Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 258V

AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 is a powerful mobile processor from the Krackan Point family that was announced at CES in early 2025. The APU integrates 8 CPU cores (4x Zen 5 with up to 5 GHz and 4x Zen 5c with less cache and a maximum of 3.5 GHz) and a big 16 MB L3-Cache.

Architecture and features

The Krackan Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores located in separate clusters, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more energy efficient version of the former. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is the size of the cache; the Zen 5 cores have larger caches available.

However, the mobile Zen 5 implementation is reportedly (ChipsAndCheese) is closer to desktop Zen 4 than desktop Zen 5 due to the different cache sizes, large differences in AVX-512 throughput, and other factors.

Elsewhere, the Ryzen AI 7 chip supports DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, giving system designers a choice between lower latency and higher throughput. The chip is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU, which is much more complex than the first generation XDNA, delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

As usual with laptop CPUs, the Ryzen 7 AI chip cannot be replaced by the user as it is soldered.

Performance

Thanks to the Zen 5 architecture and the high clock rates, the CPU performance should be very good.

Graphics

The Radeon 860M is the direct successor to the Radeon 760M and offers 8 cores (CUs = 512 shaders) and clocks at up to 3 GHz. It uses the new RDNA 3.5 architecture.

Power consumption

The AI 350 is said to have a base TDP of 28 W, although laptop manufacturers are free to set the TDP between 15 and 54 W.

The 4 nm TSMC process with which these CPUs are manufactured ensures above-average energy efficiency.

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V

► remove from comparison Intel Core Ultra 7 258V

The Intel Core Ultra 5 258V is an upper mid-range Lunar Lake family processor. This is an SoC for use in tablets and laptops of the slimmer kind that was unveiled in Autumn 2024. It sports 4 new Skymont E-cores and 4 new Lion Cove P-cores running at up to 3.7 GHz and 4.8 GHz respectively, along with the new Arc 140V iGPU and 32 GB of on-package LPDDR5x-8533 RAM. A new 47 TOPS neural engine, Thunderbolt 4 and PCIe 5 SSD support are included as well.

The only difference between this chip and the Ultra 7 256V is the amount of on-package, non-replaceable RAM: 32 GB vs 16 GB respectively.

Architecture and Features

Lunar Lake is built using the Foveros technology (stacking several dies on top of each other and next to each other), just like Meteor Lake was. The new chips make use of the enormous BGA2833 socket interface. Of the 8 cores, not a single one is Hyper-Threading-enabled which is the opposite of what AMD currently does with its Zen 5/5c chips.

Intel claims Lion Cove cores bring a 14% IPC improvement over Redwood Cove. For Skymont and Crestmont, the difference is much higher at 68%. Several tweaks and improvements are present here, such as the Low Latency Fabric that is supposed to make small data transfers between cores/caches a lot faster. The 258V has a very healthy 12 MB of level 3 cache; elsewhere, it has 4 PCIe 5 and 4 PCIe 4 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices, including NVMe SSDs at up to 15.75 GB/s. Thunderbolt 4 support is onboard by default, as is support for CNVi WiFi 7 + BT 5.4 cards from Intel. The 47 TOPS "AI Boost" neural engine is present along with technologies such as Threat Detection to make AI-enabled applications such as the Windows Defender more powerful.

Intel is predicted to get short of on-package RAM in subsequent CPU generations.

Performance

Based on the time we've had with 2 systems powered by the 258V, the chip's multi-thread performance is as good as that of the Core Ultra 7 165U and the Core i7-1360P. Please note that one of the two systems had a higher long-term TDP power target than the Intel-recommended value: 32 W vs 17 W.

Generally speaking, the 288V, 268V, 266V, 258V, 256V are faster than the 238V, 236V, 228V and 226V due to the difference in their last-level cache size (8 MB vs 12 MB) as well as clock speeds. However, the difference in performance between the slowest Lunar Lake chip, the 226V, and the fastest chip, the 288V is fairly small at around 10% to 15%. It depends on the TDP figures of the laptops being pitted against each other more than on anything else.

Graphics

The Arc Graphics 140V is here to replace the Arc 8 iGPU. Its 8 Xe² architecture "cores" run at up to 1,950 MHz and it also has 8 ray tracing units at its disposal. The adapter is DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled and able to HW-decode a long list of popular video codecs such as h.266 VVC, h.265 HEVC, h.264 AVC, AV1 and VP9. Three SUHD 4320p monitors can be used simultaneously with this iGPU.

