Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs AMD Ryzen 9 4900H vs AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 PRO 7940HS

The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is a fast high-end laptop processor of the Phoenix series. It offers 8 cores (octa core) based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (16 threads). The cores clock from 4 (base) up to 5.2 GHz (single core boost). The processor includes 8 MB L2 cache and 16 MB L3 cache.

Compared to the consumer Ryzen 9 7940HS, the PRO models offer additional security, manageability, and reliability features designed for professional users and workstation environments.

The performance of the R9 PRO 7940HS should be slightly higher than the old top model Ryzen 9 6980HX (8 Zen 3 cores with up to 4.9 GHz) at 54W TDP and Ryzen 9 6980HS at 35W TDP. Compared to the higher end Dragon Range series, the 7940HS should be similar to the Ryzen 7 7745HX (also 8 Zen 4 cores, max 5.1 GHz, 55W tDP, 32 MB L3).

The chip integrates a modern and fasts RDNA 3 graphics card (iGPU) called Radeon 780M with 12 CUs and up to 2.8 GHz clock speed. Furthermore, the Phoenix series include a video engine with AV1 de- and encoding, a new Xilinx FPGA based XDNA AI accelerator (Ryzen AI) that should be faster than the AI engine in the Apple M2 SOC and a dual-channel DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 memory controller (with ECC support). The connectivity features includes 2 possible USB 4 (40 Gbps) ports and 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes for a GPU and SSDs.

The Phoenix series uses a single monolithic design (unlike the chiplet design of the 7045HX series) and is manufactured in the modern 4nm process at TSMC. The TDP can be configured between 35 and 45 Watt.

AMD Ryzen 9 4900H

► remove from comparison AMD R9 4900H

The AMD Ryzen 9 4900H is a mobile SoC for big laptops based on the Renoir architecture. At the time of announcement in March 2020 it is the fastest model of the 4000H series. The R9 4900H integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3.3 (guaranteed base clock) to  4.4 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured in the modern 7 nm process at TSMC and partly thanks to it AMD advertises a 2x improved performance per Watt for the Renoir chips

According to our information, the Ryzen 9 4900H is only slightly faster than the Ryzen 7 4800H. The CPU is clocked 400 MHz (base +14%) to 200 MHz (boost +5%) higher, but the gains greatly depend on the cooling and TDP settings. Compared to Intel chips, the i9-9980HK top model should be comparable. That means the Ryzen 9 4900H should be able to handle all demanding tasks and gaming.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 8 integrated graphics card with 8 CUs. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 12 MB level 3 cache can be found on the chip. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information.

The TDP of the APU is specified at 45 Watt (default). That means the chip is intended for big and relatively heavy laptops.

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 7840HS

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is a powerful Phoenix family chip that saw the light of day in H1 2023. The processor features 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at 3.8 GHz. The highest Boost clock speed achievable is 5.1 GHz.

Not only does this APU has full might of the Zen 4 architecture at its disposal, it also comes with the new Ryzen AI technology that's set to make generative AI more ubiquitous than ever before. Last but not the least, the Radeon 780M serves as the integrated GPU.

Architecture & Features

Phoenix family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Dragon Range family chips are. The latter however lacks hardware AI workload acceleration capabilities that Phoenix has. Ryzen AI is coming after Intel's DL Boost and GNA technologies; time will tell if this move by AMD is a good idea.

Perhaps more importantly, Zen 4 introduces AVX512 support (which Zen 3 chips did not have) and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is set to bring a double-digit IPC improvement.

Elsewhere, the 7840HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a seriously fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600, ECC-enabled memory included). PCI-Express speeds are capped at 1.97 GB/s per lane which corresponds to the 4.0 spec.

This Ryzen 7 series chip is designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 or Linux; please note that it isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The average 7840HS in our database is in the same league as the Core i7-12700H, Core i7-12850HX, Core i9-12900H, Core i9-13900H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very fast chip, as of Q3 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,700 MHz) is capable of powering 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (AV1, HEVC, AVC). As far as gaming is concerned, the thing will let you play most games at 1080p as long as you are fine with moderate quality settings. Long story short, this is the best iGPU money can buy, as of H2 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing insanely fast. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this APU.

