Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-11900H vs Intel Core i5-10200H vs Intel Core i5-10400H

Intel Core i9-11900H

► remove from comparison Intel i9-11900H

The Intel Core i9-11900H is a high end octa core SoC for gaming laptops and mobile workstations. It is based on the Tiger Lake H45 generation and was announced in mid 2021. It integrates eight Willow Cove processor cores (16 threads thanks to HyperThreading). The base clock speed depends on the TDP setting and at 45 Watt is at 2.5 GHz. The single core boost speed can reach up to 4.9 GHz, all cores can reach up to 4.5 GHz. The CPU offers 24 MB level 3 cache and supports DDR4-3200 memory. 

Thanks to the new Tiger Lake architecture, the i9-11900H should be similar or faster than the old Intel Core i9-10885H (Comet Lake-H, 2.4 - 5.3 GHz, 16 MB L3) in single and multi threaded performance and similar to the Ryzen 9 5800H (Zen 3, 3.2 - 4.4 GHz, 16 MB L3). Therefore, the i9 should be one of the fastest laptop CPUs in 2021 and well suited for even very demanding tasks.

The SoC also included the improved Xe graphics card called UHD graphics with all 32 EUs.

Furthermore, Tiger Lake SoCs add PCIe 4 support (20 lanes in the H45 series), AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 and Wi-Fi 6E in the chip.

The chip is produced on the improved 10nm process (called 10nm SuperFin) at Intel, which should be comparable to the 7nm process at TSMC (e.g. Ryzen 4000 series). The default TDP is rated at 45 W at 2.5 GHz base speed, at 35 Watt the base clock speed decreases to 2.1 GHz (cTDP down).

All articles on Tiger Lake can be found on our Tiger Lake architecture hub.

Intel Core i5-10200H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10200H

The Intel Core i5-10200H is a fast quad-core processor for laptops with four cores based on the Comet Lake-H series (4th generation of Skylake architecture). The processor clocks at between 2.4 and 4.1 GHz  and can execute up to eight threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured on 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i5-10200H supports no vPro, TXT or SIPP. These business features are available in the faster (and later released) Core i5-10400H (2.6 - 4.6 GHz).

Performance

The performance is only minimal better than the Core i5-9300H thanks to the support for faster DDR4-2933 RAM. This means, the CPU is well suited for demanding tasks, although the faster versions offer a significantly higher Turbo Boost clock speed for faster single core execution. 

Power consumption

This 10th gen Comet Lake processor has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W, a value that laptop manufacturers are allowed to reduce somewhat, 35 W being the lower limit. Doing so will result in lower clock speeds and lower performance. Either way, this CPU is too power-hungry to be used as the base of a passively cooled laptop.

Intel Core i5-10200H is built with an old, as of late 2022, 14 nm Intel process for subpar energy efficiency.

Intel Core i5-10400H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10400H

The Intel Core i5-10400H is a fast processor for laptops with four cores based on the Comet Lake-H series (4th generation of Skylake architecture). The processor clocks at between 2.6 and 4.6 GHz (up to 4.4 with 4 cores) and can execute up to eight threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in 14nm (14nm++) process. 

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i5-10400H supports the management features vPro, TXT and SIPP. 

Performance

The performance should be slightly better than the old Core i7-8809G (Quad-Core 3.1 - 4.2) which was the fastest mobile quad core by Intel.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i5-9300H. As a  low-end solution it will probably only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i5 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

