Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS vs AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 7940HS

The Ryzen 9 7940HS is a powerful Phoenix family APU that saw the light of day in H1 2023. Its 8 cores are powered by the Zen 4 architecture and are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads. 4.0 GHz is the base clock speed and the highest Boost clock speed achievable is 5.2 GHz.

The 7940HS introduces Ryzen AI which is AMD's answer to Intel's DL Boost and GNA technologies. The Radeon 780M serves as the integrated graphics adapter.

Architecture & Features

Phoenix family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Dragon Range family chips are. The latter however lacks hardware AI workload acceleration capabilities that Phoenix has. Ryzen AI is set to give applications such as DaVinci Resolve and Photoshop quite a bit of generative AI magic.

More importantly, Zen 4 introduces AVX512 support (which Zen 3 chips did not have) and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement.

The 7940HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast RAM (up to LPDDR5x-7500 or DDR5-5600, including ECC-enabled memory). The processor is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt; PCIe support is limited to the 4.0 spec for a throughput of 1.97 GB/s per lane.

OS support is limited to 64-bit editions of Windows 11 and Windows 10 and of course to Linux. Note that the chip isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable as it gets soldered down for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The average 7940HS in our database is in the same league as the Core i9-12900HK and also, somewhat disappointingly, the Ryzen 7 7840HS, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 80 W, the ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY is among the fastest laptops built around the 7940HS that we know of. It can be about 15% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) running at up to 2,800 MHz. This is a very fast iGPU, as of late 2023. It will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p, and it is also capable of HW-encoding and HW-decoding most video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1, but more importantly it is fast enough for proper 1080p gaming as long as one is fine with low to medium detail settings.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of the system is, how fast the RAM of the system is (there is no dedicated VRAM).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 9 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving laptop makers a choice between longer battery life and higher performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a system powered by this chip.

The 7940HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

► remove from comparison AMD Z1 Extreme

The AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme is a fast high-end laptop processor of the Phoenix series and fastest model of the U-series. It offers 8 cores (octa core) based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports SMT (hyperthreading , 16 threads). The cores clock from 3.3 (base) up to 5.1 GHz (single core boost). The processor includes 8 MB L2 cache and 16 MB L3 cache.

The performance of the R7 7840U is, depending on the workload, only slightly below the Ryzen 7 7840HS (higher base clock speed and TDP). Compared to the previous generation Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, the 7840U is clearly faster thanks to the Zen 4 architecture and higher clock speeds. Compared to the similar Ryzen 7 7840U, the Z1 Extreme offers no AI engine.

The chip integrates a modern and fasts RDNA 3 graphics card (iGPU) called Radeon 780M with 12 CUs and up to 2.7 GHz clock speed. Furthermore, the Phoenix series include a video engine with AV1 de- and encoding, a new Xilinx FPGA based XDNA AI accelerator (Ryzen AI) that should be faster than the AI engine in the Apple M2 SOC and a dual-channel DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 memory controller (with ECC support). The connectivity features includes 2 possible USB 4 (40 Gbps) ports and 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes for a GPU and SSDs.

The Phoenix series uses a single monolithic design (unlike the chiplet design of the 7045HX series) and is manufactured in the modern 4nm process at TSMC. The TDP can be configured between 15 and 30 Watt.

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 PRO 7840U

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U is a fast high-end laptop processor of the Phoenix series and fastest model of the U-series. It offers 8 cores (octa core) based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (16 threads). The cores clock from 3.3 (base) up to 5.1 GHz (single core boost). The processor includes 8 MB L2 cache and 16 MB L3 cache.

Compared to the consumer Ryzen 7 7840U, the PRO models offer additional security, manageability, and reliability features designed for professional users and workstation environments.

The performance of the R7 PRO 7840U is, depending on the workload, only slightly below the Ryzen 7 7840HS (higher base clock speed and TDP). Compared to the previous generation Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, the 7840U is clearly faster thanks to the Zen 4 architecture and higher clock speeds.

The chip integrates a modern and fasts RDNA 3 graphics card (iGPU) called Radeon 780M with 12 CUs and up to 2.7 GHz clock speed. Furthermore, the Phoenix series include a video engine with AV1 de- and encoding, a new Xilinx FPGA based XDNA AI accelerator (Ryzen AI) that should be faster than the AI engine in the Apple M2 SOC and a dual-channel DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 memory controller (with ECC support). The connectivity features includes 2 possible USB 4 (40 Gbps) ports and 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes for a GPU and SSDs.

The Phoenix series uses a single monolithic design (unlike the chiplet design of the 7045HX series) and is manufactured in the modern 4nm process at TSMC. The TDP can be configured between 15 and 30 Watt.

