Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-10300H vs Intel Processor N100 vs Intel Core i9-10880H

Intel Core i5-10300H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10300H

The Intel Core i5-10300H is a fast processor for laptops with four cores based on the Comet Lake-H series (4th generation of Skylake architecture). The processor clocks at between 2.5 and 4.5 GHz (up to 4.2 with 4 cores) and can execute up to eight threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i5-9300H from 2019, the 10300H is clocked slightly higher (+100 MHz Base, +400 MHz Boost) and supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i5-10300H supports no vPro, TXT or SIPP. These business features are available in the faster Core i5-10400H (2.6 - 4.6 GHz) that was released at a later date.

Performance

The average 10300H in our database matches the AMD Ryzen 5 3550H in multi-thread performance. While not a poor result per se, it is indicative of an entry-level H-class CPU that is unlikely to meet the needs of hardcore gamers, professional videographers and similar clientele.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i5-9300H. As a low-end solution it will probably only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power consumption

The Core i5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W, a value that laptop makers are free to reduce slightly, 35 W being the lowest Intel-recommended value. Doing so would result in lower clock speeds and lower performance. Either way, a proper cooling solution is a must for a CPU like this.

The i5-10300H is manufactured on one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for lower-than-average, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

Intel Processor N100

► remove from comparison Intel N100

The Intel Processor N100 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with 1 to 3.4 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache.

Performance

The average N100 in our database delivers unimpressive multi-thread benchmark scores that are most similar to those of the Core i3-1115G4. The chip is fast enough for many day-to-day tasks, but not much more than that; the other thing to keep in mind is that of the two N100-toting systems tested by us as of October 2023, both have rather high CPU power limits. The chip will be noticeably slower if limited to just six or seven Watts.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers only 24 of the 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 450 - 750 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds, and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N100 has a base power consumption of only 6 W and is therefore suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

Intel Core i9-10880H

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10880H

The Intel Core i9-10880H is a high-end processor for laptops with eight cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-H, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.3 and probably around 4.9 GHz and can execute up to sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i9-9880H, the 10880H probably offers only increased clock rates.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

The performance of the Core i9-10880H should be only slightly higher than the old Core i9-9880H. Thanks to the 8 cores and high Turbo speeds, even demanding applications should run very good on the CPU. However, long term performance is always depending on the laptop cooling system and system configuration. At the time of announcement, the i9-10880H is the second fastest Comet Lake-H CPU behind the Core i9-10980HK.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9880H. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i9 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

According to our information, the Core i9-10880H was not released but split up into the Core i7-10875H and Core i9-10885H.

Beware, the CPU was not yet released at the time of writing and the information is based on leaks and early information.

