Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-9300H vs AMD Ryzen 5 3450U

Intel Core i5-9300H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-9300H

The Intel Core i5-9300H is a fast processor for laptops with four cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture (2019 Refresh, CFL-HR). The processor clocks at between 2.4 and 4.1 GHz (4 with 4 cores) and can execute up to eight threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i5-8300H from 2018, the 9300H is clocked slightly higher (+100 MHz CPU, +50 MHz GPU).

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

The Intel Core i5-9300H should perform similar as the older Core i7-7920HQ (3.1 - 4.1 GHz). The faster Coffee Lake CPUs, like the Core i7-8750H/9750H offers two additional cores and is therefore up to 50% faster in multithreaded benchmarks. Still, the performance of the i5-9300H should be sufficient for even demanding applications and games.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz. The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i5 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

AMD Ryzen 5 3450U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 3450U

The AMD Ryzen 5 3450U is a mobile SoC that was announced in Q2 2020 as a refresh. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.1 GHz to 3.5 GHz (-200 MHz versus 3500U) with a Radeon RX Vega 8 iGPU with 8 CUs (512 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz.

The Picasso SoC uses the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12 nm process allows for higher clocks at similar power consumption.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

Performance

The average 3450U in our database is in the same league as the Core i3-1115G4 and also the Ryzen 3 4300U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a better-than-expected result for an aging lower mid-range chip that is the 3450U, as of mid 2022.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

The Ryzen 5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W, a value that laptop manufacturers are allowed to change to anything between 12 W and 35 W if required with clock speeds and performance changing correspondingly. These values are fairly high, making active cooling solutions something of a necessity.

The CPU is built with a somewhat old, as of late 2022, 12 nm process for lower-than-average energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i5-9300HAMD Ryzen 5 3450U
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
CodenameCoffee Lake-HPicasso-U (Zen+)
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Picasso-U (Zen+)
Intel Core i9-9980HK compare2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H compare2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H compare2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M compare2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H compare2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H compare2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H compare2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H « 2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H compare2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H compare3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U « 2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
Clock2400 - 4100 MHz2100 - 3500 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB384 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB
L3 Cache8 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 8
TDP45 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm12 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketFCBGA1440FP5
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1050 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$250 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.com
Transistors4500 Million

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-9300H
30.2 pt (42%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 3450U
25.1 pt (35%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 2658     avg: 2927     median: 2926.5 (3%)     max: 3195 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 858     avg: 875     median: 875 (37%)     max: 892 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 398     avg: 415.2     median: 419 (47%)     max: 427 Points
min: 292     avg: 321.5     median: 321.5 (36%)     max: 351 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1530     avg: 1727     median: 1737 (4%)     max: 1877 Points
min: 1089     avg: 1168     median: 1168 (3%)     max: 1247 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 717     avg: 784     median: 790 (5%)     max: 850 Points
min: 530     avg: 567     median: 566.5 (4%)     max: 603 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 169     avg: 172.6     median: 172 (52%)     max: 176 Points
min: 137     avg: 137.5     median: 137.5 (41%)     max: 138 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6421     avg: 6561     median: 6572 (40%)     max: 6677 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 21798     avg: 24198     median: 24623 (18%)     max: 25656 Points
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5663 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 20736     avg: 22008     median: 22133 (13%)     max: 23155 MIPS
min: 15163     avg: 15782     median: 15878 (9%)     max: 16305 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4542     avg: 4592     median: 4609 (55%)     max: 4626 MIPS
min: 3355     avg: 3375     median: 3359 (40%)     max: 3411 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
49.4 fps (17%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
193.7 fps (45%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 5.7     avg: 6.1     median: 6 (11%)     max: 6.5 fps
min: 2.77     avg: 3.1     median: 3 (5%)     max: 3.43 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.8 GB/s (14%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
4.7 GB/s (12%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 588     avg: 611     median: 602 (4%)     max: 643 Seconds
min: 834     avg: 919     median: 946 (7%)     max: 976 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.76     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (17%)     max: 0.806 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 7787     avg: 8354     median: 8107 (17%)     max: 9169 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.1 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
20.3 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
496 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
26995 Points (24%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 7499     avg: 8987     median: 9107 (25%)     max: 10557 Points
min: 4968     avg: 5979     median: 6400 (17%)     max: 6568 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 52412     avg: 55875     median: 56000 (46%)     max: 58466 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 49250     avg: 54277     median: 54947 (45%)     max: 58074 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 58114     avg: 58963     median: 58413 (49%)     max: 61541 Points
27926 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5356     avg: 7678     median: 7828.5 (20%)     max: 8903 Points
min: 5106     avg: 5779     median: 5984 (15%)     max: 6248 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 9387     avg: 11376     median: 11698 (21%)     max: 12349 Points
min: 8985     avg: 9259     median: 9204 (16%)     max: 9587 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 3165     avg: 4074     median: 4189 (18%)     max: 4861 Points
min: 1887     avg: 2208     median: 2170 (9%)     max: 2567 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 698     avg: 819     median: 839 (35%)     max: 866 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2565     avg: 2918     median: 2972 (5%)     max: 3123 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1095     avg: 1118     median: 1123 (5%)     max: 1137 Points
853 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3697     avg: 4014     median: 4146 (13%)     max: 4200 Points
2630 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4704     avg: 4898     median: 4901 (49%)     max: 5089 Points
3486 Points (35%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14853     avg: 16246     median: 16541 (18%)     max: 17684 Points
10200 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
5266 Points (72%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
16911 Points (41%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14195     avg: 15338     median: 15527.5 (28%)     max: 16101 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3596     avg: 3854     median: 3854.5 (75%)     max: 4109 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1079     avg: 1138     median: 1108.5 (1%)     max: 1349 ms
min: 1170     avg: 1185     median: 1185 (1%)     max: 1200 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
86.6 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 22225     avg: 32344     median: 33646 (30%)     max: 34957 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
222 Points (46%)
min: 145     avg: 145.5     median: 145.5 (30%)     max: 146 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 707     avg: 722     median: 722 (28%)     max: 737 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
37.3 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
36.2 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
14.6 Points per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-9300H → 100% n=19

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 3450U → 71% n=19

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 14. 14:28:00

#0 checking url part for id 11356 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13235 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 13 May 2024 05:39:12 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.032s ... 0.033s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.033s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11356 +0.02s ... 0.053s

#7 got single benchmarks 11356 +0.069s ... 0.121s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13235 +0.019s ... 0.14s

#9 got single benchmarks 13235 +0.014s ... 0.154s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.154s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.238s ... 0.392s

#12 return log +0.022s ... 0.415s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)