Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs Intel Core i9-12900H

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is a powerful Strix Halo family processor that debuted in January 2025. The APU comes with 16 Zen 5 CPU cores running at up to 5.1 GHz, the 40 CU RDNA 3+ Radeon 8060S graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Other noteworthy features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM support and a whole lot of L3 cache.

Architecture and Features

Unlike Strix Point, Strix Halo parts are powered by Zen 5 cores - no Zen 5c here. It's not clear if this is the desktop Zen 5 implementation with full AVX512 throughput or the mobile one. According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the AI Max+ chip supports RAM as fast as LPDDR5x-8000, and is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors had. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

Performance

From leaks, we know that the Ryzen delivers around 20,700 Geekbench 6.3 Multi points, meaning it trades blow with very powerful desktop CPUs like the Ryzen 9 9900X.

Graphics

The Radeon 8060S is the most powerful iGPU that AMD has on offer, as of Jan 2025. It features 40 RDNA 3+ architecture CUs (2560 unified shaders) that could see it outcompeting lower mid-range desktop graphics cards like the GeForce RTX 4050. This GPU will undoubtedly run any game at 1080p on Ultra, however, the ultimate question is whether or not the cooling solution of the laptop will be powerful enough to let the iGPU shine.

Naturally, the Radeon is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs including AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The AI Max+ 395 can eat up to 120 W depending on the system and its TDP power targets, with 45 W named as the minimum TDP.

The 4 nm TSMC process that the CPU cores are built with make for decent, as of Jan 2025, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i9-12900H

► remove from comparison Intel i9-12900H

The Intel Core i9-12900H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 20 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.5 to 5 GHz on the performance cluster and 1.8 to 3.8 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6920HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. Compared to the 12900HK, the 12900H does not offer the open multiplicator (for overclocking) but the full "Enterprise" set of vPro features (for remote management).

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.45 GHz.

Performance

The average 12900H in our database proves to be an outrageously fast CPU, ripping the Ryzen 9 6900HX to pieces as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Perhaps surprisingly, the i9's multi-thread performance is not much higher than that of the Core i7-12700H, suggesting the latter might be a better bang for the buck.

With its decent cooling solution and a long-term Power Limit of 110 W, the Asus StudioBook 16 H7600ZW is one of the fastest laptops built around the i9-12900H that we know of. It can be more than 80% faster than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, depending on the circumstances.

Power consumption

The Core i9 has a "minimum assured" power consumption of 35 W, with 45 W being its Base power consumption. The CPU's maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption sits at 115 W.

The i9-12900H is built with Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for lower than average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395Intel Core i9-12900H
CodenameStrix HaloAlder Lake-H
SeriesAMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)Intel Alder Lake-P
Series: Alder Lake-P Alder Lake-H
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 « 3 - 5.1 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 compare3.2 - 5 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900HK compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900H « 1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12800H compare1.8 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12650H compare1.7 - 4.7 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600H compare2 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12500H compare1.8 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12450H compare1.5 - 4.4 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock3000 - 5100 MHz1800 - 5000 MHz
L2 Cache16 MB11.5 MB
L3 Cache64 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 32
16 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 5
14 / 20
TDP55 Watt45 Watt
Technology4 nm10 nm
SocketFP11BGA1744
FeaturesLPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4ADDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon 8060S ( - 2900 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1450 MHz)
NPU / AI50 TOPS INT8
Chip AI126 TOPS INT8
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache1.2 MB
max. Temp.100 °C

