Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-10400F vs AMD Ryzen 9 7900X vs Intel Core i9-10850K

Intel Core i5-10400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10400F

The Intel Core i5-10400F is a mid-range processor for desktops with six cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.9 and 4.3 GHz and can execute up to 12 threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading.

The processor is still manufactured on the old 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is made with the same 14 nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2666 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

The average 10400F in our database matches the Ryzen 7 4800U and also the Core i7-9700K in multi-thread performance to be a more than decent mid-range option for your gaming rig, as of early 2022.

Graphics

The CPUs with an "F" suffix do not feature an integrated graphics adapter. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is deactivated.

Power consumption

This Core i5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 65 W which is in line with most desktop chips.

The i5-10400F is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for poor, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

► remove from comparison AMD R9 7900X

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a fast high-end desktop processor of the Raphael series. It offers 12 cores based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (24 threads). The cores clock from 4.7 (base) up to 5.7 GHz (single core boost). When all 12 cores are fully loaded, 5.1 GHz is the max. clock speed. The 7900X is the second fastest Ryzen at launch, only bested by the Ryzen 9 7950X with 4 more cores.

The performance of the R9 7900X is clearly better than the old Ryzen 9 5900X thanks to the improved architecture and modern 5nm process. Compared to Intels Raptor Lake Core i9-13700K the single-core performance is slightly lower and the multi-core performance slightly faster. The gaming performance is a bit lower, and is on average only on par with the Core i5-13600K and also lower than the old Ryzen 7 5800X3D.

The Raphael series still uses a chiplet design with two CCD-clusters (each with 8 possible cores) in 5nm and an IO-die (including the memory controller and the Radeon Graphics iGPU) in 6nm.

Intel Core i9-10850K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10850K

The Intel Core i9-10850K is a high-end processor for desktops with ten cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 3.6 and 5.2 GHz (all 10 cores up to 4.8 GHz) and can execute up to twenty threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The 5.2 GHz can be only achieved below 70°C core temperature (Thermal Velocity Boost of 100 MHz). Compared to the fastest CML-S CPU, the Core i9-10900K, the 10850K clocks 100 MHz lower (base and Turbo clocks).

The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Thanks to the free multiplicator, the CPU can also be easily overclocked (but may not have much headroom).

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

Thanks to the high Turbo Boost, the CPU is a very fast gaming CPU available at the time of announcement. Using all cores, the i9 however is slower than the top Ryzen CPUs (like the Ryzen 9 3950X) which offer more cores.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9900K. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 125 Watts (PL1) but under full load up to 250 Watt are consumed (PL2). In default mode these 250 Watt and therefore high clock speeds can be maintained for up to 56 seconds, however, all boards offer the option to alter these settings.

ModelIntel Core i5-10400FAMD Ryzen 9 7900XIntel Core i9-10850K
SeriesIntel Comet LakeAMD Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000)Intel Comet Lake
CodenameComet LakeRaphael (Zen4)Comet Lake-S
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-S
Intel Core i9-10900K3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700K3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-107002.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10600K4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400F « 2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100F3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D4.2 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X « 4.7 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 79003.7 - 5.4 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X4.5 - 5.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 77003.8 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D4.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X4.7 - 5.3 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 76003.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10850K « 3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-109103.6 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i3-103203.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores7.9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-101003.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Clock2900 - 4300 MHz4700 - 5600 MHz3600 - 5200 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB768 KB640 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB12 MB2.5 MB
L3 Cache12 MB64 MB20 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 1212 / 2410 / 20
TDP65 Watt170 Watt125 Watt
Technology14 nm5 nm (CCD), 6 nm (I/O) nm, 0.650 - 1.475V14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C95 °C100 °C
SocketLGA1200AM5 (LGA 1718)1200
FeaturesDDR4-2666 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2TVB, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, Virtualization
Architecturex86x86x86
$155 U.S.$453 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com
TransistorsCCD: 6,5 Mrd + IOD: 3,4 Mrd Million
Die Size2x 70 (CCD) mm2 + 122 (I/O) mm2
iGPUAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)Intel UHD Graphics 630

