Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS vs AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 8845HS

The Ryzen 7 8845HS is a powerful Hawk Point family chip that we believe to be a Ryzen 7 7840HS in disguise but with higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. The R7 8845HS was brought to life in H2 2023; it features 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at up to 5.1 GHz. Last but not the least, the Radeon 780M serves as the integrated GPU.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say that there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD uncorks its 2nd generation Ryzen AI technology meaning the new processors are expected to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs. Dozens of popular apps such as DaVinci Resolve support this technology, as of late 2023.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8845HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a seriously fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600, ECC-enabled memory included). PCI-Express speeds are capped at 1.97 GB/s per lane which corresponds to the 4.0 spec.

This Ryzen 7 series chip is designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 or Linux; please note that it isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since the 8845HS is a 7840HS in disguise, it's safe to expect it to be just slightly faster than the Core i9-13900H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This is a very fast chip, as of Q3 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,700 MHz) is capable of powering 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (AV1, HEVC, AVC). As far as gaming is concerned, the thing will let you play most games at 1080p as long as you are fine with moderate quality settings. Long story short, this is the best iGPU money can buy, as of H2 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing insanely fast. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this APU.

The R7 8845HS is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 7840HS

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is a powerful Phoenix family chip that saw the light of day in H1 2023. The processor features 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at 3.8 GHz. The highest Boost clock speed achievable is 5.1 GHz.

Not only does this APU has full might of the Zen 4 architecture at its disposal, it also comes with the new Ryzen AI technology that's set to make generative AI more ubiquitous than ever before. Last but not the least, the Radeon 780M serves as the integrated GPU.

Architecture & Features

Phoenix family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Dragon Range family chips are. The latter however lacks hardware AI workload acceleration capabilities that Phoenix has. Ryzen AI is coming after Intel's DL Boost and GNA technologies; time will tell if this move by AMD is a good idea.

Perhaps more importantly, Zen 4 introduces AVX512 support (which Zen 3 chips did not have) and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is set to bring a double-digit IPC improvement.

Elsewhere, the 7840HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a seriously fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600, ECC-enabled memory included). PCI-Express speeds are capped at 1.97 GB/s per lane which corresponds to the 4.0 spec.

This Ryzen 7 series chip is designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 or Linux; please note that it isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The average 7840HS in our database is in the same league as the Core i7-12700H, Core i7-12850HX, Core i9-12900H, Core i9-13900H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very fast chip, as of Q3 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,700 MHz) is capable of powering 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (AV1, HEVC, AVC). As far as gaming is concerned, the thing will let you play most games at 1080p as long as you are fine with moderate quality settings. Long story short, this is the best iGPU money can buy, as of H2 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing insanely fast. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this APU.

