Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U vs Intel Core Ultra 9 185H vs Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 PRO 7840U

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U is a fast high-end laptop processor of the Phoenix series and fastest model of the U-series. It offers 8 cores (octa core) based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (16 threads). The cores clock from 3.3 (base) up to 5.1 GHz (single core boost). The processor includes 8 MB L2 cache and 16 MB L3 cache.

Compared to the consumer Ryzen 7 7840U, the PRO models offer additional security, manageability, and reliability features designed for professional users and workstation environments.

The performance of the R7 PRO 7840U is, depending on the workload, only slightly below the Ryzen 7 7840HS (higher base clock speed and TDP). Compared to the previous generation Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, the 7840U is clearly faster thanks to the Zen 4 architecture and higher clock speeds.

The chip integrates a modern and fasts RDNA 3 graphics card (iGPU) called Radeon 780M with 12 CUs and up to 2.7 GHz clock speed. Furthermore, the Phoenix series include a video engine with AV1 de- and encoding, a new Xilinx FPGA based XDNA AI accelerator (Ryzen AI) that should be faster than the AI engine in the Apple M2 SOC and a dual-channel DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 memory controller (with ECC support). The connectivity features includes 2 possible USB 4 (40 Gbps) ports and 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes for a GPU and SSDs.

The Phoenix series uses a single monolithic design (unlike the chiplet design of the 7045HX series) and is manufactured in the modern 4nm process at TSMC. The TDP can be configured between 15 and 30 Watt.

Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 9 185H

The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H is the top-of-the-line Meteor Lake family chip that debuted in December 2023. This 1st Gen Core Ultra processor has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; it has 16 cores (6 + 8 + 2) and 22 threads at its disposal. Its Performance cores, of which there are 6, are SMT-enabled and run at up to 5.1 GHz while its Efficient cores, of which there are 10 (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) run at up to 3.8 GHz. The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.35 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, such as the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestwood architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while the rest of the chip is turned off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes that this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 9 185H comes with 24 MB of L3 cache and a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s. vPro Enterprise and business-centric features such as the Remote Platform Erase are onboard as well. It supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the chip also features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support; fascinatingly enough, Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 185H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

If one chooses to trust the official Intel performance data, then the 185H is not a whole lot faster than the Ryzen 9 6900HX (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.9 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This isn't a ground-breaking result but let's just wait for our in-house testing results instead of jumping to conclusions.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.35 GHz is slated to be a proper alternative to the mighty Radeon 780M. The thing is about as fast as the GTX 1650 (Laptop) and the RTX 2050 (Laptop) to represent some seriously solid performance gains over aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. If one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This mighty Core Ultra 9 series processor has a "base" power consumption of 45 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. A powerful cooling solution will be needed to sort out this chip's hot temper.

The 185H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 5 125H

The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H is a mid-range Meteor Lake family chip that debuted in December 2023. This 1st Gen Core Ultra processor has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; it has 14 cores (4 + 8 + 2) and 18 threads at its disposal. Its Performance cores, of which there are 4, are HT-enabled and run at up to 4.5 GHz while its Efficient cores, of which there are 10 (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island), run at up to 3.6 GHz. The 7-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.20 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, including the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestwood architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while most other parts of the chip are temporarily switched off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 5 125H comes with 18 MB of L3 cache which is a significant reduction compared to the 24 MB that the 155H, the 165H and the 185H have. The processor has a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s; it supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the 125H features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support. It is also worth mentioning that Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 125H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

While we have no way of knowing what the 125H will be like, as of December 2023, it's safe to expect the chip to be slightly slower than the Ryzen 7 7735HS (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.75 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 7-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.20 GHz is set to overshadow the Radeon 760M; just like the 8-core Arc GPU, this graphics adapter is set to be miles ahead of the aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. As long as one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

The Base power consumption, in the case of the 125H, is 28 W while its maximum Turbo power consumption is supposed to be within 115 W. A powerful cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

This Core Ultra 5 series processor is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the fairly modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840UIntel Core Ultra 9 185HIntel Core Ultra 5 125H
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)Intel Intel Meteor Lake-HIntel Intel Meteor Lake-H
CodenamePhoenix (Zen 4)Meteor Lake-HMeteor Lake-H
Series: Intel Meteor Lake-H Meteor Lake-H
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H « 3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Clock3300 - 5100 MHz3800 - 5100 MHz3600 - 4500 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB24 MB18 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
16 / 22
6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
14 / 18
4 x 4.5 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.6 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP28 Watt45 Watt28 Watt
Technology4 nm7 nm7 nm
Die Size178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C110 °C110 °C
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2350 MHz)Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU ( - 2200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
SocketBGA2049BGA2049
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Enterprise, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHADDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Essen., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHA

