Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 9 185H vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 9 185H

The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H is the top-of-the-line Meteor Lake family chip that debuted in December 2023. This 1st Gen Core Ultra processor has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; it has 16 cores (6 + 8 + 2) and 22 threads at its disposal. Its Performance cores, of which there are 6, are SMT-enabled and run at up to 5.1 GHz while its Efficient cores, of which there are 10 (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) run at up to 3.8 GHz. The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.35 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, such as the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestmont architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while the rest of the chip is turned off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes that this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 9 185H comes with 24 MB of L3 cache and a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s. vPro Enterprise and business-centric features such as the Remote Platform Erase are onboard as well. It supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the chip also features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support; fascinatingly enough, Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 185H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

If one chooses to trust the official Intel performance data, then the 185H is not a whole lot faster than the Ryzen 9 6900HX (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.9 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This isn't a ground-breaking result but let's just wait for our in-house testing results instead of jumping to conclusions.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.35 GHz is slated to be a proper alternative to the mighty Radeon 780M. The thing is about as fast as the GTX 1650 (Laptop) and the RTX 2050 (Laptop) to represent some seriously solid performance gains over aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. If one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This mighty Core Ultra 9 series processor has a "base" power consumption of 45 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. A powerful cooling solution will be needed to sort out this chip's hot temper.

The 185H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD X Plus X1P-42-100

The Snapdragon X Plus 8-core (X1P-42-100) is a relatively affordable ARM architecture processor for use in Windows laptops that was unveiled in Sep 2024. This Qualcomm SoC features 8 Oryon CPU cores running at up to 3.4 GHz, along with the 1.7 TFLOPS X1-45 iGPU and the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU. The super-fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller, USB 4.0 support, TB 4 support and PCIe 4 support are all onboard as well.

Architecture and Features

The Oryon cores (2 clusters of essentially identical cores; 8 threads) are mostly based on Nuvia IP and they reportedly make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 however it does not appear to support eGPUs as of September 2024.

The X1P-42-100 is based on the smaller die codenamed Purwa, unlike most X Elite and X Plus processors. It is believed to have at least 8 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5x-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU present for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

A lot depends on the power targets of a specific system, just like it is with AMD, Intel and Nvidia products. That being said, the average X1P-42-100 competes with older chips such as the Core i5-1245U when executing multi-threaded x86 code. With apps compiled specifically with Windows on ARM in mind, a Core i7-1360P-like performance level is to be expected which is not bad at all for what is supposed to be a budget CPU.

The 3.4 GHz clock speed is only achievable in single-thread workloads. When under multi-threaded load, the CPU cores will run at no more than 3.2 GHz.

Graphics

The X1-45 used here delivers up to 1.7 TFLOPS of performance. Unlike the much faster 3.8 TFLOPS and 4.6 TFLOPS X1-85 iGPUs, this little guy here has much fewer unified shaders and runs at lower clock speeds, too. Games put it a little behind the GeForce MX350; this kind of performance is sufficient for older games and sub-900p resolutions only.

AVC, HEVC and AV1 video codecs can be both hardware-decoded and hardware-encoded whereas with VP9, only decoding is possible. The highest monitor resolution supported is UHD 2160p.

Power consumption

Expect to see anything between 15 W and 30 W under long-term workloads depending on the system and the power profile chosen. The number includes RAM.

