
Asus VivoBook 18 laptop review: The display monster for just under $1,000
Room for improvement.
With the release of its VivoBook 18, Asus has positioned itself in the 18-inch laptop market niche—but unlike its competitors, it does without a dGPU. You can find out whether this concept works in our review.Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by Daisy Dickson) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
Verdict - Gap in the market, but with room for improvement
Affordable 18-inch laptops without a dedicated graphics card have been a rarity until now. As a result, the VivoBook 18 M1807HA with the Ryzen 7 260 and the Radeon 780M iGPU has a real unique selling point but unfortunately, Asus hasn't exhausted its full potential. Starting with its case, which could be higher-quality and more stable, especially in the touchpad area. Its rather small keyboard in relation to the available space (no standard numeric keypad) is also a bit of a shame. Furthermore, Asus should work on the laptop's cooling, as despite its below-average GPU performance, the 18-inch device gets quite loud under load (at least from performance mode onwards). In addition to a second fan, there would have been room for a secondary M.2 or RAM slot in its case (the existing 16 GB are soldered on). Its partially outdated connections cost further rating points, as the 18-incher has to make do without USB 4.
In all the other categories, the VivoBook 18 cuts a solid to good figure. For example, we have little to complain about its CPU speed, picture quality and battery life. Overall, we would only recommend a purchase for users who absolutely want an 18-inch device that doesn't cost too much.
Pros
Cons
Price and availability
The VivoBook 18 M1807HA is not yet available to purchase in the United States. It has an estimated MRSP of just under $1,000.
Specifications
Case
The manufacturer has gone for a plastic case. Its dark gray surfaces are—as we know from many laptops—quite susceptible to fingerprint marks. With a height of around 20 mm (without the feet), the VivoBook 18 is neither thick nor particularly thin. Its weight of around 2.6 kg is also still acceptable for an 18-inch laptop. One highlight is its generous opening angle of 180°, although its hinges feel a little on the delicate side. Its build quality is generally high.
Connectivity
The VivoBook 18 has to make do with four USB 3.2 Gen 1 ports, although its two Type-C ports support PowerDelivery and DisplayPort. It also features an audio jack and an HDMI 2.0 output. There is no LAN port or card reader.
The Wi-Fi speed of the integrated wireless module (Realtek RTL8852BE) was only mediocre during our test.
The laptop's Full HD webcam, which has a mechanical cover, delivers solid sharpness but could be more color accurate.
Communication
Webcam

Input devices
We only understand the design of its keyboard to a limited extent. Despite the laptop's wide case, Asus has only installed a three-column instead of four-column numeric keypad as well as very small directional arrows. We have less to criticize about how it feels to type on the keyboard and its white backlighting (3 levels).
In contrast to its keyboard, the device's touchpad is larger than average. Just under 15 x 10 cm is record-breaking in the laptop segment—although its stability leaves a lot to be desired, as mentioned at the beginning. Thanks to its smooth finish, fingers glide quite well across its surface. The manufacturer could do with improving the rather rickety click areas.
Display
Apart from its unusual size, Asus has gone for a relatively unspectacular IPS panel. 1,920 x 1,200 pixels (16:10 aspect ratio) are on the borderline for an 18-inch device; we would have liked to see at least 2,560 x 1,600 pixels. Otherwise, the display didn't make any glaring mistakes during our test. Just under 100% sRGB coverage is just as appropriate for the laptop's price as its contrast of 1,375:1. A brightness of around 324 cd/m² is good enough for most indoor areas, but a higher brightness would be needed for outdoor use. In its delivered state, the panel has a slight blue cast, but this can be corrected through calibration. Its response times are within the typical IPS range. We noted no image flickering.