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI Max+ 395
46.9 pt (78%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900H
39.2 pt (65%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 114     avg: 115.4     median: 116 (58%)     max: 116.8 Points
min: 96     avg: 104.9     median: 106 (53%)     max: 112 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 1648     avg: 1805     median: 1827 (34%)     max: 1912 Points
min: 371     avg: 636     median: 578 (11%)     max: 920 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 29063     avg: 34856     median: 35991 (33%)     max: 37423 Points
min: 7359     avg: 15133     median: 15946.5 (15%)     max: 19648 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2034     avg: 2045     median: 2044 (83%)     max: 2052 Points
min: 1634     avg: 1829     median: 1863.5 (76%)     max: 1930 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 791     avg: 799     median: 800 (87%)     max: 803 Points
min: 624     avg: 706     median: 714.5 (78%)     max: 738 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 11357     avg: 13533     median: 13882 (34%)     max: 14641 Points
min: 2681     avg: 5717     median: 6056.5 (15%)     max: 7471 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4739     avg: 5371     median: 5488 (35%)     max: 5881 Points
min: 1395     avg: 2454     median: 2576.5 (16%)     max: 3077 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 314     avg: 316.4     median: 317 (88%)     max: 318 Points
min: 235     avg: 262.3     median: 266 (74%)     max: 277 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 55.9     avg: 63.2     median: 64.3 (83%)     max: 68.17 Points
min: 12.08     avg: 23.6     median: 25.3 (33%)     max: 32.77 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.72     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (89%)     max: 3.77 Points
min: 2.83     avg: 3     median: 3 (71%)     max: 3.3 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8691     avg: 8704     median: 8698 (53%)     max: 8728 Points
min: 7952     avg: 8475     median: 8235 (50%)     max: 9498 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 62519     avg: 66954     median: 65332 (47%)     max: 74633 Points
min: 24313     avg: 43425     median: 47767 (35%)     max: 60567 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 110924     avg: 123266     median: 114175 (73%)     max: 144699 Points
min: 48178     avg: 66910     median: 70976.5 (45%)     max: 77409 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 16057     avg: 16159     median: 16196 (20%)     max: 16223 Points
min: 12846     avg: 13385     median: 13227.5 (16%)     max: 14567 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 32.773     avg: 111.5     median: 33.1 (0%)     max: 347.1 s
min: 187.176     avg: 206.8     median: 197.8 (2%)     max: 265.116 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.361     avg: 3.7     median: 2.5 (1%)     max: 7.3 s
min: 3.421     avg: 4.1     median: 4 (1%)     max: 5.062 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 3413     avg: 14883     median: 8853.5 (14%)     max: 38410 Points
min: 7620     avg: 8202     median: 7937 (13%)     max: 9328 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 116237     avg: 123900     median: 121368 (70%)     max: 136872 MIPS
min: 34684     avg: 60849     median: 64908.5 (37%)     max: 76677 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6474     avg: 6501     median: 6499 (77%)     max: 6540 MIPS
min: 5302     avg: 5843     median: 5881 (69%)     max: 6289 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 188.8     avg: 204.4     median: 189.4 (5%)     max: 235 fps
min: 67.5     avg: 105.8     median: 111.4 (3%)     max: 126.7 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 320.5     avg: 324.5     median: 325.5 (8%)     max: 327.5 fps
min: 225     avg: 266.6     median: 263.3 (7%)     max: 317 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 32.4     avg: 35.1     median: 33.7 (59%)     max: 40.3 fps
min: 8.05     avg: 17.1     median: 17.8 (31%)     max: 22.5 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.7     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (66%)     max: 3.4 GB/s
min: 0.864     avg: 1.1     median: 1 (29%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2.7     avg: 3.8     median: 3.6 (62%)     max: 5.1 GB/s
min: 1.5     avg: 1.8     median: 1.9 (33%)     max: 2.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 16.7     avg: 21.5     median: 20.2 (53%)     max: 28.9 GB/s
min: 8.6     avg: 10.5     median: 10.3 (27%)     max: 12.8 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 132     avg: 140.6     median: 134 (2%)     max: 163 Seconds
min: 273     avg: 420.7     median: 376 (5%)     max: 850 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 86     avg: 91.6     median: 87 (1%)     max: 107 Seconds
min: 160     avg: 231.3     median: 205.5 (1%)     max: 451 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3984     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4094 sec
min: 0.4218     avg: 0.5     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.506 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 16575     avg: 17918     median: 17702.5 (38%)     max: 19691 Points
min: 10122     avg: 13153     median: 13453 (29%)     max: 14655 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.2     avg: 8.3     median: 8.3 (2%)     max: 8.359 s
min: 7.3     avg: 7.7     median: 7.5 (2%)     max: 8.329 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.502     avg: 17.6     median: 17.6 (1%)     max: 17.659 s
min: 16.373     avg: 17.3     median: 17.2 (1%)     max: 18.439 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
407.8 s (2%)
min: 385.4     avg: 410.8     median: 398.6 (2%)     max: 474.148 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 88295     avg: 91621     median: 91177 (70%)     max: 95834 Points