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 PRO 7840U
42.7 pt (59%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 9 185H
44.2 pt (61%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
110 Points (76%)
100 Points (69%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
1067 Points (20%)
min: 331     avg: 447.5     median: 447.5 (8%)     max: 564 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 12929     avg: 13952     median: 13869 (13%)     max: 15142 Points
min: 12688     avg: 17509     median: 18177 (17%)     max: 19851 Points
min: 9194     avg: 10593     median: 9965 (9%)     max: 12620 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1703     avg: 1721     median: 1717 (73%)     max: 1747 Points
min: 1620     avg: 1802     median: 1830 (78%)     max: 1906 Points
min: 1549     avg: 1638     median: 1655 (70%)     max: 1710 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 652     avg: 669     median: 670 (74%)     max: 684 Points
min: 622     avg: 692     median: 700.5 (78%)     max: 735 Points
min: 633     avg: 648     median: 655 (73%)     max: 655 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4970     avg: 5450     median: 5424 (13%)     max: 5981 Points
min: 4843     avg: 6761     median: 7138.5 (17%)     max: 7651 Points
min: 3673     avg: 4137     median: 3870 (9%)     max: 4869 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2014     avg: 2223     median: 2229 (14%)     max: 2418 Points
min: 1581.9     avg: 2627     median: 2777.5 (18%)     max: 3165 Points
min: 1700     avg: 1848     median: 1702 (11%)     max: 2143 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 263     avg: 267     median: 266 (80%)     max: 273 Points
min: 238     avg: 262.2     median: 264 (80%)     max: 280 Points
min: 236     avg: 243     median: 246 (74%)     max: 247 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
34 Points (44%)
min: 21.9     avg: 24.2     median: 24.2 (31%)     max: 26.4 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (81%)
min: 2.9     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (73%)     max: 2.98 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
10300 Points (62%)
min: 9266     avg: 9335     median: 9334.5 (56%)     max: 9403 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
59935 Points (43%)
min: 45559     avg: 48467     median: 48466.5 (35%)     max: 51374 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
88902 Points (62%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14374 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 292.1     avg: 366.7     median: 366.7 (4%)     max: 441.275 s
296.9 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.254     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (1%)     max: 8.1 s
9.5 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7940     avg: 12898     median: 12898 (20%)     max: 17856 Points
min: 6103     avg: 9592     median: 9591.5 (15%)     max: 13080 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 57056     avg: 59146     median: 58603 (34%)     max: 62320 MIPS
min: 52522     avg: 68353     median: 69924 (40%)     max: 76331 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5633     avg: 5846     median: 5881 (70%)     max: 5988 MIPS
min: 4502     avg: 5318     median: 5524.5 (66%)     max: 5781 MIPS
min: 4663     avg: 4950     median: 5082 (61%)     max: 5106 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
158.2 fps (55%)
129.6 fps (45%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
335.5 fps (77%)
305.3 fps (70%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 15.9     avg: 16.8     median: 16.7 (29%)     max: 17.8 fps
min: 14.1     avg: 19.6     median: 20.8 (37%)     max: 22.7 fps
min: 9.7     avg: 11.3     median: 10.6 (19%)     max: 13.7 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.96     avg: 1     median: 1 (0%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
min: 0.83     avg: 418.9     median: 418.9 (50%)     max: 837 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.4     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (28%)     max: 1.8 GB/s
min: 1.2     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (22%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 7.9     avg: 9.6     median: 9.6 (25%)     max: 11.3 GB/s
min: 8.9     avg: 9     median: 9 (23%)     max: 9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 354     avg: 384.8     median: 387.5 (5%)     max: 410 Seconds
min: 285     avg: 359.7     median: 327.5 (4%)     max: 538 Seconds
min: 523     avg: 620     median: 667 (8%)     max: 671 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 217     avg: 234.3     median: 236 (2%)     max: 248 Seconds
min: 163     avg: 201.2     median: 190 (1%)     max: 285 Seconds
min: 285     avg: 335.3     median: 357 (3%)     max: 364 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4658     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4807 sec
min: 0.4457     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.503 sec
min: 0.503     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.53 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9854     avg: 11420     median: 11420 (24%)     max: 12986 Points
min: 12498     avg: 13225     median: 13225 (28%)     max: 13952 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 6.6     avg: 6.7     median: 6.7 (1%)     max: 6.751 s
min: 7.4     avg: 7.5     median: 7.5 (2%)     max: 7.5 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
14.9 s (1%)
16.5 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
304.4 s (1%)
min: 400.5     avg: 403.6     median: 403.6 (2%)     max: 406.6 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
80494 Points (70%)
min: 43778     avg: 54877     median: 54876.5 (48%)     max: 65975 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 16111     avg: 17318     median: 17331.5 (47%)     max: 18499 Points
min: 12693     avg: 20917     median: 21875 (59%)     max: 24629 Points