|
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 330 cd/m²
Contrast: 1375:1 (Black: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.34 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86, calibrated: 1.03
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
68.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.112
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA BOE NE180WUM-NY3, IPS, 1920x1200, 18.4", 144 Hz | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr Samsung SDC41A6, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U Samsung ATNA60BX03-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16", 120 Hz | MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AUO28B2 (B160QAN02.N), IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz | Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 ATNA60CL09-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 30% | 32% | 21% | 30% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 66.9 | 99.6 49% | 99.9 49% | 94.6 41% | 99.9 49% |
sRGB Coverage | 97.7 | 100 2% | 100 2% | 99.7 2% | 100 2% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.8 | 96.5 40% | 100 45% | 83.4 21% | 96.6 40% |
Response Times | 93% | 93% | 20% | 95% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 13.8 ? | 0.8 ? 94% | 0.57 ? 96% | 5.6 ? 59% | 0.48 ? 97% |
Response Time Black / White * | 9.4 ? | 0.89 ? 91% | 1 ? 89% | 11.2 ? -19% | 0.64 ? 93% |
PWM Frequency | 491.8 ? | 238.8 | 240 ? | ||
Screen | 9% | 9% | -6% | 39% | |
Brightness middle | 330 | 399.4 21% | 379.8 15% | 488 48% | 387 17% |
Brightness | 324 | 405 25% | 383 18% | 444 37% | 392 21% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 98 10% | 98 10% | 86 -3% | 98 10% |
Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.36 -50% | |||
Contrast | 1375 | 1356 -1% | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.34 | 4.05 -73% | 4.7 -101% | 3.45 -47% | 1 57% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.94 | 6.69 4% | 7.51 -8% | 6.77 2% | 1.9 73% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.03 | 1.02 1% | 0.55 47% | 1.35 -31% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.9 | 1.1 72% | 0.8 79% | 4.16 -7% | 1.7 56% |
Gamma | 2.112 104% | 2.27 97% | 2.22 99% | 2.52 87% | 2.25 98% |
CCT | 6875 95% | 6419 101% | 6381 102% | 6832 95% | 6325 103% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 44% /
28% | 45% /
28% | 12% /
4% | 55% /
47% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
9.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
13.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.7 ms rise | |
↘ 7.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.3 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8437 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Performance
While its CPU performance is in the mid-range, the GPU's performance only tended towards the entry-level range in our test. 16 GB of RAM and a 512-GB SSD are fine for its price of just under $1,000, without being anything to shout about.
Testing conditions
Asus Mode | Whisper mode | Standard | Performance | Full speed |
Cyberpunk 2077 Noise | 34 dB(A) | 40 dB(A) | 50 dB(A) | 55 dB(A) |
Cyberpunk 2077 Performance (FHD/Ultra) | 13.2fps | 13.5fps | 13.6fps | 13.7fps |
Cinebench R15 Multi Score | 2002 points | 2358 points | 2523 points | 2539 points |
CPU PL1 | 27 watts | 40 watts | 54 watts | 54 watts |
CPU PL2 | 32 watts | 50 watts | 60 watts | 60 watts |
Processor
The Ryzen 7 260 is an eight-core model from the Zen 4 generation (4 nm) that we haven't previously tested, and it can process up to 16 threads in parallel via SMT and has 16 MB of L3 cache. Not least thanks to its generous PL1 and PL2 levels, the laptop's CPU performed quite well during the benchmark course and was almost on a par with the Ryzen AI 9 365 (MSI Prestige A16).
