Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 260 vs Intel Core i9-13900HX

AMD Ryzen 7 260

► remove from comparison AMD R7 260

The Ryzen 7 260 is a fast Hawk Point family chip for laptops that was announced at CES 2025. It features 8 Zen 4 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at up to 5.1 GHz. The chip is identical to the old Ryzen 7 8845HS and therefore also the Ryzen 7 7840HS (which did have a lower clocked NPU).

Architecture and Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips were. The 16 TOPS NPU present here isn't powerful enough for systems built around the 260 to be Copilot+ certified.

Elsewhere, the Ryzen 7 has 16 MB of L3 cache and a seriously fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600). PCI-Express speeds are capped at 1.97 GB/s per lane which corresponds to the 4.0 spec.

Please note that the APU isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good instead (FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since the R7 260 is an 8845HS / 7840HS in disguise, it's safe to expect it to be just slightly faster than the Core i9-13900H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,700 MHz) is capable of powering 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (such as AV1, HEVC, AVC). As far as gaming is concerned, the thing will let you play most games at 1080p as long as you are fine with low of very low settings.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the APU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing as powerful as possible. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this Ryzen.

The R7 260 is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i9-13900HX

► remove from comparison Intel i9-13900HX

The Intel Core i9-13900HX is a fast high-end mobile processor of the Raptor Lake series. Is was announced in early 2023 and looks like it is based on the desktop Core i9-13000K with combined 24 cores and 32 threads. Eight fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading that clock between 2.2 GHz (base) and 5.4 GHz (single core boost, 4.9 GHz for all cores) and sixteen Gracemont efficiency cores without Hyper-Threading (1.6 - 3.9 GHz).

Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-Cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger Caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13900HX).

Performance

The average 13900HX in our database is in the same league as the Core i9-13950HX and the Ryzen 9 7845HX, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is really impressive, to say the least.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 99 W, the Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 is among the fastest laptops built around the 13900HX that we know of. It can be about 50% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

