Notebookcheck Logo

HTC Desire 22 Pro 5G smartphone review – Speedy internet now at an acceptable price

Off to the Metaverse? At $400, the HTC Desire 22 Pro's launch price was way too high. However, in the meantime, it is significantly cheaper. Since the smartphone is said to score well with its exclusive Metaverse features, our catch-up review reveals whether or not the HTC phone is actually something special.
HTC Desire 22 Pro
HTC Desire 22 Pro (Desire Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 8 x 1.7 - 2.2 GHz, Kryo 660 Gold (2x Cortex-A78) / Silver (6x Cortex-A55)
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
Display
6.60 inch 20:9, 2412 x 1080 pixel 400 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, Gorilla Glass , glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 110 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD (SDXC), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41), 5G (n1/​n3/​n7/​n20/​n28/​n41/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.4 x 166.3 x 76.9 ( = 0.37 x 6.55 x 3.03 in)
Battery
4520 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 18-watt charging, 15-watt wireless charging, 5-watt reverse charging
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix f/​1.79, phase comparison AF, dual LED flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (Camera 1); 13.0MP, f/​2.4, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 5.0MP, f/​2.4, depth of field (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/​2.0, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, charging cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, IP67-certified, FM radio, notification LED, fanless, waterproof
Weight
206 g ( = 7.27 oz / 0.45 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
450 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors compared

Bewertung
Datum
Modell
Gewicht
Laufwerk
Groesse
Aufloesung
Preis ab
78.2 %
07/2023
HTC Desire 22 Pro
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
206 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2412x1080
81.9 %
12/2022
Motorola Moto G72
Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2
166 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2400x1080
81.4 %
06/2023
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
195 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.72"2400x1080
81.4 %
05/2023
Xiaomi Poco X5
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
190 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080

Case and features – A shiny rear side and IP certification

The Metaverse sounds like a great escape from reality. A place where you create not only your own avatar but also the world itself, and have both tailor-made to your imagination. However, the trend has not really taken off yet. With the Desire 22 Pro, HTC is offering a special mid-range phone that is even being promoted in some countries with additional trendy buzzwords such as NFT or crypto.

At first glance, the phone looks pretty normal from the outside. The manufacturer has gone for a sleek combination of rose gold and black with one of those colors dominating, depending on the variant. The rear side is shiny and has a wave pattern. Unfortunately, the device is very good at attracting fingerprints and other dirty smudges. 

The corners are nicely rounded and the Desire 22 Pro feels good in the hand, but, at 206 grams, it's a comparatively heavy device. The display bezels are also a bit chunky meaning only 81% of the front side of the phone is the actual screen. 

We are impressed with the HTC Desire 22 Pro's IP67 certification which should at least allow brief submersion in water and the case is promised full protection against dust. 

With a generous 8 GB of RAM and 128 GB UFS 2.2 flash, the Desire 22 Pro is well covered when it comes to memory. Also, a few old virtues such as a notification LED and an FM radio are on board with these being quite hard to come by on other phones. Likewise, the device also comes with NFC for mobile payments.

If desired, the memory can be expanded thanks to the microSD reader. In tests with our microSD Angelbird V60 reference card, it achieved class-level results.

HTC Desire 22 Pro
HTC Desire 22 Pro
HTC Desire 22 Pro
HTC Desire 22 Pro

Size comparison

166.3 mm / 6.55 inch 76.9 mm / 3.03 inch 9.4 mm / 0.3701 inch 206 g0.4542 lbs165.88 mm / 6.53 inch 76.21 mm / 3 inch 7.98 mm / 0.3142 inch 190 g0.4189 lbs165.5 mm / 6.52 inch 76 mm / 2.99 inch 8.3 mm / 0.3268 inch 195 g0.4299 lbs160.5 mm / 6.32 inch 74.4 mm / 2.93 inch 7.9 mm / 0.311 inch 166 g0.366 lbs148 mm / 5.83 inch 105 mm / 4.13 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 1.5 g0.00331 lbs
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Motorola Moto G72
  (Angelbird V60)
34.2 MB/s +34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10.9 - 77, n=99, last 2 years)
28.3 MB/s +11%
Xiaomi Poco X5
  (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
27.13 MB/s +6%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
  (Angelbird V60)
25.5 MB/s
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
  (Angelbird V60)
24.6 MB/s -4%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
HTC Desire 22 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø35.1 (25.7-42.7)
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø37.8 (26.7-49.3)
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø37 (28.7-44.4)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø40 (29.3-50.7)
HTC Desire 22 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.5 (25.1-81.6)
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø70.6 (29.3-82.6)
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø68.6 (26.9-79.1)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø73.4 (32.4-80)