The 7840HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HSAMD Ryzen 9 4900HAMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
CodenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4)Renoir-H (Zen 2)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
Series: Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H « 3.3 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H2.9 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H3 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock4000 - 5200 MHz3300 - 4400 MHz3800 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB4 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB8 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 168 / 16
TDP35 Watt45 Watt35 Watt
Technology4 nm7 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP8FP6FP7/FP7r2/FP8
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1750 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA, SHADDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 PRO 7940HS
44.1 pt (61%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 4900H
35.4 pt (49%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 7840HS
45.7 pt (63%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
min: 101     avg: 104.5     median: 105 (73%)     max: 107 Points
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
min: 880     avg: 918     median: 918 (17%)     max: 956 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 14919     avg: 15603     median: 14953 (14%)     max: 16938 Points
min: 11416     avg: 11604     median: 11604 (11%)     max: 11792 Points
min: 15515     avg: 16432     median: 16282.5 (15%)     max: 17214 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1568     avg: 1708     median: 1762 (75%)     max: 1794 Points
min: 1290     avg: 1294     median: 1294 (55%)     max: 1298 Points
min: 1737     avg: 1771     median: 1775 (75%)     max: 1812 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 611     avg: 665     median: 689 (77%)     max: 695 Points
min: 482     avg: 493.5     median: 493.5 (55%)     max: 505 Points
min: 661     avg: 686     median: 689 (77%)     max: 705 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5790     avg: 6068     median: 5812 (14%)     max: 6601 Points
min: 4233     avg: 4409     median: 4409 (11%)     max: 4585 Points
min: 6061     avg: 6418     median: 6361.5 (16%)     max: 6744 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2356     avg: 2478     median: 2360 (15%)     max: 2718 Points
min: 1886     avg: 1927     median: 1926.5 (12%)     max: 1967 Points
min: 2473     avg: 2592     median: 2565 (16%)     max: 2729 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 247     avg: 267.3     median: 275 (83%)     max: 280 Points
min: 192     avg: 193     median: 193 (58%)     max: 194 Points
min: 270     avg: 277.9     median: 279 (84%)     max: 286 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
23 Points (30%)
min: 29.7     avg: 30     median: 30 (39%)     max: 30.25 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.2 Points (56%)
min: 3.29     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (82%)     max: 3.33 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5946 Points (36%)
min: 7574     avg: 7642     median: 7641.5 (46%)     max: 7709 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
40253 Points (29%)
min: 45602     avg: 47933     median: 47933 (35%)     max: 50264 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
65380 Points (45%)
min: 83726     avg: 85395     median: 85395 (59%)     max: 87064 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
10173 Points (12%)
min: 14015     avg: 14096     median: 14096 (17%)     max: 14177 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
82.9 s (1%)
min: 71.922     avg: 72.4     median: 72.4 (1%)     max: 72.819 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.2 s (1%)
min: 2.626     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (1%)     max: 2.658 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4297 Points (7%)
min: 6428     avg: 7064     median: 7063.5 (11%)     max: 7699 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 61111     avg: 63409     median: 61303 (35%)     max: 67813 MIPS
48976 MIPS (28%)
min: 59538     avg: 69052     median: 70243 (40%)     max: 73035 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5844     avg: 6185     median: 6215 (74%)     max: 6497 MIPS
4727 MIPS (57%)
min: 6049     avg: 6559     median: 6632 (79%)     max: 6754 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
111 fps (39%)
min: 144.1     avg: 146.7     median: 146.7 (51%)     max: 149.3 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
215 fps (50%)
min: 281.5     avg: 289.8     median: 289.8 (67%)     max: 298 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 17     avg: 18.2     median: 17.3 (30%)     max: 20.4 fps
12.9 fps (23%)
min: 11.7     avg: 19.8     median: 20.4 (36%)     max: 21.8 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.2 GB/s (0%)
1.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
2.1 GB/s (36%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
7.4 GB/s (19%)
min: 14.7     avg: 14.8     median: 14.8 (39%)     max: 14.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 305     avg: 331     median: 343 (4%)     max: 345 Seconds
min: 298     avg: 324.8     median: 318 (4%)     max: 463 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 191     avg: 206.7     median: 214 (2%)     max: 215 Seconds
247.3 Seconds (2%)
min: 185     avg: 198.7     median: 196 (1%)     max: 229 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4462     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4835 sec
0.6 sec (12%)
min: 0.4184     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4739 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 15312     avg: 15685     median: 15663 (33%)     max: 16073 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.5 s (2%)
min: 7.112     avg: 7.9     median: 7.9 (2%)     max: 8.774 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
