Notebookcheck Logo

Apple M2 vs AMD Ryzen 3 3300X vs AMD Ryzen 9 3900X

Apple M2

► remove from comparison Apple M2

The Apple M2 is a System on a Chip (SoC) from Apple that is found in the late 2022 MacBook Air and, MacBook Pro 13. It offers 8 cores divided in four performance cores and four power-efficiency cores. The big cores offer 192 KB instruction cache, 128 KB data cache, and 16 MB shared L2 cache (up from 12 MB). The four efficiency cores are a lot smaller and offer only 128 KB instruction cache, 64 KB data cache, and 4 MB shared cache. The efficiency cores (E cluster) clock with  up to 2,4 GHz, the performance cores (P cluster) with up to 3,5 GHz and therefore higher than the M1 cores. The architecture should be similar to the A15 (iPhone 13) with Avalanche and Blizzard cores.

The chip features a unified memory architecture for the CPU and GPU cores and supports up to 24 GB LPDDR5-6400 for a bandwidth of up to 100GB/s.

According to Apple, the M2 offers a 18% higher CPU performance at the same power consumption level compared to the Apple M1. In our tests, the MacBook Pro 13 with active cooling was able to reach the 18% in Geekbench Multi. In other benchmarks we measured 12 to 15% gains compared to the M1. Therefore, the performance is now near the M1 Pro with 8 cores. The passively cooled MacBook Air may however suffer from throttling in longer load scenarios.

The integrated graphics card in the M2 offers 8 or 10 cores and a peak performance of 3.6 TFLOPs.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a fast 16 core neural engine with a peak performance of 16 TOPS (for AI hardware acceleration), a secure enclave (e.g., for encryption), Thunderbolt / USB 4 controller, an ISP, and media de- and encoders.

The Apple M2 includes 20 billion transistors (up from the 16 billion of the M1) and is manufactured in the second generation 5nm process at TSMC (most likely N5P). The power consumption is rated at 20W what we also measured under CPU load.

AMD Ryzen 3 3300X

► remove from comparison AMD R3 3300X

The Ryzen 3 3300X is a mid-range desktop processor of the Matisse series with 4 cores and 8 threads. It clocks from 3.8 (base) - 4.3 GHz (boost) and uses the Zen 2 microarchitecture. It uses all four cores in a single CCX-cluster, unlike the slower Ryzen 3 3100 which uses two clusters. The CPU is manufactured in the modern 7nm process at TSMC. The I/O die on the package is separate and manufactured in 12 nm at Globalfoundries. The TDP is specified at 65 Watt and therefore the CPU wont need a big beefy cooler.

Thanks to the high clock rates, the Ryzen 3300X is performing similar than the old Core i7-7700K (a former high end CPU) and therefore a good pick for entry level gaming systems.

AMD Ryzen 9 3900X

► remove from comparison AMD R9 3900X

Der AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ist ein Desktop-Prozessor der Matisse Serie mit 12-Kernen und Hyperthreading (SMT), weshalb dieser 24 Threads gleichzeitig verarbeiten kann. Mit dem Launch am 07.07.2019 ist der Ryzen 9 3900X der schnellste Ryzen 9 Prozessor und mit 105 Watt TDP spezifiziert. Bis zur endgültigen Verfügbarkeit des Ryzen 9 3950X bleibt der Ryzen 9 3900X allerdings das Topmodell, denn der Ryzen 9 3950X soll erst im September 2019 folgen und insgesamt 16 Kerne bieten. 

Der Ryzen 9 3900X taktet mit 3,8 GHz Basistakt und kann per Turbo auf bis zu 4,6 GHz takten. Bei Last aller 12 Kerne erreicht der Ryzen 9 3900X maximal 4,3 GHz. Dank des Precision Boost 2 kann der Takt auf einem höheren Level gehalten werden, wie wir es schon von Zen+ her kennen.

Die Leistung des AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ist durchweg bei allen Anwendungen hervorragend. Vor allem bei Multi-Thread-Anwendungen kann hier der native 12-Kerner seine Stärken ausspielen und kann es sogar mit einem AMD Threadripper 1950X aufnehmen.

Die vier CCX-Cluster bestehend aus jeweils 4 CPU-Kernen, von denen jeweils drei aktiv sind befinden sich in zwei CCD-Packages (je 3 Kerne mit eigenem 16 MByte L3 Cache). Ein CCD-Package ist genau 74 mm² groß und wird im neuen 7 nm Verfahren bei TSMC gefertigt. Bei den beiden Ryzen-9-Prozessoren befinden sich zwei dieser CCD-Einheiten unter dem Heatspreader. Der I/O-Die ist separiert und kommt im mit der älteren 12 nm Strukturbreite daher, welcher weiterhin von Gobalfoundries gefertigt. 

