Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 4800H vs Intel Core i7-10870H

AMD Ryzen 7 4800H

► remove from comparison AMD R7 4800H

The AMD Ryzen 7 4800H is a Renoir APU designed for larger, more powerful laptops with room for better termals. The Ryzen features eight Zen 2 cores running at 2.9 GHz (base clock speed) to 4.2 GHz (Boost). The CPU also has 8 MB of L3 cache and a Vega series integrated GPU. Thread-doubling SMT tech is enabled in this processor, allowing for up to 16 concurrent processing threads.

Architecture

Ryzen 7 4800H is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process and in part thanks to this fact AMD promises an up to 2x higher performance-per-watt figure compared to Ryzen 3000 series mobile APUs. This isn't the only noteworthy change however as Zen 2 architecture is leagues ahead of the outgoing Zen+ when it comes to single-core performance. Renoir family processors feature up to 8 CPU cores compared to 4 cores of the previous generation mobile AMD CPUs.

A 4800H will work with dual-channel DDR4-3200 or quad-channel LPDDR4-4266 RAM. The important difference between desktop Ryzen 4000 and mobile Ryzen 4000 processors is that the latter do not have PCI-Express 4.0 support, meaning those blazing-fast NVMe SSDs will be limited to a throughput of 3.9 GB/s.

The Ryzen 7 gets soldered straight to the motherboard (FP6 socket) and is thus not user-replaceable. Please go to our Renoir processor family hub for more information on these CPUs.

Performance

The average 4800H in our database is in the same league as the Core i7-11850H, the Core i7-1360P and also the Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This highlights just how great of a job Renoir designers did, back in the day.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term power limit of 45 W, the MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK is among the fastest laptops built around the 4800H that we know of. It can be more than 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Graphics

Ryzen 7 4800H features the Radeon RX Vega 7, a 7 CU integrated graphics adapter running at up to 1,600 MHz. The iGPU's underlying architecture is fairly old as of 2021, yet its 448 shaders will let you play many games of 2020 and 2021 as long as you stick to reasonable resolutions and presets. F1 2021 runs well at medium quality, 1080p resolution, to give you an example. A Vega 7 can be as fast as a GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, or as slow as an 80 EU Iris Xe; this depends on the benchmark as well as on cooling system performance and TDP settings of a laptop as mentioned above. As the iGPU has no VRAM of its own, it is paramount that fast system RAM is used.

The Vega definitely supports UHD 2160p monitors at 60 Hz. This iGPU is capable of hardware decoding AVC, HEVC and VP9-encoded videos. There is no AV1 support to be found here though. Such a video will have to be SW-decoded leading to much lower energy efficiency.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W. Laptop makers are allowed to change that to anything between 35 W and 54 W, with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. The Ryzen 7 4800HS is a 35 W edition of the Ryzen 7 4800H that trades away a bit of performance for lower power consumption. In both cases, an active cooling solution is a must.

Both the 4800H and the 4800HS are built with TSMC's 7 nm process for decent, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-10870H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-10870H

The Intel Core i7-10870H is a higher-end, octa-core processor of the Comet Lake product family. The Hyper-Threading-enabled processor was unveiled in 2020. It is designed for use in large gaming laptops and DTRs; its CPU cores run at 2.2 GHz (base clock speed) to 5 GHz (max. Boost frequency). The all-core Boost frequency sits at 4.2 GHz.

Core i7-10870H is slightly inferior to Core i7-10875H in that the former has a 100 MHz lower base clock speed, 100 MHz lower Boost clock speed and no support for Intel's proprietary security features: vPro, TXT, SIPP.

Last but not the least, this H-class processor features the 24 EU UHD Graphics 630 iGPU.

Architecture

Comet Lake is a yet another revision of the dated Skylake architecture (much like the previous Coffee Lake, Whiskey Lake, Kaby Lake product families) for similar feature set and performance-per-MHz figures.

Still, 10th Generation Core processors have their advantages. The upgraded memory controller is one such advantage; it can officially host memory clocked at 2,933 MHz, an upgrade over the 2,666 MHz limitation of the outgoing Coffee Lake product family. Intel recommends using no more than 128 GB, for reference.