Communication, software and operation – Unfortunately, hardly any updates

It's good to see that the HTC Desire 22 Pro comes with 5G, however, there could be more support for frequency bands such as both LTE and other modern cell phone standards.  Prior to undertaking longer trips abroad, this means the user will have to check whether it's possible to use the smartphone locally, in order to enjoy mobile internet access. 

The HTC cell phone might only have WiFi 5, but it has more antennas for both sending and receiving directions. They allow the device to send and receive data twice as fast as similarly expensive current phones. The transfer speeds are also very consistent. For our tests, we used the Asus ROG Rapture AXE11000 router.

In terms of software, despite having Android 12, you are clearly reminded of earlier Android versions as HTC has not adapted its own system info or updates to Google's current Android operating system look. The manufacturer also hasn't disclosed how many system updates there will be or whether there will be any at all. However, since December 2022, there have been no more security updates for the phone.

The focus is on the apps which are all about the Metaverse topic and the connection to one of HTC's Vive series VR headsets. HTC hasn't mentioned what it has optimized and the preinstalled programs can also be found normally by using other phones on the Google Play Store. The Viveverse, a Metaverse app, with which it is possible to roam through individual rooms, feels very empty due to a lack of participating users. In addition, it also stutters frequently on the Desire 22 Pro.

The 120 Hz touchscreen ensures smooth scrolling and responsive inputs. On the right side of the device, a fingerprint sensor is housed in the standby button. It takes around one second before the phone is (very reliably) unlocked. It is also possible to use face recognition to unlock the cell phone. This works just as well but isn't as secure.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
HTC Desire 22 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
676 (629min - 713max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Poco X5
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
364 (183min - 386max) MBit/s -46%
Motorola Moto G72
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
359 (338min - 372max) MBit/s -47%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
357 (269min - 374max) MBit/s -47%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
HTC Desire 22 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
628 (596min - 642max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Poco X5
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
344 (173min - 351max) MBit/s -45%
Motorola Moto G72
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
333 (307min - 348max) MBit/s -47%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
330 (290min - 348max) MBit/s -47%
04080120160200240280320360400440480520560600640680Tooltip
HTC Desire 22 Pro; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø627 (596-642)
HTC Desire 22 Pro; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø676 (629-713)

Cameras – For moderate demands

Front camera image
Front camera image

The 64-megapixel main camera comes from OmniVision and, at first glance, it takes the kind of decent shots, typical for this class of device. However, on closer inspection, they lack both detail and contrast. They're certainly good enough for simple snapshots and with moderate demands they are satisfactory if viewed mainly on the phone's display.

Videos can be recorded at 1080p and 30fps. They are also a little lacking in detail but, in terms of adaptive brightness, the video recordings hit the bullseye. The autofocus also doesn't jump around too much. 

There is also a straightforward wide-angle camera which doesn't capture many details and also hardly adds any vibrancy to the image. It's also a bit of a hassle using this feature to take photos as it can only be accessed via the menu.

On the front side, there is a very high-resolution, 32-megapixel selfie camera. However, typically, it only uses 1/4 of the nominal resolution in order to increase the light output. Despite good lighting, the front camera lacks vibrancy both in dark and bright areas. In addition, the photos also can't be considered to be particularly detailed.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera BlumeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera LowLightWeitwinkel
click to load images
ColorChecker
9.7 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
6 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
10 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
ColorChecker HTC Desire 22 Pro: 7.95 ∆E min: 2.23 - max: 13.42 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
55 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53.3 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
28 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
63.9 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
75.9 ∆E
44 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
92.9 ∆E
70.6 ∆E
52 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker HTC Desire 22 Pro: 46.78 ∆E min: 13.38 - max: 92.92 ∆E

Display – No PWM to be found on the Desire 22 Pro's display

Subpixel image
Subpixel image

The HTC Desire 22 Pro's display has extended Full HD resolution and you can even enjoy streaming content in HD, thanks to Widevine L1 certification. It can display up to 120 frames per second which ensures that movement is reproduced smoothly. 