All 2023 and 2024 games are playable at 1080p on low graphics settings or higher with this iGPU. We got well over 30 fps in Ghost of Tsushima and almost 40 fps in Baldur's Gate 3. This means the Radeon 780M gets left behind while the Radeon 890M reigns supreme.

Power consumption

This 2nd generation Core Ultra processor is supposed to consume 17 W when under long-term workloads. The Intel-recommended short-term power limit for the chip sits at 37 W.

ModelAMD Ryzen AI 7 350Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
CodenameKrackan Point (Zen 5)Lunar Lake
Clock2000 - 5000 MHz2200 - 4800 MHz
L2 Cache8 MB14 MB
L3 Cache16 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
4 x 5.0 GHz AMD Zen 5
4 x 3.5 GHz AMD Zen 5c
8 / 8
4 x 4.8 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
TDP28 Watt17 Watt
TDP Turbo PL254 Watt37 Watt
Technology4 nm3 nm
SocketFP8BGA2833
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4ALPDDR5x-8533 RAM, PCIe 5 + PCIe 4, USB 4, AI Boost NPU (47 TOPS), Thread Director, PSE, Threat Detection, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNi, FMA3, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon 860M ( - 3000 MHz)Intel Arc Graphics 140V (300 - 1950 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com
SeriesIntel Lunar Lake
Series: Lunar Lake Lunar Lake
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 266V compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V « 2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V compare2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 238V compare2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 236V compare2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V compare2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V compare2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
L1 Cache1.4 MB
max. Temp.100 °C