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Office | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (n=1) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Average of class Office (763 - 31245, n=88, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (n=1) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Average of class Office (4113 - 125394, n=88, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (n=1) | |
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Average of class Office (287 - 5398, n=88, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (n=1) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
Average of class Office (8185 - 115197, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (n=1) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Office (404 - 18321, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (n=1) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Average of class Office (2075 - 66922, n=88, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (n=1) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Office (7254 - 155900, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (n=1) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Office (78 - 1366, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (n=1) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Average of class Office (432 - 17834, n=88, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average of class Office (4814 - 55359, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (n=1) |
System performance
The laptop's system performance isn't bad either, although the VivoBook 18 was only in the midfield of the comparison devices. Its sluggish working memory became noticeable during our test.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, AMD Radeon 780M (n=1) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Average of class Office (2463 - 7578, n=79, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, AMD Radeon 780M (n=1) | |
Average of class Office (5575 - 20841, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, AMD Radeon 780M (n=1) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Average of class Office (3041 - 10415, n=79, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, AMD Radeon 780M (n=1) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Office (2049 - 11108, n=79, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=84, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Average of class Office (393 - 1870, n=84, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Average of class Office (340 - 2155, n=84, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Average of class Office (258 - 2017, n=84, last 2 years) |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, AMD Radeon 780M (n=1) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Average of class Office (121 - 455, n=83, last 2 years) |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, AMD Radeon 780M (n=1) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average of class Office (80 - 328, n=84, last 2 years) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Average of class Office (391 - 1966, n=92, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6810 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Office (7158 - 108783, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (n=1) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Average of class Office (7325 - 127282, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (n=1) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average of class Office (7579 - 117935, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (n=1) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Office (7.6 - 185.2, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (n=1) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC latencies
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 |
* ... smaller is better
Storage device
The 512-GB SSD from Micron installed in our test device delivered quite good values overall, if you exclude the small drop in performance at the end of our loop benchmark. Since there is only one M.2 slot, the existing drive would have to be replaced if its capacity gets too tight.
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Graphics card
The performance of the otherwise halfway decent Radeon 780M turned out to be relatively disappointing. The iGPU calculates over 30% slower in the VivoBook 18 than the average we have determined so far—both in the synthetic benchmarks and when gaming. The Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360's Arc Graphics 130V and the MSI Prestige A16's Radeon 880M were significantly faster.
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 30503 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 8127 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 159875 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 26552 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4496 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1875 points | |
Help |
Gaming performance
While the Radeon 780M in the VivoBook 18 can still handle older games such as GTA V, things look rather bleak with modern games. Of the roughly 10 games we tested that have been released since 2023, only Civilization 7 ran smoothly—in low details, mind you.
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (11.5 - 26.3, n=41) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average of class Office (6.65 - 29.6, n=43, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA |
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (12.8 - 29.6, n=35) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Average of class Office (7.96 - 30, n=34, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (12.2 - 29, n=59) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Office (3.98 - 47.8, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 104.4 | 94.2 | 34.4 | 13.6 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 125.3 | 91.1 | 36.5 | 34.4 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 44.1 | 22 | 16.3 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 57 | 40.7 | 35.2 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 88 | 34.9 | 30.2 | 26.4 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 23.6 | 19 | 15 | 14.2 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 23.9 | 19.6 | 15.1 | 13.6 |
Space Marine 2 (2024) | 14 | 12.5 | 10.5 | |
Until Dawn (2024) | 27.4 | 18.4 | 10.8 | |
Call of Duty Black Ops 6 (2024) | 31 | 28 | 20 | |
Stalker 2 (2024) | 12.3 | 11.3 | 9.31 | |
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024) | 12.7 | 0 () | ||
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 (2025) | 18 | 15.4 | 13.4 | |
Civilization 7 (2025) | 66.7 | 26.6 | 13.9 |
At least its frame rates remained stable over the long term, as our Cyberpunk test revealed.
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
Emissions
Noise emissions
As already mentioned, the VivoBook 18 is very loud in performance mode and overtook all competing devices during our test. The 50-53 dB(A) we measured under load are pretty audible, which is why we would recommend using the standard mode (approx. 40 dB) for normal use—which hardly costs any power anyway. In idle mode, the fan rarely stands still, but usually runs at a fairly discreet level of 27-29 dB(A).
Noise Level
Idle |
| 27 / 28 / 29 dB(A) |
Load |
| 52 / 53 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA R7 260, Radeon 780M | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M | Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 22% | 13% | 16% | 20% | |
off / environment * | 25 | 22.9 8% | 23.4 6% | 23 8% | 23.6 6% |
Idle Minimum * | 27 | 23 15% | 24.1 11% | 23 15% | 23.6 13% |
Idle Average * | 28 | 23 18% | 24.3 13% | 23 18% | 23.6 16% |
Idle Maximum * | 29 | 23 21% | 28 3% | 25.02 14% | 23.6 19% |
Load Average * | 52 | 23.8 54% | 41 21% | 41.88 19% | 29.4 43% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 50 | 39.79 20% | 40.6 19% | ||
Load Maximum * | 53 | 43.8 17% | 40.9 23% | 41.88 21% | 40.6 23% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.8 | 40.9 |
* ... smaller is better
Temperature
In terms of temperatures, the 18-inch device delivered no surprises. A maximum of 47 °C on the top and a maximum of 45 °C on the bottom of the case are still acceptable, especially as it stays nice and cool when idle (under 30 °C).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the class Office.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-5.4 °C / -9.7 F).
