Qualcomm Adreno 642L vs ARM Mali-G72 MP12 vs ARM Mali-G71 MP2
Qualcomm Adreno 642L ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 642L is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SoC . The chip will be available from mid 2021 and will be used mainly in upper mid-range Android devices.
According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 642L GPU offers a 40% improved performance over the Adreno 620 (compared to the specified +50% of the 642 in the SD 780G), its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 768G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR4X-4200 memory support of the SoC.
The Adreno 642L supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.
The Snapdragon 778G and therefore also the 642L is manufactured in the modern 6nm UEV process at TSMC that should provide a good power efficiency.
ARM Mali-G72 MP12 ► remove from comparison
The ARM Mali-G72 MP12 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced in October 2017 in the Huawei Mate 10 and uses 12 clusters (hence the MP12 name). In our benchmarks it performs between a Adreno 530 and 540 and is therefore suitable for demanding mobile games.
The G72 is based on the second generation of the Bifrost architecture and offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency and a bigger tile buffer for 16x anti-aliasing.
The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 FL11_1 and Renderscript.
ARM Mali-G71 MP2 ► remove from comparison
The ARM Mali-G71 MP2 is an integrated entry-level graphics adapter for ARM SoCs, which was used in combination with the smartphone and tablet chip Mediatek Helio P23 with 700 or 770 MHz clock speed. Supports OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 11 FL11_1 and RenderScript.
Qualcomm Adreno 642L ARM Mali-G72 MP12 ARM Mali-G71 MP2 Mali-G Series Shared Memory yes no no API OpenGL ES 3.2 OpenGL ES 3.2 OpenGL ES 3.2 technology 6 nm 16 nm 16 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 Date of Announcement 07.05.2021 18.10.2017 03.06.2016 Architecture Bifrost Bifrost Pipelines 12 - unified 2 - unified Core Speed 850 MHz 770 (Boost) MHz Link to Manufacturer Page developer.arm.com www.arm.com Codename Mimir
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 88482 avg: 89308 median: 89307.5 (10%) max: 90133 Points
min: 22429 avg: 32596 median: 33740 (4%) max: 36231 Points
min: 1152 avg: 11630 median: 11251.5 (1%) max: 15567 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
13392 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 6398 avg: 6666 median: 6638 (29%) max: 7281 Points
min: 2021 avg: 3208 median: 3360.5 (15%) max: 3710 Points
min: 629 avg: 779 median: 742 (3%) max: 1097 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 7199 avg: 7627 median: 7536 (17%) max: 8605 Points
min: 2062 avg: 3386 median: 3545 (8%) max: 4040 Points
min: 564 avg: 680 median: 642 (1%) max: 971 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 5032 avg: 5413 median: 5393.5 (27%) max: 5763 Points
min: 2487 avg: 2882 median: 2961.5 (15%) max: 3070 Points
min: 431 avg: 528 median: 507 (3%) max: 737 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 5103 avg: 5654 median: 5612 (17%) max: 6240 Points
min: 2597 avg: 2945 median: 3012.5 (9%) max: 3109 Points
min: 371 avg: 443.3 median: 419 (1%) max: 629 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 2321 avg: 2517 median: 2493.5 (1%) max: 2831 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 681 avg: 696 median: 687.5 (1%) max: 768 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 5.9 avg: 6.2 median: 6.1 (2%) max: 6.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 13 avg: 13.6 median: 13.5 (2%) max: 15 fps
min: 8.4 avg: 8.6 median: 8.6 (2%) max: 8.7 fps
min: 1.4 avg: 1.6 median: 1.5 (0%) max: 2.4 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 34 avg: 36.4 median: 36 (3%) max: 40 fps
min: 10 avg: 20.6 median: 23 (2%) max: 24 fps
min: 3.8 avg: 4.2 median: 4 (0%) max: 5 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 33 avg: 33.7 median: 33 (4%) max: 37 fps
min: 11 avg: 20.4 median: 21 (2%) max: 23 fps
min: 2.6 avg: 4.2 median: 4 (0%) max: 6 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 56 avg: 57.7 median: 57 (1%) max: 64 fps
min: 19 avg: 33.9 median: 38.5 (1%) max: 39 fps
min: 4.3 avg: 7 median: 6.6 (0%) max: 9.9 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 77 avg: 79.1 median: 78 (5%) max: 89 fps
min: 23 avg: 54.6 median: 59 (3%) max: 66 fps
min: 7 avg: 11 median: 11 (1%) max: 16 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642L GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 132 avg: 134.9 median: 133 (1%) max: 148 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G72 MP12
min: 45 avg: 108 median: 118 (1%) max: 125 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G71 MP2 min: 14 avg: 22.1 median: 22 (0%) max: 34 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 135972 avg: 157798 median: 157454 (20%) max: 175807 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
25922 Points (59%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
39033 Points (87%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 45.96 avg: 49.6 median: 46.9 (0%) max: 54.4 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 23666 avg: 31803 median: 30994 (31%) max: 38436 Points
