Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU

► remove from comparison NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU

The Nvidia T500 Mobile (formerly known as Quadro T500) for laptops is a professional mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). It is based on the consumer GeForce MX450 and features the same 896 cores and a 64 Bit memory bus. Currently it is available with 2 or 4 GB graphics RAM (GDDR5 or GDDR6). The TDP ranges between 18 - 25 Watt depending on the variant. As the MX450, the T500 also supports PCIe 4.0. The chip is manufactured in 12nm FinFET at TSMC. 

The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to up to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal. In contrary to the faster Quadro RTX cards, the T500 does not feature raytracing and Tensor cores.

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

► remove from comparison NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

The Nvidia RTX 3500 Ada Generation is a higher-end professional graphics card for use in laptops that sports 5,120 CUDA cores and 12 GB of ECC GDDR6 VRAM. Brought into existence in 2023, this graphics adapter leverages TSMC's 5 nm process and Nvidia's Ada Lovelace architecture to achieve higher-than-average performance combined with moderate power consumption. The Nvidia-recommended TGP range for the card is very wide at 60 W to 140 W leading to bizarre performance differences between different systems powered by what is supposed to be the same product.

Hardware-wise, the RTX 3500 is a cut-down GeForce RTX 4070 Desktop, as far as we can tell. Consequently, both make use of the AD104 chip and have little difficulty running triple-A games at QHD 1440p.

Quadro series graphics cards ship with a different BIOS and drivers than GeForce cards and are targeted at professional users rather than gaming. Commercial product design, large-scale calculations, simulation, data mining, 24 x 7 operation, certified drivers - if any of this sounds familiar, then a Quadro card will make you happy.

Architecture and Features

Ada Lovelace brings a range of improvements over older graphics cards utilizing the outgoing Ampere architecture. It's not just a better manufacturing process and a higher number of CUDA cores that we have here (up to 16,384 versus 10,752); under-the-hood refinements are plentiful, including an immensely larger L2 cache, an optimized ray tracing routine (a different wat to determine what is transparent and what isn't is used), and other changes. Naturally, these graphics cards can both encode and decode some of the most widely used video codecs, AVC, HEVC and AV1 included; they also support a host of Nvidia technologies, including Optimus and DLSS 3, and they can certainly be used for various AI tasks.

The RTX 3500 Ada features 40 RT cores of the 3rd generation, 160 Tensor cores of the 4th generation and 5,120 CUDA cores. Multiply those numbers by 1.15 and what you get looks exactly like a desktop RTX 4070: 46, 184 and 5,888, respectively. Elsewhere, the graphics card comes with 12 GB of 192-bit wide ECC GDDR6 memory for a very healthy throughput of ~432 GB/s. Error correction can be turned off if desired. The fact that error correction is present here proves that the RTX 3500 Ada is indeed targeted at professional users.

Just like Ampere-based cards, the RTX 3500 makes use of the PCI-Express 4 protocol. 8K SUHD monitors are supported, however, DP 1.4a video outputs may prove to be a bottleneck down the line.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system featuring an RTX 3500 Ada Generation as of February 2024, we have plenty of performance data for the RTX 4070 Desktop, a graphics card that's about 20% superior to the RTX 3500 Ada Generation. Based on that, we fully expect the RTX 3500 to deliver:

  • a Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA score of around 32 seconds
  • a 3DMark 11 GPU score of around 44,000
  • around 90 fps in GTA V (1440p - Highest settings possible, 16x AF, 4x MSAA, FXAA)
  • around 50 fps in Cyberpunk 2077 (1440p - High settings, Ultra RT, "Quality" DLSS)

Nvidia's marketing materials mention "up to 23 TFLOPS" of performance, a 15% improvement over 20 TFLOPS delivered by the RTX 3000 Ada Generation.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the TGP power target of the RTX 3500 is. One other thing worth mentioning is that enabling error correction appears to reduce the amount of video memory that is available to applications and games by up to a gigabyte.

Power consumption

Nvidia no longer divides its laptop graphics cards into Max-Q and non-max-Q models. Instead, laptop makers are free to set the TGP according to their needs, and the range can sometimes be shockingly wide. This is the case for the RTX 3500, as the lowest value recommended for it sits at just 60 W while the highest is more than two times higher at 140 W (this most likely includes Dynamic Boost). The slowest system built around an RTX 3500 Ada can easily be 60% slower than the fastest one. This is the kind of delta that we've been seeing on consumer-grade laptops featuring the latest GeForce RTX cards.

Last but not the least, the improved 5 nm process (TSMC 4N) the RTX 3500 is built with makes for very decent energy efficiency, as of mid 2023.

NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPUNVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
RTX Ada Generation Laptop GPU Series
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) compare 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) compare 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q compare 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) compare 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q compare 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) compare 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q compare 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) compare 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) compare 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 compare 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 9728 @ 0.93 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 20000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 7424 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 5120 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 4608 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 3072 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 2560 96 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 2048 64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
ArchitectureTuringAda Lovelace
Pipelines896 - unified5120 - unified
Core Speed1365 - 1695 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed10000 MHz16000 effective = 2000 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5, GDDR6GDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB12 GB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6DirectX 12 Ultimate, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption25 Watt115 Watt (60 - 115 Watt TGP)
technology12 nm5 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sizedlarge
Date of Announcement27.05.2019 21.03.2023
Raytracing Cores40
Tensor / AI Cores160
Theoretical Performance23 TFLOPS FP32
Memory Bandwidth432 GB/s
PCIe4.0 x16
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a
Link to Manufacturer Pageimages.nvidia.com
PredecessorRTX A3000 Laptop GPU

