ARM Mali-G57 MP6 vs Qualcomm Adreno 642L vs Qualcomm Adreno 690
ARM Mali-G57 MP6 ► remove from comparison
The ARM Mali-G57 MP6 is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced mid 2020 in the HiSilicon Kirin 820 and uses 6 clusters (hence the MP6 name).
The G57 is based on the new Valhall architecture and is intended for mainstream phones.
The performance of the G57MP6 in our benchmarks (in the Kirin 820 / Huawei P40 Lite) is comparable to the Adreno 620 (e.g. Oppo Find X2) and ARM Mali-G72 MP18 (Note10 Lite).
The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.
Qualcomm Adreno 642L ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 642L is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SoC . The chip will be available from mid 2021 and will be used mainly in upper mid-range Android devices.
According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 642L GPU offers a 40% improved performance over the Adreno 620 (compared to the specified +50% of the 642 in the SD 780G), its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 768G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR4X-4200 memory support of the SoC.
The Adreno 642L supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.
The Snapdragon 778G and therefore also the 642L is manufactured in the modern 6nm UEV process at TSMC that should provide a good power efficiency.
Qualcomm Adreno 690 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 is an integrated graphics card in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 SoC for Windows laptops. According to Qualcomm, the 690 is up to 60% faster than the previous generation. In our tests with the Lenovo ThinkPad X13s, the Adreno 690 was only on par with a low en Intel UHD Graphics iGPU and not well suited for 3D games.
The chip is manufactured in 5nm at Samsung (5LPE) and suited for fanless laptops.
ARM Mali-G57 MP6 Qualcomm Adreno 642L Qualcomm Adreno 690 Adreno 600 Series Codename Valhall Architecture Bifrost Pipelines 6 - unified Shared Memory no yes yes technology 7 nm 6 nm 5 nm Date of Announcement 03.07.2020 07.05.2021 06.12.2018 Link to Manufacturer Page developer.arm.com API OpenGL ES 3.2 DirectX 12 Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 Power Consumption 7 Watt
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Adreno 690
1.3 pt (4%)
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
909 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
811 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
57067 Points (6%)
min: 88482 avg: 89308 median: 89307.5 (10%) max: 90133 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 8602 avg: 9818 median: 9818 (10%) max: 11034 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 13768 avg: 16708 median: 16707.5 (4%) max: 19647 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 2758 avg: 2835 median: 2834.5 (5%) max: 2911 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 2837 avg: 2933 median: 2932.5 (3%) max: 3028 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
14652 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
5853 Points (25%)
min: 6398 avg: 6666 median: 6638 (29%) max: 7281 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
6327 Points (14%)
min: 7199 avg: 7627 median: 7536 (17%) max: 8605 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 4281 avg: 4563 median: 4563 (23%) max: 4845 Points
min: 5032 avg: 5413 median: 5393.5 (27%) max: 5763 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 4472 avg: 4689 median: 4689 (14%) max: 4906 Points
min: 5103 avg: 5654 median: 5612 (17%) max: 6240 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
1886 Points (1%)
min: 2321 avg: 2517 median: 2493.5 (1%) max: 2831 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
609 Points (1%)
min: 681 avg: 696 median: 687.5 (1%) max: 768 Points
3067 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 3063 avg: 3085 median: 3077 (4%) max: 3115 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 2898 avg: 2930 median: 2912 (3%) max: 2979 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 690 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
558 Points (0%)
Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Qualcomm Adreno 690 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 13.4 avg: 13.7 median: 13.7 (1%) max: 14 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Qualcomm Adreno 690 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
4.8 fps (2%)
min: 5.9 avg: 6.2 median: 6.1 (2%) max: 6.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 10 avg: 11 median: 11 (2%) max: 12 fps
min: 13 avg: 13.6 median: 13.5 (2%) max: 15 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 29 avg: 30 median: 30 (2%) max: 31 fps
min: 34 avg: 36.4 median: 36 (3%) max: 40 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 21 avg: 24 median: 24 (3%) max: 27 fps
min: 33 avg: 33.7 median: 33 (4%) max: 37 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 44 avg: 45.5 median: 45.5 (1%) max: 47 fps
min: 56 avg: 57.7 median: 57 (1%) max: 64 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 63 avg: 66 median: 66 (4%) max: 69 fps
min: 77 avg: 79.1 median: 78 (5%) max: 89 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G57 MP6 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 103 avg: 107.5 median: 107.5 (1%) max: 112 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642L
min: 132 avg: 134.9 median: 133 (1%) max: 148 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
83516 Points (10%)
min: 135972 avg: 157798 median: 157454 (20%) max: 175807 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
34.9 fps (0%)
min: 45.96 avg: 49.6 median: 46.9 (0%) max: 54.4 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 12491 avg: 22356 median: 22356 (22%) max: 32221 Points
min: 23666 avg: 31803 median: 30994 (31%) max: 38436 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 4354 avg: 6862 median: 6861.5 (12%) max: 9369 Points
min: 26134 avg: 36660 median: 40236 (70%) max: 43000 Points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 17 avg: 19.7 median: 19.7 (3%) max: 22.3 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
15.8 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
16.4 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
4.6 Watt (2%)
min: 0 avg: 4.3 median: 4 (2%) max: 9.27 Watt
Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G57 MP6 → 100% n=1 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642L → 113% n=1 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 690 → 504% n=1
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
Adreno 642L:
59 59 ~ 59 fps
Adreno 642L:
51 60 ~ 56 fps
Adreno 642L:
61 [X] Xiaomi 12 Lite 3.4.0.5930
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 642L
min:
57 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
100%
Mali-G57 MP6:
20 20 ~ 20 fps
Adreno 642L:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Mali-G57 MP6:
20 30 ~ 25 fps
100%
Adreno 642L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Adreno 642L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
Adreno 642L:
90 [X] Motorola Edge 30 2.36.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G 1.9GHz
Adreno 642L
min:
82 fps, max:
91 fps
fps
Average Gaming ARM Mali-G57 MP6 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 642L → 161% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 221%
Qualcomm Adreno 690 low med. high ultra QHD 4K F1 22 26 22.5 17 12.6 X-Plane 11.11 14 12 11 Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 19 12.3 7.29 Dota 2 Reborn 58 55 44 37 The Witcher 3 25 16 10 4 GTA V 29.9 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 5 1 4 1 4 1 2 1
Qualcomm Adreno 642L low med. high ultra QHD 4K Diablo Immortal 59 56 League of Legends: Wild Rift 61 Armajet 89 PUBG Mobile 58 40 38 Dead Trigger 2 60 Asphalt 9: Legends 30 30 Subway Surfers 90 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 3 1 2 3 1 1
ARM Mali-G57 MP6 low med. high ultra QHD 4K PUBG Mobile 20 25 World of Tanks Blitz 60 60 Asphalt 9: Legends 30 30 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 1 1 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 19. 16:35:30
#0 checking url part for id 10451 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 10945 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 11411 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 May 2024 05:37:06 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.126s ... 0.127s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.127s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.127s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10451 +0.038s ... 0.165s
#9 got single benchmarks 10451 +0.011s ... 0.177s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10945 +0.002s ... 0.178s
#11 got single benchmarks 10945 +0.048s ... 0.226s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11411 +0.02s ... 0.246s
#13 got single benchmarks 11411 +0.011s ... 0.257s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.257s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.169s ... 0.426s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.427s
#17 Got 96 rows for game benchmarks. +0.023s ... 0.449s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.449s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.008s ... 0.457s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.033s ... 0.49s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.49s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.492s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)