Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs Qualcomm Adreno 690 vs Qualcomm Adreno 640
Qualcomm Adreno 680 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 680 is an integrated graphics card in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx SoC for Windows laptops. According to Qualcomm it is 2x faster than the previous Adreno 630 in the Snapdragon 850 for Windows PCs with a 60% improved efficiency (thanks to the 7nm process). The performance should be similar to a Intel UHD Graphics 620 (e.g. in a 8th gen Core i5) when running native ARM64 compiled Windows apps and games. Running emulated 32 bit games (64 bit games compiled for AMD/Intel are not supported), the performance is notably slower.
Qualcomm Adreno 690 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 is an integrated graphics card in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 SoC for Windows laptops. According to Qualcomm, the 690 is up to 60% faster than the previous generation. In our tests with the Lenovo ThinkPad X13s, the Adreno 690 was only on par with a low en Intel UHD Graphics iGPU and not well suited for 3D games.
The chip is manufactured in 5nm at Samsung (5LPE) and suited for fanless laptops.
Qualcomm Adreno 640 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 640 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SoC. The chip will be available from early 2019 and will be used mainly in high-end Android devices.
According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 640 GPU offers a 20% improved performance over the Adreno 630, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 845 SoC. The enhanced performance is achieved by the Adreno 640 having 50% more FP16 and FP32 compute units (ALUs) than the Adreno 630, while its 7 nm FinFET manufacturing process makes it 20% more efficient too.
The Adreno 640 will also support the Vulkan 1.1 API, something which is possible for other Adreno 600 series GPUs too.
Qualcomm Adreno 680 Qualcomm Adreno 690 Qualcomm Adreno 640 Adreno 600 Series Shared Memory yes yes yes API DirectX 12 DirectX 12 DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2 Power Consumption 7 Watt 7 Watt technology 7 nm 5 nm 10 nm Date of Announcement 06.12.2018 06.12.2018 12.02.2018 Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Adreno 690
1.3 pt (4%)
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
909 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
811 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 97354 avg: 108080 median: 106829 (12%) max: 118129 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 8602 avg: 9818 median: 9818 (10%) max: 11034 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 13768 avg: 16708 median: 16707.5 (4%) max: 19647 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 2758 avg: 2835 median: 2834.5 (5%) max: 2911 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 2837 avg: 2933 median: 2932.5 (3%) max: 3028 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
14652 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 5268 avg: 7441 median: 7659 (33%) max: 8661 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 6358 avg: 9988 median: 10199 (22%) max: 12070 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 3969 avg: 6014 median: 6182 (31%) max: 6981 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 5184 avg: 7016 median: 7072.5 (21%) max: 8218 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 3079 avg: 3323 median: 3436 (2%) max: 3455 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
3067 Points (4%)
min: 864 avg: 936 median: 970 (1%) max: 974 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1650 avg: 1847 median: 1847 (3%) max: 2044 Points
min: 3063 avg: 3085 median: 3077 (4%) max: 3115 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1593 avg: 1936 median: 1935.5 (2%) max: 2278 Points
min: 2898 avg: 2930 median: 2912 (3%) max: 2979 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 680 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
353 Points (0%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 690 558 Points (0%)
Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Qualcomm Adreno 690 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 13.4 avg: 13.7 median: 13.7 (1%) max: 14 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Qualcomm Adreno 690 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
6.6 fps (3%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 8.5 avg: 17.5 median: 17 (3%) max: 39 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 16 avg: 40.5 median: 42 (3%) max: 47 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 22 avg: 40.2 median: 42 (5%) max: 48 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 35 avg: 64.4 median: 69 (1%) max: 79 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 50 avg: 94.7 median: 99.5 (6%) max: 112 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 680 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
140.2 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 640
min: 85 avg: 158.9 median: 166 (1%) max: 185 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 204205 avg: 204715 median: 204715 (26%) max: 205225 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
64.9 fps (0%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
2968 Points (1%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
2419 Points (1%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
1890 Points (2%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 10504 avg: 18251 median: 14922.5 (15%) max: 40654 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 4244 avg: 11804 median: 5422.5 (9%) max: 44840 Points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
12.6 Watt (2%)
min: 17 avg: 19.7 median: 19.7 (3%) max: 22.3 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
15.8 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
16.4 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