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - T500 Laptop GPU
1.9 pt (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1627     avg: 1953     median: 1958 (6%)     max: 2270 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1554     avg: 1814     median: 1787.5 (5%)     max: 2127 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 15562     avg: 15975     median: 15851 (17%)     max: 16513 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 22719     avg: 24657     median: 23453 (6%)     max: 27800 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3406     avg: 4047     median: 3973.5 (7%)     max: 4833 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 3696     avg: 4322     median: 4224.5 (5%)     max: 5141 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
80696 Points (10%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 6293     avg: 7692     median: 8132 (11%)     max: 8212 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 6767     avg: 7808     median: 7995.5 (7%)     max: 8475 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
3DMark 06
31133 Points (41%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 64.9     avg: 80.7     median: 82.1 (22%)     max: 93.6 fps
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 71.2     avg: 79.2     median: 77.5 (9%)     max: 90.8 fps
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 16.01     avg: 18.9     median: 16.9 (4%)     max: 23.87 fps
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 24.84     avg: 29.6     median: 28.7 (6%)     max: 36.14 fps
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 48.47     avg: 53.5     median: 51.9 (6%)     max: 62 fps
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 8.57     avg: 9.6     median: 8.7 (3%)     max: 12.41 fps
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 55.8     avg: 62.1     median: 59.2 (9%)     max: 74.3 fps
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 81.9     avg: 88.6     median: 88.3 (10%)     max: 95.8 fps
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 45.15     avg: 51     median: 50.4 (9%)     max: 57.9 fps
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
min: 37.82     avg: 40.2     median: 39.1 (8%)     max: 43.59 fps
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 66.2     avg: 76     median: 68.8 (11%)     max: 93.1 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 10.73     avg: 12.1     median: 11 (8%)     max: 14.74 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 59     avg: 65.5     median: 59.3 (9%)     max: 78.1 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 8.62     avg: 9.7     median: 8.7 (7%)     max: 11.96 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 29.28     avg: 34.7     median: 32.7 (16%)     max: 41.95 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 16.48     avg: 19.2     median: 18 (12%)     max: 23.22 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 19.56     avg: 23.3     median: 21.6 (10%)     max: 28.9 fps
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
156.6 fps (54%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 134     avg: 168.8     median: 173 (10%)     max: 195 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
119 fps (13%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
183 fps (4%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
236 fps (14%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
503 fps (4%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
653 Samples/s (3%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
1976 Samples/s (3%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
4734 Points (5%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45.1     avg: 47.1     median: 47.1 (7%)     max: 49 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 36.6     avg: 43.7     median: 43.7 (6%)     max: 50.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 37.1     avg: 49.9     median: 53 (12%)     max: 59.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.3674     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (38%)     max: 0.4555 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.439     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (37%)     max: 0.4617 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 36.1     avg: 38.1     median: 38.1 (61%)     max: 40.1 dB(A)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
27.8 34.3 ~ 31 fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
14.4 19.3 ~ 17 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
10.9 15 ~ 13 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
10.1  fps
low 1280x720
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
65  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
35  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
29  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
24  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
54.7  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
47.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
42.4  fps
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
100  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
59.8  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
44  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
29.3  fps
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
108 113 ~ 111 fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
33.6 33.8 ~ 34 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
28.8 29.2 ~ 29 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
24.5 25.6 ~ 25 fps
QHD 2560x1440
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
17.9  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
9.6  fps
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
31 72 ~ 52 fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
25 34 ~ 30 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
22 33 ~ 28 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
21 32 ~ 27 fps
low 1280x720
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
47.4 75.6 76.1 81.1 ~ 70 fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
48.1 64.2 69 71.2 ~ 63 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
38.6 56.4 60 65.1 ~ 55 fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
29.4  fps
low 1280x720
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
49.1 50.5 51.1 ~ 50 fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
23.6 23.9 25.2 ~ 24 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
16.5 16.7 16.7 ~ 17 fps
QHD 2560x1440
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
12.4  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
5.7  fps
low 1280x720
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
97.5 133 134 146 ~ 128 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
117 117 117 120 ~ 118 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
77.1 79.2 101 104 ~ 90 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
70.5 71.4 77.8 96.2 ~ 79 fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
27.7  fps
low 1024x768
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
79.2 96.2 114 ~ 96 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
50 50.4 56.9 ~ 52 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
27.6 28.4 31.4 ~ 29 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
16.9 17 21.9 22.3 ~ 20 fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
133 148 ~ 141 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
76.1 118 ~ 97 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
41.1 42.1 ~ 42 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
19 23.2 ~ 21 fps
QHD 2560x1440
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
13.2  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
14  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPUlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Cyberpunk 2077 1.031171310.1
Immortals Fenyx Rising65352924
Star Wars Squadrons54.747.242.4
F1 202010059.84429.3
Strange Brigade11134292517.99.6
Far Cry 552302827
X-Plane 11.1170635529.4
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark50241712.45.73
Dota 2 Reborn128118907927.7
The Witcher 396522920
GTA V14197422113.214
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

3
5
2
2
6
3
6
4
1
7
1
1
3


5


For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 17. 15:13:43

#0 checking url part for id 10605 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11605 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:38:48 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.092s ... 0.093s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.093s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.093s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10605 +0.042s ... 0.136s

#8 got single benchmarks 10605 +0.019s ... 0.155s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11605 +0.002s ... 0.156s

#10 got single benchmarks 11605 +0s ... 0.156s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.156s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.177s ... 0.333s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.333s

#14 Got 100 rows for game benchmarks. +0.016s ... 0.349s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.349s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.008s ... 0.357s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.027s ... 0.383s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.383s

#19 return log +0.044s ... 0.427s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)