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 7940HSAMD Ryzen Z1 ExtremeAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
CodenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4)Phoenix (Zen 4)Phoenix (Zen 4)
Series: Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) Phoenix (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Clock4000 - 5200 MHz3300 - 5100 MHz3300 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB8 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 168 / 168 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP35 Watt30 Watt28 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 7940HS
46.2 pt (64%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Z1 Extreme
43.8 pt (61%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 PRO 7840U
42.7 pt (59%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
min: 104     avg: 106     median: 106 (74%)     max: 108 Points
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
min: 824     avg: 912     median: 937.5 (17%)     max: 972 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 15556     avg: 16952     median: 16985 (16%)     max: 18131 Points
min: 13004     avg: 13982     median: 13982 (13%)     max: 14960 Points
min: 12929     avg: 13952     median: 13869 (13%)     max: 15142 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1733     avg: 1787     median: 1791 (76%)     max: 1832 Points
min: 1733     avg: 1756     median: 1756 (75%)     max: 1779 Points
min: 1703     avg: 1721     median: 1717 (73%)     max: 1747 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 680     avg: 701     median: 702 (78%)     max: 714 Points
min: 672     avg: 682     median: 682 (76%)     max: 692 Points
min: 652     avg: 669     median: 670 (74%)     max: 684 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6277     avg: 6635     median: 6640 (16%)     max: 7111 Points
min: 5109     avg: 5467     median: 5467 (13%)     max: 5825 Points
min: 4970     avg: 5450     median: 5424 (13%)     max: 5981 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2470     avg: 2687     median: 2663 (17%)     max: 2848 Points
min: 2050     avg: 2224     median: 2223.5 (14%)     max: 2397 Points
min: 2014     avg: 2223     median: 2229 (14%)     max: 2418 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 277     avg: 283.7     median: 284 (86%)     max: 288 Points
min: 268     avg: 274     median: 274 (83%)     max: 280 Points
min: 263     avg: 267     median: 266 (80%)     max: 273 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 29.8     avg: 30.3     median: 30.3 (39%)     max: 30.88 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.34     avg: 3.4     median: 3.4 (85%)     max: 3.46 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7798     avg: 7881     median: 7880.5 (48%)     max: 7963 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 47982     avg: 48914     median: 48913.5 (35%)     max: 49845 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 84721     avg: 86625     median: 86625 (60%)     max: 88529 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 14300     avg: 14516     median: 14515.5 (18%)     max: 14731 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 66.801     avg: 82.5     median: 82.5 (1%)     max: 98.222 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.648     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 2.698 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7439     avg: 7465     median: 7464.5 (12%)     max: 7490 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 66408     avg: 70832     median: 70707 (41%)     max: 73434 MIPS
min: 56966     avg: 59812     median: 59811.5 (34%)     max: 62657 MIPS
min: 57056     avg: 59146     median: 58603 (34%)     max: 62320 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6417     avg: 6643     median: 6642 (79%)     max: 6776 MIPS
6316 MIPS (76%)
min: 5633     avg: 5846     median: 5881 (70%)     max: 5988 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 140.8     avg: 145.8     median: 145.8 (51%)     max: 150.8 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 292.5     avg: 298.5     median: 298.5 (69%)     max: 304.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 20.1     avg: 21.1     median: 20.9 (37%)     max: 22.6 fps
min: 16.3     avg: 17.4     median: 17.4 (30%)     max: 18.4 fps
min: 15.9     avg: 16.8     median: 16.7 (29%)     max: 17.8 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.3     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (0%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.1 GB/s (36%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 14.8     avg: 15     median: 15 (39%)     max: 15.1 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 287     avg: 306.9     median: 305 (4%)     max: 331 Seconds
min: 366     avg: 406     median: 406 (5%)     max: 446 Seconds
min: 354     avg: 384.8     median: 387.5 (5%)     max: 410 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 182     avg: 190.4     median: 188.5 (1%)     max: 202 Seconds
213 Seconds (2%)
min: 217     avg: 234.3     median: 236 (2%)     max: 248 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4159     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4467 sec
min: 0.4447     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4662 sec
min: 0.4658     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4807 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 14891     avg: 15553     median: 15689 (33%)     max: 15851 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.058     avg: 7.3     median: 7.3 (2%)     max: 7.442 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.513     avg: 18     median: 18 (1%)     max: 18.402 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 529.929     avg: 531     median: 531.4 (2%)     max: 532.8 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 74246     avg: 80834     median: 80476.5 (70%)     max: 86583 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 16799     avg: 22601     median: 22587.5 (61%)     max: 25006 Points
