Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200U vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

► remove from comparison AMD R7 2700X

The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X is a high-end desktop processor with 8 cores (16 threads) that was announced early 2018. It is based on the revised Zen+ cores and at launch the fastest Ryzen CPU. The CPU cores clock at 3.7 GHz base and using Precision Boost 2 up to 4.3 GHz. All 8 cores and 16 threads can clock up to 4 GHz. The 8 cores are divided in two cluster (4 cores each with own L3 cache) connected via Infinity Fabric.

Compared to the older first Ryzen generation (e.g., Ryzen 5 1700X), the second generation is manufactured in an improved process (12nm called), offers and improved Precision Boost 2 (especially in partial load of the cores) and faster cache and memory speeds.

See our second generation Ryzen review for detailed benchmarks and information.

AMD Ryzen 3 3200U

► remove from comparison AMD R3 3200U

The AMD Ryzen 3 3200U is a dual-core SoC designed for laptops that was announced in January 2019. The Ryzen features two Zen cores with support for the thread-doubling SMT tech, clocked at 2.6 GHz - 3.5 GHz. The built-in Radeon RX Vega 3 iGPU has 3 CUs (192 unified shaders) clocked at up to 1,200 MHz. The default TDP is 15 W which makes the Ryzen a good fit for thin mid-range laptops.

In comparison to the faster Ryzen 3000 CPUs, the 3200U is not using the newer Zen+ microarchitecture and is still manufactured in 14nm. Compared to the old Ryzen 3 2200U, the 3200U therefore only offers a 100 MHz higher clock speed.

The Ryzen 3 is compatible with single-channel or dual-channel DDR4-2400 RAM.

Please go to our Raven Ridge launch article for details on the architecture and more.

Performance

The average 3200U in our extensive database is anything but a performance monster, its multi-thread benchmark scores only just matching those of the Core i3-8130U and the Pentium N6000. While not as atrociously slow as most N-series and J-series Intel chips, this specific Ryzen is good enough for basic day-to-day activities only.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 3 series chip has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 15 W. Laptop makers are free to change that to anything between 12 W and 25 W; most will go for a higher value to extract more performance out of it. Either way, an active cooling solution will be needed to dissipate the heat.

The R3 3200U is built with a 14 nm manufacturing process for low, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

► remove from comparison AMD R7 2700

The AMD Ryzen 7 2700 is an eight-core desktop processor that can handle sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Simultaneous Multithreading (SMT). This technology is equivalent to Intel's Hyper-Threading. Launched in April 2018, the Ryzen 7 2700 is the second fastest Ryzen 7 processor and is much more economical than its flagship sibling. The Ryzen 7 2700 has a 65 W TDP, which is nearly 50% more efficient than the 105 W TDP Ryzen 7 2700 X. This energy efficiency comes at a cost to performance though.

The Ryzen 7 2700 has a base clock speed of 3.2 GHz, which can be boosted by Extended Frequency Range (XFR) up to 4.1 GHz. The power gain is still high in multi-threaded applications, although this is some way off the Ryzen 7 2700X. The Ryzen 7 2700 benefits from AMD's new Zen+ architecture, with a greater number of instructions per cycle (IPC) and higher clock speeds than last year's Zen chips. The Ryzen 7 2700's eight cores are divided into two clusters that are connected by Infinity Fabric, a subset of HyperTransport. Each cluster has its own L3 cache.

The Ryzen 7 2700 has good performance in games. However, if it is operating at a lower base clock because of low TDP, then the Ryzen 7 2700 falls behind the Ryzen 5 2600 in gaming benchmarks. This behaviour could be because many games currently lack multi-core support. Hence, games rely more on clock speed more than core count.