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI 7 350
40.9 pt (68%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Core Ultra 7 258V
38.2 pt (64%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 113.5     avg: 116     median: 115.5 (65%)     max: 119 Points
min: 107.8     avg: 118.6     median: 119.7 (67%)     max: 123 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 720     avg: 895     median: 911 (17%)     max: 1011 Points
min: 406     avg: 552     median: 572 (11%)     max: 660 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 12647     avg: 15646     median: 15793 (15%)     max: 17899 Points
min: 7920     avg: 10141     median: 10358.5 (10%)     max: 11097 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1916     avg: 1959     median: 1954 (82%)     max: 2006 Points
min: 1664     avg: 1852     median: 1860 (78%)     max: 1947 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 751     avg: 768     median: 768.5 (84%)     max: 784 Points
min: 643     avg: 710     median: 715.5 (78%)     max: 749 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4897     avg: 6107     median: 6245.5 (15%)     max: 6990 Points
min: 3130     avg: 3936     median: 4027.5 (10%)     max: 4314 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1932     avg: 2446     median: 2454.5 (15%)     max: 2734 Points
min: 1280     avg: 1572     median: 1597.5 (10%)     max: 1656 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 204     avg: 276     median: 295 (82%)     max: 305 Points
min: 258     avg: 283.6     median: 285.5 (79%)     max: 298 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 28.96     avg: 29.9     median: 29.9 (39%)     max: 30.75 Points
19.7 Points (25%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.59     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (85%)     max: 3.6 Points
3.4 Points (80%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8478     avg: 8482     median: 8482 (51%)     max: 8486 Points
9982 Points (60%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 48792     avg: 49866     median: 49865.5 (36%)     max: 50939 Points
36479 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
89153 Points (57%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15483 Points (19%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 68.229     avg: 171     median: 171 (2%)     max: 273.713 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.069     avg: 4.5     median: 4.5 (1%)     max: 5.935 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
296.1 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
9.2 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6.46     avg: 3177     median: 3176.7 (5%)     max: 6347 Points
8536 Points (14%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 48124     avg: 56861     median: 58647 (34%)     max: 64653 MIPS
min: 28482     avg: 34718     median: 35758 (21%)     max: 36724 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5544     avg: 6017     median: 6045.5 (71%)     max: 6371 MIPS
min: 5265     avg: 5684     median: 5691.5 (67%)     max: 5869 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
155.1 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
319 fps (8%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 16.2     avg: 20.2     median: 20.6 (36%)     max: 22.9 fps
min: 9.65     avg: 12.3     median: 12.4 (22%)     max: 14.2 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (31%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
1.2 GB/s (35%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.8     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (32%)     max: 1.9 GB/s
1.4 GB/s (24%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 9.1     avg: 9.8     median: 9.8 (26%)     max: 10.5 GB/s
7.6 GB/s (20%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 281     avg: 359.2     median: 323 (4%)     max: 630 Seconds
min: 509     avg: 601     median: 585.5 (7%)     max: 772 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 182     avg: 223.7     median: 200 (1%)     max: 386 Seconds
min: 315     avg: 359.3     median: 353.5 (2%)     max: 452 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.403     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4934 sec
min: 0.443     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4852 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 14510     avg: 15492     median: 15605 (33%)     max: 16362 Points
10693 Points (23%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.541     avg: 8.7     median: 8.7 (2%)     max: 8.947 s
8.1 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 18.179     avg: 31.9     median: 31.9 (1%)     max: 45.607 s
17.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
8.7 s (0%)
418.4 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 72985     avg: 76362     median: 77404 (59%)     max: 78696 Points
40813 Points (31%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 13154     avg: 19242     median: 19672 (48%)     max: 22636 Points
min: 12322     avg: 14881     median: 15289.5 (38%)     max: 15903 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 74698     avg: 77067     median: 77668.5 (63%)     max: 78233 Points
94008 Points (76%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 77917     avg: 78292     median: 78291.5 (64%)     max: 78666 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 72599     avg: 75260     median: 75259.5 (60%)     max: 77920 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16181     avg: 18316     median: 18475.5 (47%)     max: 20125 Points
min: 10515     avg: 13408     median: 13744 (35%)     max: 14569 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 21629     avg: 27400     median: 28243 (50%)     max: 29881 Points
min: 15893     avg: 20642     median: 21092 (38%)     max: 22333 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8566     avg: 10081     median: 10182 (43%)     max: 11314 Points
min: 2097     avg: 6580     median: 7002 (30%)     max: 8295 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 1874     avg: 2783     median: 2854 (71%)     max: 2942 Points
min: 2593     avg: 2740     median: 2755.5 (69%)     max: 2795 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 10774     avg: 13005     median: 13350 (52%)     max: 14194 Points
min: 9311     avg: 10876     median: 10972.5 (43%)     max: 11334 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 805     avg: 1888     median: 2065.5 (81%)     max: 2155 Points
min: 1891     avg: 1995     median: 2005.5 (78%)     max: 2046 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6705     avg: 11120     median: 11341.5 (20%)     max: 12968 Points
min: 7717     avg: 9514     median: 9654 (17%)     max: 9864 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1247     avg: 1736     median: 1970 (9%)     max: 1992 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10194     avg: 11057     median: 11207 (35%)     max: 11769 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5708     avg: 7251     median: 7765 (78%)     max: 8281 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 41544     avg: 42707     median: 41591 (41%)     max: 44985 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 431     avg: 489.8     median: 437 (1%)     max: 693 ms
min: 468     avg: 484.5     median: 475 (1%)     max: 559 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 105563     avg: 114061     median: 115427 (84%)     max: 119825 Points
min: 94615     avg: 107955     median: 112290 (82%)     max: 113526 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 193.1     avg: 251.1     median: 261 (72%)     max: 277 Points
min: 199.5     avg: 269.7     median: 279.5 (77%)     max: 291 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 256     avg: 301.7     median: 314 (56%)     max: 336 Points
min: 219     avg: 284.2     median: 294.5 (53%)     max: 314 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1452     avg: 1767     median: 1762 (66%)     max: 2005 Points
min: 1590     avg: 1689     median: 1706.5 (64%)     max: 1742 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 39.8     avg: 74.6     median: 68.1 (12%)     max: 106.6 Watt
min: 28     avg: 44.8     median: 44.3 (8%)     max: 55.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 39.2     avg: 77.5     median: 74.7 (14%)     max: 115.7 Watt
min: 38.2     avg: 53.6     median: 54.1 (10%)     max: 61.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.7     avg: 11.1     median: 5.5 (4%)     max: 56.4 Watt
min: 1.484     avg: 4.5     median: 4.3 (3%)     max: 7.21 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.05     avg: 6.7     median: 6.8 (8%)     max: 8.5 Watt
min: 2.25     avg: 5.1     median: 5.5 (7%)     max: 9.04 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 21     avg: 34     median: 34.5 (26%)     max: 49.3 Points per Watt
min: 26.1     avg: 29.6     median: 29.2 (22%)     max: 33.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 → 100% n=41

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 258V → 88% n=41

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 22. 03:17:07

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 19172 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17995 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1758503827s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Sep 2025 05:18:53 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 19172 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 19172 +0.021s ... 0.03s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17995 +0.002s ... 0.032s

#10 got single benchmarks 17995 +0.004s ... 0.036s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.036s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.053s ... 0.089s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.09s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)