The SoC is built with TSMC's N4P process for better-than-average power efficiency, as of H2 2024.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 9 185HQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100
CodenameMeteor Lake-HOryon
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-HQualcomm Snapdragon X
Series: Snapdragon X Oryon
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H compare3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H compare3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H compare3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H compare3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE compare3.8 - 4.3 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 compare - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 compare - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 compare - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100 compare - 4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 « - 3.4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 compare - 2.98 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Clock3800 - 5100 MHz <=3400 MHz
L3 Cache24 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 22
6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
8 / 8
8 x 3.4 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
TDP45 Watt30 Watt
Technology7 nm4 nm
max. Temp.110 °C
SocketBGA2049
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Enterprise, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2350 MHz)Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
Architecturex86ARM
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.qualcomm.com
L1 Cache2.3 MB
L2 Cache12 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 9 185H
39.2 pt (65%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - SD X Plus X1P-42-100
30.2 pt (50%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 103     avg: 108.2     median: 108.1 (61%)     max: 112.2 Points
min: 107     avg: 108.1     median: 108 (61%)     max: 109 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 828     avg: 1003     median: 1021 (19%)     max: 1096 Points
min: 554     avg: 673     median: 692 (13%)     max: 759 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 12688     avg: 18030     median: 18338 (17%)     max: 19851 Points
min: 6062     avg: 7312     median: 7422 (7%)     max: 8284 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1620     avg: 1818     median: 1812 (76%)     max: 1912 Points
min: 1065     avg: 1110     median: 1109 (47%)     max: 1134 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 622     avg: 701     median: 702 (76%)     max: 735 Points
min: 406     avg: 419.3     median: 421 (46%)     max: 425 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4843     avg: 6957     median: 7192 (18%)     max: 7651 Points
min: 2361     avg: 2787     median: 2801 (7%)     max: 3097 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1581.9     avg: 2762     median: 2853 (18%)     max: 3165 Points
min: 1191     avg: 1427     median: 1419 (9%)     max: 1556 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 238     avg: 267.1     median: 268 (74%)     max: 281 Points
min: 206     avg: 210.1     median: 211 (58%)     max: 215 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 33.95     avg: 34.7     median: 34.6 (45%)     max: 35.55 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.11     avg: 3.2     median: 3.1 (75%)     max: 3.27 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 9719     avg: 9994     median: 9977.5 (60%)     max: 10300 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 59935     avg: 63422     median: 63273.5 (46%)     max: 67204 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 88902     avg: 90904     median: 91265.5 (58%)     max: 92183 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 13892     avg: 14147     median: 14161 (17%)     max: 14374 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 87.408     avg: 215.6     median: 165.1 (2%)     max: 441.275 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.254     avg: 4.3     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 8.1 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6724     avg: 9769     median: 7940 (13%)     max: 17856 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 52522     avg: 70203     median: 71934 (41%)     max: 76331 MIPS
min: 29238     avg: 31053     median: 30828 (18%)     max: 32811 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4502     avg: 5480     median: 5560 (66%)     max: 5781 MIPS
min: 4087     avg: 4504     median: 4561 (54%)     max: 4675 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 153.6     avg: 159.7     median: 159.9 (53%)     max: 165.6 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 300.5     avg: 322.4     median: 326.3 (75%)     max: 336.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 14.1     avg: 20.1     median: 20.6 (36%)     max: 22.7 fps
min: 3.16     avg: 4.9     median: 5 (9%)     max: 6.02 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.96     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (32%)     max: 1.3 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.4     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (31%)     max: 2.3 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 7.9     avg: 10.8     median: 11.3 (29%)     max: 12.1 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 280     avg: 331.7     median: 309 (4%)     max: 538 Seconds
min: 711     avg: 898     median: 856 (11%)     max: 1226 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 163     avg: 188.6     median: 177 (1%)     max: 285 Seconds
min: 399     avg: 496.3     median: 466 (3%)     max: 683 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4313     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.503 sec