Detailed information, benchmarks and values can be found in our review of the Ryzen 7 2700.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 3 3200UAMD Ryzen 7 2700
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Ryzen 7
CodenameZen+Picasso-U (Zen)Zen+
Series: Ryzen 7 Zen+
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X « 3.7 - 4.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 27003.2 - 4.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X3.7 - 4.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 « 3.2 - 4.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Clock3700 - 4300 MHz2600 - 3500 MHz3200 - 4100 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB1 MB4 MB
L3 Cache16 MB4 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 162 / 48 / 16
TDP105 Watt15 Watt65 Watt
Transistors4940 Million4500 Million4940 Million
Technology12 nm14 nm12 nm
Die Size213 mm2213 mm2
SocketAM4 (1331)FP5AM4 (1331)
FeaturesSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHADDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMESSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
Architecturex86x86x86
$329 U.S.$299 U.S.
Announced
L1 Cache192 KB
max. Temp.105 °C
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz)
Manufacturerwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R3 3200U
23.5 pt (33%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 1767     avg: 1786     median: 1786 (2%)     max: 1804 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 208     avg: 584     median: 765 (33%)     max: 780 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
430 Points (48%)
min: 274     avg: 298.2     median: 301 (33%)     max: 318 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3944 Points (10%)
min: 453     avg: 607     median: 690 (2%)     max: 727 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1740     avg: 1768     median: 1762 (11%)     max: 1801 Points
min: 318     avg: 335     median: 334 (2%)     max: 353 Points
1551 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 175.5     avg: 175.7     median: 175.7 (53%)     max: 176 Points
min: 126     avg: 128.3     median: 129 (39%)     max: 130 Points
161 Points (48%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
18.7 Points (24%)
16.7 Points (22%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (49%)
1.8 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5256 Points (32%)
4258 Points (26%)
4505 Points (27%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
34763 Points (25%)
9284 Points (7%)
31385 Points (23%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
57811 Points (40%)
49441 Points (34%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8673 Points (11%)
7756 Points (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
96.6 s (1%)
483.5 s (6%)
130.5 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.5 s (1%)
14 s (3%)
5.1 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4779 Points (8%)
1613 Points (3%)
4440 Points (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
45814 MIPS (26%)
min: 8785     avg: 9083     median: 9081.5 (5%)     max: 9382 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4647 MIPS (56%)
min: 3333     avg: 3371     median: 3372 (40%)     max: 3406 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
104.5 fps (36%)
19.5 fps (7%)
89.7 fps (31%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
226.7 fps (52%)
97.8 fps (23%)
195.7 fps (45%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.864     avg: 2     median: 2 (3%)     max: 2.03 fps
485%
1 R7 2700 +
9.5 fps (17%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
0.9 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.6 GB/s (28%)
0.4 GB/s (6%)
1.4 GB/s (24%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
10.6 GB/s (28%)
2.2 GB/s (6%)
9 GB/s (23%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 264     avg: 266.8     median: 266.8 (2%)     max: 269.6 Seconds
min: 1439     avg: 1484     median: 1485 (10%)     max: 1528 Seconds
308.3 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (13%)
min: 0.846     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (18%)     max: 0.852 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 10429     avg: 10651     median: 10643 (23%)     max: 10823 Points
3755 Points (8%)
9475 Points (20%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
10.8 s (2%)
12.5 s (3%)
11.1 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
23.2 s (1%)
29 s (1%)
24.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
578 s (3%)
730 s (3%)
597 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 55102     avg: 57950     median: 58836.5 (52%)     max: 59792 Points
51796 Points (45%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 12874     avg: 14926     median: 15098 (41%)     max: 15552 Points
min: 3653     avg: 3758     median: 3772 (10%)     max: 3835 Points
13959 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 71788     avg: 75803     median: 76251 (62%)     max: 77677 Points
min: 40774     avg: 42358     median: 41370 (34%)     max: 45919 Points
64158 Points (52%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 73539     avg: 76030     median: 76288 (62%)     max: 77262 Points
min: 39108     avg: 41332     median: 41308 (34%)     max: 43602 Points
64932 Points (53%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 74344     avg: 76804     median: 76312 (64%)     max: 79006 Points
min: 44389     avg: 48213     median: 48111 (41%)     max: 52242 Points
66419 Points (56%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13090     avg: 14891     median: 15060.5 (38%)     max: 15851 Points
min: 3321     avg: 3335     median: 3329 (8%)     max: 3362 Points
12224 Points (31%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 20189     avg: 21001     median: 20923.5 (37%)     max: 21975 Points
min: 4743     avg: 4930     median: 4867 (9%)     max: 5241 Points
17915 Points (32%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8241     avg: 8676     median: 8747 (37%)     max: 8954 Points
min: 1509     avg: 1536     median: 1541 (6%)     max: 1553 Points
8049 Points (34%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1131     avg: 1177     median: 1177 (50%)     max: 1223 Points
min: 770     avg: 803     median: 796.5 (34%)     max: 847 Points
1000 Points (42%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6372     avg: 7022     median: 7021.5 (13%)     max: 7671 Points
min: 1604     avg: 1661     median: 1651.5 (3%)     max: 1736 Points
6560 Points (12%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1126 Points (5%)
min: 823     avg: 827     median: 826.5 (4%)     max: 830 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7878 Points (25%)
min: 1529     avg: 1649     median: 1649 (5%)     max: 1769 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4999     avg: 5050     median: 5049.5 (50%)     max: 5100 Points
min: 3366     avg: 3562     median: 3562 (36%)     max: 3758 Points
4681 Points (47%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 25919     avg: 27790     median: 27789.5 (30%)     max: 29660 Points
min: 6553     avg: 7143     median: 7143 (8%)     max: 7733 Points
22776 Points (25%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3626 Points (49%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7237 Points (18%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
6922 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
3282 Points (64%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
7496 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3673 Points (55%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
7535 Points (61%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
5586 Points (51%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
9447 Points (19%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
7540 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
7816 Points (20%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1185     avg: 1243     median: 1205.5 (1%)     max: 1374 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
130.3 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
23991 Points (22%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 137     avg: 142.3     median: 139 (29%)     max: 154 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
211.2 Watt (36%)
17.2 Watt (3%)
119%
1 R7 2700 +
140.9 Watt (24%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
219.2 Watt (40%)
19.4 Watt (4%)
123%
1 R7 2700 +
143.2 Watt (26%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
8.2 Points per Watt (6%)
18.2 Points per Watt (14%)
131%
1 R7 2700 +
10.8 Points per Watt (8%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 2700X → 100% n=28

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 3200U → 51% n=28

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 2700 → 90% n=28

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 15. 22:01:02

#0 checking url part for id 9978 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11191 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10030 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 13 May 2024 05:39:12 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.037s ... 0.038s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.038s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9978 +0.003s ... 0.041s

#8 got single benchmarks 9978 +0.053s ... 0.094s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11191 +0.015s ... 0.109s

#10 got single benchmarks 11191 +0.028s ... 0.136s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 10030 +0.003s ... 0.139s

#12 got single benchmarks 10030 +0.007s ... 0.147s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.147s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.376s ... 0.522s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.522s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)