Notebookcheck Logo

Intel HD Graphics 500 vs NVIDIA Quadro K500M

Intel HD Graphics 500

► remove from comparison Intel HD Graphics 500

The Intel HD Graphics 500 is an integrated processor graphics unit from the Apollo Lake generation (e. g. Celeron N3450 and Celeron N3350), which was announced mid 2016. The GPU can convince with low consumption figures, but the performance is only in the low-end segment and is rarely sufficient for modern games. Being a partial configuration of the Apollo Lake GPU, the HD Graphics 505 is equipped with just 12 Execution Units (EUs) (HD Graphics 505: 18 EUs) running at up to 650-700 MHz depending on the model. The technical specifications of the GPU are based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which is also used for the more expensive Skylake series.

Due to its lack of dedicated graphics memory or eDRAM cache, the HD 505 has to access the main memory via processor (2x 64bit DDR3L-/LPDDR3-1866, LPDDR4-2400).

Performance

The HD Graphics 505 should be slightly slower than the older Broadwell GPU HD Graphics (Broadwell), so modern games (as of 2016) will rarely run smoothly even at the lowest settings.

Features

The revised video engine now decodes H.265/HEVC completely in hardware and thereby much more efficiently than before. Up to three displays can be connected via DP/eDP or HDMI (4K probably only at 30 Hz via HDMI 1.4).

Power Consumption

The TDP of the whole Pentium N4200 chip is 6 Watts by default, so the GPU is primarily used for (often passively cooled) netbooks or thin notebooks. The TDP can also be reduced to 4 Watts, but this will obviously affect the performance.

NVIDIA Quadro K500M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro K500M

The NVIDIA Quadro K500M is an entry-level, DirectX 11.1-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Kepler-based GPU built on the GK107 architecture and is manufactured in 28nm at TSMC. Compared to the K2000M, the K500M only features a 64-Bit memory bus and 192 shader cores instead of 384. The Quadro K500M is built for the Intel Chief River generation (Ivy Bridge) and is the successor to the Fermi-based Quadro 1000M (Huron River platform).

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better than GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Architecture

The Kepler architecture is the successor to the Fermi architecture that first appeared in laptops with the GeForce 400M series. The GK107 Kepler core offers two shader blocks, called SMX, each with 192 shaders for a total of 384 shader cores that are clocked at the same speed as the central core. The K500M, however, offers only one SMX with 192 shaders. Although more shader cores are available in the Kepler architecture as compared to the Fermi design, the Kepler shaders are still expected to be up to twice as power efficient. However, due to the missing hot clock of the shader domain, two shaders of a Kepler chip are about as fast as one shader of a Fermi chip (as the latter is clocked twice as fast).

PCIe 3.0 is now supported by the mobile Kepler series and an optional Turbo mode can automatically overclock the Nvidia card by a theoretical 15 percent if the laptop cooling system allows it. The implementation of this boost mode is done in the BIOS, but it is ultimately dependent upon the manufacturer of the laptop.

Performance

The gaming performance should be similar to the consumer GeForce GT 620M.

Features

The improved feature set now includes support for up to 4 active displays. Furthermore, high resolution monitors of up to 3840x2160 pixels can now be connected using DisplayPort 1.2 or HDMI 1.4a if available. HD-Audio codecs, such as Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD, can be transmitted via bitstream mode through the HDMI port. However, as most laptops will feature Optimus, the integrated GPU will likely have direct control over the display ports and may limit the feature set available by the Nvidia Kepler cards.

The 5th generation PureVideo HD video processor (VP5) is also integrated in the GK107 core and offers hardware decoding of HD videos. Common codecs such as MPEG-1/2, MPEG-4 ASP, H.264 and VC1/WMV9 are fully supported up to 4K resolutions while VC1 and MPEG-4 are supported up to 1080p. Two streams can be decoded in parallel for features such as Picture-in-Picture. Another novelty is the inclusion of a dedicated video encoding engine similar to Intel QuickSync that can be accessed by the NVENC API.

The power consumption of the K500M is rated at 35 Watt (TGP according to Nvidia) and therefore suited for medium-sized notebooks of 15-inches or greater.