7.8 Watt (3%)
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 680 → 0% n= Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 690 → 0% n= Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 640 → 0% n=
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
Adreno 640:
30 30 [X] Xiaomi Pad 5 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 GHz
Adreno 640
min:
30 fps, max:
30 fps
~ 30 fps
Adreno 640:
59 60 [X] OnePlus 7 Pro 1.28.2.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
58 fps, max:
61 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 7 1.29.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
59 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] LG G8s ThinQ 1.29.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
59 fps, max:
61 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 7T 1.31.1.5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
59 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 7T Pro 1.31.1.5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
58 fps, max:
60 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
Adreno 640:
30 [X] Asus ROG Phone 2 1.32.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
30 fps, max:
31 fps
59 60 [X] OnePlus 7 Pro 1.28.2.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
59 fps, max:
61 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 7 1.29.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
58 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] LG G8s ThinQ 1.29.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
53 fps, max:
61 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 7T 1.31.1.5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
1 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 7T Pro 1.31.1.5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
50 fps, max:
60 fps
60 61 [X] Asus ROG Phone 2 1.32.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
60 fps, max:
63 fps
62 [X] Google Pixel 4 1.31.1.5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
35 fps, max:
63 fps
~ 57 fps
Adreno 640:
59 60 [X] OnePlus 7 Pro 1.18.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
2 fps, max:
61 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 7T Pro 1.19.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
59 fps, max:
60 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
Adreno 640:
59 60 [X] OnePlus 7 Pro 1.18.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
2 fps, max:
61 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 7T Pro 1.19.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
52 fps, max:
60 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
Adreno 640:
60 120 [X] Asus ROG Phone 2 1.6.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
118 fps, max:
121 fps
~ 90 fps
Adreno 640:
28 [X] LG G8s ThinQ 1.6.3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
26 fps, max:
30 fps
30 [X] OnePlus 7 Pro 1.5.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] OnePlus 7 1.5.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 [X] OnePlus 7T 1.7.3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] OnePlus 7T Pro 1.8.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 60 [X] Asus ROG Phone 2 1.8.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
44 fps, max:
61 fps
60 [X] Asus ROG Phone 2 1.8.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
56 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 36 fps
Adreno 640:
28 [X] LG G8s ThinQ 1.6.3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
24 fps, max:
30 fps
29 30 [X] OnePlus 7 Pro 1.5.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] OnePlus 7 1.5.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 2.8GHz
Adreno 640
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 [X] OnePlus 7T 1.7.3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 [X] OnePlus 7T Pro 1.8.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
25 fps, max:
31 fps
60 ~ 33 fps
Adreno 640:
120 [X] Asus ROG Phone 2 1.62.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
118 fps, max:
121 fps
fps
Adreno 640:
60 120 [X] Asus ROG Phone 2 1.112.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus GHz
Adreno 640
min:
118 fps, max:
121 fps
~ 90 fps
Qualcomm Adreno 690 low med. high ultra QHD 4K F1 22 26 22.5 17 12.6 X-Plane 11.11 14 12 11 Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 19 12.3 7.29 Dota 2 Reborn 58 55 44 37 The Witcher 3 25 16 10 4 GTA V 29.9 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 5 1 4 1 4 1 2 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 06. 02:54:25
#0 checking url part for id 9846 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 11411 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 9446 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:42:18 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.139s ... 0.14s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.14s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.14s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9846 +0.045s ... 0.185s
#9 got single benchmarks 9846 +0.014s ... 0.199s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11411 +0.021s ... 0.22s
#11 got single benchmarks 11411 +0.011s ... 0.231s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 9446 +0.002s ... 0.233s
#13 got single benchmarks 9446 +0.069s ... 0.302s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.302s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.149s ... 0.451s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.451s
#17 Got 108 rows for game benchmarks. +0.033s ... 0.484s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.484s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.009s ... 0.494s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.039s ... 0.533s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.533s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.535s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)