The 7840HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 8845HSAMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
CodenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)AMD Phoenix (Zen 4)
Series: Phoenix (Zen 4) Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS compare3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3800 - 5100 MHz3800 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 16
TDP45 Watt35 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 8845HS
39.9 pt (66%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 7840HS
40.3 pt (67%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 102     avg: 104.4     median: 103.8 (58%)     max: 107.8 Points
min: 101     avg: 104.6     median: 105 (59%)     max: 107 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 567     avg: 869     median: 902 (17%)     max: 956 Points
min: 880     avg: 912     median: 913 (17%)     max: 956 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 14895     avg: 16165     median: 16192 (15%)     max: 18037 Points
min: 15515     avg: 16343     median: 16188 (15%)     max: 17214 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1623     avg: 1751     median: 1769 (74%)     max: 1783 Points
min: 1718     avg: 1769     median: 1774 (75%)     max: 1812 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 673     avg: 686     median: 685 (75%)     max: 698 Points
min: 668     avg: 687     median: 688 (75%)     max: 705 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5808     avg: 6317     median: 6346 (15%)     max: 7026 Points
min: 6061     avg: 6387     median: 6344 (15%)     max: 6744 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2342     avg: 2563     median: 2575 (16%)     max: 2908 Points
min: 2473     avg: 2587     median: 2565 (16%)     max: 2729 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 269     avg: 276     median: 276 (76%)     max: 283 Points
min: 270     avg: 277.2     median: 278 (77%)     max: 286 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 29.28     avg: 29.8     median: 29.8 (39%)     max: 30.3 Points
min: 29.59     avg: 29.9     median: 29.7 (38%)     max: 30.25 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.29     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (79%)     max: 3.34 Points
min: 3.29     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (78%)     max: 3.33 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7426     avg: 7545     median: 7523 (45%)     max: 7685 Points
min: 7515     avg: 7599     median: 7574 (46%)     max: 7709 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 47332     avg: 47532     median: 47500 (34%)     max: 47764 Points
min: 45602     avg: 48003     median: 48144 (35%)     max: 50264 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 85872     avg: 86827     median: 86827 (55%)     max: 87782 Points
min: 83726     avg: 85254     median: 84973 (54%)     max: 87064 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 14163     avg: 14360     median: 14360 (17%)     max: 14557 Points
min: 14015     avg: 14130     median: 14177 (17%)     max: 14197 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 70.718     avg: 113.2     median: 98.9 (1%)     max: 170 s
min: 71.922     avg: 73.4     median: 72.8 (1%)     max: 75.535 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.703     avg: 3.6     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 5.3 s
min: 2.626     avg: 2.8     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 3.244 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7275     avg: 11203     median: 7327 (12%)     max: 19008 Points
min: 6428     avg: 7133     median: 7271 (12%)     max: 7699 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 62669     avg: 68390     median: 68354 (39%)     max: 74664 MIPS
min: 59538     avg: 69163     median: 70243 (40%)     max: 73035 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5197     avg: 6319     median: 6393 (75%)     max: 6714 MIPS
min: 6049     avg: 6558     median: 6604 (78%)     max: 6754 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 143.7     avg: 146.8     median: 146.8 (49%)     max: 149.8 fps
min: 142.85     avg: 145.4     median: 144.1 (48%)     max: 149.3 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 286.5     avg: 287.8     median: 287.8 (66%)     max: 289 fps
min: 280     avg: 286.5     median: 281.5 (65%)     max: 298 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 18.6     avg: 20.1     median: 20.4 (36%)     max: 22.7 fps
min: 11.7     avg: 19.9     median: 20.4 (36%)     max: 21.8 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (38%)
min: 1.2     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (38%)     max: 1.3 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2     avg: 2     median: 2 (34%)     max: 2.1 GB/s
min: 1.9     avg: 2     median: 2.1 (36%)     max: 2.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 14     avg: 14.4     median: 14.4 (38%)     max: 14.9 GB/s
min: 10.2     avg: 13.3     median: 14.7 (38%)     max: 14.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 288     avg: 326.8     median: 318 (4%)     max: 367 Seconds
min: 298     avg: 324.6     median: 319 (4%)     max: 463 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 179     avg: 200.9     median: 198 (1%)     max: 216 Seconds
min: 185     avg: 198.7     median: 196 (1%)     max: 229 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4304     avg: 0.5     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.4935 sec
min: 0.4184     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4739 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 15091     avg: 15422     median: 15313 (33%)     max: 15969 Points
min: 14213     avg: 15469     median: 15583 (33%)     max: 16073 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.1     avg: 7.2     median: 7.1 (2%)     max: 7.331 s
min: 7.112     avg: 7.7     median: 7.2 (2%)     max: 8.774 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.6     avg: 17.8     median: 17.7 (1%)     max: 18.138 s
min: 17.676     avg: 18.9     median: 17.7 (1%)     max: 21.271 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 659.5     avg: 662     median: 662.4 (3%)     max: 665.289 s