Intel HD Graphics 500NVIDIA Quadro K500M
Quadro K Series
Iris Pro Graphics P580 compare 72 @ 0.35 - 1.1 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Pro Graphics 580 compare 72 @ 0.35 - 1.05 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 550 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 540 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 530 compare 24 @ 0.35 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 520 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 515 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 610 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 610 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 510 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 605 compare 18 @ 0.3 - 0.75 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 505 compare 18 @ 0.3 - 0.75 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 600 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 500 12 @ 0.3 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
Quadro K5100M compare 1536 @ 0.77 GHz256 Bit @ 3600 MHz
Quadro K5000M compare 1344 @ 0.71 GHz256 Bit @ 3000 MHz
Quadro K4100M compare 1152 @ 0.71 GHz256 Bit @ 3200 MHz
Quadro K4000M compare 960 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 2800 MHz
Quadro K3100M compare 768 @ 0.71 GHz256 Bit @ 3200 MHz
Quadro K3000M compare 576 @ 0.65 GHz256 Bit @ 2800 MHz
Quadro K2100M compare 576 @ 0.67 GHz128 Bit @ 3000 MHz
Quadro K1100M compare 384 @ 0.71 GHz128 Bit @ 2800 MHz
Quadro K620M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 2000 MHz
Quadro K2000M compare 384 @ 0.75 GHz128 Bit @ 1800 MHz
Quadro K1000M compare 192 @ 0.85 GHz128 Bit @ 1800 MHz
Quadro K610M compare 192 @ 0.95 GHz64 Bit @ 2600 MHz
Quadro K510M compare 192 @ 0.85 GHz64 Bit @ 2400 MHz
Quadro K500M 192 @ 0.85 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 MHz
CodenameApollo LakeN14M-Q1
ArchitectureGen. 9 Apollo LakeKepler
Pipelines12 - unified192 - unified
Core Speed300 - 700 (Boost) MHz850 MHz
Memory Bus Width64/128 Bit64 Bit
Shared Memoryyesno
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.4DirectX 11, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.3
technology14 nm28 nm
FeaturesQuickSyncOptimus, PhysX, Verde Drivers, CUDA, 3D Vision, 3DTV Play
Date of Announcement01.09.2016 01.06.2012
Memory Speed1800 MHz
Memory TypeDDR3 / GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB
Power Consumption35 Watt
Transistors1.3 Billion
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Information118mm2, CUDA, OpenCL 1.2, OpenGL 4.3
CPU in HD Graphics 500GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Celeron J34554 x 1500 MHz, 10 W250 MHz750 MHz
Intel Celeron N34504 x 1100 MHz, 6 W200 MHz700 MHz
Intel Celeron J33552 x 2000 MHz, 10 W250 MHz700 MHz
Intel Celeron N33502 x 1100 MHz, 6 W200 MHz650 MHz
min. - max.200 - 250 MHz650 - 750 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - HD Graphics 500
0.1 pt (0%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 19294     avg: 24491     median: 24609 (2%)     max: 29579 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 12299     avg: 15195     median: 15085 (2%)     max: 18200 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 1932     avg: 2140     median: 2116 (2%)     max: 2306 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 271     avg: 321.5     median: 307 (0%)     max: 401 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 20140     avg: 26074     median: 23761 (3%)     max: 34320 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
2013 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
2516 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
2208 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
2731 Points (9%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel HD Graphics 500
3DMark 06
min: 3393     avg: 3551     median: 3506 (5%)     max: 3753 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel HD Graphics 500
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 2791     avg: 2888     median: 2894 (2%)     max: 3031 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 500
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 7.05     avg: 8.2     median: 8.1 (3%)     max: 9.61 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 500
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 500
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3.6 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
9.7 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
8.4 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
15 fps (0%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
20 fps (1%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Intel HD Graphics 500
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
42 fps (0%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
16.3 fps (0%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
49 Samples/s (0%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
79 Samples/s (0%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 296     avg: 320     median: 324 (0%)     max: 336 Points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
8.9 Watt (1%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark
450 MHz (18%)

Average Benchmarks Intel HD Graphics 500 → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Valorant

