NVIDIA T600 vs NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
NVIDIA T600 ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia T600 Desktop GPU is a professional graphics card for workstations that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). The desktop version only offers 640 of the 1024 cores and therefore also less than the T600 mobile (896 CUDA cores). The card offers 4 GB GDDR6 graphics memory connected with a 128 bit bus (up to 160 GB/s bandwidth). The T600 supports certified drivers (former Quadro line) for professional applications like CAD, 3D modelling, DCC, medicine, or visualization applications.
The maximum power consumption of the card is rated at 40W.
NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia T550 Laptop GPU (formerly known as Quadro T550 Mobile) for laptops is a professional mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). It is based on the consumer GeForce MX550 and features the same 1024 cores and a 64 Bit memory bus. The card offers 4 GB GDDR6 with a maximum bandwidth of 112 GB/s and no dedicated display outputs (iGPU display outputs used via Optimus). The chip is manufactured in 12nm FinFET at TSMC.
The professional GPUs offer certified drivers , which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.
The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to up to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal. In contrary to the faster Quadro RTX cards, the T550 does not feature raytracing and Tensor cores.
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is a professional high-end graphics card for powerful laptops and mobile workstations. The Max-Q variants are lower clocked versions that are running more efficient and can be used in smaller chassis than the regular versions. It is based on the same TU104 chip as the consumer GeForce RTX 2080 (mobile) but offers fewer shaders (2,560) and is therefore positioned between the GeForce RTX 2080 (2,944) and 2070 (2,304). Currently we know of three different Max-Q variants with a power consumption (TGP) of 90, 85 and 80 Watt and different clock speeds.
Model Shader TGP (W) Base (MHz) Boost (MHz) Quadro RTX 4000 Desktop 2304 160 1005 1545 Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile 2560 110 1350 1770 Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 2560 90 960 1485 Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 2560 85 900 1440 Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 2560 80 780 1380 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile 2304 115? 1215 1440
The Quadro GPUs offer certified drivers , which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.
NVIDIA manufacturers the TU104 chip on a 12 nm FinFET process and includes features like Deep Learning Super Sampling (DLSS) and Real-Time Ray Tracing (RTRT), which should combine to create more realistic lighting effects than older GPUs based on the company's Pascal architecture (if the games support it). The Quadro RTX 5000 is also DisplayPort 1.4 ready, while there is also support for HDMI 2.0b, HDR, Simultaneous Multi-Projection (SMP) and H.265 video en/decoding (PlayReady 3.0).
Performance
For professional applications, the Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q should be only slightly above the mobile Quadro RTX 3000 (depending on the version). Compared to consumer cards, the mobile RTX 2070 will offer a similar performance (or slightly lower).
The still relatively high power consumption of the RTX4000 Max-Q makes the card most suited for big laptops although we should see thinner designs with the Max-Q variants.
NVIDIA T600 NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q Quadro Turing Series Architecture Turing Turing Turing Pipelines 640 - unified 1024 - unified 2560 - unified TMUs 40 ROPs 32 Core Speed 735 - 1335 (Boost) MHz 1065 - 1665 (Boost) MHz 780 - 960 - 1380 - 1485 (Boost) MHz Memory Speed 10000 effective = 1250 MHz 12000 effective = 1500 MHz 14000 MHz Memory Bus Width 128 Bit 64 Bit 256 Bit Memory Type GDDR6 GDDR5, GDDR6 GDDR6 Max. Amount of Memory 4 GB 4 GB 8 GB Shared Memory no no no Memory Bandwidth 160 GB/s 112 GB/s API DirectX 12_1, Shader 6.6, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3 DirectX 12_1, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6 DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6 Power Consumption 40 Watt 25 Watt (20 - 60 Watt TGP) 80 - 90 Watt Transistors 4.7 Billion 10.8 Billion Die Size 200 mm² technology 12 nm 12 nm 12 nm PCIe 3.0 x16 Displays 4 Displays (max.), DisplayPort 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a Date of Announcement 12.04.2021 27.05.2022 27.05.2019 Codename TU117 N19E-Q3 MAX-Q Theoretical Performance 7.2 TFLOPS FP16, 3.7 TFLOPS FP32 Notebook Size medium sized large Information Optimus only Link to Manufacturer Page nvdam.widen.net Features DLSS, Raytraycing, VR Ready, G-SYNC, Vulkan, Multi Monitor
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - T600
3 pt (9%)
...