Bei Spielen kann der AMD Ryzen 9 3900X dank der verbesserten IPC überzeugen. Schlussendlich kommt es jedoch immer auf die Unterstützung der Spiele an. Wer nur Spielen möchte, ist gut beraten sich den AMD Ryzen 7 3700X genauer anzuschauen. Wer jedoch gleichzeitig Streamen oder Videos bearbeiten möchte, für diejenigen ist der Ryzen 9 3900X die bessere Wahl. 

ModelApple M2AMD Ryzen 3 3300XAMD Ryzen 9 3900X
SeriesApple M2AMD Matisse (Ryzen 3000 Desktop)AMD Matisse (Ryzen 3000 Desktop)
Series: Matisse (Ryzen 3000 Desktop) Matisse (Zen 2)
Apple M2 Max2.42 - 3.7 GHz12 / 12 cores48 MB L3
Apple M2 Pro2.42 - 3.5 GHz12 / 12 cores24 MB L3
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core2.42 - 3.7 GHz10 / 10 cores24 MB L3
Apple M2 « 2.42 - 3.48 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X3.5 - 4.7 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X3.8 - 4.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 39003.1 - 4.3 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT3.9 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X3.6 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X « 3.8 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 31003.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X3.5 - 4.7 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X « 3.8 - 4.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 39003.1 - 4.3 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT3.9 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X3.6 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X3.8 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 31003.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores16 MB L3
Clock2424 - 3480 MHz3800 - 4300 MHz3800 - 4600 MHz
L1 Cache2 MB256 KB768 KB
L2 Cache20 MB2 MB6 MB
L3 Cache8 MB16 MB64 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 84 / 812 / 24
TDP20 Watt65 Watt105 Watt
Transistors20000 Million
Technology5 nm7 nm7 nm
FeaturesARMv8 Instruction SetMMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2DDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUApple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz)
Chip AI15.8 TOPS INT8
ArchitectureARMx86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.apple.comwww.amd.com
CodenameMatisse (Zen 2)Matisse (Zen 2)
SocketAM4 (1331)AM4 (LGA1331)
$120 U.S.$499 U.S.
max. Temp.95 °C

