ARM Mali-G72 MP12 vs Qualcomm Adreno 619 vs ARM Mali-G57 MP6
ARM Mali-G72 MP12 ► remove from comparison
The ARM Mali-G72 MP12 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced in October 2017 in the Huawei Mate 10 and uses 12 clusters (hence the MP12 name). In our benchmarks it performs between a Adreno 530 and 540 and is therefore suitable for demanding mobile games.
The G72 is based on the second generation of the Bifrost architecture and offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency and a bigger tile buffer for 16x anti-aliasing.
The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 FL11_1 and Renderscript.
Qualcomm Adreno 619 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 619 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).
The performance is 60% better compared to the Adreno 612 graphics card and in our benchmarks on par with the 700 series cards.
The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).
ARM Mali-G57 MP6 ► remove from comparison
The ARM Mali-G57 MP6 is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced mid 2020 in the HiSilicon Kirin 820 and uses 6 clusters (hence the MP6 name).
The G57 is based on the new Valhall architecture and is intended for mainstream phones.
The performance of the G57MP6 in our benchmarks (in the Kirin 820 / Huawei P40 Lite) is comparable to the Adreno 620 (e.g. Oppo Find X2) and ARM Mali-G72 MP18 (Note10 Lite).
The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.
ARM Mali-G72 MP12 Qualcomm Adreno 619 ARM Mali-G57 MP6 Mali-G Series Architecture Bifrost Adreno 600 Bifrost Pipelines 12 - unified 6 - unified Core Speed 850 MHz Shared Memory no yes no API OpenGL ES 3.2 DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan technology 16 nm 8 nm 7 nm Date of Announcement 18.10.2017 15.12.2015 03.07.2020 Link to Manufacturer Page developer.arm.com developer.arm.com Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) Codename Valhall
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 22429 avg: 32596 median: 33740 (4%) max: 36231 Points
min: 54788 avg: 55662 median: 55911 (6%) max: 56286 Points
57067 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 2021 avg: 3208 median: 3360.5 (15%) max: 3710 Points
min: 3602 avg: 4041 median: 4118 (18%) max: 4286 Points
5853 Points (25%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2062 avg: 3386 median: 3545 (8%) max: 4040 Points
min: 3817 avg: 4280 median: 4298 (9%) max: 4573 Points
6327 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2487 avg: 2882 median: 2961.5 (15%) max: 3070 Points
min: 2536 avg: 2906 median: 2981.5 (15%) max: 3107 Points
min: 4281 avg: 4563 median: 4563 (23%) max: 4845 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2597 avg: 2945 median: 3012.5 (9%) max: 3109 Points
min: 2412 avg: 2788 median: 2834 (8%) max: 3008 Points
min: 4472 avg: 4689 median: 4689 (14%) max: 4906 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 635 avg: 1108 median: 1194.5 (1%) max: 1227 Points
1886 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 189 avg: 327.8 median: 351 (0%) max: 371 Points
609 Points (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 2.9 avg: 3.5 median: 3.5 (1%) max: 4 fps
4.8 fps (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 8.4 avg: 8.6 median: 8.6 (2%) max: 8.7 fps
min: 3.3 avg: 7.4 median: 7.7 (1%) max: 8.9 fps
min: 10 avg: 11 median: 11 (2%) max: 12 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 10 avg: 20.6 median: 23 (2%) max: 24 fps
min: 17 avg: 20.1 median: 21 (2%) max: 23 fps
min: 29 avg: 30 median: 30 (2%) max: 31 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 11 avg: 20.4 median: 21 (2%) max: 23 fps
min: 16 avg: 18.5 median: 19 (2%) max: 20 fps
min: 21 avg: 24 median: 24 (3%) max: 27 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 19 avg: 33.9 median: 38.5 (1%) max: 39 fps
min: 26 avg: 32.4 median: 34 (1%) max: 35 fps
min: 44 avg: 45.5 median: 45.5 (1%) max: 47 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 23 avg: 54.6 median: 59 (3%) max: 66 fps
min: 33 avg: 45.4 median: 46 (3%) max: 68 fps
min: 63 avg: 66 median: 66 (4%) max: 69 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G72 MP12 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 45 avg: 108 median: 118 (1%) max: 125 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619
min: 55 avg: 87.8 median: 91 (1%) max: 96 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G57 MP6
min: 103 avg: 107.5 median: 107.5 (1%) max: 112 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 65241 avg: 91217 median: 97281.5 (12%) max: 102780 Points
83516 Points (10%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
25922 Points (59%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
39033 Points (87%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 19.62 avg: 26.6 median: 26.8 (0%) max: 29.71 fps
34.9 fps (0%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 1363 avg: 1377 median: 1377.5 (0%) max: 1391 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 1119 avg: 1168 median: 1160 (0%) max: 1231 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
8180 Points (8%)
min: 8763 avg: 23246 median: 25388 (25%) max: 30058 Points
min: 12491 avg: 22356 median: 22356 (22%) max: 32221 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
3761 Points (7%)
min: 3274 avg: 19611 median: 22384 (39%) max: 28746 Points
min: 4354 avg: 6862 median: 6861.5 (12%) max: 9369 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 2.69 avg: 3.6 median: 3.4 (1%) max: 7.31 Watt
4.6 Watt (2%)
Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G72 MP12 → 100% n=13 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 156% n=13 Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G57 MP6 → 152% n=13
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 [X] Nokia G42 2.0.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 ~ 30 fps
Adreno 619:
30 30 [X] Nokia G42 2.0.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
26 fps, max:
32 fps
30 30 ~ 30 fps
Adreno 619:
30 [X] Honor Magic4 Lite 3.2.0.5531