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10400F
33.2 pt (46%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 7900X
57.1 pt (79%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-10850K
40.2 pt (56%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 28925     avg: 29289     median: 29300 (27%)     max: 29628 Points
15538 Points (14%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2012     avg: 2020     median: 2016.5 (86%)     max: 2039 Points
1314 Points (56%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
438 Points (49%)
min: 780     avg: 783     median: 782.5 (87%)     max: 787 Points
511 Points (57%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3201 Points (8%)
min: 11353     avg: 11474     median: 11471.5 (28%)     max: 11623 Points
5961 Points (15%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1332 Points (8%)
min: 4753     avg: 4818     median: 4820.5 (30%)     max: 4856 Points
2457 Points (16%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
180 Points (54%)
min: 319     avg: 322.2     median: 323 (97%)     max: 325 Points
215 Points (65%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
14.4 Points (19%)
min: 53.91     avg: 54.6     median: 54.7 (71%)     max: 55.26 Points
28.1 Points (37%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (50%)
min: 3.78     avg: 3.8     median: 3.8 (95%)     max: 3.85 Points
2.5 Points (61%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6719 Points (41%)
min: 8465     avg: 8658     median: 8623 (52%)     max: 8858 Points
6829 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
36564 Points (26%)
min: 67036     avg: 68658     median: 68579.5 (50%)     max: 70741 Points
58453 Points (42%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
47901 Points (33%)
min: 121250     avg: 126872     median: 125768 (87%)     max: 134469 Points
76123 Points (53%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8849 Points (11%)
min: 16151     avg: 16234     median: 16246 (20%)     max: 16338 Points
6828 Points (8%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
134.7 s (2%)
min: 39.576     avg: 40.4     median: 40.3 (0%)     max: 41.122 s
68.1 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
6.3 s (1%)
min: 1.781     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (0%)     max: 1.872 s
2.7 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
17225 Points (27%)
9424 Points (15%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
36731 MIPS (21%)
min: 124975     avg: 127080     median: 127195 (73%)     max: 129087 MIPS
70932 MIPS (41%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5064 MIPS (61%)
min: 8252     avg: 8280     median: 8269 (99%)     max: 8345 MIPS
5914 MIPS (71%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
81.2 fps (28%)
241 fps (84%)
146.5 fps (51%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
228.5 fps (53%)
376 fps (87%)
285.5 fps (66%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
11.2 fps (20%)
min: 36.2     avg: 36.8     median: 36.9 (65%)     max: 37.1 fps
20.3 fps (36%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.5 GB/s (0%)
1.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.8 GB/s (48%)
2.5 GB/s (43%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
14.8 GB/s (39%)
14.5 GB/s (38%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 165     avg: 166.4     median: 166 (2%)     max: 168 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
332.4 Seconds (2%)
min: 105     avg: 106.2     median: 106 (1%)     max: 107 Seconds
181.2 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (13%)
min: 0.3643     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.3758 sec
0.5 sec (12%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 20439     avg: 21223     median: 21284 (45%)     max: 21659 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.7 s (2%)
6.1 s (1%)
7.6 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
19.2 s (1%)
13.3 s (1%)
16.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
470.4 s (2%)
313.4 s (1%)
419.8 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 82063     avg: 100438     median: 102019 (89%)     max: 102765 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
14539 Points (39%)
min: 26455     avg: 27800     median: 27731 (75%)     max: 28963 Points
22639 Points (61%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
62086 Points (50%)
min: 96003     avg: 102745     median: 103232 (84%)     max: 105350 Points
72388 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
61795 Points (50%)
min: 97281     avg: 102964     median: 103220 (84%)     max: 106230 Points
72353 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
62883 Points (53%)
min: 94657     avg: 102993     median: 101826 (86%)     max: 108551 Points
73572 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
11914 Points (30%)
min: 25631     avg: 26260     median: 26310.5 (67%)     max: 26732 Points
19764 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 40436     avg: 42329     median: 42325 (75%)     max: 43200 Points
28058 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
7548 Points (32%)
min: 13634     avg: 15940     median: 15959.5 (67%)     max: 16721 Points
14278 Points (60%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1217     avg: 1220     median: 1220 (51%)     max: 1223 Points
min: 2274     avg: 2290     median: 2294 (97%)     max: 2297 Points
1401 Points (59%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6358     avg: 6365     median: 6365 (11%)     max: 6372 Points
min: 19987     avg: 20553     median: 20667.5 (37%)     max: 20799 Points
11436 Points (20%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1217 Points (5%)
min: 2183     avg: 2195     median: 2196 (10%)     max: 2201 Points
1412 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
6349 Points (20%)
min: 19975     avg: 20532     median: 20658 (65%)     max: 20765 Points
11426 Points (36%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5587 Points (56%)
min: 9193     avg: 9260     median: 9275 (93%)     max: 9311 Points
6425 Points (64%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
25403 Points (28%)
min: 74731     avg: 76662     median: 77033 (85%)     max: 77769 Points
44146 Points (48%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
849 ms (1%)
min: 431     avg: 438     median: 440 (1%)     max: 441 ms
717 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 300     avg: 305.8     median: 304.5 (88%)     max: 314 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
215 Points (45%)
min: 371     avg: 383.8     median: 383 (80%)     max: 395 Points
253 Points (53%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2315     avg: 2370     median: 2370 (91%)     max: 2408 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
135.8 Watt (23%)
319 Watt (55%)
302.2 Watt (52%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
125.5 Watt (23%)
313 Watt (57%)
259.3 Watt (47%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
94.1 Watt (62%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
10.6 Points per Watt (8%)
15.5 Points per Watt (12%)
9.5 Points per Watt (7%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10400F → 100% n=36

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 7900X → 203% n=36

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-10850K → 136% n=36

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.27
log 17. 05:03:13

#0 checking url part for id 12714 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14608 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13162 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.037s ... 0.038s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.038s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12714 +0.019s ... 0.057s

#8 got single benchmarks 12714 +0.009s ... 0.066s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14608 +0.017s ... 0.083s

#10 got single benchmarks 14608 +0.044s ... 0.126s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 13162 +0.018s ... 0.144s

#12 got single benchmarks 13162 +0.007s ... 0.151s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.151s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.525s ... 0.676s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.676s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)