min: 655.388     avg: 690     median: 689.9 (3%)     max: 724.411 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 82048     avg: 82541     median: 82586.5 (63%)     max: 82943 Points
min: 72488     avg: 81330     median: 82000.5 (63%)     max: 85884 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 19492     avg: 22379     median: 22207 (55%)     max: 26212 Points
min: 17320     avg: 22264     median: 22611 (56%)     max: 25584 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 81620     avg: 84501     median: 84429 (69%)     max: 88462 Points
min: 77280     avg: 88106     median: 89565 (73%)     max: 93910 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 81607     avg: 85179     median: 85402 (69%)     max: 88305 Points
min: 80023     avg: 88577     median: 88981 (72%)     max: 93208 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 83958     avg: 87188     median: 85870 (71%)     max: 93052 Points
min: 83382     avg: 90268     median: 91995 (76%)     max: 95508 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 18507     avg: 20158     median: 20268.5 (51%)     max: 22215 Points
min: 13602     avg: 19552     median: 20556.5 (52%)     max: 21602 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 25099     avg: 27322     median: 27428 (49%)     max: 30715 Points
min: 24338     avg: 27634     median: 27816 (50%)     max: 29343 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8550     avg: 11247     median: 10853 (46%)     max: 19164 Points
min: 8903     avg: 10918     median: 11131 (47%)     max: 12218 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2510     avg: 2624     median: 2630 (66%)     max: 2698 Points
min: 2585     avg: 2660     median: 2670 (67%)     max: 2721 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 11073     avg: 12854     median: 12998 (50%)     max: 14014 Points
min: 12111     avg: 12998     median: 13088 (51%)     max: 13498 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2577     avg: 2844     median: 2846 (90%)     max: 3105 Points
min: 2488     avg: 2682     median: 2603 (83%)     max: 3105 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 12719     avg: 16862     median: 16862.5 (69%)     max: 21003 Points
min: 12439     avg: 14395     median: 12823.5 (53%)     max: 21003 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1765     avg: 1931     median: 1949 (76%)     max: 2004 Points
min: 1837     avg: 1962     median: 1957.5 (76%)     max: 2017 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11256     avg: 11906     median: 11864 (21%)     max: 12726 Points
min: 8446     avg: 11688     median: 11859.5 (21%)     max: 12339 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1869     avg: 1895     median: 1898 (8%)     max: 1914 Points
min: 1834     avg: 1886     median: 1887 (8%)     max: 1936 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11742     avg: 12016     median: 12086 (38%)     max: 12109 Points
min: 8572     avg: 11542     median: 11888 (37%)     max: 12278 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8034     avg: 8109     median: 8077.5 (81%)     max: 8245 Points
min: 7879     avg: 8077     median: 8144.5 (81%)     max: 8166 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 47602     avg: 48576     median: 48614.5 (48%)     max: 49473 Points
min: 47599     avg: 48497     median: 48725.5 (49%)     max: 48906 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 496     avg: 534     median: 527 (1%)     max: 664 ms
min: 485     avg: 511     median: 516 (1%)     max: 544 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 85632     avg: 90739     median: 90496 (68%)     max: 96330 Points
min: 91356     avg: 91588     median: 91577 (69%)     max: 91831 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 176.4     avg: 255.2     median: 256.5 (70%)     max: 314 Points
min: 232     avg: 263.8     median: 263 (72%)     max: 319 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 275     avg: 304.2     median: 305 (55%)     max: 334 Points
min: 288     avg: 316.9     median: 320 (57%)     max: 339 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1531     avg: 1772     median: 1795.5 (67%)     max: 1939 Points
min: 1566     avg: 1769     median: 1802 (67%)     max: 1891 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 42.5     avg: 82.2     median: 81.1 (14%)     max: 147.2 Watt
min: 64.7     avg: 92.2     median: 86.6 (15%)     max: 137.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 39     avg: 79.3     median: 78.1 (14%)     max: 145.6 Watt
min: 74.7     avg: 97.6     median: 88.7 (16%)     max: 135.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.78     avg: 9     median: 7.1 (5%)     max: 16.5 Watt
min: 4.73     avg: 13.6     median: 11.5 (8%)     max: 59.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.42     avg: 8.9     median: 7.8 (9%)     max: 16.4 Watt
min: 7.09     avg: 13.7     median: 12.6 (14%)     max: 35.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 20     avg: 35.5     median: 33.7 (25%)     max: 66.2 Points per Watt
min: 20.1     avg: 28.3     median: 30.3 (23%)     max: 33.2 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS → 100% n=55

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS → 101% n=55

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 07. 15:43:58

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16399 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14948 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751895838s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 07 Jul 2025 05:21:36 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 16399 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#8 got single benchmarks 16399 +0.003s ... 0.009s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14948 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#10 got single benchmarks 14948 +0.03s ... 0.043s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.043s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.056s ... 0.1s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.101s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)