min: 0.8     avg: 1.1     median: 1.2 (34%)     max: 1.2 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.9 GB/s (15%)
min: 1     avg: 1.3     median: 1.4 (24%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
min: 1.3     avg: 1.8     median: 1.9 (33%)     max: 2 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.2 GB/s (14%)
min: 4.9     avg: 7.3     median: 8 (21%)     max: 8 GB/s
min: 7.8     avg: 10.4     median: 11.1 (29%)     max: 11.5 GB/s
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
468.5 Seconds (3%)
min: 312     avg: 332.8     median: 332.8 (2%)     max: 353.5 Seconds
min: 219.2     avg: 239.7     median: 223.8 (2%)     max: 276.1 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (14%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 11599     avg: 11729     median: 11701 (25%)     max: 11886 Points
min: 10312     avg: 13253     median: 14281.5 (30%)     max: 14409 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.3 s (2%)
min: 7.545     avg: 8     median: 8 (2%)     max: 8.329 s
min: 7.545     avg: 7.7     median: 7.7 (2%)     max: 7.823 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
20.8 s (1%)
min: 16.73     avg: 17.8     median: 17.8 (1%)     max: 18.77 s
min: 16.73     avg: 17     median: 16.9 (1%)     max: 17.25 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
499.8 s (2%)
min: 413.8     avg: 443.5     median: 442.8 (2%)     max: 465.1 s
min: 413.8     avg: 429.5     median: 432.2 (2%)     max: 440 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 58733     avg: 65154     median: 65153.5 (50%)     max: 71574 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
11185 Points (28%)
min: 13293     avg: 14460     median: 14766 (36%)     max: 15013 Points
min: 16598     avg: 17566     median: 17264 (43%)     max: 19169 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
70546 Points (57%)
min: 63878     avg: 64781     median: 64445 (52%)     max: 66020 Points
min: 64697     avg: 67569     median: 67554.5 (55%)     max: 72059 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
70482 Points (57%)
min: 63734     avg: 64731     median: 64316 (52%)     max: 66143 Points
min: 67420     avg: 68874     median: 67813 (55%)     max: 72450 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
72413 Points (58%)
min: 63328     avg: 65156     median: 65451.5 (53%)     max: 66393 Points
min: 67259     avg: 68959     median: 68173.5 (55%)     max: 72229 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
8275 Points (21%)
min: 12363     avg: 12530     median: 12521 (32%)     max: 12713 Points
min: 16435     avg: 17955     median: 17969 (45%)     max: 18694 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
12616 Points (22%)
min: 18221     avg: 18728     median: 18574 (33%)     max: 19358 Points
min: 21585     avg: 24141     median: 24497.5 (44%)     max: 25010 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
5777 Points (24%)
min: 6578     avg: 7256     median: 7255.5 (31%)     max: 7933 Points
min: 9413     avg: 10630     median: 10593 (45%)     max: 11298 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1139 Points (45%)
1210 Points (47%)
1300 Points (51%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
5715 Points (10%)
6310 Points (11%)
8845 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1132 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5698 Points (18%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5347 Points (53%)
min: 5760     avg: 5827     median: 5783 (58%)     max: 5937 Points
min: 6014     avg: 6113     median: 6049 (60%)     max: 6339 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
21830 Points (22%)
min: 24546     avg: 24938     median: 25045 (25%)     max: 25223 Points
min: 26616     avg: 31703     median: 32981 (33%)     max: 34233 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5738     avg: 5754     median: 5754 (64%)     max: 5770 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 23187     avg: 23209     median: 23208.5 (30%)     max: 23230 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
25920 Points (41%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
4914 Points (74%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
867 ms (1%)
753 ms (1%)
min: 919     avg: 937     median: 924 (1%)     max: 968 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 52.2     avg: 55.8     median: 55.8 (1%)     max: 59.3 ms
71 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 45565     avg: 47064     median: 47063.5 (34%)     max: 48562 Points
min: 38473     avg: 40081     median: 40081 (29%)     max: 41689 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
211 Points (38%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
131.6 Watt (23%)
min: 142.7     avg: 149.4     median: 149.4 (26%)     max: 156 Watt
202 Watt (35%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
122.5 Watt (22%)
min: 134.3     avg: 143.2     median: 143.2 (26%)     max: 152 Watt
203.2 Watt (37%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
8 Points per Watt (6%)
min: 9.36     avg: 9.6     median: 9.6 (7%)     max: 9.85 Points per Watt
10 Points per Watt (7%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-9400F → 100% n=35

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8700K → 124% n=35

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-9900K → 155% n=35

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 12. 11:29:06

#0 ran 1s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12197 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9296 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 10442 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1754990946s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 10 Aug 2025 05:18:26 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12197 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#9 got single benchmarks 12197 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 9296 +0.001s ... 0.015s

#11 got single benchmarks 9296 +0.006s ... 0.022s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 10442 +0.005s ... 0.026s

#13 got single benchmarks 10442 +0.017s ... 0.043s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.043s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.071s ... 0.114s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.114s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)