ModelIntel Core i9-11900HIntel Core i5-10200HIntel Core i5-10400H
CodenameTiger Lake-HComet Lake-HComet Lake-H
SeriesIntel Tiger LakeIntel Comet LakeIntel Comet Lake
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
Intel Core i9-11900KB3.3 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-11900H « 2.5 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-11950H2.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-11955M2.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11850H2.5 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11800H2.3 - 4.6 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-11855M3.2 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11500B3.3 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11400H2.7 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11260H2.6 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H « 2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H « 2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock2500 - 4900 MHz2400 - 4100 MHz2600 - 4600 MHz
L1 Cache640 KB256 KB256 KB
L2 Cache10 MB1 MB1 MB
L3 Cache24 MB8 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 164 / 84 / 8
TDP45 Watt45 Watt45 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1787BGA1440FCBGA1440
FeaturesDDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, 8 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, BMI2, AES-NI, SSE4.1, ABM, VMX, EIST, RDRAND, SSE4.2, TM1, RDSEED, SSE, AVX, FMA, SMEP, TM2, SSE2, AVX2, ADX, SMAP, HT, SGX, SSE3, Turbo, SSSE3, MPX, SSTDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) (350 - 1450 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 610 (350 - 1050 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1100 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-11900H
36.3 pt (60%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10200H
28.3 pt (47%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10400H
29.8 pt (50%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 11135     avg: 12109     median: 12143.5 (11%)     max: 13012 Points
5372 Points (5%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1574     avg: 1585     median: 1580.5 (64%)     max: 1605 Points
1089 Points (44%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 600     avg: 607     median: 608 (66%)     max: 615 Points
419 Points (46%)
471 Points (51%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4324     avg: 4758     median: 4878 (12%)     max: 5160 Points
2082 Points (5%)
1924 Points (5%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1770     avg: 2068     median: 2148 (14%)     max: 2211 Points
842 Points (5%)
796 Points (5%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 236     avg: 239.8     median: 241 (67%)     max: 243 Points
171.6 Points (48%)
192 Points (53%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
9.6 Points (12%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.2 Points (52%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7403 Points (45%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
25731 Points (19%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
801 s (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
24.9 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4115 Points (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 49486     avg: 52910     median: 53205 (31%)     max: 57263 MIPS
21148 MIPS (12%)
23136 MIPS (13%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5582     avg: 5781     median: 5795 (68%)     max: 6018 MIPS
4497 MIPS (53%)
4766 MIPS (56%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
49.1 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
191.4 fps (5%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 13.6     avg: 15     median: 15 (26%)     max: 16.7 fps
6.5 fps (11%)
6.1 fps (11%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.6 GB/s (16%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.9 GB/s (16%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.3 GB/s (14%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
479 Seconds (6%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 231     avg: 247     median: 243 (2%)     max: 270 Seconds
515 Seconds (4%)
565 Seconds (4%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.52     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.544 sec
0.7 sec (15%)
0.6 sec (14%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
9578 Points (20%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.1 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
484.5 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 14467     avg: 17623     median: 18686 (46%)     max: 19231 Points
6233 Points (15%)
8007 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
51050 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13550     avg: 15637     median: 16364 (41%)     max: 17649 Points
7729 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 21513     avg: 24434     median: 24867 (44%)     max: 26502 Points
10760 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 9050     avg: 9865     median: 9631.5 (41%)     max: 11145 Points
3613 Points (15%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
2355 Points (54%)
1480 Points (34%)
1356 Points (31%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
9401 Points (36%)
5122 Points (20%)
4879 Points (19%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1576     avg: 1634     median: 1632 (55%)     max: 1692 Points
min: 1093     avg: 1094     median: 1094 (37%)     max: 1095 Points
1245 Points (42%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7725     avg: 9140     median: 9628 (17%)     max: 9856 Points
min: 3564     avg: 3845     median: 3845 (7%)     max: 4126 Points
4332 Points (8%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 603     avg: 606     median: 606 (1%)     max: 608 ms
882 ms (1%)
787 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
227 Points (59%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 272     avg: 275.2     median: 273 (49%)     max: 286 Points
187.3 Points (34%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1632 Points (61%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 88.9     avg: 110.4     median: 116 (20%)     max: 122 Watt
99.5 Watt (17%)
67.4 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 89.3     avg: 137.7     median: 152 (28%)     max: 159 Watt
75.9 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
17.3 Watt (11%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
4.9 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 13.3     avg: 14.4     median: 14.1 (10%)     max: 16 Points per Watt
77 Points per Watt (57%)
10.5 Points per Watt (8%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-11900H → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10200H → 55% n=15

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10400H → 58% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.35
log 16. 12:38:41

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13143 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12747 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 11958 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1765885121s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Dec 2025 05:18:30 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13143 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#9 got single benchmarks 13143 +0.01s ... 0.021s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 12747 +0.002s ... 0.023s

#11 got single benchmarks 12747 +0.001s ... 0.023s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11958 +0.004s ... 0.027s

#13 got single benchmarks 11958 +0.004s ... 0.031s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.031s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.034s ... 0.066s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.066s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)