Intel Core i7-1255U debut: Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 convertible review
The Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 directly replaces last year's 16:9 Inspiron 14 7400 or 7415 2-in-1 by introducing both a brand new 16:10 chassis design and Intel 12th gen Alder Lake-U processor options. In fact, it's one of the first consumer models to ship with such Intel CPUs. Unlike the more professional Latitude series or flagship XPS series, the Inspiron series targets students and more casual home or office users on tighter budgets.
Our test unit in review is a higher-end configuration with the Core i7-1255U CPU, integrated Iris Xe graphics, and 16 GB of DDR4 RAM for approximately $1050 USD retail. Other SKUs exist with the Core i3-1215U, i5-1235U, and even discrete GeForce MX550 graphics alongside the usual RAM and storage variations. All options otherwise come with the same 16:10 FHD+ touchscreen with no other panel choices.
Alternatives to the Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 include other budget to midrange 14-inch convertibles like the Acer Spin 3, Dell Inspiron 14 5410, Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5, Asus VivoBook Flip 14, or the HP Pavilion x360 14. Dell offers AMD versions of this same chassis design called the Inspiron 14 7425 2-in-1.
More Dell reviews:
Potential Competitors in Comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
83.7 % | 06/2022 | Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.6 kg | 17.86 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
89 % | 07/2021 | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.5 kg | 13.94 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
82.9 % | 09/2021 | Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 R7 5700U, Vega 8 | 1.5 kg | 17.95 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
86.5 % | 05/2022 | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W R7 5800H, Vega 8 | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
89.5 % | 05/2021 | HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 16.9 mm | 13.50" | 3000x2000 | |
89.8 % | 05/2022 | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 15.25 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
Case — Mylar Palm Rests
Visually, the revamped chassis design is very distinct from the outgoing Inspiron 7400 series. The rear ventilation grilles, for example, are now longer in size while the edges are more rectangular instead of round. The keyboard deck is flatter now as well for a cleaner look. New to the series this year is the sheet of smooth translucent mylar across the palm rests and clickpad that is more resistant to scuffs and other superficial damage than the otherwise standard plastic and aluminum surface.
Chassis rigidity is average for the base but strong for the lid. Attempting to twist the base or lid around their respective corners results in just minor warping with no creaking for good first impressions. Pressing down on the keyboard center or outer lid will warp their surfaces more so than on pricier models like the HP Spectre x360 14.
When compared to the outgoing Inspiron 14 7410, the 7420 is both wider and shorter due to the new 16:10 form factor. Meanwhile, weight and height have remained nearly the same between the two designs. Pricier alternatives like the latitude 9420 2-in-1, Zenbook Flip 14, and HP Spectre x360 14 are all smaller and lighter than our 7420.
Connectivity — No Thunderbolt Support
Port options are good for a subnotebook convertible. We particularly appreciate the integrated HDMI port as many competitors are lacking the option. However, keep in mind that the two USB-C ports here support only data transfer, power delivery, and DisplayPort; there is no Thunderbolt available.
The HDMI port is version 1.4 only meaning 4K video output at 60 FPS will only be possible via USB-C.
SD Card Reader
Transfer rates from the SD reader are slow. Moving 1 GB of pictures from our UHS-II test card takes 50 seconds compared to 6 or 7 seconds on the Dell XPS 15. The reader is not spring-loaded and so inserted cards still protrude by over half their length.
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 (AV Pro V60) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 (AV Pro V60) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
Communication — Wi-Fi 6E Compatible
The Intel AX211 comes standard for Intel Wi-Fi 6E connectivity. We experienced a stable connection when paired to our 6 GHz network, but transfer rates aren't necessarily any faster than regular Wi-Fi 6.
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
Webcam
The camera is 1080p instead of 720p for a sharper picture than most other budget laptops. Colors are still relatively poor, however.
There is no IR camera and so Windows Hello is not supported. A physical camera shutter is built-in for additional privacy.
Maintenance
The bottom panel is secured by 7 Philips screws for easy servicing. The battery, 2x SODIMM slots, and M.2 2280 slot are all accessible.