Valorant

2020
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
9.1  fps
low 1920x1080
100%
HD Graphics 500:
23.9  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
HD Graphics 500:
24  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
HD Graphics 500:
11.2  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
28.2  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
HD Graphics 500:
20.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
HD Graphics 500:
13.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
HD Graphics 500:
12.6  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
2  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
3  fps
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
0 (!)  fps
F1 2018

F1 2018

2018
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
12  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
5.5  fps
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
1  fps
QHD 2560x1440
100%
HD Graphics 500:
1  fps
World of Tanks enCore

World of Tanks enCore

2018
low 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
34.4 (!)  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
HD Graphics 500:
4.6 (!)  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
5.3 5.5 7.6 ~ 6 fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
HD Graphics 500:
3.9 4.7 ~ 4 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
HD Graphics 500:
3.6 4.3 ~ 4 fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
10  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
18.2 21.2 ~ 20 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
17.2  fps
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
10  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
HD Graphics 500:
5.6  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
18.1  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
HD Graphics 500:
6.2  fps
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
4.9  fps
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
8.7  fps
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
15.9  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
15.5  fps
low 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
19.1  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
16.4  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
9.7  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
15.9 22.1 27.6 ~ 22 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
15.3 15.3 ~ 15 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
HD Graphics 500:
5.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
HD Graphics 500:
5.1  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
28.5  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
12.5  fps
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
22  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
16  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
17.7  fps
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
71.6  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
13.7  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
10  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
6.3  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
43.8  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
19.1  fps
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
29.3  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
14.4  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
16.2 18 18.7 21 21.2 22.5 24.3 ~ 20 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
8.8 9.6 9.8 11 13 ~ 10 fps
high 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
7.9 8.9 9.7 ~ 9 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
HD Graphics 500:
2.7  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
21.5  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
9.3  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
19.3  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
9.1  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
14 16.6 ~ 15 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
14  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
12.7 22 ~ 17 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
13.6  fps
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
27.8  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
12.2  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
11.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
7.6  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
22.9  fps
high 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
11.1  fps
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
100%
HD Graphics 500:
40.1  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
14.7  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
54.5  fps
med. 1360x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
14.1  fps
Trackmania Nations Forever

Trackmania Nations Forever

2008
low 640x480
100%
HD Graphics 500:
119  fps
high 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
27.2  fps
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
100%
HD Graphics 500:
46  fps

Average Gaming Intel HD Graphics 500 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Intel HD Graphics 500NVIDIA Quadro K500M
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Valorant9.09
Hearthstone23.92411.2
League of Legends28.220.213.912.6
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider3
Strange Brigade
F1 201812
The Crew 25.5
Far Cry 511
World of Tanks enCore34.44.6
X-Plane 11.11644
Middle-earth: Shadow of War10
Team Fortress 22017.2
Dirt 4105.6
Rocket League18.16.2
Prey4.9
For Honor8.7
Overwatch15.9
Rainbow Six Siege15.5
World of Warships19.1
Metal Gear Solid V16.49.7
Dota 2 Reborn22155.65.1
Dirt Rally28.512.5
F1 20142216
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor17.7
Sims 471.613.7
Risen 3: Titan Lords106.3
GRID: Autosport43.819.1
GRID 229.314.4
BioShock Infinite201092.7
Tomb Raider21.59.3
Dead Space 319.39.1
Counter-Strike: GO1514
Diablo III1713.6
Anno 207027.812.2
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim11.27.6
Deus Ex Human Revolution22.911.1
Dirt 340.114.7
StarCraft 254.514.1
Trackmania Nations Forever11927.2
World of Warcraft46
Intel HD Graphics 500NVIDIA Quadro K500M
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
33
5
2
24


7


3


1





< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


















For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 28. 15:10:02

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7543 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3239 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1753708202s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Jul 2025 05:18:01 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.038s ... 0.038s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.038s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.038s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 7543 +0.021s ... 0.059s

#9 got single benchmarks 7543 +0.026s ... 0.085s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 3239 +0s ... 0.085s

#11 got single benchmarks 3239 +0s ... 0.086s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.086s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.013s ... 0.099s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.099s

#15 Got 98 rows for game benchmarks. +0.006s ... 0.105s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.105s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.107s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.013s ... 0.12s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.12s

#20 return log +0.001s ... 0.121s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)