min: 33640     avg: 52620     median: 53621 (41%)     max: 62706 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 22033     avg: 25525     median: 26998 (66%)     max: 28889 Points
min: 10552     avg: 21276     median: 22264 (55%)     max: 26126 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 75830     avg: 79255     median: 77087 (63%)     max: 84504 Points
min: 70655     avg: 87893     median: 91477 (74%)     max: 103016 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 75621     avg: 78854     median: 77354 (63%)     max: 83969 Points
min: 71651     avg: 89380     median: 91745 (74%)     max: 103757 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 76968     avg: 79446     median: 79260.5 (64%)     max: 82293 Points
min: 81857     avg: 89973     median: 89999 (72%)     max: 100472 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 21608     avg: 23690     median: 23927.5 (61%)     max: 25765 Points
min: 9262     avg: 17875     median: 18691.5 (47%)     max: 22123 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 30555     avg: 35481     median: 37386 (67%)     max: 39630 Points
min: 9703     avg: 25492     median: 26678.5 (48%)     max: 31176 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 9451     avg: 10534     median: 10837 (46%)     max: 11285 Points
min: 5062     avg: 11544     median: 12039 (51%)     max: 14424 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 2791     avg: 2909     median: 2929 (68%)     max: 2978 Points
min: 1893     avg: 2368     median: 2384 (55%)     max: 2652 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 16510     avg: 19000     median: 17599 (68%)     max: 22157 Points
min: 9258     avg: 10829     median: 10337.5 (40%)     max: 12856 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2819     avg: 2820     median: 2819.5 (90%)     max: 2820 Points
min: 2093     avg: 2248     median: 2203 (70%)     max: 2440 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 16420     avg: 16428     median: 16428 (67%)     max: 16436 Points
min: 8918     avg: 10207     median: 9930 (41%)     max: 11663 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2184     avg: 2224     median: 2228 (75%)     max: 2275 Points
min: 1631     avg: 1800     median: 1820 (61%)     max: 1897 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16535     avg: 19467     median: 17552 (31%)     max: 24593 Points
min: 8519     avg: 11913     median: 12237 (22%)     max: 14376 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1991     avg: 2060     median: 2091 (9%)     max: 2097 Points
min: 1553     avg: 1695     median: 1710 (7%)     max: 1838 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16628     avg: 19726     median: 17929 (57%)     max: 24621 Points
min: 8374     avg: 10525     median: 9892 (31%)     max: 12717 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8054     avg: 8190     median: 8220 (82%)     max: 8295 Points
min: 7191     avg: 7533     median: 7650 (76%)     max: 8015 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 66187     avg: 78352     median: 66840 (66%)     max: 102029 Points
min: 30682     avg: 36787     median: 36900 (36%)     max: 41134 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
7309 Points (81%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
46641 Points (61%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 424     avg: 431.8     median: 427 (0%)     max: 453 ms
min: 490     avg: 520     median: 508 (1%)     max: 608 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
123023 Points (81%)
min: 84027     avg: 87439     median: 86645 (57%)     max: 92438 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 252     avg: 274.2     median: 273 (71%)     max: 317 Points
min: 239     avg: 262     median: 264 (69%)     max: 279 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 302     avg: 325.2     median: 320 (57%)     max: 358 Points
min: 263     avg: 297.3     median: 296 (53%)     max: 332 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1948     avg: 2089     median: 2069 (77%)     max: 2274 Points
min: 1515     avg: 1846     median: 1872 (70%)     max: 2108 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 111.2     avg: 157.5     median: 169.9 (29%)     max: 184.7 Watt
min: 52     avg: 109.2     median: 101.2 (17%)     max: 180 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 133.2     avg: 177     median: 192.8 (35%)     max: 200 Watt
min: 74.6     avg: 126.3     median: 124 (23%)     max: 222 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 8.18     avg: 9.9     median: 10.5 (7%)     max: 11.5 Watt
min: 4.05     avg: 29.1     median: 27 (18%)     max: 96.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
13.8 Watt (10%)
min: 7.99     avg: 18.1     median: 14.8 (11%)     max: 34.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 27.9     avg: 31.4     median: 29.7 (22%)     max: 36.3 Points per Watt
min: 13.6     avg: 19.9     median: 19.1 (14%)     max: 27.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 → 100% n=55

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900H → 74% n=55

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 04. 17:11:05

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18628 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14043 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1764864665s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Dec 2025 05:18:50 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18628 +0.005s ... 0.013s

#8 got single benchmarks 18628 +0.011s ... 0.024s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14043 +0.005s ... 0.029s

#10 got single benchmarks 14043 +0.037s ... 0.066s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.066s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.088s ... 0.154s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.155s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)