min: 0.728     avg: 0.8     median: 0.7 (16%)     max: 0.777 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9854     avg: 13153     median: 13074 (28%)     max: 15529 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 6.6     avg: 6.8     median: 6.8 (1%)     max: 7.256 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 14.786     avg: 14.9     median: 14.9 (1%)     max: 15.15 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 304.446     avg: 358     median: 366.9 (2%)     max: 402.742 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 73186     avg: 76512     median: 75742.5 (58%)     max: 80494 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 12693     avg: 21337     median: 22169.5 (55%)     max: 24629 Points
min: 11743     avg: 12416     median: 12523 (31%)     max: 12625 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 74638     avg: 81658     median: 76996.5 (63%)     max: 100241 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 73618     avg: 82055     median: 75494 (61%)     max: 100192 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 78677     avg: 89559     median: 91059 (76%)     max: 102469 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 14341     avg: 18938     median: 18896 (48%)     max: 21425 Points
min: 8737     avg: 8919     median: 8996 (23%)     max: 9024 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 21106     avg: 28071     median: 28964.5 (52%)     max: 30623 Points
min: 13147     avg: 13554     median: 13563 (24%)     max: 13780 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6307     avg: 10957     median: 11454.5 (48%)     max: 12209 Points
min: 3282     avg: 4225     median: 3306 (14%)     max: 5699 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2199     avg: 2483     median: 2495 (62%)     max: 2573 Points
min: 2287     avg: 2384     median: 2393.5 (60%)     max: 2442 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 12825     avg: 13823     median: 13974 (54%)     max: 14540 Points
min: 10833     avg: 11258     median: 11384 (44%)     max: 11508 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2410     avg: 2931     median: 3105 (99%)     max: 3105 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 12735     avg: 18936     median: 21003 (86%)     max: 21003 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1700     avg: 1828     median: 1852 (72%)     max: 1902 Points
min: 1486     avg: 1531     median: 1531 (60%)     max: 1576 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10441     avg: 13368     median: 13566 (24%)     max: 14230 Points
min: 4457     avg: 5351     median: 5350.5 (10%)     max: 6244 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1695     avg: 1788     median: 1799 (8%)     max: 1830 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13228     avg: 13612     median: 13736 (43%)     max: 13972 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7040     avg: 7372     median: 7422 (74%)     max: 7602 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 47960     avg: 49362     median: 49781.5 (50%)     max: 49924 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 494     avg: 524     median: 522 (1%)     max: 594 ms
min: 407.5     avg: 640     median: 472.1 (1%)     max: 1145 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 90543     avg: 95362     median: 96090 (73%)     max: 98144 Points
min: 78058     avg: 81387     median: 79536 (60%)     max: 88419 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 237     avg: 258.7     median: 260 (71%)     max: 271 Points
min: 130.3     avg: 251.9     median: 270 (74%)     max: 284 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 237     avg: 279.4     median: 286 (51%)     max: 301 Points
min: 129.9     avg: 356.4     median: 401 (72%)     max: 426 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1589     avg: 1774     median: 1770 (66%)     max: 1971 Points
min: 1061     avg: 1186     median: 1161 (43%)     max: 1463 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 44.4     avg: 113.4     median: 123.8 (21%)     max: 176.1 Watt
min: 32.2     avg: 43.1     median: 44.3 (8%)     max: 58.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 88     avg: 129.5     median: 124.6 (23%)     max: 171.8 Watt
min: 37.5     avg: 50.7     median: 51.8 (9%)     max: 60.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 5.1     avg: 12.4     median: 11.7 (8%)     max: 21.4 Watt
min: 2.95     avg: 4.9     median: 4.2 (3%)     max: 9.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.18     avg: 13.7     median: 11.9 (13%)     max: 28.8 Watt
min: 2.56     avg: 4.5     median: 4.9 (5%)     max: 6.14 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 17.8     avg: 27.4     median: 24.2 (18%)     max: 67 Points per Watt
min: 25.9     avg: 28     median: 27.3 (20%)     max: 31.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 9 185H → 100% n=27

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 → 65% n=27

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 16. 02:34:13

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16921 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17591 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752626053s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 13 Jul 2025 05:20:07 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.008s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 16921 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#8 got single benchmarks 16921 +0.031s ... 0.043s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17591 +0.004s ... 0.047s

#10 got single benchmarks 17591 +0.01s ... 0.057s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.057s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.051s ... 0.108s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.11s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)