Qualcomm Adreno 619L vs ARM Mali-G72 MP18 vs ARM Mali-G57 MP2
Qualcomm Adreno 619L ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 619L is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).
The performance is 60% better compared to the Adreno 612 graphics card and in our benchmarks on par with the 700 series cards.
The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).
ARM Mali-G72 MP18 ► remove from comparison
The ARM Mali-G72 MP18 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced in early 2018 in the Exynos 9810 (e.g. Galaxy S9). It integrates 18 of the 32 possible cores and is based on the second generation of the Bifrost architecture. According to ARM it offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency and a bigger tile buffer for 16x anti-aliasing.
In our benchmarks it slightly below a Adreno 540 and is therefore suitable for demanding mobile games.
The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 FL11_1 and Renderscript.
ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ► remove from comparison
The ARM Mali-G57 MP2 (or MC2) is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced mid 2021 in the MediaTek Dimensity 700 and uses 2 clusters (hence the MC2/MP2 name).
The G57 is based on the new Valhall architecture and is intended for mainstream phones.
The performance of the G57MP2 in our benchmarks is comparable to the Adreno 618 .
The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.
Qualcomm Adreno 619L ARM Mali-G72 MP18 ARM Mali-G57 MP2 Mali-G Series Architecture Adreno 600 Bifrost Bifrost Shared Memory yes no no API DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan OpenGL ES 3.2 technology 8 nm 16 nm 7 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) Date of Announcement 15.12.2015 01.01.2018 03.07.2020 Pipelines 18 - unified 2 - unified Core Speed 850 MHz Link to Manufacturer Page developer.arm.com developer.arm.com Codename Valhall
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
44899 Points (5%)
min: 36190 avg: 43744 median: 46610 (5%) max: 48433 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 3122 avg: 3225 median: 3224.5 (14%) max: 3327 Points
min: 3744 avg: 3994 median: 4054.5 (18%) max: 4124 Points
min: 1440 avg: 3517 median: 3585 (16%) max: 3965 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3307 avg: 3311 median: 3311 (7%) max: 3315 Points
min: 3958 avg: 4626 median: 4820 (11%) max: 4904 Points
min: 1285 avg: 3573 median: 3637 (8%) max: 4075 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2308 avg: 2328 median: 2328 (12%) max: 2348 Points
min: 3376 avg: 3634 median: 3435 (17%) max: 4291 Points
min: 969 avg: 2551 median: 2544.5 (13%) max: 3489 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2120 avg: 2154 median: 2153.5 (6%) max: 2187 Points
min: 3697 avg: 4023 median: 3794.5 (11%) max: 4806 Points
min: 825 avg: 2422 median: 2347 (7%) max: 3908 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 809 avg: 818 median: 817.5 (0%) max: 826 Points
min: 1003 avg: 1168 median: 1168.5 (1%) max: 1340 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
247 Points (0%)
min: 309 avg: 352.7 median: 330 (0%) max: 1073 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 2 avg: 2.4 median: 2.4 (1%) max: 2.8 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
5.8 fps (1%)
11 fps (2%)
min: 1.9 avg: 5.6 median: 5.7 (1%) max: 6.5 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 15 avg: 15.5 median: 15.5 (1%) max: 16 fps
31 fps (2%)
min: 5.2 avg: 15 median: 15 (1%) max: 18 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 14 avg: 14.5 median: 14.5 (2%) max: 15 fps
min: 28 avg: 28.3 median: 28 (3%) max: 29 fps
min: 4.7 avg: 14.7 median: 15 (2%) max: 28 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
26 fps (1%)
min: 24 avg: 40.5 median: 45.5 (1%) max: 47 fps
min: 8.6 avg: 23.9 median: 25 (1%) max: 43 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 36 avg: 36.5 median: 36.5 (2%) max: 37 fps
min: 73 avg: 74 median: 73.5 (4%) max: 76 fps
min: 14 avg: 38.1 median: 38.5 (2%) max: 70 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619L GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 72 avg: 72.5 median: 72.5 (1%) max: 73 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G72 MP18
min: 80 avg: 129.3 median: 145 (1%) max: 147 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G57 MP2
min: 23 avg: 59.4 median: 63 (1%) max: 66 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
76440 Points (10%)
min: 0 avg: 64420 median: 60119 (7%) max: 83222 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 22.78 avg: 22.8 median: 22.8 (0%) max: 22.85 fps
min: 22.5 avg: 244 median: 27.1 (0%) max: 2418 fps
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 1179 avg: 1250 median: 1254 (0%) max: 1292 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 1133 avg: 1233 median: 1255 (0%) max: 1290 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
13095 Points (13%)
min: 8620 avg: 8803 median: 8802.5 (9%) max: 8985 Points