The 10870H is manufactured on Intel's third-gen 14 nm process. The octa-core CPU is compatible with Thunderbolt 3; it has sixteen PCI-Express 3.0 lanes for connecting discrete graphics cards, SSDs and other devices. Four PCI-Express 3.0 lanes allow for read/write rates of up to 3.9 GB/s provided a suitably fast NVMe SSD is used.

Please note this isn't a user-replaceable CPU. It gets soldered permanently on to the motherboard (BGA1440 socket interface) and is thus pretty much impossible to replace.

Performance

The average 10870H in our database is close to the Ryzen 5 5600H and the Core i9-9980HK, as far as multi-thread banchmark scores are concerned. The i7 thus is absolutely capable of handling any task that requires significant processing muscle, as of late 2021.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 95 W, the MSI GE76 Raider 10UH is among the fastest laptops featuring the 10870H that we know of. It can be about 30% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system built around the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Graphics

The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is an old acquaintance of ours; this 24 EU iGPU was used in many H-class Intel Core processors of previous years, like a Core i7-9750H.

In the case of 10870H, the UHD Graphics runs at 350 MHz to 1,200 MHz. It will let you use up to 3 displays simultaneously. The highest resolution supported here is 4K (4096 by 2304 pixels). This graphics adapter will happily hardware-decode VP9, AVC, HEVC, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs; the latest AV1 codec did not make the list.

UHD Graphics 630 was not made for gaming; it is not fast enough to handle most triple-A titles of 2019 and 2020, even if you set the resolution to 1024 x 768 and select the lowest quality preset possible.

Power consumption

The i7-10870H has a 45 W TDP (also known as the long-term Power Limit). Laptop makers are allowed to reduce that value somewhat, the lower limit being 35 W, with clock speeds and performance taking a hit as a result. As far as short-term loads are concerned, the CPU will happily consume 70 or even 100 W when Boosting, making quality active cooling solution a must.

