Qualcomm Adreno 618 vs ARM Mali-G52 MP1 vs Qualcomm Adreno 644
Qualcomm Adreno 618 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 618 is a mobile graphics card for upper mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 and 730G SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).
In our benchmarks, the Adreno 618 in the Snapdragon 730 was 14 to 30% faster than the Adreno 616 in the Snapdragon 710. The performance in the 730G should be additional 15% faster, due to higher clock rates.
The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).
ARM Mali-G52 MP1 ► remove from comparison
The ARM Mali-G52 MP1 (or G52MC1) is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based Tablets). It was introduced mid 2020 in the MediaTek MT8168 with a clock speed of up to 800 MHz.
The G52 is based on the Bifrost architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. ARM claims that the G52 series offers 30% more performance density and 15% better energy efficiency compared to the ARM Mali G51 series.
The performance of the G52MP2 in our benchmarks (in the MediaTek MT8168) is clearly below the G52 MP2 version in the entry level. That means its not well suited for demanding 3D Android games like PUBG Mobile.
The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.
Qualcomm Adreno 644 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 644 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 SoC. The chip was announced mid 2022 and was available in early 2023 in upper mid-range Android smartphones.
According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 644 GPU offers a 20% improved performance over the Adreno 642 , its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 780G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR5 with 3200 MHz. In our benchmarks with the Mi 13 Lite however, the performance was only on par with the old Adreno 642.
The Adreno 644 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.
The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 is manufactured in the modern 4nm process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.
Qualcomm Adreno 618 ARM Mali-G52 MP1 Qualcomm Adreno 644 Adreno 600 Series Architecture Adreno 600 Bifrost Shared Memory yes no yes API DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan OpenGL ES 3.2 technology 14 nm 12 nm 4 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 Date of Announcement 09.04.2019 29.07.2020 07.05.2021 Pipelines 1 - unified Core Speed 800 (Boost) MHz Link to Manufacturer Page developer.arm.com Predecessor Adreno 642
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
129 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
112 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 44009 avg: 51701 median: 52650 (6%) max: 56640 Points
min: 13089 avg: 14037 median: 13379.5 (2%) max: 16301 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
2900 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
3273 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
494 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
504 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 3002 avg: 3603 median: 3646 (16%) max: 3939 Points
min: 950 avg: 1287 median: 1275 (6%) max: 2142 Points
min: 6303 avg: 6921 median: 6953.5 (30%) max: 7472 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3101 avg: 3734 median: 3753.5 (8%) max: 4256 Points
min: 834 avg: 1165 median: 1143.5 (3%) max: 2001 Points
min: 8656 avg: 8893 median: 8751 (19%) max: 9414 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2214 avg: 2624 median: 2626 (13%) max: 2938 Points
min: 605 avg: 893 median: 915 (5%) max: 1516 Points
min: 5501 avg: 6172 median: 6286 (31%) max: 6466 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2085 avg: 2495 median: 2471 (7%) max: 2832 Points
min: 508 avg: 766 median: 787.5 (2%) max: 1339 Points
min: 6767 avg: 7065 median: 7023 (21%) max: 7388 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 637 avg: 899 median: 934 (0%) max: 1124 Points
min: 410 avg: 470.6 median: 426 (0%) max: 716 Points
min: 3035 avg: 3133 median: 3143 (2%) max: 3184 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 258 avg: 447 median: 313 (0%) max: 1047 Points
min: 111 avg: 126.7 median: 117 (0%) max: 181 Points
min: 825 avg: 834 median: 829 (1%) max: 854 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
1921 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
1849 Points (1%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 624 avg: 639 median: 645 (1%) max: 648 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 572 avg: 590 median: 599 (1%) max: 599 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 618 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
288 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 0.6 avg: 0.9 median: 0.9 (0%) max: 0.96 fps
min: 7 avg: 7.5 median: 7.5 (3%) max: 7.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 5.4 avg: 7 median: 6.9 (1%) max: 10 fps
min: 1.4 avg: 2.1 median: 2.1 (0%) max: 3.7 fps
min: 15 avg: 16.6 median: 17 (3%) max: 18 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 15 avg: 18.1 median: 18 (1%) max: 21 fps
min: 3.9 avg: 5.9 median: 5.9 (0%) max: 11 fps
min: 41 avg: 46 median: 47 (3%) max: 49 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 14 avg: 17.1 median: 17 (2%) max: 19 fps
min: 4.2 avg: 5.9 median: 6 (1%) max: 8.8 fps
min: 37 avg: 38.2 median: 38 (4%) max: 40 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 24 avg: 29.8 median: 30 (1%) max: 33 fps
min: 6.6 avg: 9.4 median: 9.4 (0%) max: 15 fps
min: 52 avg: 62.4 median: 65 (1%) max: 67 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 34 avg: 40.9 median: 41 (2%) max: 45 fps
min: 11 avg: 15.6 median: 16 (1%) max: 26 fps