Accessories and Warranty
There are no extras included in the retail box aside from the AC adapter and paperwork. An optional PN5122W stylus pen is available for tablet mode users.
The standard one-year limited warranty applies when purchased in the US with plenty of extension options if purchased directly from Dell.
Input Devices — Feedback Could Be Firmer
Keyboard
Keyboard layout remains identical to the keyboard on the Inspiron 14 7415 2-in-1 despite the chassis redesign. The typing experience is satisfactory and with minimal clatter, but the somewhat soft feedback takes getting used to. The soft Space key in particular could have benefited from a firmer click for stronger feedback.
Touchpad
The Precision clickpad is relatively large (~11.5 x 8 cm) to be 14 percent larger than the clickpad on the previous generation model. The top edge is stylized to blend in with the surrounding palm rests unlike the clickpads on most other laptops. Traction is smooth at medium-to-high speeds while slower speeds tend to stick for more accurate clicking or drag and dropping.
It takes a lot of force to click on the clickpad which can make it tiring to use after a while. Feedback isn't as strong as we would like and travel is shallow as well. You'll want to use an external mouse for longer sessions.
Display — Sharp, But Limited Color Reproduction
The 16:10 14-inch BOE NV14N42 IPS panel on the Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 is the first to appear in our database as the last generation 16:9 Inspiron 14 7400 would ship with a Chi Mei panel instead. For better or worse, however, the BOE panel doesn't seem to be offering much over the older Chi Mei panel aside from the larger 16:10 aspect ratio. Key attributes like contrast ratio, colors, brightness, and response times have unfortunately not improved between the Inspiron generations. If such display features are important for your daily workloads, then you'll still need to consider one of Dell's higher-end options instead like the XPS 13 2-in-1 or Latitude 9420 2-in-1.
|
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 259.7 cd/m²
Contrast: 657:1 (Black: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.53 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.94, calibrated: 3.13
ΔE Greyscale 5.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
39.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
56.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.05
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 BOE NV14N42, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 AU Optronics B140QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 Chi Mei 140HCA, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W SDC4154, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng Samsung SDC4148, OLED, 3000x2000, 13.5" | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US Lenovo LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 96% | 11% | 128% | 126% | 128% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 38.6 | 80.7 109% | 42.5 10% | 99.7 158% | 99.9 159% | 99.8 159% |
sRGB Coverage | 56.2 | 100 78% | 63.1 12% | 100 78% | 100 78% | 100 78% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 39.9 | 79.7 100% | 44 10% | 98.6 147% | 96.1 141% | 98.7 147% |
Response Times | -79% | -20% | 92% | 92% | 95% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 27.2 ? | 54 ? -99% | 28.8 ? -6% | 2 ? 93% | 2 ? 93% | 1.2 ? 96% |
Response Time Black / White * | 20.8 ? | 32.8 ? -58% | 27.6 ? -33% | 2 ? 90% | 2 ? 90% | 1.2 ? 94% |
PWM Frequency | 250 ? | 347.2 ? | ||||
Screen | 55% | 1% | 40% | 659% | 36% | |
Brightness middle | 269.4 | 483.6 80% | 262.7 -2% | 366 36% | 370 37% | 367.3 36% |
Brightness | 260 | 465 79% | 245 -6% | 369 42% | 374 44% | 369 42% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 92 3% | 84 -6% | 96 8% | 90 1% | 97 9% |
Black Level * | 0.41 | 0.32 22% | 0.37 10% | 0.01 98% | ||
Contrast | 657 | 1511 130% | 710 8% | 37000 5532% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.53 | 3.69 43% | 6.23 5% | 2.84 57% | 2.57 61% | 5.2 20% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 19.76 | 5.97 70% | 22.62 -14% | 5.29 73% | 4.52 77% | 8.04 59% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.13 | 2.05 35% | 1.8 42% | 2.81 10% | 2.31 26% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.4 | 3.5 35% | 7.1 -31% | 2.32 57% | 2.2 59% | 2.8 48% |
Gamma | 2.05 107% | 2.04 108% | 2.22 99% | 2.44 90% | 2.36 93% | 2.21 100% |
CCT | 6007 108% | 6158 106% | 6241 104% | 6170 105% | 6154 106% | 5992 108% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 85.8 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 24% /
45% | -3% /
-0% | 87% /
71% | 292% /
464% | 86% /
72% |
* ... smaller is better
The display is not very well calibrated out of the box which is to be expected from a budget-midrange convertible with limited sRGB coverage. Average grayscale and color DeltaE values can improve through calibration to 3.4 and 3.1, respectively, but the narrow gamut puts a hard limit to how much further they can go. Owners can apply our ICM profile above for improved colors over the default settings.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
20.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.6 ms rise | |
↘ 9.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise | |
↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.1 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17204 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
We typically expect convertible laptops to have brighter displays for more comfortable outdoor viewing, but the Inspiron display is unfortunately dimmer than most others in its size category. You'll have to spend more on a Latitude, Spectre, or Zenbook if you want something brighter.
