Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Intel Core i5-10300H

AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 4900HS

The AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS is a mobile SoC for big laptops based on the Renoir architecture. The 4900HS integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.3 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured in the modern 7 nm process at TSMC and partly thanks to it AMD advertises a 2x improved performance per Watt for the Renoir chips

According to our information, the Ryzen 9 4900HS is only slightly faster than the Ryzen 7 4800HS. The CPU is clocked 100 MHz (base and boost) higher, but the gains greatly depend on the cooling and TDP settings. Compared to Intel chips, the i9-9980HK top model should be comparable. That means the Ryzen 9 4900HS should be able to handle all demanding tasks and gaming. Compared to the similar named 45W-version, the Ryzen 9 4900H, the 4900HS is differs in 100 MHz boost and 300 MHz base clock.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 7 integrated graphics card with most likely 7 CUs. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 8 MB level 3 cache can be found on the chip. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information.

The TDP of the APU is specified at 35 Watt (default). That means the chip is intended for big and relatively heavy laptops. The Ryzen 7 4900HS is the 35 Watt version of the R9 4900H with a 10 Watt lower TDP.

Intel Core i5-10300H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10300H

The Intel Core i5-10300H is a fast processor for laptops with four cores based on the Comet Lake-H series (4th generation of Skylake architecture). The processor clocks at between 2.5 and 4.5 GHz (up to 4.2 with 4 cores) and can execute up to eight threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i5-9300H from 2019, the 10300H is clocked slightly higher (+100 MHz Base, +400 MHz Boost) and supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i5-10300H supports no vPro, TXT or SIPP. These business features are available in the faster Core i5-10400H (2.6 - 4.6 GHz) that was released at a later date.

Performance

The average 10300H in our database matches the AMD Ryzen 5 3550H in multi-thread performance. While not a poor result per se, it is indicative of an entry-level H-class CPU that is unlikely to meet the needs of hardcore gamers, professional videographers and similar clientele.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i5-9300H. As a low-end solution it will probably only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power consumption

The Core i5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W, a value that laptop makers are free to reduce slightly, 35 W being the lowest Intel-recommended value. Doing so would result in lower clock speeds and lower performance. Either way, a proper cooling solution is a must for a CPU like this.