...
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
7.8 pt (23%)
...
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
...
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
2496 Points (7%)
min: 2031 avg: 2187 median: 2066 (6%) max: 2465 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 82% 99%
6724 Points (19%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 37% 30% 37% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
2195 Points (6%)
min: 1882 avg: 2021 median: 1928 (5%) max: 2252 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 97% 85% 100%
6764 Points (18%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 32% 28% 33% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
304731 Points (35%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
152912 Points (20%)
23072 Points (3%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 80 W 100% 15%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
31922 Points (34%)
min: 17399 avg: 17614 median: 17614 (19%) max: 17829 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 55%
23809 Points (25%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 80 W 100% 55% 75%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
40917 Points (11%)
min: 32743 avg: 33219 median: 33218.5 (9%) max: 33694 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 81%
35167 Points (9%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 80 W 100% 81% 86%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
6284 Points (11%)
min: 4559 avg: 4786 median: 4581 (8%) max: 5218 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 73% 83%
15010 Points (26%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 42% 30% 35% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
6552 Points (7%)
min: 4816 avg: 5100 median: 4890 (6%) max: 5593 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 74% 85%
17049 Points (19%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 38% 28% 33% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
182459 Points (22%)
35402 Points (4%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 80 W 100% 19%
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3530 avg: 3590 median: 3589.5 (4%) max: 3649 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
9497 Points (13%)
min: 7405 avg: 8160 median: 8160 (11%) max: 8915 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 78% 94%
min: 19079 avg: 19888 median: 19888 (28%) max: 20697 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 79% 39% 47% 100%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
8694 Points (7%)
min: 7432 avg: 8067 median: 8066.5 (7%) max: 8701 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 85% 100%
min: 23464 avg: 23574 median: 23574 (20%) max: 23684 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 68% 31% 37% 100%
3DMark Vantage 3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA T600 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
344838 Points (100%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
25155 Points (7%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA T600 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
30400 Points (17%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
24697 Points (14%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 81%
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
46380 Points (51%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA T600
43997 Points (57%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
31003 Points (41%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 70%
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
32.7 fps (11%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 278 avg: 282 median: 283 (42%) max: 285 Seconds
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 102%
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 256 avg: 263.3 median: 265 (99%) max: 269 Seconds
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 650%
SPECviewperf 12 specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA T600 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
115 fps (29%)
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
116 fps (29%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA T600 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
68.6 fps (10%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
128 fps (19%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA T600 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
35.3 fps (8%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
96.6 fps (21%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA T600 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
19.5 fps (5%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA T600 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
67.4 fps (18%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
77.6 fps (21%)
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA T600 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
5 fps (4%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA T600 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
78.5 fps (31%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
131 fps (52%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA T600 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
76.9 fps (13%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
122 fps (20%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA T600 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
80 fps (14%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
175 fps (31%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA T600 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
114 fps (31%)
specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 95 avg: 98.8 median: 95.8 (26%) max: 105.68 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 84% 93%
specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 112.1 avg: 121.1 median: 121.1 (32%) max: 130 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 100% 78% 87% 92%
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA T600 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
122 fps (14%)
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 95.8 avg: 101.7 median: 99.7 (11%) max: 109.67 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 80% 90%
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 225.4 avg: 245.2 median: 245.2 (27%) max: 265 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 86% 43% 49% 100%
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA T600 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
34.9 fps (8%)
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 24.8 avg: 26.1 median: 25.3 (6%) max: 28.06 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 72% 80%
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 89.3 avg: 93 median: 93 (20%) max: 96.6 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 74% 28% 31% 100%
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA T600 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
35.7 fps (7%)
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 34.5 avg: 37.2 median: 36.2 (8%) max: 40.74 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 88% 87% 100%