ModelIntel Core i5-10300HIntel Processor N100Intel Core i9-10880H
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Alder Lake-NIntel Comet Lake
CodenameComet Lake-HAlder Lake-NComet Lake-H
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
Intel Core i9-10980HK2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H « 2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N3051.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N2001 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 « 1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N501 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H « 2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock2500 - 4500 MHz1000 - 3400 MHz2300 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB512 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB
L3 Cache8 MB6 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 4
4 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
8 / 16
TDP45 Watt6 Watt45 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1440BGA1264FCBGA1440
FeaturesDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s, MMX, BMI2, AES-NI, SSE4.1, ABM, VMX, EIST, RDRAND, SSE4.2, TM1, RDSEED, SSE, AVX, FMA, SMEP, TM2, SSE2, AVX2, ADX, SMAP, Hyper-Threading, SGX, SSE3, Turbo, SSSE3, MPX, SSTDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1050 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
$128 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10300H
31.8 pt (44%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N100
25.7 pt (36%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
68.2 Points (47%)
89%
1 N100 +
min: 60     avg: 60.5     median: 60.5 (42%)     max: 61 Points
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
331 Points (6%)
59%
1 N100 +
min: 194     avg: 195     median: 195 (4%)     max: 196 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 4621     avg: 5132     median: 5106 (5%)     max: 5668 Points
50%
1 N100 +
min: 1577     avg: 2450     median: 2559.5 (2%)     max: 2983 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1095     avg: 1126     median: 1136 (48%)     max: 1147 Points
81%
1 N100 +
min: 747     avg: 887     median: 918 (39%)     max: 942 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 312     avg: 443.2     median: 454 (50%)     max: 470 Points
77%
1 N100 +
min: 285     avg: 338.3     median: 349.5 (39%)     max: 358 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1397     avg: 2046     median: 2117 (5%)     max: 2240 Points
46%
1 N100 +
min: 590     avg: 933     median: 978.5 (2%)     max: 1139 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 536     avg: 825     median: 892 (6%)     max: 921 Points
45%
1 N100 +
min: 246     avg: 383.5     median: 401.5 (3%)     max: 479 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 108     avg: 174     median: 186 (56%)     max: 194 Points
80%
1 N100 +
min: 118.8     avg: 143.8     median: 149 (45%)     max: 155 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 9.87     avg: 10     median: 10.1 (13%)     max: 10.06 Points
47%
1 N100 +
min: 3.91     avg: 4.8     median: 4.7 (6%)     max: 5.99 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.05     avg: 2.1     median: 2.2 (54%)     max: 2.17 Points
83%
1 N100 +
min: 1.55     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (45%)     max: 1.87 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6867     avg: 7056     median: 7130 (43%)     max: 7170 Points
70%
1 N100 +
min: 4604     avg: 4927     median: 4962.5 (30%)     max: 5179 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 26994     avg: 27496     median: 27692 (20%)     max: 27801 Points
48%
1 N100 +
min: 9608     avg: 12840     median: 13207 (10%)     max: 15336 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 35899     avg: 36042     median: 36042 (25%)     max: 36185 Points
57%
1 N100 +
min: 14514     avg: 19900     median: 20430 (14%)     max: 24225 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 9326     avg: 9339     median: 9338.5 (11%)     max: 9351 Points
85%
1 N100 +
min: 7171     avg: 7812     median: 7924 (10%)     max: 8227 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
215.2 s (3%)
96%
1 N100 +
min: 481.652     avg: 549     median: 542.5 (6%)     max: 630.2 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.1 s (1%)
98%
1 N100 +
min: 15.795     avg: 16.4     median: 16.1 (3%)     max: 17.7 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4825 Points (8%)
50%
1 N100 +
min: 2187     avg: 2373     median: 2401.5 (4%)     max: 2501 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 15146     avg: 23295     median: 24158 (14%)     max: 24841 MIPS
49%
1 N100 +
min: 7532     avg: 11146     median: 11763.5 (7%)     max: 13291 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2945     avg: 4704     median: 4896 (59%)     max: 4956 MIPS
76%
1 N100 +
min: 3046     avg: 3629     median: 3707.5 (44%)     max: 3958 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
53.3 fps (19%)
54%
1 N100 +
min: 21.8     avg: 28.6     median: 29 (10%)     max: 34.7 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
190.2 fps (44%)
77%
1 N100 +
min: 105.35     avg: 143     median: 146.9 (34%)     max: 173 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 6.13     avg: 7.1     median: 7.3 (13%)     max: 7.78 fps
41%
1 N100 +
min: 1.72     avg: 2.8     median: 3 (5%)     max: 3.49 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.4 GB/s (0%)
67%
1 N100 +
min: 0.257     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (0%)     max: 0.263 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.7 GB/s (12%)
78%
1 N100 +
min: 0.531     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (9%)     max: 0.538 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
3.1 GB/s (8%)
94%
1 N100 +
min: 2.8     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (8%)     max: 2.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
962 Seconds (12%)
84%
1 N100 +
min: 1992     avg: 2546     median: 2052 (26%)     max: 3964 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 478.9     avg: 515     median: 515.5 (4%)     max: 555 Seconds
95%
1 N100 +
min: 1017     avg: 1333     median: 1197 (8%)     max: 1956 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.625     avg: 0.7     median: 0.6 (14%)     max: 1.088 sec
95%
1 N100 +