Up to now, everything sounds good but, unfortunately, the IPS screen isn't particularly bright: At maximum brightness, we measured an average of 456 cd/m². OLED displays, which are no longer a rarity in this price class, manage considerably higher values. The contrast is acceptable, but colors appear dull on the screen. Mostly due to a blue tint our spectral photometer picked up in tests.

But, at least PWM is absent.

456
cd/m²
456
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 476 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 455.6 cd/m² Minimum: 5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 476 cd/m²
Contrast: 1442:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.26 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 8.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.238
HTC Desire 22 Pro
IPS, 2412x1080, 6.60
Motorola Moto G72
P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.60
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.72
Xiaomi Poco X5
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Response Times
92%
1%
93%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
28.8 ?(14.8, 14)
1.5 ?(0.8, 0.7)
95%
26 ?(15, 11)
10%
1.51 ?(0.7165, 0.791)
95%
Response Time Black / White *
12.9 ?(8.8, 4.1)
1.5 ?(0.8, 0.7)
88%
14 ?(10, 4)
-9%
1.18 ?(0.5735, 0.6055)
91%
PWM Frequency
180
486
Screen
58%
24%
50%
Brightness middle
476
992
108%
672
41%
674
42%
Brightness
456
980
115%
656
44%
683
50%
Brightness Distribution
91
92
1%
90
-1%
98
8%
Black Level *
0.33
0.39
-18%
Contrast
1442
1723
19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.26
4.56
27%
3.88
38%
1.6
74%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
11.76
7.96
32%
7.89
33%
5.3
55%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
8.5
3.1
64%
5.2
39%
2.5
71%
Gamma
2.238 98%
2.233 99%
2.218 99%
2.21 100%
CCT
8656 75%
7098 92%
7734 84%
6346 102%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
75% / 66%
13% / 20%
72% / 61%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
12.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.8 ms rise
↘ 4.1 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14.8 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CalMAN Gray scales
CalMAN Gray scales
CalMAN Color accuracy
CalMAN Color accuracy
CalMAN sRGB color space
CalMAN sRGB color space
CalMAN Saturation
CalMAN Saturation

Performance, emissions and battery life – A fast cell phone with no throttling

With the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695, the HTC Desire 22 Pro was somewhat underpowered at its original price point but, priced at somewhere between $200 and $300, it's just right. With this processor, the system runs smoothly in many situations but, of course, is insufficient to be able to run demanding games or 4K graphics.

The UFS-2.2 memory is what you would expect for this category of device and only the Moto G72 can offer significantly higher data throughputs thanks to its faster memory controller. 

Under longer periods of load, the case heats up to a maximum of 47.7 °C. However, summery temperatures also prevailed throughout the test. Nevertheless, the 3DMark stress tests showed hardly any loss in performance after numerous runs and the same benchmarks.

Back in the day, HTC made smartphones with some of the best speakers on the market but the HTC Desire 22 Pro doesn't live up to its ancestors in this regard: The small speaker on the bottom edge sounds muffled and can only manage a medium-level volume of 79 dB(A). The most important Bluetooth audio codecs are all available, even modern variants such as aptX TWS+. Alternatively, wired headphones can be connected via the 3.5mm audio jack. Either way, both sound good. 

The HTC Desire 22 Pro's battery appears smaller than other smartphones due to the phone's hefty weight: However, with its 4,520 mAh, it managed 15 hours and 3 minutes in our Wi-Fi test. This should definitely get you through the day, as long as you don't ask too much of your phone. At a maximum of 18 watts, charging is done via the cable but a charger is not included. Likewise, wireless charging at up to 15 watts is also possible as well as wireless reverse charging at up to 5 watts from other devices.