min: 13388 avg: 20840 median: 20466 (20%) max: 26779 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
1751 Points (3%)
min: 4747 avg: 4762 median: 4762 (8%) max: 4777 Points
min: 10582 avg: 18758 median: 19555.5 (34%) max: 24231 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
2.4 Watt (1%)
min: 1.077 avg: 3.3 median: 3 (1%) max: 8.02 Watt
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 100% n=12 Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G72 MP18 → 174% n=12 Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G57 MP2 → 192% n=12
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
Mali-G57 MP2:
26 [X] Samsung Galaxy A15 4.5.0_21307647_21321795
Mediatek Helio G99 2GHz
Mali-G57 MP2
min:
2 fps, max:
36 fps
35.4 37 39.2 [X] Teclast T65 Max 4.6.0_22174900_22378599
Mediatek Helio G99 2GHz
Mali-G57 MP2
min:
14 fps, max:
53 fps
43.1 [X] Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G 4.7.0_23093867_23435602
MediaTek Dimensity 6080 2GHz
Mali-G57 MP2
min:
29 fps, max:
56 fps
55 [X] Oukitel WP33 Pro 5G 4.4.0_20481013_20559831
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ 2GHz
Mali-G57 MP2
min:
45 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 39 fps
Mali-G57 MP2:
29.7 [X] Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G 4.7.0_23093867_23435602
MediaTek Dimensity 6080 2GHz
Mali-G57 MP2
min:
18 fps, max:
44 fps
fps
Mali-G57 MP2:
17 [X] Samsung Galaxy A15 4.5.0_21307647_21321795
Mediatek Helio G99 2GHz
Mali-G57 MP2
min:
1 fps, max:
30 fps
20.7 [X] Teclast T65 Max 4.6.0_22174900_22378599
Mediatek Helio G99 2GHz
Mali-G57 MP2
min:
4 fps, max:
31 fps
22 23.2 23.5 [X] Oukitel WP33 Pro 5G 4.4.0_20481013_20559831
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ 2GHz
Mali-G57 MP2
min:
19 fps, max:
30 fps
26.6 [X] Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G 4.7.0_23093867_23435602
MediaTek Dimensity 6080 2GHz
Mali-G57 MP2
min:
14 fps, max:
40 fps
~ 22 fps
100%
Adreno 619L:
39 40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP18:
40 fps
100%
Adreno 619L:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Mali-G57 MP2:
39.7 [X] Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G 3.2.0
MediaTek Dimensity 6080 2GHz
Mali-G57 MP2
min:
28 fps, max:
41 fps
40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 619L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
133%
Mali-G72 MP18:
40 fps
Mali-G72 MP18:
59 60 ~ 60 fps
Mali-G72 MP18:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
Mali-G72 MP18:
59 60 ~ 60 fps
Mali-G72 MP18:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
50%
Mali-G72 MP18:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
108%
Mali-G57 MP2:
39 90 ~ 65 fps
Mali-G72 MP18:
30 □ 30 ~ 30 fps
Mali-G72 MP18:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
Mali-G57 MP2:
30 [X] Realme 8 5G 2.8.4a
MediaTek Dimensity 700 2GHz
Mali-G57 MP2
min:
21 fps, max:
31 fps
fps
103%
Mali-G72 MP18:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
103%
Mali-G57 MP2:
30 [X] Realme 8 5G 2.8.4a
MediaTek Dimensity 700 2GHz
Mali-G57 MP2
min:
19 fps, max:
31 fps
fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming ARM Mali-G72 MP18 → 97% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 117%
Average Gaming ARM Mali-G57 MP2 → 102% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 101%
Qualcomm Adreno 619L low med. high ultra QHD 4K League of Legends: Wild Rift 60 PUBG Mobile 40 40 30 Dead Trigger 2 60 Asphalt 9: Legends 29 Real Racing 3 60 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 1 2 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.27
log 17. 08:37:02
#0 checking url part for id 10573 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 8770 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 10691 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:38:48 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.139s ... 0.14s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.14s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.14s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10573 +0.04s ... 0.18s
#9 got single benchmarks 10573 +0.011s ... 0.191s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 8770 +0.002s ... 0.193s
#11 got single benchmarks 8770 +0.01s ... 0.202s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 10691 +0.002s ... 0.205s
#13 got single benchmarks 10691 +0.2s ... 0.405s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.405s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.184s ... 0.588s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.588s
#17 Got 120 rows for game benchmarks. +0.051s ... 0.639s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.639s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.007s ... 0.647s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.039s ... 0.685s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.685s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.688s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)