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
81.9 fps (17%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 44% 43% 50% 100%
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA T600 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
99.8 fps (11%)
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 77.5 avg: 82 median: 80.9 (9%) max: 87.57 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 79% 88%
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 162 avg: 185 median: 185 (21%) max: 208 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 95% 49% 54% 100%
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA T600 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
12.6 fps (4%)
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 11.7 avg: 12.4 median: 12 (4%) max: 13.37 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 94% 89% 100%
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
35.3 fps (11%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 36% 34% 38% 100%
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA T600 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
98 fps (14%)
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 82.4 avg: 86.2 median: 85.5 (13%) max: 90.66 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 86% 93%
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 162.1 avg: 186.1 median: 186.1 (27%) max: 210 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 95% 52% 56% 100%
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA T600 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
79.9 fps (14%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 61.6 avg: 63.7 median: 63 (11%) max: 66.38 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 78% 83%
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 129.5 avg: 150.8 median: 150.8 (26%) max: 172 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 97% 48% 51% 100%
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 104 avg: 110.4 median: 109 (12%) max: 118.22 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 90% 100%
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 181.6 avg: 204.8 median: 204.8 (23%) max: 228 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 100% 47% 52% 80%
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k + NVIDIA T600 SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k
16.9 fps (5%)
specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
63.1 fps (19%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 80 W 27% 100%
specvp2020 snx-04 4k + NVIDIA T600 SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
75.6 fps (8%)
specvp2020 snx-04 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
111.4 fps (11%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 80 W 68% 100%
specvp2020 medical-03 4k + NVIDIA T600 SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
4.5 fps (4%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
14.6 fps (14%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 80 W 31% 100%
specvp2020 maya-06 4k + NVIDIA T600 SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
46.1 fps (8%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
75.8 fps (12%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 80 W 61% 100%
specvp2020 energy-03 4k + NVIDIA T600 SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
6.7 fps (1%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
41.4 fps (9%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 80 W 16% 100%
specvp2020 creo-03 4k + NVIDIA T600 SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
32.3 fps (15%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
58.7 fps (28%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 80 W 55% 100%
specvp2020 catia-06 4k + NVIDIA T600 SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
13.8 fps (9%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
36 fps (24%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 80 W 38% 100%
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k + NVIDIA T600 SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
19.4 fps (8%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
45.3 fps (19%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 80 W 43% 100%
specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
min: 46.3 avg: 54 median: 54.3 (11%) max: 61.38 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 82% 100%
specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
114.4 fps (22%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 44% 54% 100%
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 84 avg: 99.4 median: 99.3 (16%) max: 114.82 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 80% 100%
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
181 fps (30%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 51% 63% 100%
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 13.5 avg: 15.6 median: 15.4 (11%) max: 17.87 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 81% 100%
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
38.3 fps (27%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 38% 47% 100%
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 86.9 avg: 98.2 median: 98.1 (14%) max: 109.68 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 84% 100%
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
159.9 fps (23%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 58% 69% 100%
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 10.6 avg: 12.1 median: 12 (10%) max: 13.56 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 83% 100%
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
35.7 fps (29%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 32% 38% 100%
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 44.5 avg: 46.2 median: 45.7 (23%) max: 48.5 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 98%
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
88.3 fps (43%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 53% 52% 100%
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 22.4 avg: 25.6 median: 24.9 (16%) max: 29.58 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 80% 100%
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
60.5 fps (39%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 39% 49% 100%
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 28.3 avg: 30 median: 29.6 (13%) max: 32.03 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 90% 100%
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
64.1 fps (29%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 45% 50% 100%
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA T600 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6830 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T600 Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
104.1 fps (36%)
Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T600 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
227.1 fps (13%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 184.9 avg: 193 median: 189.2 (11%) max: 205 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 82% 90%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 191 avg: 210.5 median: 210.5 (12%) max: 230 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 100% 82% 90% 84%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA T600 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