24.1 s (1%)
min: 17.697     avg: 19.5     median: 19.5 (1%)     max: 21.271 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
729 s (3%)
min: 655.388     avg: 690     median: 689.9 (3%)     max: 724.411 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
64532 Points (57%)
min: 76708     avg: 82457     median: 83358.5 (73%)     max: 85884 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17734     avg: 19358     median: 18994.5 (51%)     max: 21708 Points
12199 Points (33%)
min: 17320     avg: 22184     median: 22615 (61%)     max: 25584 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
63266 Points (51%)
min: 77280     avg: 89035     median: 91414 (74%)     max: 93910 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
63416 Points (51%)
min: 84349     avg: 89853     median: 91645 (74%)     max: 93208 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
69343 Points (58%)
min: 84416     avg: 91454     median: 92596 (78%)     max: 95508 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 18622     avg: 18646     median: 18646 (47%)     max: 18670 Points
15719 Points (40%)
min: 13602     avg: 19711     median: 20681 (52%)     max: 21602 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 24750     avg: 25817     median: 25765.5 (46%)     max: 26986 Points
20613 Points (37%)
min: 24338     avg: 27680     median: 27921 (50%)     max: 29343 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8500     avg: 9183     median: 9056.5 (38%)     max: 10117 Points
6523 Points (27%)
min: 9433     avg: 11035     median: 11145 (47%)     max: 12218 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2339     avg: 2519     median: 2605 (70%)     max: 2614 Points
min: 2585     avg: 2662     median: 2670 (72%)     max: 2721 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 10095     avg: 11157     median: 10348 (41%)     max: 13028 Points
min: 12111     avg: 12974     median: 13100 (52%)     max: 13498 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1758     avg: 1894     median: 1956 (83%)     max: 1969 Points
min: 1230     avg: 1232     median: 1231.5 (52%)     max: 1233 Points
min: 1837     avg: 1968     median: 1967 (83%)     max: 2017 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9897     avg: 10631     median: 9959 (18%)     max: 12038 Points
min: 7224     avg: 8012     median: 8012 (14%)     max: 8800 Points
min: 8446     avg: 11651     median: 11872 (21%)     max: 12339 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1237 Points (5%)
min: 1834     avg: 1896     median: 1900 (8%)     max: 1936 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7624 Points (24%)
min: 8572     avg: 11439     median: 11933 (38%)     max: 12278 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5287 Points (53%)
min: 7924     avg: 8100     median: 8148 (81%)     max: 8166 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
28402 Points (31%)
min: 47599     avg: 48417     median: 48498 (53%)     max: 48906 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 532     avg: 547     median: 546 (1%)     max: 564 ms
767 ms (1%)
min: 485     avg: 508     median: 508 (1%)     max: 544 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
77466 Points (70%)
min: 91356     avg: 91588     median: 91577 (82%)     max: 91831 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 229     avg: 247     median: 252 (72%)     max: 255 Points
min: 220     avg: 261.3     median: 263 (76%)     max: 319 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 279     avg: 296.7     median: 296 (62%)     max: 315 Points
227 Points (47%)
min: 288     avg: 316.9     median: 322 (67%)     max: 339 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1423     avg: 1538     median: 1555 (60%)     max: 1635 Points
min: 1566     avg: 1770     median: 1801 (69%)     max: 1993 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 59     avg: 78.4     median: 61.3 (11%)     max: 114.8 Watt
73.2 Watt (13%)
min: 64.7     avg: 94.4     median: 89.6 (15%)     max: 137.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 62     avg: 79.3     median: 63 (12%)     max: 113 Watt
105.3 Watt (19%)
min: 74.7     avg: 102.2     median: 93 (17%)     max: 135.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.3     avg: 6.2     median: 6.3 (4%)     max: 7.86 Watt
min: 4.73     avg: 14.6     median: 11.8 (8%)     max: 59.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 6.65     avg: 7.4     median: 7.1 (8%)     max: 8.33 Watt
min: 7.09     avg: 13.7     median: 12.6 (14%)     max: 35.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 37.4     avg: 37.8     median: 37.8 (28%)     max: 38.1 Points per Watt
18.7 Points per Watt (14%)
min: 20.1     avg: 27     median: 28.4 (21%)     max: 33.2 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS → 100% n=19

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 4900H → 79% n=19

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS → 108% n=19

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 21. 23:34:58

#0 checking url part for id 15052 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11929 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14948 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 May 2024 05:35:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.042s ... 0.043s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.043s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 15052 +0.018s ... 0.061s

#8 got single benchmarks 15052 +0.016s ... 0.077s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11929 +0.017s ... 0.095s

#10 got single benchmarks 11929 +0.012s ... 0.106s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 14948 +0.014s ... 0.12s

#12 got single benchmarks 14948 +0.068s ... 0.188s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.188s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.414s ... 0.602s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.602s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)