The CPU is still produced in a further improved 10nm FinFET process (Intel 7) that allows the higher clock speeds. The power consumption is specified at 55W base power up to 157 Watt max. Turbo power.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 260Intel Core i9-13900HX
CodenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Raptor Lake-HX
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)Intel Raptor Lake-HX
Series: Raptor Lake-HX Raptor Lake-HX
AMD Ryzen 9 H 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS compare3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13980HX compare1.6 - 5.6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13950HX compare1.6 - 5.5 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HX « 1.6 - 5.4 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13850HX compare1.5 - 5.3 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700HX compare1.5 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13650HX compare1.9 - 4.9 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600HX compare1.9 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500HX compare1.8 - 4.7 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13450HX compare1.8 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock3800 - 5100 MHz1600 - 5400 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB32 MB
L3 Cache16 MB36 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
24 / 32
8 x 5.4 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 x 3.9 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP45 Watt55 Watt
Technology4 nm10 nm
Die Size178 mm2257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP8BGA1964
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, Ryzen AI (16 TOPS), MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200/DDR5-5600 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL B., GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1650 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 260
40.4 pt (67%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13900HX
45 pt (75%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 104     avg: 105.3     median: 105.3 (59%)     max: 106.5 Points
121.4 Points (68%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 786     avg: 893     median: 893 (17%)     max: 1000 Points
1675 Points (31%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 15864     avg: 16788     median: 16788 (16%)     max: 17712 Points
min: 24270     avg: 28275     median: 27900 (26%)     max: 32623 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1760     avg: 1781     median: 1780.5 (75%)     max: 1801 Points
min: 1867     avg: 2044     median: 2056 (86%)     max: 2105 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 690     avg: 694     median: 693.5 (76%)     max: 697 Points
min: 722     avg: 784     median: 788 (86%)     max: 810 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6161     avg: 6565     median: 6565 (16%)     max: 6969 Points
min: 9152     avg: 10785     median: 10557 (26%)     max: 12541 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2564     avg: 2698     median: 2697.5 (17%)     max: 2831 Points
min: 3913     avg: 4521     median: 4494.5 (28%)     max: 4970 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 278     avg: 280.5     median: 280.5 (78%)     max: 283 Points
min: 247     avg: 292     median: 296 (82%)     max: 304 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
30.1 Points (39%)
min: 49.5     avg: 52.3     median: 52.3 (68%)     max: 55.14 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (78%)
min: 3.64     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (87%)     max: 3.67 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7384 Points (45%)
min: 11618     avg: 11700     median: 11699.5 (71%)     max: 11781 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
45689 Points (33%)
min: 76718     avg: 79300     median: 79299.5 (57%)     max: 81881 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
111582 Points (71%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
17169 Points (21%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
215.7 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7121 Points (11%)
min: 12876     avg: 12916     median: 12916 (20%)     max: 12956 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 63076     avg: 67982     median: 67982 (39%)     max: 72888 MIPS
min: 90675     avg: 112115     median: 115262 (66%)     max: 127283 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6439     avg: 6468     median: 6468 (76%)     max: 6497 MIPS
min: 6340     avg: 6859     median: 6895 (81%)     max: 7177 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
144.6 fps (48%)
217.7 fps (73%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
269.1 fps (62%)
387.7 fps (89%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 17.6     avg: 20     median: 20 (35%)     max: 22.4 fps
min: 23.5     avg: 29.2     median: 29.8 (52%)     max: 34.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (38%)
min: 2.1     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (66%)     max: 2.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.1 GB/s (36%)
min: 4.1     avg: 4.3     median: 4.3 (73%)     max: 4.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
11.4 GB/s (30%)
min: 15.2     avg: 17     median: 17 (44%)     max: 18.8 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 290     avg: 306     median: 306 (4%)     max: 322 Seconds
min: 175     avg: 209.9     median: 202 (3%)     max: 275 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 183     avg: 193.5     median: 193.5 (1%)     max: 204 Seconds
min: 101     avg: 117.6     median: 113.5 (1%)     max: 153 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4454     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.4465 sec
min: 0.375     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4564 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
14995 Points (32%)
min: 16591     avg: 17802     median: 18036.5 (38%)     max: 18235 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7 s (2%)
min: 6.2     avg: 6.2     median: 6.2 (1%)     max: 6.215 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.6 s (1%)
13.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
529 s (2%)
min: 315     avg: 315.1     median: 315.1 (1%)     max: 315.265 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 74788     avg: 76276     median: 76275.5 (59%)     max: 77763 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17725     avg: 21327     median: 21326.5 (53%)     max: 24928 Points
min: 19090     avg: 23181     median: 23767 (59%)     max: 25681 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
84022 Points (68%)
min: 77043     avg: 86045     median: 83045 (67%)     max: 101046 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
82808 Points (67%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
85007 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
19375 Points (49%)
min: 16532     avg: 21282     median: 21573 (55%)     max: 23984 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 25641     avg: 27521     median: 27520.5 (49%)     max: 29400 Points
min: 28693     avg: 37096     median: 37730 (67%)     max: 43004 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 9216     avg: 9965     median: 9965 (42%)     max: 10714 Points
min: 13288     avg: 15302     median: 15066 (64%)     max: 18304 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2622     avg: 2653     median: 2652.5 (66%)     max: 2683 Points
min: 2548     avg: 2770     median: 2871 (72%)     max: 2892 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 10180     avg: 11765     median: 11764.5 (46%)     max: 13349 Points
min: 15031     avg: 16586     median: 16712 (65%)     max: 18014 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2191     avg: 2625     median: 2713 (86%)     max: 2818 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 14982     avg: 16173     median: 16420.5 (67%)     max: 16949 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1948     avg: 1967     median: 1967 (77%)     max: 1986 Points
min: 1345     avg: 1991     median: 2041.5 (80%)     max: 2093 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9848     avg: 11223     median: 11222.5 (20%)     max: 12597 Points
min: 17614     avg: 19819     median: 20013.5 (36%)     max: 21075 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1804     avg: 1964     median: 1982 (9%)     max: 2064 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 18612     avg: 19451     median: 19027 (60%)     max: 20594 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8706     avg: 8840     median: 8843 (88%)     max: 8936 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 66537     avg: 70316     median: 71143 (71%)     max: 71700 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 R7 260 +
7721 Points (85%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 R7 260 +
41046 Points (54%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
494 ms (1%)
min: 453     avg: 471     median: 464 (1%)     max: 520 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
105241 Points (77%)
min: 95898     avg: 101834     median: 103988 (76%)     max: 105526 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
261 Points (72%)
min: 243     avg: 289.1     median: 291 (80%)     max: 304 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 276     avg: 292     median: 292 (52%)     max: 308 Points
min: 266     avg: 321.9     median: 322 (58%)     max: 358 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1792 Points (67%)
min: 1825     avg: 2073     median: 2113.5 (79%)     max: 2295 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R7 260 +
min: 68.3     avg: 98.5     median: 98.5 (17%)     max: 128.6 Watt
min: 106.1     avg: 173.5     median: 178.7 (31%)     max: 231 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R7 260 +
139 Watt (25%)
min: 176     avg: 216.9     median: 222 (41%)     max: 266 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R7 260 +
min: 4.06     avg: 11.1     median: 11.1 (7%)     max: 18.2 Watt
min: 13.9     avg: 24.1     median: 25 (17%)     max: 31.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 R7 260 +
min: 4.35     avg: 6.7     median: 6.7 (7%)     max: 9.03 Watt
min: 15     avg: 19.7     median: 18.8 (21%)     max: 29 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
100%
1 R7 260 +
20.4 Points per Watt (15%)
min: 19.5     avg: 20.9     median: 21 (16%)     max: 21.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 260 → 100% n=42

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13900HX → 139% n=42

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 15. 15:55:20

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 19156 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14659 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755266119s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Aug 2025 05:18:40 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 19156 +0.003s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 19156 +0.005s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14659 +0.004s ... 0.019s

#10 got single benchmarks 14659 +0.029s ... 0.048s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.048s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.065s ... 0.114s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.114s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)