min: 12766     avg: 14502     median: 13800 (37%)     max: 16940 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 75240     avg: 75478     median: 75478 (61%)     max: 75716 Points
72226 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 75340     avg: 75417     median: 75417 (61%)     max: 75494 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 78677     avg: 84868     median: 84868 (71%)     max: 91059 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16274     avg: 17360     median: 17641 (45%)     max: 18165 Points
min: 17876     avg: 18479     median: 18664 (47%)     max: 18896 Points
14164 Points (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 21327     avg: 23216     median: 23745 (42%)     max: 24045 Points
min: 21106     avg: 27092     median: 27113 (48%)     max: 30416 Points
min: 16291     avg: 18500     median: 17907 (32%)     max: 21301 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8245     avg: 8428     median: 8405.5 (35%)     max: 8657 Points
min: 6307     avg: 10846     median: 11696 (49%)     max: 12052 Points
min: 6216     avg: 7109     median: 6391 (27%)     max: 8721 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 1896     avg: 2330     median: 2467 (66%)     max: 2491 Points
min: 2199     avg: 2443     median: 2487.5 (67%)     max: 2570 Points
min: 2258     avg: 2282     median: 2279 (61%)     max: 2310 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 7596     avg: 10604     median: 11375.5 (45%)     max: 12069 Points
min: 12825     avg: 13616     median: 13664 (54%)     max: 14160 Points
min: 11192     avg: 11439     median: 11555 (46%)     max: 11571 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1740     avg: 1806     median: 1801 (76%)     max: 1881 Points
min: 1700     avg: 1815     median: 1833.5 (77%)     max: 1902 Points
min: 1630     avg: 1671     median: 1684 (71%)     max: 1699 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9663     avg: 10365     median: 10437.5 (19%)     max: 10920 Points
min: 10441     avg: 12931     median: 13109 (23%)     max: 14230 Points
min: 9696     avg: 10260     median: 10309 (18%)     max: 10775 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1821 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
13228 Points (42%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7602 Points (76%)
6750 Points (67%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
47960 Points (53%)
38736 Points (43%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 526     avg: 557     median: 565.5 (1%)     max: 571 ms
min: 494     avg: 526     median: 515 (1%)     max: 594 ms
min: 560     avg: 574     median: 575 (1%)     max: 588 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 85772     avg: 87443     median: 87442.5 (79%)     max: 89113 Points
min: 90543     avg: 94299     median: 94299 (85%)     max: 98055 Points
min: 85765     avg: 86220     median: 86219.5 (78%)     max: 86674 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
234 Points (67%)
min: 237     avg: 258.3     median: 262.5 (75%)     max: 269 Points
min: 237     avg: 238.5     median: 238.5 (69%)     max: 240 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 259     avg: 283.5     median: 279 (58%)     max: 317 Points
min: 237     avg: 277.7     median: 288.5 (60%)     max: 295 Points
min: 245     avg: 252.7     median: 250 (52%)     max: 263 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1533     avg: 1595     median: 1588 (61%)     max: 1669 Points
min: 1589     avg: 1712     median: 1715 (66%)     max: 1823 Points
min: 1548     avg: 1591     median: 1590.5 (61%)     max: 1633 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 39.7     avg: 51.8     median: 54.9 (9%)     max: 57.9 Watt
min: 44.4     avg: 114.9     median: 125.7 (22%)     max: 176.1 Watt
min: 41.3     avg: 47.4     median: 46.9 (8%)     max: 53.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
55.5 Watt (10%)
min: 88     avg: 142.4     median: 154.9 (28%)     max: 171.8 Watt
min: 56.7     avg: 60.5     median: 60.5 (11%)     max: 64.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 5.18     avg: 6.9     median: 6.7 (4%)     max: 8.88 Watt
min: 5.87     avg: 11.2     median: 11.4 (8%)     max: 19.2 Watt
min: 4.31     avg: 5.3     median: 5.3 (3%)     max: 6.35 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.4     avg: 5.4     median: 5.1 (6%)     max: 7.1 Watt
min: 11.7     avg: 16.6     median: 13 (14%)     max: 28.8 Watt
min: 5.71     avg: 6.7     median: 6.7 (7%)     max: 7.68 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
40 Points per Watt (30%)
min: 18.4     avg: 34     median: 25.3 (19%)     max: 67 Points per Watt
min: 26.5     avg: 28.3     median: 28.3 (21%)     max: 30 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U → 100% n=24

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 9 185H → 112% n=24

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 5 125H → 89% n=24

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 01. 20:26:46

#0 checking url part for id 15058 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16921 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 16911 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:37:57 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.035s ... 0.036s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.036s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 15058 +0.015s ... 0.051s

#8 got single benchmarks 15058 +0.014s ... 0.065s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 16921 +0.014s ... 0.079s

#10 got single benchmarks 16921 +0.032s ... 0.111s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 16911 +0.003s ... 0.114s

#12 got single benchmarks 16911 +0.013s ... 0.127s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.127s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.393s ... 0.521s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.521s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)