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=220, last 2 years)
911 Points +36%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
678 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (659 - 697, n=24)
676 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
674 Points 0%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
671 Points
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
540 Points -20%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=220, last 2 years)
2988 Points +57%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1963 Points +3%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
1925 Points +1%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
1907 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1663 - 2038, n=24)
1904 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1810 Points -5%
Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 2930, n=105, last 2 years)
1390 Points +51%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
918 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (893 - 919, n=8)
906 Points -1%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
893 Points -3%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 7408, n=105, last 2 years)
3840 Points +75%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2189 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1993 - 2189, n=8)
2073 Points -5%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2064 Points -6%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=215, last 2 years)
11771 Points +10%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
10675 Points
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
10634 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
10589 Points -1%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
10055 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (6897 - 11732, n=23)
9629 Points -10%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2944 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (2827 - 2983, n=19)
2930 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2924 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 7890, n=106, last 2 years)
2738 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2600 Points -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2822 Points 0%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2819 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (2733 - 2845, n=19)
2813 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 9814, n=106, last 2 years)
2733 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2433 Points -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3482 Points
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3425 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3093 - 3554, n=19)
3407 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3346 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 4679, n=106, last 2 years)
3156 Points -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=183, last 2 years)
6705 Points +116%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3103 Points
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3069 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (2887 - 3107, n=21)
3069 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2648 Points -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=182, last 2 years)
9675 Points +223%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2997 Points
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2988 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (2812 - 3008, n=21)
2974 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2459 Points -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Smartphone
  (938 - 8480, n=182, last 2 years)
4216 Points +19%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3622 Points +2%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3539 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3182 - 3613, n=21)
3465 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3392 Points -4%
Wild Life Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (395 - 9839, n=136, last 2 years)
2540 Points +110%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
1216 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1197 - 1292, n=22)
1212 Points 0%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
1207 Points
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1183 Points -2%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (394 - 20068, n=204, last 2 years)
6251 Points +418%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1232 Points +2%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
1207 Points
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
1207 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1193 - 1227, n=22)
1204 Points 0%
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 5226, n=208, last 2 years)
1682 Points +366%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
361 Points
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
360 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (355 - 364, n=22)
360 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
347 Points -4%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (110 - 5248, n=202, last 2 years)
1698 Points +378%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
355 Points
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
354 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (351 - 371, n=22)
354 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
337 Points -5%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=227, last 2 years)
43.9 fps +131%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (18 - 38, n=23)
19.7 fps +4%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
19 fps
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
19 fps 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
19 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
14 fps -26%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 229, n=227, last 2 years)
64 fps +205%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
22 fps +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (21 - 23, n=23)
21.5 fps +2%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
21 fps
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
21 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
16 fps -24%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 119, n=227, last 2 years)
32.7 fps +173%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (11 - 24, n=23)
12.4 fps +3%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
12 fps
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
12 fps 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
12 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
8.9 fps -26%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 94, n=227, last 2 years)
25.5 fps +227%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
8 fps +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (7.7 - 8.2, n=23)
7.99 fps +2%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
7.8 fps
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
7.8 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
5.9 fps -24%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.38 - 42, n=214, last 2 years)
12.5 fps +257%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4 fps +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3.5 - 4, n=21)
3.6 fps +3%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3.5 fps
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3.5 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2.5 fps -29%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years)
33357 Points +49%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
24196 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (17849 - 31647, n=21)
24051 Points +7%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
22881 Points +2%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
22407 Points
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
18237 Points -19%
HTC Desire 22 ProMotorola Moto G72OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5GXiaomi Poco X5Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
33%
-9%
1%
13%
105%
Sequential Read 256KB
527.1
868.5
65%
506.1
-4%
522.64
-1%
Sequential Write 256KB
468.5
497.5
6%
466.6
0%
497.38
6%
Random Read 4KB
186.9
231.4
24%
162.5
-13%
185.09
-1%
Random Write 4KB
168.6
230.2
37%
134.9
-20%
168.49
0%

Temperature

Max. Load
 47 °C
117 F
39.2 °C
103 F
37.4 °C
99 F
 
 47.7 °C
118 F
39.4 °C
103 F
39.5 °C
103 F
 
 47.5 °C
118 F
36.3 °C
97 F
39.8 °C
104 F
 
Maximum: 47.7 °C = 118 F
Average: 41.5 °C = 107 F
35.8 °C
96 F
38.4 °C
101 F
43 °C
109 F
37.1 °C
99 F
38.8 °C
102 F
43.9 °C
111 F
35.8 °C
96 F
40 °C
104 F
45.3 °C
114 F
Maximum: 45.3 °C = 114 F
Average: 39.8 °C = 104 F
Power Supply (max.)  42.3 °C = 108 F | Room Temperature 25.8 °C = 78 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.7 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.3 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.