The i5-10300H is manufactured on one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for lower-than-average, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 4900HSIntel Core i5-10300H
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)Intel Comet Lake
CodenameRenoir (Zen 2)Comet Lake-H
Clock3000 - 4300 MHz2500 - 4500 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB256 KB
L2 Cache4 MB1 MB
L3 Cache8 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 164 / 8
TDP35 Watt45 Watt
Technology7 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C
SocketFP6BGA1440
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s, MMX, BMI2, AES-NI, SSE4.1, ABM, VMX, EIST, RDRAND, SSE4.2, TM1, RDSEED, SSE, AVX, FMA, SMEP, TM2, SSE2, AVX2, ADX, SMAP, Hyper-Threading, SGX, SSE3, Turbo, SSSE3, MPX, SST
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1050 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H « 2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 4900HS
35.2 pt (49%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10300H
31.8 pt (44%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
68.2 Points (47%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
331 Points (6%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 4621     avg: 5132     median: 5106 (5%)     max: 5668 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1095     avg: 1126     median: 1136 (48%)     max: 1147 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
495 Points (55%)
min: 312     avg: 443.2     median: 454 (50%)     max: 470 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4288 Points (10%)
min: 1397     avg: 2046     median: 2117 (5%)     max: 2240 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1863 Points (12%)
min: 536     avg: 825     median: 892 (6%)     max: 921 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
193 Points (58%)
min: 108     avg: 174     median: 186 (56%)     max: 194 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
18.2 Points (24%)
min: 9.87     avg: 10     median: 10.1 (13%)     max: 10.06 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.2 Points (55%)
min: 2.05     avg: 2.1     median: 2.2 (54%)     max: 2.17 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5866 Points (35%)
min: 6867     avg: 7056     median: 7130 (43%)     max: 7170 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
37938 Points (27%)
min: 26994     avg: 27496     median: 27692 (20%)     max: 27801 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 35899     avg: 36042     median: 36042 (25%)     max: 36185 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 9326     avg: 9339     median: 9338.5 (11%)     max: 9351 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
88.2 s (1%)
215.2 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.3 s (1%)
7.1 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4548 Points (7%)
4825 Points (8%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
48577 MIPS (28%)
min: 15146     avg: 23295     median: 24158 (14%)     max: 24841 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4634 MIPS (55%)
min: 2945     avg: 4704     median: 4896 (59%)     max: 4956 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
106 fps (37%)
53.3 fps (19%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
223 fps (51%)
190.2 fps (44%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
12.2 fps (21%)
min: 6.13     avg: 7.1     median: 7.3 (13%)     max: 7.78 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.2 GB/s (0%)
0.4 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.9 GB/s (33%)
0.7 GB/s (12%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
11.2 GB/s (29%)
3.1 GB/s (8%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
962 Seconds (12%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
297 Seconds (2%)
min: 478.9     avg: 515     median: 515.5 (4%)     max: 555 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.625     avg: 0.7     median: 0.6 (14%)     max: 1.088 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
12448 Points (26%)
min: 9731     avg: 9744     median: 9744 (21%)     max: 9757 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.5 s (2%)
8.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
21.8 s (1%)
19.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
547 s (2%)
516 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
57045 Points (50%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
15184 Points (41%)
min: 8554     avg: 9719     median: 9884.5 (27%)     max: 10909 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
63010 Points (51%)
min: 58736     avg: 60992     median: 61113 (50%)     max: 62933 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
62786 Points (51%)
min: 58462     avg: 61155     median: 61387 (50%)     max: 62548 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
67850 Points (57%)
min: 38284     avg: 60059     median: 63707 (54%)     max: 63995 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
15900 Points (40%)
min: 8220     avg: 8936     median: 9017.5 (23%)     max: 9305 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
21873 Points (39%)
min: 12298     avg: 12919     median: 13016 (23%)     max: 13267 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
8966 Points (38%)
min: 3772     avg: 4678     median: 4684 (20%)     max: 5600 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
1599 Points (49%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
5340 Points (21%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1218 Points (51%)
min: 703     avg: 1166     median: 1203.5 (51%)     max: 1241 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
7675 Points (14%)
min: 2783     avg: 4351     median: 4478 (8%)     max: 4728 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1121     avg: 1175     median: 1172.5 (5%)     max: 1234 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3887     avg: 4333     median: 4365 (14%)     max: 4713 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5372 Points (54%)
min: 4844     avg: 5198     median: 5199 (52%)     max: 5549 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
30230 Points (33%)
min: 15448     avg: 17203     median: 17278 (19%)     max: 18807 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest 9 - PerformanceTest 9.0 CPU Mark
12111 Points (63%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
894 ms (1%)
min: 812     avg: 872     median: 824 (1%)     max: 1366 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
38616 Points (35%)
min: 36854     avg: 47282     median: 48896 (44%)     max: 51952 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 134     avg: 206.2     median: 210.5 (44%)     max: 231 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
104.2 Watt (18%)
min: 76.8     avg: 95.8     median: 95.3 (16%)     max: 112 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
104.5 Watt (19%)
min: 75.3     avg: 85.7     median: 85.8 (16%)     max: 93 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
17.8 Points per Watt (13%)
min: 9.51     avg: 10.4     median: 10.5 (8%)     max: 11.1 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS → 100% n=37

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10300H → 79% n=37

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 17. 04:14:33

#0 checking url part for id 11882 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11706 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 16 May 2024 05:39:24 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.031s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11882 +0.019s ... 0.05s

#7 got single benchmarks 11882 +0.013s ... 0.063s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11706 +0.016s ... 0.08s

#9 got single benchmarks 11706 +0.084s ... 0.164s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.164s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.357s ... 0.52s

#12 return log +0.034s ... 0.555s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)