min: 15202     avg: 18389     median: 19181 (52%)     max: 20784 Points
min: 16111     avg: 17318     median: 17331.5 (47%)     max: 18499 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 79935     avg: 88670     median: 89772 (73%)     max: 96559 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 79450     avg: 88483     median: 89602 (73%)     max: 96418 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 85305     avg: 91108     median: 92030 (78%)     max: 96047 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13400     avg: 19703     median: 21112 (53%)     max: 21353 Points
15761 Points (40%)
min: 16274     avg: 17360     median: 17641 (45%)     max: 18165 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 24034     avg: 28329     median: 28504 (51%)     max: 30876 Points
min: 19305     avg: 23686     median: 25255 (45%)     max: 26499 Points
min: 21327     avg: 23216     median: 23745 (42%)     max: 24045 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 10388     avg: 11211     median: 11210 (47%)     max: 12212 Points
min: 6281     avg: 8857     median: 9704 (41%)     max: 10587 Points
min: 8245     avg: 8428     median: 8405.5 (35%)     max: 8657 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2426     avg: 2618     median: 2630 (80%)     max: 2746 Points
min: 2530     avg: 2534     median: 2534 (77%)     max: 2538 Points
min: 1896     avg: 2330     median: 2467 (75%)     max: 2491 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 9899     avg: 12185     median: 12249 (48%)     max: 13470 Points
min: 10872     avg: 10931     median: 10931 (43%)     max: 10990 Points
min: 7596     avg: 10604     median: 11375.5 (45%)     max: 12069 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1823     avg: 1982     median: 1994.5 (84%)     max: 2032 Points
min: 1896     avg: 1917     median: 1898 (80%)     max: 1956 Points
min: 1740     avg: 1806     median: 1801 (76%)     max: 1881 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11207     avg: 11870     median: 11837.5 (21%)     max: 12500 Points
min: 9589     avg: 10103     median: 9803 (18%)     max: 10917 Points
min: 9663     avg: 10365     median: 10437.5 (19%)     max: 10920 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1764     avg: 1874     median: 1906 (8%)     max: 1918 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11232     avg: 11567     median: 11454 (36%)     max: 12127 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7410     avg: 7856     median: 7904 (79%)     max: 8253 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 45905     avg: 46966     median: 46270 (52%)     max: 48723 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 481     avg: 497.2     median: 499 (1%)     max: 515 ms
556 ms (1%)
min: 526     avg: 557     median: 565.5 (1%)     max: 571 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
89067 Points (80%)
86617 Points (78%)
min: 85772     avg: 87443     median: 87442.5 (79%)     max: 89113 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 234     avg: 261.2     median: 263 (76%)     max: 271 Points
277 Points (80%)
234 Points (67%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 302     avg: 319.9     median: 317 (66%)     max: 349 Points
min: 300     avg: 366     median: 366 (76%)     max: 432 Points
min: 259     avg: 283.5     median: 279 (58%)     max: 317 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1674     avg: 1784     median: 1792 (69%)     max: 1861 Points
1718 Points (66%)
min: 1533     avg: 1595     median: 1588 (61%)     max: 1669 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 70     avg: 103.1     median: 105.2 (18%)     max: 130.1 Watt
42.2 Watt (7%)
min: 39.7     avg: 51.8     median: 54.9 (9%)     max: 57.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 73     avg: 107.5     median: 110.4 (20%)     max: 134 Watt
55.5 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.81     avg: 13.3     median: 15.5 (10%)     max: 20.1 Watt
12.8 Watt (8%)
min: 5.18     avg: 6.9     median: 6.7 (4%)     max: 8.88 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 9.82     avg: 15.9     median: 15.6 (17%)     max: 21.5 Watt
min: 4.95     avg: 8.6     median: 8.6 (10%)     max: 12.3 Watt
min: 4.4     avg: 5.4     median: 5.1 (6%)     max: 7.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 21.9     avg: 26.5     median: 25.5 (19%)     max: 33.8 Points per Watt
40 Points per Watt (30%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme → 92% n=25

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U → 89% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 05. 12:47:44

#0 checking url part for id 14946 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 15017 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15058 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.031s ... 0.032s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.032s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14946 +0.019s ... 0.052s

#8 got single benchmarks 14946 +0.059s ... 0.11s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 15017 +0.017s ... 0.127s

#10 got single benchmarks 15017 +0.011s ... 0.138s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 15058 +0.016s ... 0.154s

#12 got single benchmarks 15058 +0.02s ... 0.174s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.174s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.392s ... 0.566s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.566s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)