8180 Points (8%)
min: 2471 avg: 4582 median: 4550 (5%) max: 6755 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 26134 avg: 36660 median: 40236 (70%) max: 43000 Points
3761 Points (7%)
min: 1205 avg: 1444 median: 1451.5 (3%) max: 1668 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 0 avg: 4.3 median: 4 (2%) max: 9.27 Watt
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642L → 100% n=13 Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G72 MP12 → 54% n=13 Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G71 MP2 → 11% n=13
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
100%
Adreno 642L:
59 59 ~ 59 fps
100%
Adreno 642L:
51 60 ~ 56 fps
100%
Adreno 642L:
61 [X] Xiaomi 12 Lite 3.4.0.5930
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 642L
min:
57 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
55%
Mali-G72 MP12:
32 [X] Honor Play 0.7.0
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
18 fps, max:
33 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 642L:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
70%
Mali-G71 MP2:
26 29 30 ~ 28 fps
89%
Mali-G72 MP12:
32 [X] Honor 10 0.5.0
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
20 fps, max:
42 fps
32 [X] Honor Play 0.7.0
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
22 fps, max:
33 fps
33 [X] Huawei P20 Pro 0.7.0
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
14 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Huawei P20 Pro 0.7.0 mit GPU Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
16 fps, max:
42 fps
~ 34 fps
Mali-G72 MP12:
31 55 [X] Honor Play 1.24.1.2
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
43 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 43 fps
Mali-G71 MP2:
60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 54 [X] Honor Play 1.24.1.2
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
21 fps, max:
61 fps
58 [X] Honor 10 1.21.1.3
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
2 fps, max:
60 fps
58 [X] Huawei P20 Pro 1.23.1.2
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
40 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 50 fps
62%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 30 30 59 [X] Huawei P20 1.3.3
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
46 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 37 fps
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Mali-G71 MP2:
29 30 ~ 30 fps
Mali-G72 MP12:
29 29 30 30 [X] Huawei P20 3.6.0k
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
26 fps, max:
31 fps
~ 30 fps
Mali-G71 MP2:
23 30 ~ 27 fps
100%
Adreno 642L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 fps
100%
Adreno 642L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 fps
100%
Adreno 642L:
90 [X] Motorola Edge 30 2.36.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G 1.9GHz
Adreno 642L
min:
82 fps, max:
91 fps
fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 642L → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming ARM Mali-G72 MP12 → 81% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 69%
Average Gaming ARM Mali-G71 MP2 → 77% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 87%
Qualcomm Adreno 642L low med. high ultra QHD 4K Diablo Immortal 59 56 League of Legends: Wild Rift 61 Armajet 89 PUBG Mobile 58 40 38 Dead Trigger 2 60 Asphalt 9: Legends 30 30 Subway Surfers 90 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 3 1 2 3 1 1
ARM Mali-G71 MP2 low med. high ultra QHD 4K PUBG Mobile 30 28 27 Arena of Valor 60 52 Shadow Fight 3 60 60 Battle Bay 47 Dead Trigger 2 52 Asphalt 8: Airborne 30 27 Asphalt 9: Legends 29 26 Temple Run 2 59 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 2 2 1 3 3 1 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.27
log 15. 23:33:09
#0 checking url part for id 10945 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 8138 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 8348 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 05:35:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.135s ... 0.136s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.136s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.136s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10945 +0.04s ... 0.175s
#9 got single benchmarks 10945 +0.054s ... 0.23s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 8138 +0.002s ... 0.232s
#11 got single benchmarks 8138 +0.023s ... 0.255s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 8348 +0.002s ... 0.257s
#13 got single benchmarks 8348 +0.068s ... 0.325s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.325s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.184s ... 0.509s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.509s
#17 Got 112 rows for game benchmarks. +0.035s ... 0.544s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.544s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.008s ... 0.552s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.035s ... 0.587s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.587s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.589s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)