99.6 % (100%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 100% 100%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
99.6 % (100%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
19 fps (3%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
43.5 fps (3%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
118.3 fps (13%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
172.6 fps (4%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
229.9 fps (13%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
449.9 fps (4%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
1121 Samples/s (5%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
2049 Samples/s (4%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
4825 Points (5%)
5190 Points (6%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 93% 100%
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
76.7 Watt (11%)
min: 34.2 avg: 34.7 median: 34.7 (5%) max: 35.1 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 107%
149.2 Watt (21%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 80 W 113% 121% 100%
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
83.5 Watt (12%)
min: 41.2 avg: 41.3 median: 41.3 (6%) max: 41.4 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 107%
152.8 Watt (21%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 80 W 112% 120% 100%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 42.9 avg: 44.1 median: 44.1 (10%) max: 45.3 Watt
168.4 Watt (37%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 80 W 143% 100%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.4393 avg: 0.4 median: 0.4 (44%) max: 0.4569 fps per Watt
0.4 fps per Watt (37%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 80 W 100% 83%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.3 fps per Watt (27%)
min: 0.4734 avg: 0.5 median: 0.5 (40%) max: 0.483 fps per Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 68% 100%
0.4 fps per Watt (34%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 80 W 68% 100% 86%
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 38.2 avg: 40.4 median: 40.5 (65%) max: 42.5 dB(A)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 93% 100%
Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
48 dB(A) (77%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 82% 89% 100%
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA T600 → 100% n=18 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU → 83% n=18 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q → 198% n=18
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
79%
T550 Laptop GPU:
75 fps
89%
T550 Laptop GPU:
41 fps
90%
T550 Laptop GPU:
38 fps
90%
T550 Laptop GPU:
35 fps
70%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
93.3 fps
74%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
78.8 fps
69%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
66.2 fps
111%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
45.3 fps
167%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
118 fps
248%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
86.5 fps
272%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
68.3 fps
260%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
46.3 fps
298%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
29.7 fps
80%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
131 fps
78%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
116 fps
89%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
107 fps
91%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
101 fps
164%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
65 fps
159%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
221 fps
91%
T550 Laptop GPU:
73 75 78 ~ 75 fps
215%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
178 fps
86%
T550 Laptop GPU:
39 40 43 ~ 41 fps
242%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
115 fps
230%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
62.6 fps
224%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
36 fps
Average Gaming NVIDIA T600 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU → 80% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 82%
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q → 165% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 190%
NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU low med. high ultra QHD 4K F1 22 69 62 43 31 F1 2021 153 74 59 37 Strange Brigade 131 52 42 36 Far Cry 5 75 41 38 35 X-Plane 11.11 70 63 57 Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 62 31 22 Dota 2 Reborn 117 105 95 88 The Witcher 3 128 75 41 21 GTA V 116 114 62 29 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 6 3 3 6 1 6 2 2 4 1
NVIDIA T600 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Far Cry 6 93.5 44.6 21.3 6.33 F1 2021 171.9 78.8 63.7 40.2 29.1 15.7 F1 2020 150.4 73.1 55.5 38.6 27 14.5 Borderlands 3 107.6 42 26.7 19.9 13.4 5.54 Metro Exodus 74.6 34 24 19.4 14.8 8.47 Strange Brigade 174.4 64.9 51.4 44.8 31.9 17.9 Far Cry 5 95 46 42 39 26 12 X-Plane 11.11 132.8 107 95.9 40.8 Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 70.7 34.9 25.1 17.8 9.98 Dota 2 Reborn 162.8 148.6 120.7 110.5 39.6 The Witcher 3 139.1 82.8 47.5 27.2 16.1 GTA V 181.5 175.6 80.3 38.2 26.6 25 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 5 7 5 5 2 4 4 3 1 4 5 1 7 1 9 2
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q low med. high ultra QHD 4K X-Plane 11.11 93.3 78.8 66.2 45.3 Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 118 86.5 68.3 46.3 29.7 Dota 2 Reborn 131 116 107 101 65 The Witcher 3 221 178 115 62.6 36 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 2 2 3 1 4 2 1 1 2 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 29. 12:52:22
#0 checking url part for id 11373 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 11429 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 9882 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 05:41:30 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.16s ... 0.161s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.161s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.161s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11373 +0.048s ... 0.209s
#9 got single benchmarks 11373 +0.008s ... 0.216s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11429 +0.001s ... 0.218s
#11 got single benchmarks 11429 +0.015s ... 0.233s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 9882 +0.017s ... 0.249s
#13 got single benchmarks 9882 +0.008s ... 0.257s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.257s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.448s ... 0.705s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.705s
#17 Got 178 rows for game benchmarks. +0.027s ... 0.733s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.733s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.01s ... 0.743s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.032s ... 0.775s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.775s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.778s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)