Heat map front
Heat map front
Heat map rear
Heat map rear
3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Motorola Moto G72
99.4 (2.08min - 2.09max) % +1%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
99.2 (2.16min - 2.18max) % +1%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
98.7 (2.14min - 2.17max) %
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
HTC Desire 22 Pro
99.7 (7.22min - 7.24max) %
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
99.7 (7.24min - 7.27max) % 0%
Motorola Moto G72
97.1 (6.59min - 6.79max) % -3%

Legend

 
HTC Desire 22 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Motorola Moto G72 Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Xiaomi Poco X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Speakers

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs204344.82535.438.53132.529.1403535.4503836.86328.526.68021.121.71002124.112520.926.416019.736.920014.741.825013.647.931511.952.240012.657.850014.461.663014.561.680015.658.6100012.569125012.873.1160011.172.3200011.969.7250011.960.9315013.160.6400014.457500015.965.3630015.960.8800016.360.1100001754.4125001748.31600017.651.6SPL26.579N0.838.8median 14.5median 58.6Delta2.27.729.642.93043.824.537.725.840.837.543.325.240.320.247.520.445.917.547.814.450.814.351.215.251.811.956.913.561.612.166.112.466.311.77111.876.611.478.112.377.112.279.312.180.612.283.912.985.713.48413.282.512.979.613.678.913.476.913.265.324.8930.691.7median 12.9median 76.90.99.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHTC Desire 22 ProXiaomi Poco X5
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HTC Desire 22 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Poco X5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Battery life

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
5000 mAh
986 min +9%
Motorola Moto G72
5000 mAh
929 min +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (424 - 2844, n=229, last 2 years)
914 min +1%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
4520 mAh
903 min
Xiaomi Poco X5
5000 mAh
662 min -27%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
15h 03min

Pros

+ fast Wi-Fi 5
+ wireless charging
+ IP67 certification
+ good performance without throttling
+ no PWM

Cons

- no charger in the box
- hardly any new software updates
- very heavy
- average screen-to-body-ratio

Verdict– More beautifully retro than futuristic

HTC Desire 22 Pro review: Review device provided by:
HTC Desire 22 Pro review: Review device provided by:
cyberport.de

In some respects, the HTC Desire 22 Pro is a little old-fashioned: The somewhat overly thick bezels and the software look - which reminds us of Android 5 or 6 - take us on a trip back in time to HTC's best times. An era which is already quite a while ago. But that shouldn't be all bad: Anyone grateful for a notification LED and an FM radio in their smartphone will get their money's worth. However, the phone's high weight, coupled with the very low capacity battery is annoying. 

Nevertheless, modern features such as a 120 Hz screen, wireless charging and 5G can all be found here, as well as fast Wi-Fi, and a speedy processor IP certification. It was not generous of HTC not to include a charger in the box at the one-time enormous RRP.

The HTC Desire 22 Pro hardly keeps its promises as a Metaverse and crypto cell phone but could still find its fans with its affordable price, fast internet and retro features. 

Despite this, we would advise against counting on the manufacturer's advertizing promises when it comes to software: The search for software updates in 2023 has, so far, ended in vain and the promised Metaverse crypto features have just turned out to be simple apps that can also be used on other smartphones. 

With the Motorola Moto G72 you get a very bright OLED screen but have to deal with compromised processor performance. The Xiaomi Poco X5 is faster and also has an OLED screen as well as a 33-watt charger in the box.

Price and availability

Currently, the international version of the HTC Desire 22 Pro can be purchased for $312 on Amazon

HTC Desire 22 Pro - 07/02/2023 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
82%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
52 / 70 → 75%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
83%
Games Performance
30 / 64 → 47%
Application Performance
73 / 86 → 85%
Temperature
85%
Noise
100%
Audio
54 / 90 → 60%
Camera
51%
Average
73%
78%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > HTC Desire 22 Pro 5G smartphone review – Speedy internet now at an acceptable price
Florian Schmitt, 2023-07- 3 (Update: 2023-07- 3)