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA R7 260, Radeon 780M | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M | Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -2% | -8% | -6% | 8% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 47 | 42.6 9% | 41.6 11% | 52 -11% | 40.9 13% |
Maximum Bottom * | 45 | 47.8 -6% | 46.6 -4% | 44 2% | 45.1 -0% |
Idle Upper Side * | 27 | 27.4 -1% | 30.4 -13% | 28 -4% | 23.8 12% |
Idle Bottom * | 25 | 27.8 -11% | 31 -24% | 28 -12% | 23.5 6% |
* ... smaller is better
Stress test
Speakers
Its sound quality is slightly better than the laptop average, although it's lacking some bass as usual.
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Power management
Power consumption
Although this isn't an HS or U-CPU, the laptop's power consumption in idle mode is nice and low. An average of 4.4 watts proved to be the best value in the whole test field. Under load, however, the VivoBook 18 consumes more than 60 watts, so the included 65-watt power supply is used to its limits.
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA R7 260, Radeon 780M | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M | Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -23% | -56% | -53% | 6% | -11% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.6 | 5 -39% | 7.1 -97% | 6.9 -92% | 5.3 -47% | 4.63 ? -29% |
Idle Average * | 4.4 | 6.2 -41% | 10.1 -130% | 12 -173% | 6.7 -52% | 7.56 ? -72% |
Idle Maximum * | 9 | 14.7 -63% | 18.6 -107% | 12.5 -39% | 7.3 19% | 8.98 ? -0% |
Load Average * | 64 | 49.9 22% | 45.3 29% | 79.8 -25% | 37.6 41% | 42.3 ? 34% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 68 | 74.5 -10% | 42.8 37% | |||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 68 | 62.5 8% | 44.6 34% | |||
Load Maximum * | 69 | 65 6% | 52.9 23% | 96 -39% | 64.1 7% | 62.4 ? 10% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 54.5 | 39.5 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
Runtimes
The 70-Wh battery's runtimes are definitely impressive. In our web browsing test with the brightness reduced to 150 cd/m², the laptop lasted a respectable 11 hours. Of the comparison devices, only the MSI Prestige A16 was slightly better.
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA R7 260, Radeon 780M, 70 Wh | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 68 Wh | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 54 Wh | MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, 82 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, 76 Wh | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -31% | -49% | 3% | -3% | 1% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 663 | 459 -31% | 336 -49% | 683 3% | 646 -3% | 669 ? 1% |
Reader / Idle | 935 | 1254 ? | ||||
Load | 116 | 127 | 128 | 114.7 ? | ||
H.264 | 609 | 1181 | 755 ? |
Notebookcheck total rating
The VivoBook 18 M1807HA is currently the only 18-inch laptop you can get for under $1,000, which makes it stand out from the crowd. However, our test has shown that Asus could have made a little more effort here and there, for example in terms of its case quality, connectivity, interior build (keyword: upgrades) and cooling system.
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA
- 03/24/2025 v8
Florian Glaser
Possible alternatives compared
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Asus VivoBook 18 M1807HA AMD Ryzen 7 260 ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | List Price: 800 EUR | 2.6 kg | 20 mm | 18.40" 1920x1200 123 PPI IPS | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 1300 USD | 1.8 kg | 18.3 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,029.99 List Price: 1300 USD | 1.2 kg | 13 mm | 16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI OLED | |
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ⎘ AMD Radeon 880M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 1599 Euro | 2 kg | 17.35 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 226V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,699.99 List Price: 1799€ | 1.7 kg | 12.8 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.