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R3 3300X
31.4 pt (52%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 3900X
34.8 pt (58%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 M2 +
121 Points (68%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 M2 +
513 Points (10%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 M2 +
min: 8517     avg: 8654     median: 8667 (8%)     max: 8772 Points
19000 Points (18%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 M2 +
min: 1580     avg: 1595     median: 1585 (67%)     max: 1638 Points
1370 Points (58%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
M2 +
min: 216     avg: 370.8     median: 381 (42%)     max: 446 Points
500 Points (54%)
min: 504     avg: 512     median: 514 (56%)     max: 519 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
M2 +
min: 2231     avg: 2325     median: 2324 (6%)     max: 2416 Points
2430 Points (6%)
min: 6882     avg: 6952     median: 6910 (17%)     max: 7065 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
M2 +
min: 1209.9     avg: 1222     median: 1215 (8%)     max: 1243 Points
1071 Points (7%)
min: 3018     avg: 3057     median: 3049 (19%)     max: 3104 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
M2 +
min: 222     avg: 223.8     median: 223 (62%)     max: 229 Points
195 Points (54%)
min: 202.9     avg: 206.3     median: 207 (57%)     max: 209 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
11.8 Points (15%)
min: 33.44     avg: 33.9     median: 33.9 (44%)     max: 34.31 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.3 Points (54%)
min: 2.35     avg: 2.4     median: 2.4 (56%)     max: 2.36 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5856 Points (35%)
min: 5992     avg: 6019     median: 6018.5 (36%)     max: 6045 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
25416 Points (18%)
min: 45047     avg: 45539     median: 45539 (33%)     max: 46031 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
40869 Points (26%)
min: 76051     avg: 76666     median: 76666 (49%)     max: 77281 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
10250 Points (12%)
min: 10352     avg: 10418     median: 10417.5 (13%)     max: 10483 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
164.5 s (2%)
min: 57.5     avg: 64.9     median: 64.9 (1%)     max: 72.2 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
6 s (1%)
min: 2.564     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 2.811 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7177 Points (11%)
min: 7529     avg: 7534     median: 7534 (12%)     max: 7539 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
30353 MIPS (17%)
min: 76732     avg: 79929     median: 80935 (46%)     max: 82119 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5329 MIPS (63%)
min: 5185     avg: 5345     median: 5316 (63%)     max: 5533 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
61.8 fps (2%)
147 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
233.5 fps (6%)
267.5 fps (7%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
8.3 fps (15%)
min: 20.6     avg: 20.8     median: 20.8 (36%)     max: 20.9 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.6 GB/s (17%)
1.7 GB/s (50%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1 GB/s (17%)
2.9 GB/s (50%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.9 GB/s (15%)
min: 10.6     avg: 10.8     median: 10.8 (28%)     max: 10.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 M2 +
min: 540     avg: 620     median: 619.5 (8%)     max: 702 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
M2 +
min: 549     avg: 614     median: 597 (4%)     max: 713 Seconds
449.4 Seconds (3%)
min: 161.7     avg: 163.6     median: 162.3 (1%)     max: 166.8 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (12%)
min: 0.534     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (12%)     max: 0.542 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 14310     avg: 14803     median: 14889 (32%)     max: 14948 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.5 s (2%)
9.1 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
20.6 s (1%)
19.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
531 s (2%)
511 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 67309     avg: 68033     median: 68132 (52%)     max: 68694 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
12952 Points (32%)
min: 18030     avg: 18763     median: 18932 (47%)     max: 19423 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
75411 Points (61%)
min: 73712     avg: 75420     median: 75582 (61%)     max: 76230 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
75503 Points (61%)
min: 74027     avg: 75640     median: 75774.5 (61%)     max: 76405 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
77142 Points (62%)
min: 75265     avg: 76737     median: 76898 (62%)     max: 78314 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
10377 Points (26%)
min: 16219     avg: 17989     median: 18192.5 (46%)     max: 18441 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
14632 Points (26%)
min: 27809     avg: 28863     median: 28975 (52%)     max: 29484 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
5161 Points (22%)
min: 0     avg: 11332     median: 11923 (50%)     max: 12484 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
100%
1 M2 +
min: 2587     avg: 2609     median: 2599 (63%)     max: 2650 Points
1765 Points (43%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
100%
1 M2 +
min: 10034     avg: 10083     median: 10089 (39%)     max: 10120 Points
10929 Points (42%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
M2 +
min: 1887     avg: 1914     median: 1915.5 (73%)     max: 1953 Points
1296 Points (49%)
min: 1223     avg: 1250     median: 1250 (47%)     max: 1275 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
M2 +
min: 8491     avg: 8812     median: 8956 (16%)     max: 8994 Points
5311 Points (10%)
min: 6372     avg: 9556     median: 10498 (19%)     max: 10854 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1299 Points (6%)
min: 1247     avg: 1262     median: 1247 (5%)     max: 1293 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5406 Points (17%)
min: 11135     avg: 11252     median: 11135 (35%)     max: 11485 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5753 Points (57%)
min: 5575     avg: 5712     median: 5680 (57%)     max: 5880 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
20529 Points (20%)
min: 42241     avg: 43190     median: 43350 (42%)     max: 43978 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
M2 +
min: 440     avg: 450.1     median: 449.2 (1%)     max: 466.8 ms
716 ms (1%)
727 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 M2 +
min: 72484     avg: 75019     median: 74878 (55%)     max: 78736 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 M2 +
min: 223     avg: 237.8     median: 235 (65%)     max: 256 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
M2 +
min: 342     avg: 366.5     median: 376 (68%)     max: 387 Points
233 Points (42%)
225 Points (40%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 M2 +
min: 1257990     avg: 1337360     median: 1337360 (65%)     max: 1416730 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 M2 +
min: 294643     avg: 298254     median: 298254 (74%)     max: 301865 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 Total Score
100%
1 M2 +
min: 1936540     avg: 1954930     median: 1961470 (63%)     max: 1966790 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 CPU
100%
1 M2 +
min: 535127     avg: 540446     median: 537292 (54%)     max: 548919 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 M2 +
min: 1437     avg: 1515     median: 1507 (56%)     max: 1585 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
144.7 Watt (25%)
min: 193.6     avg: 202.1     median: 202.1 (35%)     max: 210.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 M2 +
29 Watt (5%)
137.3 Watt (25%)
min: 214.6     avg: 221.9     median: 221.9 (40%)     max: 229.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 M2 +
min: 6.86     avg: 8.3     median: 8.4 (4%)     max: 9.71 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 M2 +
min: 2.03     avg: 2.6     median: 2.4 (2%)     max: 3.98 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 M2 +
min: 1.631     avg: 3.5     median: 3.6 (4%)     max: 5.32 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
100%
1 M2 +
42.4 Points per Watt (32%)
7.8 Points per Watt (6%)
min: 13.3     avg: 13.9     median: 13.9 (10%)     max: 14.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Apple M2 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 3300X → 88% n=9

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 3900X → 161% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.34
log 10. 14:16:10

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14521 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12167 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 11456 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1760098570s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 10 Oct 2025 05:18:33 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.007s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14521 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#9 got single benchmarks 14521 +0.008s ... 0.015s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 12167 +0.005s ... 0.02s

#11 got single benchmarks 12167 +0.004s ... 0.024s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11456 +0.004s ... 0.028s

#13 got single benchmarks 11456 +0.021s ... 0.049s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.049s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.055s ... 0.104s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.104s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)