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
28 fps, max:
30 fps
fps
Adreno 619:
60 [X] Sony Xperia 10 V 4.3.0.6993
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
56 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 619:
20 [X] Motorola Moto G34 4.5.0_21307647_21321795
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
max:
28 fps
45 [X] Nokia XR21 3.7.0_14806628_14807925
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
25 fps, max:
60 fps
54 ~ 40 fps
Adreno 619:
36 [X] Nokia XR21 3.7.0_14806628_14807925
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
29 fps, max:
47 fps
fps
Adreno 619:
20 [X] Motorola Moto G34 4.5.0_21307647_21321795
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
max:
20 fps
28 [X] Nokia XR21 3.7.0_14806628_14807925
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
18 fps, max:
41 fps
30 ~ 26 fps
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 [X] Motorola Moto G51 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 [X] Nokia G42 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
59 60 60 [X] Nokia X20 1.59.7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
55 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] Nokia X10 1.60.13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
51 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] Nokia XR20 1.60.13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
58 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] Realme 9 Pro 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
59 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 [X] Nokia X30 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
55 fps, max:
61 fps
60 77 86 89 90 95 98 ~ 60 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
32 [X] Honor Play 0.7.0
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
18 fps, max:
33 fps
fps
63%
Mali-G57 MP6:
20 20 ~ 20 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
32 [X] Honor 10 0.5.0
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
20 fps, max:
42 fps
32 [X] Honor Play 0.7.0
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
22 fps, max:
33 fps
33 [X] Huawei P20 Pro 0.7.0
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
14 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Huawei P20 Pro 0.7.0 mit GPU Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
16 fps, max:
42 fps
~ 34 fps
74%
Mali-G57 MP6:
20 30 ~ 25 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
60 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
31 55 [X] Honor Play 1.24.1.2
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
43 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 43 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 54 [X] Honor Play 1.24.1.2
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
21 fps, max:
61 fps
58 [X] Honor 10 1.21.1.3
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
2 fps, max:
60 fps
58 [X] Huawei P20 Pro 1.23.1.2
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
40 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 50 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
60 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 30 30 59 [X] Huawei P20 1.3.3
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
46 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 37 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
29 29 30 30 [X] Huawei P20 3.6.0k
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
26 fps, max:
31 fps
~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 fps
100%
Adreno 619:
30 30 [X] Nokia X20 2.8.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
22 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Motorola Moto G51 3.3.5a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
25 fps, max:
31 fps
~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 fps
100%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 [X] Nokia X20 2.8.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
19 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Motorola Moto G51 3.3.5a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
24 fps, max:
31 fps
30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
51 fps
Average Gaming ARM Mali-G72 MP12 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 131% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 107%
Average Gaming ARM Mali-G57 MP6 → 87% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
ARM Mali-G57 MP6 low med. high ultra QHD 4K PUBG Mobile 20 25 World of Tanks Blitz 60 60 Asphalt 9: Legends 30 30 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 1 1 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 19. 05:02:21
#0 checking url part for id 8138 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 10584 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 10451 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 16 May 2024 05:40:59 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.126s ... 0.127s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.127s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.127s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8138 +0.037s ... 0.164s
#9 got single benchmarks 8138 +0.02s ... 0.184s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10584 +0.001s ... 0.186s
#11 got single benchmarks 10584 +0.113s ... 0.299s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 10451 +0.002s ... 0.3s
#13 got single benchmarks 10451 +0.012s ... 0.312s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.312s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.157s ... 0.469s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.469s
#17 Got 148 rows for game benchmarks. +0.071s ... 0.54s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.54s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.007s ... 0.547s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.032s ... 0.579s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.579s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.582s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)