Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 619 vs ARM Mali-G52 MP6 vs Qualcomm Adreno 642

Qualcomm Adreno 619

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 619 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

The performance is 60% better compared to the Adreno 612 graphics card and in our benchmarks on par with the 700 series cards.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

ARM Mali-G52 MP6

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G52 MP6

The ARM Mali-G52 MP6 is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced mid 2019 in the HiSilicon Kirin 810 and uses 6 clusters (hence the MP6 name). 

The G52 is based on the Bifrost architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. ARM claims that the G52 series offers 30% more performance density and 15% better energy efficiency compared to the ARM Mali G51 series.

The performance of the G52MP6 in our benchmarks (in the Kirin 810) is comparable to the Adreno 618 in the Snapdragon 730 and G76MP4 in the Helio G90T.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.

Qualcomm Adreno 642

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 642

The Qualcomm Adreno 642 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G SoC. The chip will be available from mid 2021 and will be used mainly in upper mid-range Android devices.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 642 GPU offers a 50% improved performance over the Adreno 620, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 768G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR4X-4200 memory support of the SoC.

The Adreno 642 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

The Snapdragon 780G is manufactured in the modern 5nm LPPE process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 619ARM Mali-G52 MP6Qualcomm Adreno 642
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
ArchitectureAdreno 600Bifrost
Shared Memoryyesnoyes
APIDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanOpenGL ES 3.2
technology8 nm12 nm5 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement15.12.2015 06.03.2018 07.05.2021
Pipelines6 - unified
Link to Manufacturer Pagedeveloper.arm.com
CPU in Adreno 619GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G8 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 18 x 1804 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
» show 2 more
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-G52 MP6GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 8108 x 1880 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 642GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G8 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 54788     avg: 55662     median: 55911 (6%)     max: 56286 Points
min: 45182     avg: 46563     median: 46944 (5%)     max: 47563 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 3602     avg: 4041     median: 4118 (18%)     max: 4286 Points
min: 3314     avg: 3463     median: 3483 (15%)     max: 3591 Points
5587 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3817     avg: 4280     median: 4298 (9%)     max: 4573 Points
min: 3274     avg: 3389     median: 3406 (7%)     max: 3488 Points
8380 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2536     avg: 2906     median: 2981.5 (15%)     max: 3107 Points
min: 2515     avg: 2810     median: 2954 (15%)     max: 2961 Points
4478 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2412     avg: 2788     median: 2834 (8%)     max: 3008 Points
min: 2328     avg: 2626     median: 2752 (8%)     max: 2798 Points
6148 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 635     avg: 1108     median: 1194.5 (1%)     max: 1227 Points
3212 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 189     avg: 327.8     median: 351 (0%)     max: 371 Points
786 Points (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 2.9     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (1%)     max: 4 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 3.3     avg: 7.4     median: 7.7 (1%)     max: 8.9 fps
min: 7.7     avg: 7.8     median: 7.8 (1%)     max: 7.9 fps
18 fps (3%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 17     avg: 20.1     median: 21 (2%)     max: 23 fps
min: 20     avg: 21     median: 21 (2%)     max: 22 fps
50 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 16     avg: 18.5     median: 19 (2%)     max: 20 fps
min: 19     avg: 20     median: 20 (2%)     max: 21 fps
40 fps (5%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 26     avg: 32.4     median: 34 (1%)     max: 35 fps
min: 33     avg: 34     median: 34 (1%)     max: 35 fps
65 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 33     avg: 45.4     median: 46 (3%)     max: 68 fps
min: 47     avg: 49.3     median: 48 (3%)     max: 53 fps
90 fps (5%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 55     avg: 87.8     median: 91 (1%)     max: 96 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G52 MP6
min: 85     avg: 87     median: 87 (1%)     max: 89 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642
153 fps (1%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 65241     avg: 91217     median: 97281.5 (12%)     max: 102780 Points
162946 Points (20%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 19.62     avg: 26.6     median: 26.8 (0%)     max: 29.71 fps
21.1 fps (0%)
48 fps (0%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
8.6 fps (2%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 1363     avg: 1377     median: 1377.5 (0%)     max: 1391 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 1119     avg: 1168     median: 1160 (0%)     max: 1231 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 8763     avg: 23246     median: 25388 (25%)     max: 30058 Points
11576 Points (12%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 3274     avg: 19611     median: 22384 (39%)     max: 28746 Points
3831 Points (7%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 2.69     avg: 3.6     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 7.31 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G52 MP6 → 95% n=11

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 192% n=11

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
100%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
ultra Ultra
100%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
100%
Adreno 619:
30  fps
high
100%
Adreno 619:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Adreno 619:
20 45 54 ~ 40 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 619:
36  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 619:
20 28 30 ~ 26 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 30 30 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 77 86 89 90 95 98 ~ 60 fps
50%
Adreno 642:
30  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 619:
29 39 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 39 fps
103%
Mali-G52 MP6:
40  fps
154%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
med.
100%
Adreno 619:
40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Mali-G52 MP6:
40  fps
148%
Adreno 642:
59  fps
high
100%
Adreno 619:
28 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 60 ~ 31 fps
97%
Mali-G52 MP6:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
194%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
ultra
Adreno 642:
40  fps
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
low
Mali-G52 MP6:
60  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 619:
60 60 93 115 121 ~ 90 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-G52 MP6:
30  fps
200%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
high
100%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-G52 MP6:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
200%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
100%
Adreno 619:
90  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G52 MP6 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 101%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 157%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 179%

Qualcomm Adreno 619lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal3030
League of Legends: Wild Rift3060
Genshin Impact403626
Armajet60
PUBG Mobile394031
Dead Trigger 290
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
Subway Surfers90
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
5


2


2
4
1
1







Qualcomm Adreno 642lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Armajet30
PUBG Mobile60596040
Asphalt 9: Legends6060
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2

1


1
2

1







ARM Mali-G52 MP6lowmed.highultraQHD4K
PUBG Mobile404030
World of Tanks Blitz60
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
1

1


2










For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 09. 05:59:36

#0 checking url part for id 10584 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10362 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10693 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 May 2024 05:40:33 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.203s ... 0.204s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.204s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.204s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10584 +0.041s ... 0.245s

#9 got single benchmarks 10584 +0.131s ... 0.377s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10362 +0.002s ... 0.379s

#11 got single benchmarks 10362 +0.015s ... 0.393s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 10693 +0.002s ... 0.396s

#13 got single benchmarks 10693 +0.009s ... 0.404s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.404s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.186s ... 0.59s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.59s

#17 Got 132 rows for game benchmarks. +0.074s ... 0.665s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.665s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.005s ... 0.67s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.024s ... 0.694s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.694s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.696s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)