min: 0.822     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (19%)     max: 1.06 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9731     avg: 9744     median: 9744 (21%)     max: 9757 Points
58%
1 N100 +
min: 4091     avg: 5451     median: 5636.5 (12%)     max: 6441 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.7 s (2%)
98%
1 N100 +
min: 19.264     avg: 19.4     median: 19.4 (4%)     max: 19.531 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
19.8 s (1%)
99%
1 N100 +
min: 40.302     avg: 40.4     median: 40.4 (2%)     max: 40.601 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
516 s (2%)
99%
1 N100 +
min: 816.966     avg: 829     median: 818.6 (4%)     max: 862.019 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N100 +
min: 9434     avg: 13138     median: 13747 (12%)     max: 15625 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 8554     avg: 9719     median: 9884.5 (27%)     max: 10909 Points
60%
1 N100 +
min: 3814     avg: 5449     median: 5940 (16%)     max: 6486 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 58736     avg: 60992     median: 61113 (50%)     max: 62933 Points
74%
1 N100 +
min: 34828     avg: 44177     median: 45408.5 (37%)     max: 51063 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 58462     avg: 61155     median: 61387 (50%)     max: 62548 Points
74%
1 N100 +
min: 34083     avg: 44202     median: 45652 (37%)     max: 51420 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 38284     avg: 60059     median: 63707 (54%)     max: 63995 Points
82%
1 N100 +
min: 50867     avg: 52287     median: 52453.5 (44%)     max: 53373 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 8220     avg: 8936     median: 9017.5 (23%)     max: 9305 Points
45%
1 N100 +
min: 3133     avg: 3971     median: 4061.5 (10%)     max: 4693 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 12298     avg: 12919     median: 13016 (23%)     max: 13267 Points
50%
1 N100 +
min: 4589     avg: 5899     median: 6522 (12%)     max: 6602 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 3772     avg: 4678     median: 4684 (20%)     max: 5600 Points
44%
1 N100 +
min: 1407     avg: 1998     median: 2054 (9%)     max: 2516 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
1599 Points (43%)
77%
1 N100 +
min: 1070     avg: 1189     median: 1228 (33%)     max: 1245 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
5340 Points (21%)
59%
1 N100 +
min: 2283     avg: 2910     median: 3157 (12%)     max: 3282 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 703     avg: 1166     median: 1203.5 (51%)     max: 1241 Points
83%
1 N100 +
min: 915     avg: 982     median: 996 (42%)     max: 1018 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2783     avg: 4351     median: 4478 (8%)     max: 4728 Points
63%
1 N100 +
min: 1911     avg: 2600     median: 2829 (5%)     max: 2896 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1121     avg: 1175     median: 1172.5 (5%)     max: 1234 Points
85%
1 N100 +
min: 982     avg: 996     median: 996 (4%)     max: 1008 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3887     avg: 4333     median: 4365 (14%)     max: 4713 Points
64%
1 N100 +
min: 2424     avg: 2711     median: 2778.5 (9%)     max: 2862 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4844     avg: 5198     median: 5199 (52%)     max: 5549 Points
86%
1 N100 +
min: 4390     avg: 4481     median: 4492.5 (45%)     max: 4549 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 15448     avg: 17203     median: 17278 (19%)     max: 18807 Points
65%
1 N100 +
min: 10938     avg: 11162     median: 11223.5 (12%)     max: 11264 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest 9 - PerformanceTest 9.0 CPU Mark
12111 Points (63%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 812     avg: 872     median: 824 (1%)     max: 1366 ms
100%
1 N100 +
min: 1004     avg: 1048     median: 1023.5 (1%)     max: 1122 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 36854     avg: 47282     median: 48896 (44%)     max: 51952 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 N100 +
min: 128.3     avg: 134.3     median: 136.2 (39%)     max: 138.3 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 134     avg: 206.2     median: 210.5 (44%)     max: 231 Points
82%
1 N100 +
min: 156.3     avg: 171.5     median: 173.4 (36%)     max: 187.4 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 N100 +
min: 735     avg: 787     median: 786 (30%)     max: 839 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 76.8     avg: 95.8     median: 95.3 (16%)     max: 112 Watt
115%
1 N100 +
min: 12.2     avg: 20.9     median: 21.3 (4%)     max: 29.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 75.3     avg: 85.7     median: 85.8 (16%)     max: 93 Watt
113%
1 N100 +
min: 12.4     avg: 20.6     median: 24 (4%)     max: 26.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 2.84     avg: 7.1     median: 7.6 (5%)     max: 9.98 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 N100 +
3.9 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 9.51     avg: 10.4     median: 10.5 (8%)     max: 11.1 Points per Watt
178%
1 N100 +
min: 18.3     avg: 18.7     median: 18.7 (14%)     max: 19.1 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10300H → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N100 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.27
log 16. 04:15:22

#0 checking url part for id 11706 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14932 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11871 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 05:33:43 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.044s ... 0.045s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.045s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11706 +0.023s ... 0.068s

#8 got single benchmarks 11706 +0.089s ... 0.156s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14932 +0.019s ... 0.176s

#10 got single benchmarks 14932 +0.023s ... 0.199s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11871 +0.004s ... 0.203s

#12 got single benchmarks 11871 +0.006s ... 0.208s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.208s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.444s ... 0.652s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.652s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)