Performance — New Intel 12th Gen Options
Testing Conditions
Our unit was set to Windows Performance mode and Dell Ultra Performance mode via the My Dell software prior to running any benchmarks below for the highest possible scores. It's recommended to become familiar with My Dell as important battery and power features are toggled here. It effectively replaces the Dell Power Manager software found on older generation models.
Processor — Faster Than The 11th Gen Core i7-1165G7
CPU performance is excellent with multi-thread results that are between the 11th gen Core i7-1165G7 that was so popular on last year's Ultrabooks and the newer 12th gen Core i7-1260P. Meanwhile, single-thread performance is essentially on par with the Core i7-1260P despite their differing TDP levels. When compared to the 8-core Ryzen 7 5800U, the Core i7-1255U is both faster and slower in single-thread and multi-thread workloads, respectively.
Performance sustainability is excellent with no major dips in clock rates when subjected to extreme processor stress for extended periods.
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (4313 - 8127, n=10) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (3577 - 5095, n=10) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (2474 - 4400, n=10) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (13899 - 44054, n=10) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 |
System Performance
PCMark results are neck-to-neck with many pricier high-end models powered by the 11th gen Core i7-1165G7 including the Latitude 9420 2-in-1 or HP Spectre x360 14. System navigation doesn't feel any slower despite utilizing a U-series CPU instead of the faster P series.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4676 - 5523, n=9) | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (9381 - 11654, n=9) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6530 - 7418, n=9) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4498 - 6203, n=9) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1329 - 1573, n=9) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1364 - 1554, n=9) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1372 - 1660, n=9) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1117 - 1434, n=9) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
PCMark 10 Score | 5271 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (22846 - 67017, n=10) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (22877 - 67398, n=10) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (22883 - 65839, n=10) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (76 - 163.2, n=10) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latency
LatencyMon reveals DPC issues when opening multiple browser tabs of our homepage. 4K video playback at 60 FPS is otherwise smooth with just a single dropped frame during our tests. CPU and GPU utilization become stable at 9 percent and 43 percent, respectively.
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 |
* ... smaller is better
Storage Devices — Up To One M.2 2280 Drive
Our test unit ships with the WDC PC SN530 which is a midrange PCIe3 x4 NVMe SSD. Transfer rates can approach 2500 MB/s compared to 3000+ MB/s on higher-end models like the Samsung PM981a. For a midrange model like an Inspiron, however, the WDC PC SN530 is sufficient.
Our drive in the Inspiron exhibits issues maintaining maximum transfer rates for extended periods as shown by our DiskSpd loop graph below. Read rates would throttle between 1800 MB/s and 2500 MB/s due to poor heat dissipation properties.
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU Performance — Iris Xe Returns
Graphics performance is about 5 to 20 percent slower than the average Iris Xe 96 EUs in our database. Most notably, our GPU here can be 25 to 30 percent slower than on the Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 which comes with the same integrated GPU but a more powerful Core i7-1260P processor. Though not a gaming machine, the Inspiron is still good enough for common undemanding titles like DOTA 2 or Fortnite at lower graphics settings. We recommend configuring with dual-channel RAM whenever possible or else GPU performance will be pared back even further.