This 10th generation Intel chip is manufactured on one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for low, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 4800HIntel Core i7-10870H
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)Intel Comet Lake
CodenameRenoir-H (Zen 2)Comet Lake-H
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H compare3.3 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H « 2.9 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H compare3 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H « 2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock2900 - 4200 MHz2200 - 5000 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB
L3 Cache8 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 168 / 16
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
Technology7 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C
SocketFP6BGA1440
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGX
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1600 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 4800H
35.1 pt (49%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-10870H
35.5 pt (49%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 9644     avg: 10889     median: 11135.5 (10%)     max: 11642 Points
min: 8250     avg: 9594     median: 9892.5 (9%)     max: 10450 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1248     avg: 1254     median: 1253.5 (53%)     max: 1259 Points
min: 1177     avg: 1223     median: 1226 (52%)     max: 1253 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 462     avg: 482.1     median: 485 (54%)     max: 491 Points
min: 460     avg: 473.6     median: 473.5 (53%)     max: 484 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3692     avg: 4275     median: 4339.5 (11%)     max: 4663 Points
min: 3027     avg: 3588     median: 3632 (9%)     max: 4020 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1652     avg: 1859     median: 1854 (12%)     max: 1995 Points
min: 1336     avg: 1614     median: 1659 (10%)     max: 1740 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 186     avg: 188     median: 188 (57%)     max: 191 Points
min: 196     avg: 199.8     median: 200 (60%)     max: 204 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 19.95     avg: 21     median: 21.1 (27%)     max: 21.92 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.16     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (54%)     max: 2.19 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 5643     avg: 5684     median: 5684 (34%)     max: 5725 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 37236     avg: 37276     median: 37276 (27%)     max: 37316 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 61208     avg: 62934     median: 62933.5 (44%)     max: 64659 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 9712     avg: 9782     median: 9781.5 (12%)     max: 9851 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
90.9 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.4 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4601 Points (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 44827     avg: 49860     median: 50075 (29%)     max: 53883 MIPS
min: 39581     avg: 44452     median: 44975.5 (26%)     max: 46708 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4575     avg: 4678     median: 4686 (56%)     max: 4743 MIPS
min: 5145     avg: 5293     median: 5295.5 (63%)     max: 5429 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 101.5     avg: 102.7     median: 102.7 (36%)     max: 103.9 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 209     avg: 215.6     median: 215.6 (50%)     max: 222.2 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 10.8     avg: 12.6     median: 12.8 (22%)     max: 14.1 fps
min: 10.7     avg: 12.2     median: 12.5 (22%)     max: 13.5 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.9 GB/s (33%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
10.3 GB/s (27%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 248     avg: 266     median: 262 (2%)     max: 299 Seconds
min: 272     avg: 297.6     median: 292 (2%)     max: 333 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.562     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (12%)     max: 0.603 sec
min: 0.573     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.614 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 12018     avg: 12683     median: 12683 (27%)     max: 13348 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
22.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
564 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 51446     avg: 57673     median: 57672.5 (50%)     max: 63899 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 11401     avg: 14657     median: 15160 (41%)     max: 15838 Points
min: 13753     avg: 15226     median: 15943 (43%)     max: 16331 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 60191     avg: 61331     median: 61331 (50%)     max: 62471 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 59769     avg: 62130     median: 62130 (50%)     max: 64491 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 65802     avg: 66827     median: 67127 (57%)     max: 67553 Points
min: 63612     avg: 64430     median: 63696 (54%)     max: 65981 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13135     avg: 15479     median: 15669 (40%)     max: 16818 Points
min: 12985     avg: 14960     median: 15506 (39%)     max: 15719 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 19980     avg: 21647     median: 21847 (39%)     max: 22687 Points
min: 17337     avg: 19768     median: 20247 (36%)     max: 20886 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6255     avg: 8706     median: 8925 (38%)     max: 9631 Points
min: 7603     avg: 8624     median: 8636.5 (36%)     max: 9627 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1154     avg: 1188     median: 1191 (50%)     max: 1207 Points
min: 1191     avg: 1273     median: 1282.5 (54%)     max: 1295 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5920     avg: 7725     median: 7955 (14%)     max: 8672 Points
min: 6403     avg: 7482     median: 7735.5 (14%)     max: 7882 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1177     avg: 1184     median: 1184 (5%)     max: 1191 Points
min: 1264     avg: 1272     median: 1276 (6%)     max: 1277 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6027     avg: 7108     median: 7108 (22%)     max: 8189 Points
min: 7678     avg: 7738     median: 7700 (24%)     max: 7837 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4808     avg: 4950     median: 4949.5 (49%)     max: 5091 Points
min: 5311     avg: 5555     median: 5652 (56%)     max: 5703 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 23108     avg: 26453     median: 26453 (29%)     max: 29798 Points
min: 30420     avg: 30536     median: 30578 (34%)     max: 30611 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 783     avg: 826     median: 791 (1%)     max: 1220 ms
min: 789     avg: 801     median: 796.5 (1%)     max: 861 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 37080     avg: 43309     median: 43309 (39%)     max: 49538 Points
min: 53412     avg: 54494     median: 54493.5 (49%)     max: 55575 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 204     avg: 217.7     median: 218.5 (46%)     max: 229 Points
min: 220     avg: 226.4     median: 225 (47%)     max: 243 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 62     avg: 76.6     median: 83 (14%)     max: 84.9 Watt
min: 98.4     avg: 98.9     median: 98.9 (17%)     max: 99.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 81     avg: 84     median: 84 (15%)     max: 86.9 Watt
min: 98.6     avg: 98.8     median: 98.8 (18%)     max: 98.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 20.9     avg: 22.1     median: 22.1 (16%)     max: 23.3 Points per Watt
min: 13.5     avg: 13.8     median: 13.8 (10%)     max: 14 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 4800H → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-10870H → 101% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 02. 09:05:32

#0 checking url part for id 11677 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12757 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 01 May 2024 05:34:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.051s ... 0.052s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.052s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11677 +0.018s ... 0.07s

#7 got single benchmarks 11677 +0.109s ... 0.179s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12757 +0.013s ... 0.192s

#9 got single benchmarks 12757 +0.067s ... 0.259s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.259s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.273s ... 0.532s

#12 return log +0.03s ... 0.562s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)