min: 86 avg: 89.2 median: 88 (5%) max: 94 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 618 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 67 avg: 83.1 median: 84.5 (1%) max: 91 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G52 MP1 min: 19 avg: 24.8 median: 24 (0%) max: 42 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 644
min: 147 avg: 150.2 median: 148 (1%) max: 158 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 74888 avg: 89032 median: 90943.5 (11%) max: 95350 Points
min: 0 avg: 16041 median: 22462 (3%) max: 25274 Points
min: 174679 avg: 177977 median: 175343 (22%) max: 187645 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 23.89 avg: 26.3 median: 26.3 (0%) max: 28.78 fps
min: 9.57 avg: 12.7 median: 12.7 (0%) max: 15.81 fps
min: 50.74 avg: 51.7 median: 51.7 (0%) max: 52.63 fps
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 2496 avg: 2535 median: 2498 (1%) max: 2610 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 2650 avg: 2794 median: 2738 (1%) max: 2993 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 10269 avg: 16045 median: 10289 (10%) max: 27578 Points
min: 3562 avg: 15210 median: 15410 (15%) max: 24108 Points
30029 Points (30%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 3043 avg: 9739 median: 3056 (5%) max: 23117 Points
min: 1293 avg: 10223 median: 11400 (20%) max: 16564 Points
42541 Points (74%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
3.4 Watt (1%)
min: 0 avg: 3.3 median: 2.7 (1%) max: 7.07 Watt
min: 4.19 avg: 4.8 median: 4.6 (2%) max: 5.9 Watt
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 618 → 100% n=16 Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G52 MP1 → 63% n=16 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 310% n=16
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
Adreno 644:
42 [X] Motorola Razr 40 2.0.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
36 fps, max:
45 fps
fps
Adreno 644:
45 [X] Motorola Razr 40 2.0.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
40 fps, max:
46 fps
fps
120%
Adreno 644:
45 [X] Motorola Razr 40 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
44 fps, max:
45 fps
89 [X] Xiaomi 13 Lite 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
84 fps, max:
90 fps
~ 67 fps
158%
Adreno 644:
60 [X] Motorola Razr 40 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
56 fps, max:
60 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 618:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
78%
Mali-G52 MP1:
24 37 ~ 31 fps
100%
Adreno 644:
40 [X] Honor 90 5G 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
37 fps, max:
41 fps
fps
133%
Adreno 644:
40 [X] Xiaomi 13 Lite 2.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
34 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Xiaomi 13 Lite 2.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
22 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Motorola Razr 40 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
38 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Honor 90 5G 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
37 fps, max:
41 fps
40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 618:
60 [X] Xiaomi Mi 9T 1.18.5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 2.2GHz
Adreno 618
min:
1 fps, max:
61 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
Adreno 644:
60 [X] Honor 90 5G 1.9.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
59 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
97%
Mali-G52 MP1:
28 30 30 ~ 29 fps
Adreno 644:
60 61 [X] Xiaomi 13 Lite 3.9.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
50 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 61 fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 618 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming ARM Mali-G52 MP1 → 78% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 76%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 128% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 128%
Qualcomm Adreno 644 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Diablo Immortal 42 45 Armajet 67 PUBG Mobile 60 40 40 Dead Trigger 2 60 Subway Surfers 61 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 1 3 1
Qualcomm Adreno 618 low med. high ultra QHD 4K League of Legends: Wild Rift 114 99 83.5 Call of Duty Mobile 60 58 57 Armajet 56 PUBG Mobile 38 40 30 Arena of Valor 54 55 Shadow Fight 3 60 60 Dota 2 Reborn 27.6 19.7 9.6 8.7 Asphalt 8: Airborne 30 Asphalt 9: Legends 30 30 BioShock Infinite 23 17.6 16.9 Diablo III 20.7 20 17.2 12 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 3 3 3 3 1 3 5 2 2 2 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 04. 16:50:41
#0 checking url part for id 9900 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 10459 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 11580 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:42:18 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.139s ... 0.14s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.14s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.14s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9900 +0.038s ... 0.178s
#9 got single benchmarks 9900 +0.058s ... 0.237s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10459 +0.002s ... 0.239s
#11 got single benchmarks 10459 +0.031s ... 0.27s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11580 +0.002s ... 0.271s
#13 got single benchmarks 11580 +0.013s ... 0.285s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.285s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.198s ... 0.483s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.483s
#17 Got 134 rows for game benchmarks. +0.03s ... 0.514s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.514s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.008s ... 0.521s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.035s ... 0.556s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.556s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.558s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)